Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Pediatric Radiology 10/2014

01-10-2014 | Original Article

Acute appendicitis in children: ultrasound and CT findings in negative appendectomy cases

Authors: Seong Ho Kim, Young Hun Choi, Woo Sun Kim, Jung-Eun Cheon, In-One Kim

Published in: Pediatric Radiology | Issue 10/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

To decrease the negative appendectomy rate in children, knowledge of the misleading imaging findings on US and CT in negative appendicitis cases is important.

Objective

To evaluate the negative appendectomy rate and describe the imaging findings of US and CT that lead radiologists to misdiagnose acute appendicitis in children.

Materials and methods

From 2007 to 2013, 374 children operated for suspected appendicitis were proved to either have acute appendicitis (n = 348) or to be negative for appendicitis (n = 26) on pathological reports. Negative appendectomy rates were compared among imaging modalities, age groups and genders. We retrospectively reviewed US and CT findings from negative appendectomy cases.

Results

The overall negative appendectomy rate was 7.0% (26/374). There were no statistically significant differences among the subgroups. The most common misleading presentations on US were sonographic tenderness (9/16, 56%) and non-compressibility (9/16, 56%). The most common misleading finding on CT were the presence of an appendicolith or hyperdense feces (5/12, 42%). Periappendiceal fat inflammation was observed in only one case of negative appendicitis on US and on CT.

