Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Experimental Brain Research 1/2013

01-05-2013 | Research Article

Action co-representation and social exclusion

Authors: Marcello Costantini, Francesca Ferri

Published in: Experimental Brain Research | Issue 1/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Humans are thought to be able to form shared representations, considered a keystone of social cognition. However, whether and to what extent such representations are social in nature is still open for debate. In the present study, we address the question of whether action co-representation can be modulated by social attitudes, such as judgments about one’s own social status. Two groups of participants performed an Interactive Simon task after the experimental induction of a feeling of social inclusion or exclusion (ostracism) by means of a virtual ball tossing game. Results showed a compatibility effect in included, but not in excluded participants. This indicates that judgments about one’s own social status modulate action co-representation. We suggest that this modulation may occur by way of a redirection of one’s attentional focus away from others when one experiences social exclusion. This is a far-reaching issue given the increasing need for integration in modern society. Indeed, if integration fails, modern society fails also.
Footnotes
1
Ostracism occurred long before it was named (“ostrakismos”) around 500 BC, when Athenians cast their votes on shards of clay, ostraca, to determine whether a member of the community, usually a former political leader, should be banished for a period of 10 years.
 
Literature
go back to reference Brewer MB (2007) The social psychology of intergroup relations. Guilford Press, New York Brewer MB (2007) The social psychology of intergroup relations. Guilford Press, New York
go back to reference Cardellicchio P, Sinigaglia C, Costantini M (2012) Grasping affordances with the other’s hand: a TMS study. Soc Cognit Affect Neurosci (Epub ahead of print). doi:10.1093/scan/nss017 Cardellicchio P, Sinigaglia C, Costantini M (2012) Grasping affordances with the other’s hand: a TMS study. Soc Cognit Affect Neurosci (Epub ahead of print). doi:10.​1093/​scan/​nss017
go back to reference Cardini F, Costantini M, Galati G, Romani GL, Ladavas E, Serino A (2011) Viewing one’s own face being touched modulates tactile perception: an fMRI study. J Cognit Neurosci 23:503–513. doi:10.1162/jocn.2010.21484 CrossRef Cardini F, Costantini M, Galati G, Romani GL, Ladavas E, Serino A (2011) Viewing one’s own face being touched modulates tactile perception: an fMRI study. J Cognit Neurosci 23:503–513. doi:10.​1162/​jocn.​2010.​21484 CrossRef
go back to reference Carpenter M (2009) Just how joint is joint action in infancy? Topics Cognit Sci 1:380–392CrossRef Carpenter M (2009) Just how joint is joint action in infancy? Topics Cognit Sci 1:380–392CrossRef
go back to reference Costantini M, Sinigaglia C (2012) Grasping affordance: a window onto social cognition. In: Seemann A (ed) Joint attention: new developments. MIT press, Cambridge Costantini M, Sinigaglia C (2012) Grasping affordance: a window onto social cognition. In: Seemann A (ed) Joint attention: new developments. MIT press, Cambridge
go back to reference Costantini M, Committeri G, Sinigaglia C (2011b) Ready both to your and to my hands: mapping the action space of others. PLoS ONE 6:e17923PubMedCrossRef Costantini M, Committeri G, Sinigaglia C (2011b) Ready both to your and to my hands: mapping the action space of others. PLoS ONE 6:e17923PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Galati G, Committeri G, Spitoni G, Aprile T, Di Russo F, Pitzalis S, Pizzamiglio L (2008) A selective representation of the meaning of actions in the auditory mirror system. Neuroimage 40:1274–1286PubMedCrossRef Galati G, Committeri G, Spitoni G, Aprile T, Di Russo F, Pitzalis S, Pizzamiglio L (2008) A selective representation of the meaning of actions in the auditory mirror system. Neuroimage 40:1274–1286PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Hommel B, Musseler J, Aschersleben G, Prinz W (2001) The theory of event coding (TEC): a framework for perception and action planning. Behav Brain Sci 24:849–878 (discussion 878–937) Hommel B, Musseler J, Aschersleben G, Prinz W (2001) The theory of event coding (TEC): a framework for perception and action planning. Behav Brain Sci 24:849–878 (discussion 878–937)
