Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 1/2024

09-10-2023 | Achalasia | 2023 SAGES Oral

Using impedance planimetry to define the end of a peroral endoscopic myotomy

Authors: Monica Polcz, Dau Ku, Gregory T. Scarola, Paul D. Colavita

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 1/2024

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is a minimally invasive endoscopic option for management of achalasia. Adequate distal myotomy is necessary for relief of symptoms, but when too long may also increase risk of reflux. The objective of this study is to evaluate clinical outcomes after POEM and final length of gastric myotomy using impedance planimetry (EndoFLIP).

Methods

A retrospective review of 34 consecutive patients undergoing POEM with EndoFLIP were included. EndoFLIP measurements, including esophagogastric junction distensibility index (DI), minimum diameter (Dmin), and cross-sectional area (CSA) were recorded at 30- and 40-mL balloon-fill pre- and post- myotomy. The myotomy was considered complete when DI ≥ 3.4 mm2/mmHg. Postoperative Eckardt score (ES) was determined at initial postoperative visit and most recent follow-up. Linear and logistic regression were used to evaluate the association between gastric myotomy length and post-myotomy EndoFLIP measurements on postoperative ES and GERD. Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to compare gastric myotomy lengths and EndoFLIP parameters in relation to clinical success and development of GERD, and paired t-test to compare EndoFLIP measurements and ES pre- and post-myotomy.

Results

Final length of gastric myotomy measured 1 cm in 1 (2.9%), 1.5 cm in 11 (32.4%), 2.0 cm in 19 (55.9%), and 2.5 cm in 3 (8.8%) patients. Mean preoperative ES was 6.6 ± 2.2. All patients achieved ES < 3 postoperatively, which was maintained in 88.5% of patients at a median of 7.5 months of follow-up. Gastric myotomy length and post-myotomy EndoFLIP values were not associated with postoperative Eckardt scores or GERD.

Discussion

Early and late symptom relief was achieved in 100 and 88.5% of patients, respectively, at a gastric myotomy length of 1–2.5 cm. Using EndoFLIP to define a completed myotomy at DI of 3.4 mm2/mmHg yielded variable lengths of gastric myotomy.

