Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 8/2008

01-08-2008 | Orthopaedic Surgery

Acetabular revision arthroplasty using jumbo cups: an experience in Asia

Authors: Cheng-Yu Fan, Wei-Ming Chen, Ocar K. Lee, Ching-Kuei Huang, Chao-Ching Chiang, Tain-Hsiung Chen

Published in: Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery | Issue 8/2008

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

Variable degrees of bony deficiencies often complicate revisional arthrolasties of acetabular components and represent challenges to orthopedic surgeons. Many solutions exist and cementless jumbo cup reconstruction had been proven to be a feasible and successful method. Our study aimed to access the results of these cementless giant cups for managing acetabular bony defect at one institute.

Materials and methods

Between March 2000 and March 2003, 47 revisions of the failed acetabular components using the so-called “Jumbo Acetabular Cups” were enrolled in our study. All cases were followed for at least 4 years. We defined the size of the jumbo cups for the Asians to be of an outside diameter of 64 mm for men and 60 mm for women, which were 2 mm smaller than the commonly used definition in the Western countries. The radiographic outcomes and the migration of hip centers were analyzed. The endurance of these giant sockets was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier analysis.

Results

After a mean follow-up of 65 months, only three implant failures requiring re-revision were identified. The estimated 5-year survival rate according to the Kaplan-Meier analysis was 94.5%. Radiographic analysis demonstrated an improvement of vertical hip center from 31 to 27 mm proximal to the interteardrop line. Eight (17%) cups exhibited radiolucent line around the bone-prosthesis interface but did not attenuate implant instability. The complication rate was not high. Dislocation happened in five (11%) patients. One deep infection was successfully reconstructed in stage surgeries after eradication of the infection.