go back to reference Sebanz N, Knoblich G, Prinz W (2003) Representing others’ actions: just like one’s own? Cognition 88:B11–B21PubMedCrossRef Sebanz N, Knoblich G, Prinz W (2003) Representing others’ actions: just like one’s own? Cognition 88:B11–B21PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Sebanz N, Bekkering H, Knoblich G (2006a) Joint action: bodies and minds moving together. Trends Cognit Sci 10:70–76CrossRef Sebanz N, Bekkering H, Knoblich G (2006a) Joint action: bodies and minds moving together. Trends Cognit Sci 10:70–76CrossRef
go back to reference Sebanz N, Knoblich G, Prinz W, Wascher E (2006b) Twin peaks: an ERP study of action planning and control in co-acting individuals. J Cogn Neurosci 18(5):859–870 Sebanz N, Knoblich G, Prinz W, Wascher E (2006b) Twin peaks: an ERP study of action planning and control in co-acting individuals. J Cogn Neurosci 18(5):859–870
go back to reference Simon J, Rudell A (1967) Auditory S-R compatibility: the effect of an irrelevant cue on information processing. J Appl Psychol 51:300–304PubMedCrossRef Simon J, Rudell A (1967) Auditory S-R compatibility: the effect of an irrelevant cue on information processing. J Appl Psychol 51:300–304PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Tajfel H, Turner JC (1979) An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. Brooks-Cole, Monterey Tajfel H, Turner JC (1979) An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. Brooks-Cole, Monterey
go back to reference Thomas R, Press C, Haggard P (2006) Shared representations in body perception. Acta Psychol (Amst) 121:317–330CrossRef Thomas R, Press C, Haggard P (2006) Shared representations in body perception. Acta Psychol (Amst) 121:317–330CrossRef
go back to reference Tipper S, Paul M, Hayes A (2006) Vision-for-action: the effects of object property discrimination and action state on affordance compatibility effects. Psychon Bull Rev 13:493–498. doi:10.3758/bf03193875 PubMedCrossRef Tipper S, Paul M, Hayes A (2006) Vision-for-action: the effects of object property discrimination and action state on affordance compatibility effects. Psychon Bull Rev 13:493–498. doi:10.​3758/​bf03193875 PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Tollefsen D (2005) Let’s pretend! Children and joint action. Philos Soc Sci 35:75–97CrossRef Tollefsen D (2005) Let’s pretend! Children and joint action. Philos Soc Sci 35:75–97CrossRef
go back to reference Tsai C–C, Kuo W-J, Jing J-T, Hung D, Tzeng O (2006) A common coding framework in self-other interaction: evidence from joint action task. Exp Brain Res 175:353PubMedCrossRef Tsai C–C, Kuo W-J, Jing J-T, Hung D, Tzeng O (2006) A common coding framework in self-other interaction: evidence from joint action task. Exp Brain Res 175:353PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Turner JC, Hogg MA, Oakes PJ, Reicher SD, Wetherell MS (1987) Rediscovering the social group: a self-categorization theory. Blackwell, Oxford Turner JC, Hogg MA, Oakes PJ, Reicher SD, Wetherell MS (1987) Rediscovering the social group: a self-categorization theory. Blackwell, Oxford
go back to reference Welsh TN, Ray MC, Weeks DJ, Dewey D, Elliott D (2009) Does Joe influence Fred’s action? Not if Fred has autism spectrum disorder. Brain Res Cognit Brain Res 1248:141–148 Welsh TN, Ray MC, Weeks DJ, Dewey D, Elliott D (2009) Does Joe influence Fred’s action? Not if Fred has autism spectrum disorder. Brain Res Cognit Brain Res 1248:141–148
go back to reference Williams KD, Jarvis B (2006) Cyberball: a program for use in research on interpersonal ostracism and acceptance. Behav Res Methods 38:174–180PubMedCrossRef Williams KD, Jarvis B (2006) Cyberball: a program for use in research on interpersonal ostracism and acceptance. Behav Res Methods 38:174–180PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Zadro L, Williams KD, Richardson R (2004) How low can you go? Ostracism by a computer is sufficient to lower self-reported levels of belonging, control, self-esteem, and meaningful existence. J Exp Soc Psychol 40:560CrossRef Zadro L, Williams KD, Richardson R (2004) How low can you go? Ostracism by a computer is sufficient to lower self-reported levels of belonging, control, self-esteem, and meaningful existence. J Exp Soc Psychol 40:560CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Action co-representation and social exclusion
Authors
Marcello Costantini
Francesca Ferri
Publication date
01-05-2013
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Experimental Brain Research / Issue 1/2013
Print ISSN: 0014-4819
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1106
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-013-3487-3

Other articles of this Issue 1/2013

Experimental Brain Research 1/2013 Go to the issue