Graphical abstract

Literature
1.
go back to reference Inoue H, Minami H, Kobayashi Y et al (2010) Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for esophageal achalasia. Endoscopy 42(4):265–271CrossRefPubMed Inoue H, Minami H, Kobayashi Y et al (2010) Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for esophageal achalasia. Endoscopy 42(4):265–271CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Werner YB, Hakanson B, Martinek J et al (2019) Endoscopic or surgical myotomy in patients with idiopathic achalasia. N Engl J Med 381(23):2219–2229CrossRefPubMed Werner YB, Hakanson B, Martinek J et al (2019) Endoscopic or surgical myotomy in patients with idiopathic achalasia. N Engl J Med 381(23):2219–2229CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Zhang LP, Chang R, Matthews BD et al (2014) Incidence, mechanisms, and outcomes of esophageal and gastric perforation during laparoscopic foregut surgery: a retrospective review of 1,223 foregut cases. Surg Endosc 28(1):85–90CrossRefPubMed Zhang LP, Chang R, Matthews BD et al (2014) Incidence, mechanisms, and outcomes of esophageal and gastric perforation during laparoscopic foregut surgery: a retrospective review of 1,223 foregut cases. Surg Endosc 28(1):85–90CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference El Nakeeb A, Ezzat H, Shehta A et al (2019) Impact of the myotomy extent on gastric side on surgical outcome after heller’s cardiomotomy for achalasia. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 29(5):362–366CrossRefPubMed El Nakeeb A, Ezzat H, Shehta A et al (2019) Impact of the myotomy extent on gastric side on surgical outcome after heller’s cardiomotomy for achalasia. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 29(5):362–366CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Salvador R, Caruso V, Costantini M et al (2015) Shorter myotomy on the gastric site (</ = 2.5 cm) provides adequate relief of dysphagia in achalasia patients. Dis Esophagus 28(5):412–417CrossRefPubMed Salvador R, Caruso V, Costantini M et al (2015) Shorter myotomy on the gastric site (</ = 2.5 cm) provides adequate relief of dysphagia in achalasia patients. Dis Esophagus 28(5):412–417CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Ramirez M, Zubieta C, Ciotola F et al (2018) Per oral endoscopic myotomy vs. laparoscopic Heller myotomy, does gastric extension length matter? Surg Endosc 32(1):282–288CrossRefPubMed Ramirez M, Zubieta C, Ciotola F et al (2018) Per oral endoscopic myotomy vs. laparoscopic Heller myotomy, does gastric extension length matter? Surg Endosc 32(1):282–288CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference McMahon BP, Frokjaer JB, Liao D, Kunwald P, Drewes AM, Gregersen H (2005) A new technique for evaluating sphincter function in visceral organs: application of the functional lumen imaging probe (FLIP) for the evaluation of the oesophago-gastric junction. Physiol Meas 26(5):823–836CrossRefPubMed McMahon BP, Frokjaer JB, Liao D, Kunwald P, Drewes AM, Gregersen H (2005) A new technique for evaluating sphincter function in visceral organs: application of the functional lumen imaging probe (FLIP) for the evaluation of the oesophago-gastric junction. Physiol Meas 26(5):823–836CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Chen JW, Rubenstein JH (2017) Esophagogastric junction distensibility assessed using the functional lumen imaging probe. World J Gastroenterol 23(7):1289–1297CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Chen JW, Rubenstein JH (2017) Esophagogastric junction distensibility assessed using the functional lumen imaging probe. World J Gastroenterol 23(7):1289–1297CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
go back to reference Su B, Dunst C, Gould J et al (2021) Experience-based expert consensus on the intra-operative usage of the Endoflip impedance planimetry system. Surg Endosc 35(6):2731–2742CrossRefPubMed Su B, Dunst C, Gould J et al (2021) Experience-based expert consensus on the intra-operative usage of the Endoflip impedance planimetry system. Surg Endosc 35(6):2731–2742CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Gyawali CP, Kahrilas PJ, Savarino E et al (2018) Modern diagnosis of GERD: the Lyon consensus. Gut 67(7):1351–1362CrossRefPubMed Gyawali CP, Kahrilas PJ, Savarino E et al (2018) Modern diagnosis of GERD: the Lyon consensus. Gut 67(7):1351–1362CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Familiari P, Gigante G, Marchese M et al (2016) Peroral endoscopic myotomy for esophageal achalasia: outcomes of the first 100 patients with short-term follow-up. Ann Surg 263(1):82–87CrossRefPubMed Familiari P, Gigante G, Marchese M et al (2016) Peroral endoscopic myotomy for esophageal achalasia: outcomes of the first 100 patients with short-term follow-up. Ann Surg 263(1):82–87CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Stavropoulos SN, Modayil R, Friedel D (2015) Per oral endoscopic myotomy for the treatment of achalasia. Curr Opin Gastroenterol 31(5):430–440CrossRefPubMed Stavropoulos SN, Modayil R, Friedel D (2015) Per oral endoscopic myotomy for the treatment of achalasia. Curr Opin Gastroenterol 31(5):430–440CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Bhayani NH, Kurian AA, Dunst CM, Sharata AM, Rieder E, Swanstrom LL (2014) A comparative study on comprehensive, objective outcomes of laparoscopic Heller myotomy with per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for achalasia. Ann Surg 259(6):1098–1103CrossRefPubMed Bhayani NH, Kurian AA, Dunst CM, Sharata AM, Rieder E, Swanstrom LL (2014) A comparative study on comprehensive, objective outcomes of laparoscopic Heller myotomy with per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for achalasia. Ann Surg 259(6):1098–1103CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Sharata AM, Dunst CM, Pescarus R et al (2015) Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for esophageal primary motility disorders: analysis of 100 consecutive patients. J Gastrointest Surg 19(1):161–170CrossRefPubMed Sharata AM, Dunst CM, Pescarus R et al (2015) Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for esophageal primary motility disorders: analysis of 100 consecutive patients. J Gastrointest Surg 19(1):161–170CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Hungness ES, Sternbach JM, Teitelbaum EN, Kahrilas PJ, Pandolfino