Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® 2/2012

01-02-2012 | Clinical Research

Accuracy of Measuring Tape and Vertebral-level Methods to Determine Shoulder Internal Rotation

Authors: Seung-Hwan Han, MD, Kyung-Soo Oh, MD, Kyeong-Jin Han, MD, Joon Jo, MD, Doo-Hyung Lee, MD

Published in: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® | Issue 2/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Goniometers can be used to assess shoulder ROM with reasonable accuracy, but not internal rotation. Vertebral level, as determined by the hand-behind-the-back method, is used frequently but its reproducibility is questionable. We therefore devised a new measuring tape-based method for determining vertebral level.

Questions/purposes

We (1) compared the accuracy of a measuring tape-based and conventional vertebral-level method; (2) determined whether BMI affects their accuracy; and (3) devised a formula for converting distances measured using a measuring tape to vertebral levels.

Patients and Methods

We assessed internal rotation in 61 patients with shoulder pain. An electrode was taped to the skin where the thumb reached maximally behind the back. The vertebral-level method involved determining the vertebral level of the electrode by palpating bony landmarks whereas the measuring tape method involved measuring the distance between the C7 spinous process and the electrode. True vertebral levels of the electrode were confirmed by radiography.

Results

In nonobese patients, the accuracies of the upper thoracic and lumbar-level measurements were better for the measuring tape method than the vertebral-level method (r = 0.861 and 0.700, respectively in upper thoracic; 0.913 and 0.710, respectively in lumbar). Patient BMI affected the accuracy of the vertebral-level method but not that of the measuring tape method. The distances obtained using the measuring tape method could be converted into vertebral-level units using the formula: estimated vertebral level = 0.031 × [distance between C7 spinous process and thumb behind back] − 0.044 × [patient height] + 7.277.

Conclusions

The measuring tape-based method reflected shoulder internal rotation with higher accuracy than the vertebral-level method, and unlike the vertebral-level method, the measuring tape method was not affected by obesity.

