Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Orthopaedics 7/2023

13-05-2023 | Achilles Tendon Rupture | Original Paper

Re-ruptures and early outcomes after surgical repair of acute Achilles tendon ruptures: prospective, comparative multicenter study

Authors: E. Laboute, P. Thoreux, J. Beldame, A. Caubere, J.C. Giunta, R. Coursier, M. Saab

Published in: International Orthopaedics | Issue 7/2023

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The primary objective of this study was to compare the re-rupture rate, clinical results, and functional outcomes six months after the surgical repair of an acute Achilles tendon rupture between three different techniques (open repair, percutaneous repair with the Tenolig®, and minimally invasive repair).

Methods

A prospective, comparative, multicenter, non-randomized study was performed and included 111 patients who had an acute ruptured Achilles tendon: 74 underwent an open repair, 22 underwent a percutaneous repair using the Tenolig® and 15 had a minimally invasive repair. At six months follow-up we analyzed the number of re-ruptures, phlebitis, infections, complex regional pain syndrome, clinical outcomes (muscle atrophy, ankle dorsal flexion), functional scores (ATRS, VISA-A, EFAS, SF-12), and return to running.

Results

There were more re-ruptures (p=0.0001) after repair with the Tenolig® (27%) than with open repairs (1.3%) and minimally invasive repairs (0%). The rate of other complications was not different. No clinical differences were found between the three groups. Only some functional scores EFAS Total (p=0.006), and VISA-A (p=0.015) were worse in the Tenolig® group. All the other results were similar between the three groups.

Conclusion

Despite heterogeneous studies in literature, the results of this comparative and prospective study between three surgical techniques of Achilles tendon repair confirmed that Tenolig® repair increased the rate of early re-rupture compared to open or minimally invasive techniques.
Literature
7.
go back to reference Ma G, Griffith T (1977) Percutaneous repair of acute closed ruptures Achilles tendon: a new technique. Clin Orthop Relat Res 128:247–255 Ma G, Griffith T (1977) Percutaneous repair of acute closed ruptures Achilles tendon: a new technique. Clin Orthop Relat Res 128:247–255
8.
go back to reference Kakiuchi M (1995) A combined open and percutaneous technique for repair of tendo Achillis. Comparison with open repair. J Bone Joint Surg Br 77:60–63CrossRefPubMed Kakiuchi M (1995) A combined open and percutaneous technique for repair of tendo Achillis. Comparison with open repair. J Bone Joint Surg Br 77:60–63CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Assal M, Jung M, Stern R et al (2002) Limited open repair of Achilles tendon ruptures: a technique with a new instrument and findings of a prospective multicenter study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84:161–170CrossRefPubMed Assal M, Jung M, Stern R et al (2002) Limited open repair of Achilles tendon ruptures: a technique with a new instrument and findings of a prospective multicenter study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84:161–170CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Delponte P, Potier L, De Poulpiquet P, Buisson P (1992) Treatment of subcutaneous ruptures of the Achilles tendon by percutaneous tenorraphy. Rev Chir Orthop 78:404–407PubMed Delponte P, Potier L, De Poulpiquet P, Buisson P (1992) Treatment of subcutaneous ruptures of the Achilles tendon by percutaneous tenorraphy. Rev Chir Orthop 78:404–407PubMed
17.
go back to reference Maes R, Copin G, Averous C (2006) Is percutaneous repair of the Achilles tendon a safe technique? A study of 124 cases. Acta Orthop Belg 72:179–183PubMed Maes R, Copin G, Averous C (2006) Is percutaneous repair of the Achilles tendon a safe technique? A study of 124 cases. Acta Orthop Belg 72:179–183PubMed
Metadata
Title
Re-ruptures and early outcomes after surgical repair of acute Achilles tendon ruptures: prospective, comparative multicenter study
Authors
E. Laboute
P. Thoreux
J. Beldame
A. Caubere
J.C. Giunta
R. Coursier
M. Saab
Publication date
13-05-2023
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
International Orthopaedics / Issue 7/2023
Print ISSN: 0341-2695
Electronic ISSN: 1432-5195
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-023-05827-5

Other articles of this Issue 7/2023

International Orthopaedics 7/2023 Go to the issue