Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Critical Care 1/2022

Open Access 01-12-2022 | Acute Respiratory Distress-Syndrome | Correspondence

PEEP, p-values, and pulmonary mechanics; don’t throw the baby out with the bathwater

Authors: Matthew E. Cove, Michael R. Pinsky, John J. Marini

Published in: Critical Care | Issue 1/2022

Login to get access

Excerpt

We read with interest the viewpoint by Grieco and colleagues “Why compliance and driving pressure may be inappropriate targets for PEEP setting during ARDS” [1], written in response to our viewpoint, “Are we ready to think differently about PEEP?” [2]. We are delighted our article achieved its main objectives: generating attention to the urgent need to identify a physiology-based personalized PEEP strategy and highlighting the pitfalls of titrating PEEP based only on oxygenation measures. As we suggested, PEEP selection may be guided by seeking optimal compliance, simultaneously identifying least driving pressure for a given tidal volume, a measurement associated with important outcomes in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) [3]. …
Literature
1.
go back to reference Grieco DL, Bongiovanni F, Dell’Anna AM, Antonelli M. Why compliance and driving pressure may be inappropriate targets for PEEP setting during ARDS. Crit Care. 2022;26:234.CrossRef Grieco DL, Bongiovanni F, Dell’Anna AM, Antonelli M. Why compliance and driving pressure may be inappropriate targets for PEEP setting during ARDS. Crit Care. 2022;26:234.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Cove ME, Pinsky MR, Marini JJ. Are we ready to think differently about setting PEEP? Crit Care. 2022;26:222.CrossRef Cove ME, Pinsky MR, Marini JJ. Are we ready to think differently about setting PEEP? Crit Care. 2022;26:222.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Amato MBP, Meade MO, Slutsky AS, Brochard L, Costa ELV, Schoenfeld DA, et al. Driving pressure and survival in the acute respiratory distress syndrome. NEJM. 2015;372:747–55.CrossRef Amato MBP, Meade MO, Slutsky AS, Brochard L, Costa ELV, Schoenfeld DA, et al. Driving pressure and survival in the acute respiratory distress syndrome. NEJM. 2015;372:747–55.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Writing Group for the Alveolar Recruitment for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Trial (ART) Investigators, Cavalcanti AB, Suzumura ÉA, Laranjeira LN, Paisani D de M, Damiani LP, et al. Effect of lung recruitment and titrated positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) vs low PEEP on mortality in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2017;318:1335–45. Writing Group for the Alveolar Recruitment for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Trial (ART) Investigators, Cavalcanti AB, Suzumura ÉA, Laranjeira LN, Paisani D de M, Damiani LP, et al. Effect of lung recruitment and titrated positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) vs low PEEP on mortality in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2017;318:1335–45.
5.
go back to reference Suter PM, Fairley B. M D Isenberg Optimum Positive end-expiratory pressure in patients with acute pulmonary failure. NEJM. 1975;292:284–9.CrossRef Suter PM, Fairley B. M D Isenberg Optimum Positive end-expiratory pressure in patients with acute pulmonary failure. NEJM. 1975;292:284–9.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
PEEP, p-values, and pulmonary mechanics; don’t throw the baby out with the bathwater
Authors
Matthew E. Cove
Michael R. Pinsky
John J. Marini
Publication date
01-12-2022
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Critical Care / Issue 1/2022
Electronic ISSN: 1364-8535
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-022-04183-x

Other articles of this Issue 1/2022

Critical Care 1/2022 Go to the issue