Level of Evidence

Level II, diagnostic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Bovens AM, van Baak MA, Vrencken JG, Wijnen JA, Verstappen FT. Variability and reliability of joint measurements. Am J Sports Med. 1990;18:58–63.PubMedCrossRef Bovens AM, van Baak MA, Vrencken JG, Wijnen JA, Verstappen FT. Variability and reliability of joint measurements. Am J Sports Med. 1990;18:58–63.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Chakraverty R, Pynsent P, Isaacs K. Which spinal levels are identified by palpation of the iliac crests and the posterior superior iliac spines? J Anat. 2007;210:232–236.PubMedCrossRef Chakraverty R, Pynsent P, Isaacs K. Which spinal levels are identified by palpation of the iliac crests and the posterior superior iliac spines? J Anat. 2007;210:232–236.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Constant CR, Murley AH. A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1987;214:160–164.PubMed Constant CR, Murley AH. A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1987;214:160–164.PubMed
4.
go back to reference Croft P, Pope D, Boswell R, Rigby A, Silman A. Observer variability in measuring elevation and external rotation of the shoulder. Primary Care Rheumatology Society Shoulder Study Group. Rheumatology (Oxford). 1994;33:942–946.CrossRef Croft P, Pope D, Boswell R, Rigby A, Silman A. Observer variability in measuring elevation and external rotation of the shoulder. Primary Care Rheumatology Society Shoulder Study Group. Rheumatology (Oxford). 1994;33:942–946.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Edwards TB, Bostick RD, Greene CC, Baratta RV, Drez D. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the measurement of shoulder internal rotation by vertebral level. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2002;11:40–42.PubMedCrossRef Edwards TB, Bostick RD, Greene CC, Baratta RV, Drez D. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the measurement of shoulder internal rotation by vertebral level. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2002;11:40–42.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Fess EE. The need for reliability and validity in hand assessment instruments. J Hand Surg Am. 1986;11:621–623.PubMed Fess EE. The need for reliability and validity in hand assessment instruments. J Hand Surg Am. 1986;11:621–623.PubMed
7.
go back to reference Green S, Buchbinder R, Forbes A, Bellamy N. A standardized protocol for measurement of range of movement of the shoulder using the Plurimeter-V inclinometer and assessment of its intrarater and interrater reliability. Arthritis Care Res. 1998;11:43–52.PubMedCrossRef Green S, Buchbinder R, Forbes A, Bellamy N. A standardized protocol for measurement of range of movement of the shoulder using the Plurimeter-V inclinometer and assessment of its intrarater and interrater reliability. Arthritis Care Res. 1998;11:43–52.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Kumar VP, Satku SK. Documenting rotation at the glenohumeral joint: a technical note. Acta Orthop Scand. 1994;65:483–484.PubMedCrossRef Kumar VP, Satku SK. Documenting rotation at the glenohumeral joint: a technical note. Acta Orthop Scand. 1994;65:483–484.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Magee DJ. Orthopedic Physical Assessment. Ed 4. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders; 2002. Magee DJ. Orthopedic Physical Assessment. Ed 4. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders; 2002.
10.
go back to reference Mallon WJ, Herring CL, Sallay PI, Moorman CT, Crim JR. Use of vertebral levels to measure presumed internal rotation at the shoulder: a radiographic analysis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1996;5:299–306.PubMedCrossRef Mallon WJ, Herring CL, Sallay PI, Moorman CT, Crim JR. Use of vertebral levels to measure presumed internal rotation at the shoulder: a radiographic analysis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1996;5:299–306.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Marx RG, Bombardier C, Wright JG. What do we know about the reliability and validity of physical examination tests used to examine the upper extremity? J Hand Surg Am. 1999;24:185–193.PubMedCrossRef Marx RG, Bombardier C, Wright JG. What do we know about the reliability and validity of physical examination tests used to examine the upper extremity? J Hand Surg Am. 1999;24:185–193.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference McKenzie AM, Taylor NF. Can physiotherapists locate lumbar spinal levels by palpation? Physiotherapy. 1997;83:235–239.CrossRef McKenzie AM, Taylor NF. Can physiotherapists locate lumbar spinal levels by palpation? Physiotherapy. 1997;83:235–239.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Riddle DL, Rothstein JM, Lamb RL. Goniometric reliability in a clinical setting: shoulder measurements. Phys Ther. 1987;67:668–673.PubMed Riddle DL, Rothstein JM, Lamb RL. Goniometric reliability in a clinical setting: shoulder measurements. Phys Ther. 1987;67:668–673.PubMed
14.
go back to reference Robinson R, Robinson HS, Bjørke G, Kvale A. Reliability and validity of a palpation technique for identifying the spinous processes of C7 and L5. Man Ther. 2009;14:409–414.PubMedCrossRef Robinson R, Robinson HS, Bjørke G, Kvale A. Reliability and validity of a palpation technique for identifying the spinous processes of C7 and L5. Man Ther. 2009;14:409–414.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Snider KT, Kribs JW, Snider EJ, Degenhardt BF, Bukowski A, Johnson JC. Reliability of Tuffier’s line as an anatomic landmark. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008;33:E161–E165.CrossRef Snider KT, Kribs JW, Snider EJ, Degenhardt BF, Bukowski A, Johnson JC. Reliability of Tuffier’s line as an anatomic landmark. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008;33:E161–E165.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Accuracy of Measuring Tape and Vertebral-level Methods to Determine Shoulder Internal Rotation
Authors
Seung-Hwan Han, MD
Kyung-Soo Oh, MD
Kyeong-Jin Han, MD
Joon Jo, MD
Doo-Hyung Lee, MD
Publication date
01-02-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® / Issue 2/2012
Print ISSN: 0009-921X
Electronic ISSN: 1528-1132
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-011-2112-7

Other articles of this Issue 2/2012

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® 2/2012 Go to the issue

Symposium: Papers Presented at the Annual Meetings of The Hip Society

Factors Affecting Modular Acetabular Ceramic Liner Insertion: A Biomechanical Analysis

Symposium: Papers Presented at the Annual Meetings of The Hip Society

Low Incidence of Groin Pain and Early Failure with Large Metal Articulation Total Hip Arthroplasty

Symposium: Papers Presented at the Annual Meetings of The Hip Society

Bony Impingement Limits Design-related Increases in Hip Range of Motion