Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Public Health 1/2020

Open Access 01-12-2020 | Prolonged Grief Disorder | Research article

Information uncertainty: a correlate for acute stress disorder during the COVID-19 outbreak in China

Authors: Danhua Lin, Daniela B. Friedman, Shan Qiao, Cheuk Chi Tam, Xiaoyan Li, Xiaoming Li

Published in: BMC Public Health | Issue 1/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Individuals’ stress in responding to the current COVID-19 pandemic may be exacerbated by information uncertainty driven by inconsistent, unverified, and conflicting news from various sources. The current study aims to test if information uncertainty during the COVID-19 outbreak was related to acute stress disorder (ASD) over and above other psychosocial stressors.

Methods

An anonymous online survey was conducted with 7800 college students throughout China from January 31 through February 11, 2020. Existing scales were modified to measure ASD and six potential stressors including information uncertainty during the COVID-19 outbreak. Hierarchical regression analysis was conducted to assess the unique association of information uncertainty with ASD. To minimize the effect of large sample size and also to get a sense of whether the effects of information uncertainty were similar to people at the center of the epidemic, we repeated the hierarchical regression among 10% of the students who were randomly selected from the entire sample (“10% random sample”; n = 780) and 226 students from Hubei Province where the outbreak started.

Results

Information uncertainty was highly prevalent among the respondents (64%). It was significantly associated with ASD beyond other key variables and potential stressors across three samples. In the hierarchical regression among the entire sample, demographic variables accounted for 9.4% of the variance in ASD. The other five stressors added 5.1% of the variance. The information uncertainty (β = .159; p < .001) explained an additional 2.1% of the variance. Likewise, the information uncertainty explained an additional 2.1 and 3.4% of the variance in ASD beyond all other variables among the 10% random sample (β = .165; p < .001) and the Hubei sample (β = .196; p < .01), respectively.