JE, Soper NJ (2016) Per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) after the learning curve: durable long-term results with a low complication rate. Ann Surg 264(3):508–517CrossRefPubMed Hungness ES, Sternbach JM, Teitelbaum EN, Kahrilas PJ, Pandolfino JE, Soper NJ (2016) Per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) after the learning curve: durable long-term results with a low complication rate. Ann Surg 264(3):508–517CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Talukdar R, Inoue H, Nageshwar RD (2015) Efficacy of peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) in the treatment of achalasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 29(11):3030–3046CrossRefPubMed Talukdar R, Inoue H, Nageshwar RD (2015) Efficacy of peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) in the treatment of achalasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 29(11):3030–3046CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Grimes KL, Bechara R, Shimamura Y, Ikeda H, Inoue H (2020) Gastric myotomy length affects severity but not rate of post-procedure reflux: 3-year follow-up of a prospective randomized controlled trial of double-scope per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for esophageal achalasia. Surg Endosc 34(7):2963–2968CrossRefPubMed Grimes KL, Bechara R, Shimamura Y, Ikeda H, Inoue H (2020) Gastric myotomy length affects severity but not rate of post-procedure reflux: 3-year follow-up of a prospective randomized controlled trial of double-scope per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for esophageal achalasia. Surg Endosc 34(7):2963–2968CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference DeHaan RK, Davila D, Frelich MJ, Gould JC (2017) Esophagogastric junction distensibility is greater following Toupet compared to Nissen fundoplication. Surg Endosc 31(1):193–198CrossRefPubMed DeHaan RK, Davila D, Frelich MJ, Gould JC (2017) Esophagogastric junction distensibility is greater following Toupet compared to Nissen fundoplication. Surg Endosc 31(1):193–198CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Amundson JR, Wu H, VanDruff V et al (2023) Esophagogastric junction compliance on impedance planimetry (EndoFLIP) following peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) predicts improvement in postoperative Eckardt score. Surg Endosc 37(2):1493–1500CrossRefPubMed Amundson JR, Wu H, VanDruff V et al (2023) Esophagogastric junction compliance on impedance planimetry (EndoFLIP) following peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) predicts improvement in postoperative Eckardt score. Surg Endosc 37(2):1493–1500CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Familiari P, Gigante G, Marchese M et al (2014) EndoFLIP system for the intraoperative evaluation of peroral endoscopic myotomy. United Eur Gastroenterol J 2(2):77–83CrossRef Familiari P, Gigante G, Marchese M et al (2014) EndoFLIP system for the intraoperative evaluation of peroral endoscopic myotomy. United Eur Gastroenterol J 2(2):77–83CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Moran RA, Brewer Gutierrez OI, Rahden B et al (2021) Impedance planimetry values for predicting clinical response following peroral endoscopic myotomy. Endoscopy 53(6):570–577CrossRefPubMed Moran RA, Brewer Gutierrez OI, Rahden B et al (2021) Impedance planimetry values for predicting clinical response following peroral endoscopic myotomy. Endoscopy 53(6):570–577CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Attaar M, Su B, Wong HJ et al (2021) Intraoperative impedance planimetry (EndoFLIP) results and development of esophagitis in patients undergoing peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM). Surg Endosc 35(8):4555–4562CrossRefPubMed Attaar M, Su B, Wong HJ et al (2021) Intraoperative impedance planimetry (EndoFLIP) results and development of esophagitis in patients undergoing peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM). Surg Endosc 35(8):4555–4562CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Su B, Callahan ZM, Novak S, Kuchta K, Ujiki MB (2020) Using impedance planimetry (EndoFLIP) to evaluate myotomy and predict outcomes after surgery for achalasia. J Gastrointest Surg 24(4):964–971CrossRefPubMed Su B, Callahan ZM, Novak S, Kuchta K, Ujiki MB (2020) Using impedance planimetry (EndoFLIP) to evaluate myotomy and predict outcomes after surgery for achalasia. J Gastrointest Surg 24(4):964–971CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Ngamruengphong S, von Rahden BH, Filser J et al (2016) Intraoperative measurement of esophagogastric junction cross-sectional area by impedance planimetry correlates with clinical outcomes of peroral endoscopic myotomy for achalasia: a multicenter study. Surg Endosc 30(7):2886–2894CrossRefPubMed Ngamruengphong S, von Rahden BH, Filser J et al (2016) Intraoperative measurement of esophagogastric junction cross-sectional area by impedance planimetry correlates with clinical outcomes of peroral endoscopic myotomy for achalasia: a multicenter study. Surg Endosc 30(7):2886–2894CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Shemmeri E, Aye RW, Farivar AS, Bograd AJ, Louie BE (2020) Use of a report card to evaluate outcomes of achalasia surgery: beyond the Eckardt score. Surg Endosc 34(4):1856–1862CrossRefPubMed Shemmeri E, Aye RW, Farivar AS, Bograd AJ, Louie BE (2020) Use of a report card to evaluate outcomes of achalasia surgery: beyond the Eckardt score. Surg Endosc 34(4):1856–1862CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Holmstrom AL, Campagna RAJ, Alhalel J et al (2021) Intraoperative FLIP distensibility during POEM varies according to achalasia subtype. Surg Endosc 35(6):3097–3103CrossRefPubMed Holmstrom AL, Campagna RAJ, Alhalel J et al (2021) Intraoperative FLIP distensibility during POEM varies according to achalasia subtype. Surg Endosc 35(6):3097–3103CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Using impedance planimetry to define the end of a peroral endoscopic myotomy
Authors
Monica Polcz
Dau Ku
Gregory T. Scarola
Paul D. Colavita
Publication date
09-10-2023
Publisher
Springer US
Keyword
Achalasia
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 1/2024
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-023-10427-w

Other articles of this Issue 1/2024

Surgical Endoscopy 1/2024 Go to the issue