Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Quality of Life Research
Published in: Quality of Life Research 7/2018

Open Access 01-07-2018 | Brief Communication

Activity pacing: moving beyond taking breaks and slowing down

Authors: Deborah Antcliff, Philip Keeley, Malcolm Campbell, Steve Woby, Anne-Maree Keenan, Linda McGowan

Published in: Quality of Life Research | Issue 7/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

This brief communication responds to the paper by Jeong and Cho (Qual Life Res 26(4):903–911, 2017) that has described activity pacing in limited terms of adjusting activities through going at a slower rate and taking breaks. Activity pacing was reported as not involving goal setting, in comparison to other strategies for long-term conditions such as Acceptance and Commitment Therapy. This brief communication aims to challenge this limited perception of activity pacing in light of numerous studies that recognise pacing to be a more complex strategy. Pacing is considered to be a multifaceted coping strategy, including broad themes of not only adjusting activities, but also planning activities, having consistent activity levels, acceptance of current abilities and gradually increasing activities, and one that includes goal setting as a key facet. It is essential that pacing is both defined and measured as a multifaceted strategy in order to assess the outcomes of pacing, and for meaningful comparisons with other strategies regarding efficacy for the management of long-term conditions.
Literature
1.
Torrance, N., Smith, B. H., Elliott, A. M., Campbell, S. E., Chambers, W. A., Hannaford, P. C., & Johnston, M. (2011). Potential pain management programmes in primary care. A UK-wide questionnaire and Delphi survey of experts. Family Practice, 28(1), 41–48.CrossRefPubMed
2.
Goudsmit, E. M., Nijs, J., Jason, L. A., & Wallman, K. E. (2012). Pacing as a strategy to improve energy management in myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome: A consensus document. Disability and Rehabilitation, 34(13), 1140–1147.CrossRefPubMed
3.
NICE. (2007). Chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis (or encephalopathy). NICE Clinical Guideline 53. London.
4.
Birkholtz, M., Aylwin, L., & Harman, R. M. (2004). Activity pacing in chronic pain management: One aim, but which method? Part one: Introduction and literature review. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 67(10), 447–452.CrossRef
5.
Jamieson-Lega, K., Berry, R., & Brown, C. A. (2013). Pacing: A concept analysis of a chronic pain intervention. Pain Research & Management, 18(4), 207–213.CrossRef
6.
Beissner, K., Henderson, C. R. Jr., Papaleontiou, M., Olkhovskaya, Y., Wigglesworth, J., & Reid, M. C. (2009). Physical therapists’ use of cognitive-behavioral therapy for older adults with chronic pain: A nationwide survey. Physical Therapy, 89(9), 456–469.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
7.
Wallman, K. E., Morton, A. R., Goodman, C., Grove, R., & Guilfoyle, A. M. (2004). Randomised controlled trial of graded exercise in chronic fatigue syndrome. The Medical Journal of Australia, 180, 444–448.PubMed
8.
Scott-Dempster, C., Toye, F., Truman, J., & Barker, K. (2014). Physiotherapists’ experiences of activity pacing with people with chronic musculoskeletal pain: An interpretative phenomenological analysis. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice, 30(5), 319–328.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Linton, S. J., & Shaw, W. S. (2011). Impact of psychological factors in the experience of pain. Physical Therapy, 91(5), 700–711.CrossRefPubMed
10.
McCracken, L. M., & Morley, S. (2014). The psychological flexibility model: A basis for integration and progress in psychological approaches to chronic pain management. Journal of Pain, 15(3), 221–234.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Jeong, S., & Cho, S. (2017). Acceptance and patient functioning in chronic pain: The mediating role of physical activity. Quality of Life Research, 26(4), 903–911.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Nielson, W. R., Jensen, M. P., & Hill, M. L. (2001). An activity pacing scale for the chronic pain coping inventory: Development in a sample of patients with fibromyalgia syndrome. Pain, 89(2–3), 111–115.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Antcliff, D., Campbell, M., Woby, S., & Keeley, P. (2015). Assessing the psychometric properties of an activity pacing questionnaire for chronic pain and fatigue. Physical Therapy, 95(9), 1274–1286.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
14.
Esteve, R., Ramirez-Maestre, C., Peters, M. L., Serrano-Ibanez, E. R., Ruiz-Parraga, G. T., & Lopez-Martinez, A. E. (2016). Development and initial validation of the activity patterns scale in patients with chronic pain. The Journal of Pain, 17(4), 451–461.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Nielson, W. R., Jensen, M. P., Karsdorp, P. A., & Vlaeyen, J. W. (2013). Activity pacing in chronic pain: Concepts, evidence, and future directions. Clinical Journal of Pain, 29, 461–468.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Antcliff, D., Keeley, P., Campbell, M., Oldham, J., & Woby, S. (2013). The development of an activity pacing questionnaire for chronic pain and/or fatigue: A Delphi technique. Physiotherapy, 99(3), 241–246.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Birkholtz, M., Aylwin, L., & Harman, R. M. (2004). Activity pacing in chronic pain management: One aim, but which method? Part two: National activity pacing survey. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 67(11), 481–487.CrossRef
18.
Kindermans, H. P., Roelofs, J., Goossens, M. E., Huijnen, I. P., Verbunt, J. A., & Vlaeyen, J. W. (2011). Activity patterns in chronic pain: underlying dimensions and associations with disability and depressed mood. The Journal of Pain, 12(10), 1049–1058.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Nijs, J., Paul, L., & Wallman, K. (2008). Chronic fatigue syndrome: An approach combining self-management with graded exercise to avoid exacerbations. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 40(4), 241–247.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Pemberton, S., & Cox, D. L. (2014). Experiences of daily activity in chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis (CFS/ME) and their implications for rehabilitation programmes. Disability and Rehabilitation, 36(21), 1790–1797.CrossRefPubMed
21.
White, P. D., Goldsmith, K. A., Johnson, A. L., Potts, L., Walwyn, R., DeCesare, J., et al. (2011). Comparison of adaptive pacing therapy, cognitive behaviour therapy, graded exercise therapy, and specialist medical care for chronic fatigue syndrome (PACE): A randomised trial. Lancet, 377(9768), 823–836.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
22.
McCracken, L. M., & Samuel, V. M. (2007). The role of avoidance, pacing, and other activity patterns in chronic pain. Pain, 130(1–2), 119–125.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Gill, J. R., & Brown, C. A. (2009). A structured review of the evidence for pacing as a chronic pain intervention. European Journal of Pain, 13(2), 214–216.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Activity pacing: moving beyond taking breaks and slowing down
Authors
Deborah Antcliff
Philip Keeley
Malcolm Campbell
Steve Woby
Anne-Maree Keenan
Linda McGowan
Publication date
01-07-2018
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Quality of Life Research / Issue 7/2018
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-018-1794-7

Other articles of this Issue 7/2018

Quality of Life Research 7/2018 Go to the issue

Special Section: Test Construction (by invitation only)

Application of validity theory and methodology to patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs): building an argument for validity

OriginalPaper

Coping mediates the relationship between sense of coherence and mental quality of life in patients with chronic illness: a cross-sectional study

Special Section: Test Construction (by invitation only)

Measurement invariance, the lack thereof, and modeling change

OriginalPaper

Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the Child Health Utility 9D (CHU9D-CHN): a school-based study in China

OriginalPaper

Health state utility values of high prevalence mental disorders in Australia: results from the National Survey of Mental Health and Wellbeing

Special Section: Test Construction (by invitation only)

Scale development with small samples: a new application of longitudinal item response theory