Conclusion

Information uncertainty is a unique correlate of psychological stress during the COVID-19 outbreak. Reducing information uncertainty is essential not only for halting virus transmission but also for mitigating negative impacts of the pandemic on people’s psychosocial wellbeing. Transparent, timely, and accurate communication can reduce public confusion, fear, and stress. Capacity building in governments, communities, and media outlets to prevent, reduce and manage information uncertainty should be a critical part of the response to an emerging global health crisis such as the COVID-19 pandemic.
Literature
3.
go back to reference Rubin GJ, Wessely S. The psychological effects of quarantining a city. Bmj. 2020;368:m313.CrossRef Rubin GJ, Wessely S. The psychological effects of quarantining a city. Bmj. 2020;368:m313.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Xiang Y-T, Yang Y, Li W, Zhang L, Zhang Q, Cheung T, et al. Timely mental health care for the 2019 novel coronavirus outbreak is urgently needed. Lancet Psychiatry. 2020;7(3):228–9.CrossRef Xiang Y-T, Yang Y, Li W, Zhang L, Zhang Q, Cheung T, et al. Timely mental health care for the 2019 novel coronavirus outbreak is urgently needed. Lancet Psychiatry. 2020;7(3):228–9.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Ophir Y. Coverage of epidemics in American newspapers through the lens of the crisis and emergency risk communication framework. Heal Secur. 2018;16(3):147–57.CrossRef Ophir Y. Coverage of epidemics in American newspapers through the lens of the crisis and emergency risk communication framework. Heal Secur. 2018;16(3):147–57.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Kott A, Limaye RJ. Delivering risk information in a dynamic information environment: framing and authoritative voice in centers for disease control (CDC) and primetime broadcast news media communications during the 2014 Ebola outbreak. Soc Sci Med. 2016;169:42–9.CrossRef Kott A, Limaye RJ. Delivering risk information in a dynamic information environment: framing and authoritative voice in centers for disease control (CDC) and primetime broadcast news media communications during the 2014 Ebola outbreak. Soc Sci Med. 2016;169:42–9.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Ophir Y. The effects of news coverage of epidemics on public support for and compliance with the CDC–an experimental study. J Health Commun. 2019;24(5):547–58.CrossRef Ophir Y. The effects of news coverage of epidemics on public support for and compliance with the CDC–an experimental study. J Health Commun. 2019;24(5):547–58.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Hsu Y-C, Chen Y-L, Wei H-N, Yang Y-W, Chen Y-H. Risk and outbreak communication: lessons from Taiwan’s experiences in the post-SARS era. Heal Secur. 2017;15(2):165–9.CrossRef Hsu Y-C, Chen Y-L, Wei H-N, Yang Y-W, Chen Y-H. Risk and outbreak communication: lessons from Taiwan’s experiences in the post-SARS era. Heal Secur. 2017;15(2):165–9.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Bryant RA, Harvey AG, Dang S, Sackville T. Assessing acute stress disorder: psychometric properties of a structured clinical interview. Psychol Assess. 1998;10:215–20.CrossRef Bryant RA, Harvey AG, Dang S, Sackville T. Assessing acute stress disorder: psychometric properties of a structured clinical interview. Psychol Assess. 1998;10:215–20.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Main A, Zhou Q, Ma Y, Luecken LJ, Liu X. Relations of SARS-related stressors and coping to Chinese college students’ psychological adjustment during the 2003 Beijing SARS epidemic. J Couns Psychol. 2011;58(3):410.CrossRef Main A, Zhou Q, Ma Y, Luecken LJ, Liu X. Relations of SARS-related stressors and coping to Chinese college students’ psychological adjustment during the 2003 Beijing SARS epidemic. J Couns Psychol. 2011;58(3):410.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Kavanagh MM. Authoritarianism, outbreaks, and information politics. Lancet Public Health. 2020;5(3):135–6.CrossRef Kavanagh MM. Authoritarianism, outbreaks, and information politics. Lancet Public Health. 2020;5(3):135–6.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Gui X, Kou Y, Pine KH, Chen Y. Managing uncertainty: using social media for risk assessment during a public health crisis. In: Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems; 2017. p. 4520–33.CrossRef Gui X, Kou Y, Pine KH, Chen Y. Managing uncertainty: using social media for risk assessment during a public health crisis. In: Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems; 2017. p. 4520–33.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Avery EJ. Public information officers’ social media monitoring during the Zika virus crisis, a global health threat surrounded by public uncertainty. Public Relat Rev. 2017;43(3):468–76.CrossRef Avery EJ. Public information officers’ social media monitoring during the Zika virus crisis, a global health threat surrounded by public uncertainty. Public Relat Rev. 2017;43(3):468–76.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Han PKJ, Zikmund-Fisher BJ, Duarte CW, Knaus M, Black A, Scherer AM, et al. Communication of scientific uncertainty about a novel pandemic health threat: ambiguity aversion and its mechanisms. J Health Commun. 2018;23(5):435–44.CrossRef Han PKJ, Zikmund-Fisher BJ, Duarte CW, Knaus M, Black A, Scherer AM, et al. Communication of scientific uncertainty about a novel pandemic health threat: ambiguity aversion and its mechanisms. J Health Commun. 2018;23(5):435–44.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Fry E. The grim business of containing an epidemic. Future. 2020 Mar:17–9. Fry E. The grim business of containing an epidemic. Future. 2020 Mar:17–9.
21.
go back to reference Vaughan E, Tinker T. Effective health risk communication about pandemic influenza for vulnerable populations. Am J Public Health. 2009;99(Suppl 2):S324–42.CrossRef Vaughan E, Tinker T. Effective health risk communication about pandemic influenza for vulnerable populations. Am J Public Health. 2009;99(Suppl 2):S324–42.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Sell TK, Boddie C, McGinty EE, Pollack K, Smith KC, Burke TA, et al. News media coverage of US Ebola policies: implications for communication during future infectious disease threats. Prev Med (Baltim). 2016;93:115–20.CrossRef Sell TK, Boddie C, McGinty EE, Pollack K, Smith KC, Burke TA, et al. News media coverage of US Ebola policies: implications for communication during future infectious disease threats. Prev Med (Baltim). 2016;93:115–20.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Veil S, Reynolds B, Sellnow TL, Seeger MW. CERC as a theoretical framework for research and practice. Health Promot Pract. 2008;9(4):26S–34S.CrossRef Veil S, Reynolds B, Sellnow TL, Seeger MW. CERC as a theoretical framework for research and practice. Health Promot Pract. 2008;9(4):26S–34S.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Freberg K. Intention to comply with crisis messages communicated via social media. Public Relat Rev. 2012;38(3):416–21.CrossRef Freberg K. Intention to comply with crisis messages communicated via social media. Public Relat Rev. 2012;38(3):416–21.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Charest F, Bouffard J, Zajmovic E. Public relations and social media: deliberate or creative strategic planning. Public Relat Rev. 2016;42(4):530–8.CrossRef Charest F, Bouffard J, Zajmovic E. Public relations and social media: deliberate or creative strategic planning. Public Relat Rev. 2016;42(4):530–8.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Dredze M, Broniatowski DA, Hilyard KM. Zika vaccine misconceptions: a social media analysis. Vaccine. 2016;34(30):3441.CrossRef Dredze M, Broniatowski DA, Hilyard KM. Zika vaccine misconceptions: a social media analysis. Vaccine. 2016;34(30):3441.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Information uncertainty: a correlate for acute stress disorder during the COVID-19 outbreak in China
Authors
Danhua Lin
Daniela B. Friedman
Shan Qiao
Cheuk Chi Tam
Xiaoyan Li
Xiaoming Li
Publication date
01-12-2020
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Public Health / Issue 1/2020
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2458
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-09952-3

Other articles of this Issue 1/2020

BMC Public Health 1/2020 Go to the issue