Conclusion

Radiologists can misdiagnose children with equivocal diameters of appendices as having acute appendicitis when sonographic tenderness or non-compressibility is present on US and when an appendicolith or hyperdense feces is noted on CT. The possibility of negative appendicitis should be borne in mind when periappendiceal fat inflammation is absent or minimal in indeterminate cases.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Morse BC, Roettger RH, Kalbaugh CA et al (2007) Abdominal CT scanning in reproductive-age women with right lower quadrant abdominal pain: does its use reduce negative appendectomy rates and healthcare costs? Am Surg 73:580–584PubMed Morse BC, Roettger RH, Kalbaugh CA et al (2007) Abdominal CT scanning in reproductive-age women with right lower quadrant abdominal pain: does its use reduce negative appendectomy rates and healthcare costs? Am Surg 73:580–584PubMed
2.
go back to reference Pinto Leite N, Pereira JM, Cunha R et al (2005) CT evaluation of appendicitis and its complications: imaging techniques and key diagnostic findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 185:406–417PubMedCrossRef Pinto Leite N, Pereira JM, Cunha R et al (2005) CT evaluation of appendicitis and its complications: imaging techniques and key diagnostic findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 185:406–417PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Antevil J, Rivera L, Langenberg B et al (2004) The influence of age and gender on the utility of computed tomography to diagnose acute appendicitis. Am Surg 70:850–853PubMed Antevil J, Rivera L, Langenberg B et al (2004) The influence of age and gender on the utility of computed tomography to diagnose acute appendicitis. Am Surg 70:850–853PubMed
4.
go back to reference Raman SS, Osuagwu FC, Kadell B et al (2008) Effect of CT on false positive diagnosis of appendicitis and perforation. N Engl J Med 358:972–973PubMedCrossRef Raman SS, Osuagwu FC, Kadell B et al (2008) Effect of CT on false positive diagnosis of appendicitis and perforation. N Engl J Med 358:972–973PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Wagner PL, Eachempati SR, Soe K et al (2008) Defining the current negative appendectomy rate: for whom is preoperative computed tomography making an impact? Surgery 144:276–282PubMedCrossRef Wagner PL, Eachempati SR, Soe K et al (2008) Defining the current negative appendectomy rate: for whom is preoperative computed tomography making an impact? Surgery 144:276–282PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Pena BM, Taylor GA, Fishman SJ et al (2000) Costs and effectiveness of ultrasonography and limited computed tomography for diagnosing appendicitis in children. Pediatrics 106:672–676PubMedCrossRef Pena BM, Taylor GA, Fishman SJ et al (2000) Costs and effectiveness of ultrasonography and limited computed tomography for diagnosing appendicitis in children. Pediatrics 106:672–676PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Cuschieri J, Florence M, Flum DR et al (2008) Negative appendectomy and imaging accuracy in the Washington state surgical care and outcomes assessment program. Ann Surg 248:557–563PubMed Cuschieri J, Florence M, Flum DR et al (2008) Negative appendectomy and imaging accuracy in the Washington state surgical care and outcomes assessment program. Ann Surg 248:557–563PubMed
8.
go back to reference Colvin JM, Bachur R, Kharbanda A (2007) The presentation of appendicitis in preadolescent children. Pediatr Emerg Care 23:849–855PubMedCrossRef Colvin JM, Bachur R, Kharbanda A (2007) The presentation of appendicitis in preadolescent children. Pediatr Emerg Care 23:849–855PubMedCrossRef
9.
10.
go back to reference Flum DR, Koepsell T (2002) The clinical and economic correlates of misdiagnosed appendicitis: nationwide analysis. Arch Surg 137:799PubMedCrossRef Flum DR, Koepsell T (2002) The clinical and economic correlates of misdiagnosed appendicitis: nationwide analysis. Arch Surg 137:799PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Taylor GA, Callahan MJ, Rodriguez D et al (2006) CT for suspected appendicitis in children: an analysis of diagnostic errors. Pediatr Radiol 36:331–337PubMedCrossRef Taylor GA, Callahan MJ, Rodriguez D et al (2006) CT for suspected appendicitis in children: an analysis of diagnostic errors. Pediatr Radiol 36:331–337PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Trout AT, Sanchez R, Ladino-Torres MF et al (2012) A critical evaluation of US for the diagnosis of pediatric acute appendicitis in a real-life setting: how can we improve the diagnostic value of sonography? Pediatr Radiol 42:813–823PubMedCrossRef Trout AT, Sanchez R, Ladino-Torres MF et al (2012) A critical evaluation of US for the diagnosis of pediatric acute appendicitis in a real-life setting: how can we improve the diagnostic value of sonography? Pediatr Radiol 42:813–823PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Stengel JW, Webb EM, Poder L et al (2010) Acute appendicitis: clinical outcome in patients with an initial false-positive CT diagnosis. Radiology 256:119–126PubMedCrossRef Stengel JW, Webb EM, Poder L et al (2010) Acute appendicitis: clinical outcome in patients with an initial false-positive CT diagnosis. Radiology 256:119–126PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Keyzer C, Tack D, de Maertelaer V et al (2004) Acute appendicitis: comparison of low-dose and standard-dose unenhanced multi-detector row CT. Radiology 232:164–172PubMedCrossRef Keyzer C, Tack D, de Maertelaer V et al (2004) Acute appendicitis: comparison of low-dose and standard-dose unenhanced multi-detector row CT. Radiology 232:164–172PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Pereira JM, Sirlin CB, Pinto PS et al (2004) Disproportionate fat stranding: a helpful CT sign in patients with acute abdominal pain. Radiographics 24:703–715PubMedCrossRef Pereira JM, Sirlin CB, Pinto PS et al (2004) Disproportionate fat stranding: a helpful CT sign in patients with acute abdominal pain. Radiographics 24:703–715PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Rettenbacher T, Hollerweger A, Macheiner P et al (2001) Outer diameter of the vermiform appendix as a sign of acute appendicitis: evaluation at US. Radiology 218:757–762PubMedCrossRef Rettenbacher T, Hollerweger A, Macheiner P et al (2001) Outer diameter of the vermiform appendix as a sign of acute appendicitis: evaluation at US. Radiology 218:757–762PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Akay HO, Akpinar E, Ozmen CA et al (2007) Visualization of the normal appendix in children by non-contrast MDCT. Acta Chir Belg 107:531 Akay HO, Akpinar E, Ozmen CA et al (2007) Visualization of the normal appendix in children by non-contrast MDCT. Acta Chir Belg 107:531
