Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 5/2011

01-05-2011 | Breast Oncology

Accuracy of a Preoperative Model for Predicting Invasive Breast Cancer in Women with Ductal Carcinoma-in-situ on Vacuum-Assisted Core Needle Biopsy

Authors: Nehmat Houssami, MBBS, PhD, Daniela Ambrogetti, MD, M. Luke Marinovich, MPH, Simonetta Bianchi, MD, Petra Macaskill, PhD, Vania Vezzosi, MD, PhD, Eleftherios P. Mamounas, MD, MPH, Stefano Ciatto, MD

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 5/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Core needle biopsy (CNB) diagnoses of ductal carcinoma-in-situ (DCIS) may represent understaged invasive breast cancer (IBC). We aimed to develop a model that helps identify preoperatively women with IBC after a CNB diagnosis of DCIS.

Methods

Retrospective study of all women with DCIS on vacuum-assisted CNB of microcalcifications (1999–2008), with prospective classification of imaging variables independently by two radiologists. Variables included lesion size and level of suspicion on imaging, morphology and distribution of microcalcifications, DCIS nuclear grade on CNB, number of cores, and age. Multivariate logistic regression models of the probability of IBC were developed; the accuracy of these models was examined for each radiologist.

Results

Excision histology showed IBC in 77 (17.4%) of 442 subjects with DCIS on CNB. Lesion size on imaging yielded the best model fit and highest accuracy, and had the highest agreement between radiologists. Addition of grade to a model which included size improved model fit (P < 0.0001). However, model fit and accuracy were not improved by inclusion of any other variables. A model based on size and grade had similar areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (accuracy of 74%) for each radiologist. Modeled sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values for different combinations of size and grade thresholds are reported. If the imaging lesion is >50 mm and the CNB grade is high, the model’s positive predictive value is ≥50%.