Conclusion

With the aid of novel implant-coating technique and materials, jumbo cup reconstruction can achieve stability and longevity through an adequate peripheral ring-contact, regardless of inadequate implant to host bone contact. We believe that this is a reliable and easily performed reconstruction for acetabular defect.
Literature
1.
2.
go back to reference Dearborn JT, Harris WH (2000) Acetabular revision arthroplasty using so-called jumbo cementless components: an average 7-year follow-up study. J Arthroplasty 15:8–15PubMedCrossRef Dearborn JT, Harris WH (2000) Acetabular revision arthroplasty using so-called jumbo cementless components: an average 7-year follow-up study. J Arthroplasty 15:8–15PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference DeLee JG, Charnley J (1976) Radiological demarcation of cemented sockets in total hip replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 121:20–32PubMed DeLee JG, Charnley J (1976) Radiological demarcation of cemented sockets in total hip replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 121:20–32PubMed
4.
go back to reference Goodman SB, Adler SJ, Fyhrie DP, Schurman DJ (1988) The acetabular teardrop and its relevance to acetabular migration. Clin Orthop Relat Res 236:199–204PubMed Goodman SB, Adler SJ, Fyhrie DP, Schurman DJ (1988) The acetabular teardrop and its relevance to acetabular migration. Clin Orthop Relat Res 236:199–204PubMed
5.
6.
go back to reference Hendricks KJ, Harris WH (2006) Revison of failed acetabular components with use of so-called jumbo noncemented components. A concise follow-up of a previous report. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88:559–563PubMedCrossRef Hendricks KJ, Harris WH (2006) Revison of failed acetabular components with use of so-called jumbo noncemented components. A concise follow-up of a previous report. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88:559–563PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Hodgkinson JP, Shelley P, Wroblewski BM (1988) The correlation between the roentgenographic appearance and operative findings at the bone-cement junction of the socket in Charnley low friction arthroplasties. Clin Orthop Relat Res 228:105–109PubMed Hodgkinson JP, Shelley P, Wroblewski BM (1988) The correlation between the roentgenographic appearance and operative findings at the bone-cement junction of the socket in Charnley low friction arthroplasties. Clin Orthop Relat Res 228:105–109PubMed
8.
go back to reference Hooten JP Jr, Engh CA Jr, Engh CA (1994) Failure of structural acetabular allografts in cementless revision hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 76:419–422PubMed Hooten JP Jr, Engh CA Jr, Engh CA (1994) Failure of structural acetabular allografts in cementless revision hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 76:419–422PubMed
10.
go back to reference Jerosch J, Steinbeck J, Stechmann J, Guth V (1997) Influence of a high hip center on abductor muscle function. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 116:385–389PubMedCrossRef Jerosch J, Steinbeck J, Stechmann J, Guth V (1997) Influence of a high hip center on abductor muscle function. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 116:385–389PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Kaplan EL, Meier P (1958) Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observation. J Am Stat Assoc 53:457–481CrossRef Kaplan EL, Meier P (1958) Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observation. J Am Stat Assoc 53:457–481CrossRef
12.
go back to reference McCollum DE, Gray WJ (1990) Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty. Causes and prevention. Clin Orthop Relat Res 261:159–170PubMed McCollum DE, Gray WJ (1990) Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty. Causes and prevention. Clin Orthop Relat Res 261:159–170PubMed
13.
go back to reference Morag G, Zalzal P, Liberman B, Safir O, Flint M, Gross AE (2005) Outcome of revision hip arthroplasty in patients with a previous total hip replacement for developmental dysplasia of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br 87:1068–1072PubMedCrossRef Morag G, Zalzal P, Liberman B, Safir O, Flint M, Gross AE (2005) Outcome of revision hip arthroplasty in patients with a previous total hip replacement for developmental dysplasia of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br 87:1068–1072PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Padgett DE, Kull L, Rosenberg A, Sumner DR, Galante JO (1993) Revision of the acetabular component without cement after total hip arthroplasty. Three to six-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am 75:663–573PubMed Padgett DE, Kull L, Rosenberg A, Sumner DR, Galante JO (1993) Revision of the acetabular component without cement after total hip arthroplasty. Three to six-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am 75:663–573PubMed
15.
go back to reference Paprosky WG, Perona PG, Lawrence JM (1994) Acetabular defect classification and surgical reconstruction in revision arthroplasty. A 6-year follow-up evaluation. J Arthroplasty 9:33–44PubMedCrossRef Paprosky WG, Perona PG, Lawrence JM (1994) Acetabular defect classification and surgical reconstruction in revision arthroplasty. A 6-year follow-up evaluation. J Arthroplasty 9:33–44PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Patel JV, Masonis JL, Bourne RB, Rorabeck CH (2003) The fate of cementless jumbo cups in revision hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 18:129–133PubMedCrossRef Patel JV, Masonis JL, Bourne RB, Rorabeck CH (2003) The fate of cementless jumbo cups in revision hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 18:129–133PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Pierchon F, Pasquier G, Cotton A, Fontaine C, Clarisse J, Duquennoy A (1994) Cause of dislocation of total hip arthroplasty. CT study of component alignment. J Bone Joint Surg Br 76:45–48PubMed Pierchon F, Pasquier G, Cotton A, Fontaine C, Clarisse J, Duquennoy A (1994) Cause of dislocation of total hip arthroplasty. CT study of component alignment. J Bone Joint Surg Br 76:45–48PubMed
18.
go back to reference Russotti GM, Harris WH (1991) Proximal placement of the acetabular component in total hip arthroplasty: a long-term follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 73:587–592PubMed Russotti GM, Harris WH (1991) Proximal placement of the acetabular component in total hip arthroplasty: a long-term follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 73:587–592PubMed
19.
go back to reference Sporer SM, O’Rourke M, Paprosky WG (2005) The treatment of pelvic discontinuity during acetabular revision. J Arthroplasty 20:79–84PubMedCrossRef Sporer SM, O’Rourke M, Paprosky WG (2005) The treatment of pelvic discontinuity during acetabular revision. J Arthroplasty 20:79–84PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Templeton JE, Callaghan JJ, Goetz DD, Sullivan PM, Johnston RC (2001) Revision of a cemented acetabular component to a cementless acetabular component. A ten to fourteen-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 8:1706–1711 Templeton JE, Callaghan JJ, Goetz DD, Sullivan PM, Johnston RC (2001) Revision of a cemented acetabular component to a cementless acetabular component. A ten to fourteen-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 8:1706–1711
21.
go back to reference Whaley AL, Berry DJ, Harmsen WS (2001) Extra-large uncemented hemispherical acetabular components for revision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 83:1352–1357PubMed Whaley AL, Berry DJ, Harmsen WS (2001) Extra-large uncemented hemispherical acetabular components for revision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 83:1352–1357PubMed
22.
go back to reference Yoder SA, Brand RA, Pedersen Dr, O’Gorman TW (1988) Total hip acetabular composition affects component loosening rates. Clin Orthop Relat Res 228:79–87PubMed Yoder SA, Brand RA, Pedersen Dr, O’Gorman TW (1988) Total hip acetabular composition affects component loosening rates. Clin Orthop Relat Res 228:79–87PubMed
Metadata
Title
Acetabular revision arthroplasty using jumbo cups: an experience in Asia
Authors
Cheng-Yu Fan
Wei-Ming Chen
Ocar K. Lee
Ching-Kuei Huang
Chao-Ching Chiang
Tain-Hsiung Chen
Publication date
01-08-2008
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery / Issue 8/2008
Print ISSN: 0936-8051
Electronic ISSN: 1434-3916
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-007-0492-7

Other articles of this Issue 8/2008

Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 8/2008 Go to the issue