18.
go back to reference Ozel A, Orhan UP, Akdana B et al (2011) Sonographic appearance of the normal appendix in children. J Clin Ultrasound 39:183–186PubMedCrossRef Ozel A, Orhan UP, Akdana B et al (2011) Sonographic appearance of the normal appendix in children. J Clin Ultrasound 39:183–186PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Wiersma F, Srameck A, Holscher HC (2005) US features of the normal appendix and surrounding area in children. Radiology 235:1018–1022PubMedCrossRef Wiersma F, Srameck A, Holscher HC (2005) US features of the normal appendix and surrounding area in children. Radiology 235:1018–1022PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Searle AR, Ismail KA, MacGregor D et al (2013) Changes in the length and diameter of the normal appendix throughout childhood. J Pediatr Surg 48:1535–1539PubMedCrossRef Searle AR, Ismail KA, MacGregor D et al (2013) Changes in the length and diameter of the normal appendix throughout childhood. J Pediatr Surg 48:1535–1539PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Lowe LH, Penney MW, Scheker LE et al (2000) Appendicolith revealed on CT in children with suspected appendicitis: how specific is it in the diagnosis of appendicitis? AJR Am J Roentgenol 175:981–984PubMedCrossRef Lowe LH, Penney MW, Scheker LE et al (2000) Appendicolith revealed on CT in children with suspected appendicitis: how specific is it in the diagnosis of appendicitis? AJR Am J Roentgenol 175:981–984PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Je BK, Kim SB, Lee SH et al (2009) Diagnostic value of maximal-outer-diameter and maximal-mural-thickness in use of ultrasound for acute appendicitis in children. World J Radiol 15:2900–2903 Je BK, Kim SB, Lee SH et al (2009) Diagnostic value of maximal-outer-diameter and maximal-mural-thickness in use of ultrasound for acute appendicitis in children. World J Radiol 15:2900–2903
23.
go back to reference Karmazyn B, Werner EA, Rejaie B et al (2005) Mesenteric lymph nodes in children: what is normal? Pediatr Radiol 35:774–777PubMedCrossRef Karmazyn B, Werner EA, Rejaie B et al (2005) Mesenteric lymph nodes in children: what is normal? Pediatr Radiol 35:774–777PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Bachur RG, Hennelly K, Callahan MJ et al (2012) Diagnostic imaging and negative appendectomy rates in children: effects of age and gender. Pediatrics 129:877–884PubMedCrossRef Bachur RG, Hennelly K, Callahan MJ et al (2012) Diagnostic imaging and negative appendectomy rates in children: effects of age and gender. Pediatrics 129:877–884PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Oyetunji TA, Ong’uti SK, Bolorunduro OB et al (2012) Pediatric negative appendectomy rate: trend, predictors, and differentials. J Surg Res 173:16–20PubMedCrossRef Oyetunji TA, Ong’uti SK, Bolorunduro OB et al (2012) Pediatric negative appendectomy rate: trend, predictors, and differentials. J Surg Res 173:16–20PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Sohail S, Siddiqui KJ (2009) Doptaus — a simple criterion for improving sonographic diagnosis of acute appendicitis. J Pak Med Assoc 59:75–79 Sohail S, Siddiqui KJ (2009) Doptaus — a simple criterion for improving sonographic diagnosis of acute appendicitis. J Pak Med Assoc 59:75–79
28.
go back to reference Rollins MD, Andolsek W, Scaife ER et al (2010) Prophylactic appendectomy: unnecessary in children with incidental appendicoliths detected by computed tomographic scan. J Pediatr Surg 45:2377–2380PubMedCrossRef Rollins MD, Andolsek W, Scaife ER et al (2010) Prophylactic appendectomy: unnecessary in children with incidental appendicoliths detected by computed tomographic scan. J Pediatr Surg 45:2377–2380PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Pooler BD, Lawrence EM, Pickhardt PJ (2012) Alternative diagnoses to suspected appendicitis at CT. Radiology 265:733–742PubMedCrossRef Pooler BD, Lawrence EM, Pickhardt PJ (2012) Alternative diagnoses to suspected appendicitis at CT. Radiology 265:733–742PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Lai V, Chan WC, Lau HY et al (2012) Diagnostic power of various computed tomography signs in diagnosing acute appendicitis. Clin Imaging 36:29–34PubMedCrossRef Lai V, Chan WC, Lau HY et al (2012) Diagnostic power of various computed tomography signs in diagnosing acute appendicitis. Clin Imaging 36:29–34PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Cobben LP, De Van Otterloo AM, Puylaert JB (2000) Spontaneously resolving appendicitis: frequency and natural history in 60 patients. Radiology 215:349–352PubMedCrossRef Cobben LP, De Van Otterloo AM, Puylaert JB (2000) Spontaneously resolving appendicitis: frequency and natural history in 60 patients. Radiology 215:349–352PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Acute appendicitis in children: ultrasound and CT findings in negative appendectomy cases
Authors
Seong Ho Kim
Young Hun Choi
Woo Sun Kim
Jung-Eun Cheon
In-One Kim
Publication date
01-10-2014
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Pediatric Radiology / Issue 10/2014
Print ISSN: 0301-0449
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1998
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-014-3009-x

Other articles of this Issue 10/2014

Pediatric Radiology 10/2014 Go to the issue

Hermes

Hermes