Conclusions

A model based on imaging size of microcalcifications and CNB nuclear grade can identify women at high risk of having IBC with moderate accuracy and may be used to guide informed preoperative discussion in women with newly diagnosed DCIS on CNB.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ciatto S, Houssami N, Ambrogetti D, et al. Accuracy and underestimation of malignancy of breast core needle biopsy: the Florence experience of over 4000 consecutive biopsies. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2007;101:291–7.PubMedCrossRef Ciatto S, Houssami N, Ambrogetti D, et al. Accuracy and underestimation of malignancy of breast core needle biopsy: the Florence experience of over 4000 consecutive biopsies. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2007;101:291–7.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Parker SH, Burbank F, Jackman RJ, et al. Percutaneous large-core breast biopsy: a multi-institutional study. Radiology. 1994;193:359–64.PubMed Parker SH, Burbank F, Jackman RJ, et al. Percutaneous large-core breast biopsy: a multi-institutional study. Radiology. 1994;193:359–64.PubMed
3.
go back to reference Liberman L. Clinical management issues in percutaneous core breast biopsy. Radiol Clin North Am. 2000;38:791–807.PubMedCrossRef Liberman L. Clinical management issues in percutaneous core breast biopsy. Radiol Clin North Am. 2000;38:791–807.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Burbank F. Stereotactic breast biopsy of atypical ductal hyperplasia and ductal carcinoma in situ lesions: improved accuracy with directional, vacuum-assisted biopsy. Radiology. 1997;202:843–7.PubMed Burbank F. Stereotactic breast biopsy of atypical ductal hyperplasia and ductal carcinoma in situ lesions: improved accuracy with directional, vacuum-assisted biopsy. Radiology. 1997;202:843–7.PubMed
5.
go back to reference Provenzano E, Pinder SE. Pre-operative diagnosis of breast cancer in screening: problems and pitfalls. Pathology. 2009;41:3–17.PubMedCrossRef Provenzano E, Pinder SE. Pre-operative diagnosis of breast cancer in screening: problems and pitfalls. Pathology. 2009;41:3–17.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Bruening W, Fontanarosa J, Tipton K, et al. Systematic review: comparative effectiveness of core-needle and open surgical biopsy to diagnose breast lesions. Ann Intern Med. 2010;152:238–46.PubMed Bruening W, Fontanarosa J, Tipton K, et al. Systematic review: comparative effectiveness of core-needle and open surgical biopsy to diagnose breast lesions. Ann Intern Med. 2010;152:238–46.PubMed
7.
go back to reference Rakha EA, Ellis IO. An overview of assessment of prognostic and predictive factors in breast cancer needle core biopsy specimens. J Clin Pathol. 2007;60:1300–6.PubMedCrossRef Rakha EA, Ellis IO. An overview of assessment of prognostic and predictive factors in breast cancer needle core biopsy specimens. J Clin Pathol. 2007;60:1300–6.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Houssami N, Ciatto S, Ellis I, Ambrogetti D. Underestimation of malignancy of breast core-needle biopsy: concepts and precise overall and category-specific estimates. Cancer. 2007;109:487–95.PubMedCrossRef Houssami N, Ciatto S, Ellis I, Ambrogetti D. Underestimation of malignancy of breast core-needle biopsy: concepts and precise overall and category-specific estimates. Cancer. 2007;109:487–95.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Kettritz U, Rotter K, Schreer I, et al. Stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy in 2874 patients: a multicenter study. Cancer. 2004;100:245–51.PubMedCrossRef Kettritz U, Rotter K, Schreer I, et al. Stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy in 2874 patients: a multicenter study. Cancer. 2004;100:245–51.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference El-Sayed ME, Rakha EA, Reed J, et al. Audit of performance of needle core biopsy diagnoses of screen detected breast lesions. Eur J Cancer. 2008;44:2580–6.PubMedCrossRef El-Sayed ME, Rakha EA, Reed J, et al. Audit of performance of needle core biopsy diagnoses of screen detected breast lesions. Eur J Cancer. 2008;44:2580–6.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Jackman RJ, Burbank F, Parker SH, et al. Stereotactic breast biopsy of nonpalpable lesions: determinants of ductal carcinoma in situ underestimation rates. Radiology. 2001;218:497–502.PubMed Jackman RJ, Burbank F, Parker SH, et al. Stereotactic breast biopsy of nonpalpable lesions: determinants of ductal carcinoma in situ underestimation rates. Radiology. 2001;218:497–502.PubMed
12.
go back to reference Wallis MG, Cheung S, Kearins O, Lawrence GM. Non-operative diagnosis—effect on repeat-operation rates in the UK breast screening programme. Eur Radiol. 2009;19:318–23.PubMedCrossRef Wallis MG, Cheung S, Kearins O, Lawrence GM. Non-operative diagnosis—effect on repeat-operation rates in the UK breast screening programme. Eur Radiol. 2009;19:318–23.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Bagnall MJ, Evans AJ, Wilson AR, et al. Predicting invasion in mammographically detected microcalcification. Clin Radiol. 2001;56:828–32.PubMedCrossRef Bagnall MJ, Evans AJ, Wilson AR, et al. Predicting invasion in mammographically detected microcalcification. Clin Radiol. 2001;56:828–32.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Dillon MF, McDermott EW, Quinn CM, et al. Predictors of invasive disease in breast cancer when core biopsy demonstrates DCIS only. J Surg Oncol. 2006;93:559–63.PubMedCrossRef Dillon MF, McDermott EW, Quinn CM, et al. Predictors of invasive disease in breast cancer when core biopsy demonstrates DCIS only. J Surg Oncol. 2006;93:559–63.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Yen TW, Hunt KK, Ross MI, et al. Predictors of invasive breast cancer in patients with an initial diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ: a guide to selective use of sentinel lymph node biopsy in management of ductal carcinoma in situ. J Am Coll Surg. 2005;200:516–26.PubMedCrossRef Yen TW, Hunt KK, Ross MI, et al. Predictors of invasive breast cancer in patients with an initial diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ: a guide to selective use of sentinel lymph node biopsy in management of ductal carcinoma in situ. J Am Coll Surg. 2005;200:516–26.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference O’Flynn EA, Morel JC, Gonzalez J, et al. Prediction of the presence of invasive disease from the measurement of extent of malignant microcalcification on mammography and ductal carcinoma in situ grade at core biopsy. Clin Radiol. 2009;64:178–83.PubMedCrossRef O’Flynn EA, Morel JC, Gonzalez J, et al. Prediction of the presence of invasive disease from the measurement of extent of malignant microcalcification on mammography and ductal carcinoma in situ grade at core biopsy. Clin Radiol. 2009;64:178–83.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Margolin FR, Kaufman L, Jacobs RP, Denny SR, Schrumpf JD. Stereotactic core breast biopsy of malignant calcifications: diagnostic yield of cores with and cores without calcifications on specimen radiographs. Radiology. 2004;233:251–4.PubMedCrossRef Margolin FR, Kaufman L, Jacobs RP, Denny SR, Schrumpf JD. Stereotactic core breast biopsy of malignant calcifications: diagnostic yield of cores with and cores without calcifications on specimen radiographs. Radiology. 2004;233:251–4.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Houssami N, Irwig L. Likelihood ratios for clinical examination, mammography, ultrasound and fine needle biopsy in women with breast problems. Breast. 1998;7:85–9.CrossRef Houssami N, Irwig L. Likelihood ratios for clinical examination, mammography, ultrasound and fine needle biopsy in women with breast problems. Breast. 1998;7:85–9.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Perry N, Broeders M, de Wolf C, et al, editors. European guidelines for quality assurance in breast cancer screening and diagnosis. 4th ed. Luxembourg: Europe Against Cancer, European Commission; 2006. Perry N, Broeders M, de Wolf C, et al, editors. European guidelines for quality assurance in breast cancer screening and diagnosis. 4th ed. Luxembourg: Europe Against Cancer, European Commission; 2006.
20.
go back to reference Denley H, Pinder SE, Elston CW, Lee AH, Ellis IO. Needle core biopsy of the breast. Curr Diagn Pathol. 2000;6:200–5.CrossRef Denley H, Pinder SE, Elston CW, Lee AH, Ellis IO. Needle core biopsy of the breast. Curr Diagn Pathol. 2000;6:200–5.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Krag DN, Anderson SJ, Julian TB, et al. Technical outcomes of sentinel-lymph-node resection and conventional axillary-lymph-node dissection in patients with clinically node-negative breast cancer: results from the NSABP B-32 randomised phase III trial. Lancet Oncol. 2007;8:881–8.PubMedCrossRef Krag DN, Anderson SJ, Julian TB, et al. Technical outcomes of sentinel-lymph-node resection and conventional axillary-lymph-node dissection in patients with clinically node-negative breast cancer: results from the NSABP B-32 randomised phase III trial. Lancet Oncol. 2007;8:881–8.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Accuracy of a Preoperative Model for Predicting Invasive Breast Cancer in Women with Ductal Carcinoma-in-situ on Vacuum-Assisted Core Needle Biopsy
Authors
Nehmat Houssami, MBBS, PhD
Daniela Ambrogetti, MD
M. Luke Marinovich, MPH
Simonetta Bianchi, MD
Petra Macaskill, PhD
Vania Vezzosi, MD, PhD
Eleftherios P. Mamounas, MD, MPH
Stefano Ciatto, MD
Publication date
01-05-2011
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 5/2011
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-010-1438-9

Other articles of this Issue 5/2011

Annals of Surgical Oncology 5/2011 Go to the issue