Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Urology 7/2015

01-07-2015 | Original Article

Accuracy in detecting and measuring residual fragments with the Uro Dyna-CT

Authors: B. Meister, M. C. Rassweiler, C. Weiß, A. Häcker, M. Ritter

Published in: World Journal of Urology | Issue 7/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background and purpose

Residual calculi after stone therapy need to be treated if they are clinically significant, mainly depending on the size of the calculi. There are different ways to detect and measure the size of residual calculi as for example KUB or computed tomography. The Uro Dyna-CT (Siemens Healthcare solutions, Erlangen, Germany) allows cross-sectional imaging and 3D reconstructions during endourological interventions. In this ex vivo study, we investigate the accuracy of imaging residual calculi with the Uro Dyna-CT.

Materials and methods

Twenty-seven artificial stones (plaster of Paris) were scanned with the Uro Dyna-CT by a special urolithiasis protocol and post-image processing with 3D-reconstruction and cross-sectional imaging was performed. The major diameter of each stone was measured at the dedicated workstation by one investigator. The same stones were measured randomized with a digital caliper (real size). Finally, the two measurements were compared. The paired t test, Pearson’s correlation coefficient, the F Test, a reference area for differences, the intraclass correlation coefficient, the Maloney–Rastogi test and the Bland–Altman analysis were used for statistical analyses.

Results

The range of stone sizes was 3–5 mm. We did not find significant differences in the size of the stones measured with the Uro Dyna-CT and the digital caliper (paired t test p = 0.3597) and we showed a good correlation between the two measuring methods (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.4465; p = 0.0088).

Conclusion

Renal calculi can be measured highly accurately with the Uro Dyna-CT. Whether this technique will lead to less residual fragments after stone treatment needs to be shown in further studies.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Osman Y, El-Tabey N, Refai H, Elnahas A, Shoma A, Eraky I, Kenawy N, El-Kapany H (2008) Detection of residual stones after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: role of nonenhanced spiral computerized tomography. J Urol 179:198–200PubMedCrossRef Osman Y, El-Tabey N, Refai H, Elnahas A, Shoma A, Eraky I, Kenawy N, El-Kapany H (2008) Detection of residual stones after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: role of nonenhanced spiral computerized tomography. J Urol 179:198–200PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Türk C, Knoll T, Petrik A, Sarica K, Straub M, Seitz C (2012) Guidelines on Urolithiasis. The European Association of Urology (EAU) Urolithiasis Guidelines S. 61 Türk C, Knoll T, Petrik A, Sarica K, Straub M, Seitz C (2012) Guidelines on Urolithiasis. The European Association of Urology (EAU) Urolithiasis Guidelines S. 61
4.
go back to reference Osman MM, Alfano Y, Kamp S, Haecker A, Alken P, Michel MS, Knoll T (2005) 5-year-follow-up of patients with clinically insignificant residual fragments after extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy. Eur Urol 47(6):860–864PubMedCrossRef Osman MM, Alfano Y, Kamp S, Haecker A, Alken P, Michel MS, Knoll T (2005) 5-year-follow-up of patients with clinically insignificant residual fragments after extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy. Eur Urol 47(6):860–864PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference El-Nahas AR, El-Assmy AM, Madbouly K et al (2006) Predictors of clinical significance of residual fragments after extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for renal stones. J Endourol 20(11):870–874PubMedCrossRef El-Nahas AR, El-Assmy AM, Madbouly K et al (2006) Predictors of clinical significance of residual fragments after extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for renal stones. J Endourol 20(11):870–874PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Shigeta M, Kasaoka Y, Yasumoto H et al (1999) Fate of residual fragments after successful extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. Int J Urol 6(4):169–172PubMedCrossRef Shigeta M, Kasaoka Y, Yasumoto H et al (1999) Fate of residual fragments after successful extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. Int J Urol 6(4):169–172PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Park J, Hong B, Park T, Park HK (2007) Effectiveness of noncontrast computes tomography in evaluation of residual stones after percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol 21(7):684–687PubMedCrossRef Park J, Hong B, Park T, Park HK (2007) Effectiveness of noncontrast computes tomography in evaluation of residual stones after percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol 21(7):684–687PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Lehtoranta K, Mankinen P, Taari K, Rannikko S, Lehtonen T, Salo J (1995) Residual stones after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: sensitivities of different imaging methods in renal stone detection. Ann Chir Gynaecol 84(1):43–49PubMed Lehtoranta K, Mankinen P, Taari K, Rannikko S, Lehtonen T, Salo J (1995) Residual stones after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: sensitivities of different imaging methods in renal stone detection. Ann Chir Gynaecol 84(1):43–49PubMed
9.
go back to reference Worster A, Preyra I, Weaver B et al (2002) The accuracy of noncontrast helical computed tomography versus intravenous pyelography in the diagnosis of suspected acute urolithiasis: a meta-analysis. Ann Emerg Med 40(3):280–286PubMedCrossRef Worster A, Preyra I, Weaver B et al (2002) The accuracy of noncontrast helical computed tomography versus intravenous pyelography in the diagnosis of suspected acute urolithiasis: a meta-analysis. Ann Emerg Med 40(3):280–286PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Poletti PA, Platon A, Rutschmann OT et al (2007) Low-dose versus standard-dose CT protocol in patients with clinically suspected renal colic. AJR Am J Roentgenol 188(4):927–933PubMedCrossRef Poletti PA, Platon A, Rutschmann OT et al (2007) Low-dose versus standard-dose CT protocol in patients with clinically suspected renal colic. AJR Am J Roentgenol 188(4):927–933PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Niemann T, Kollmann T, Bongartz G (2008) Diagnostic performance of low-dose CT for the detection of urolithiasis: a meta-analysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 191(2):396–401PubMedCrossRef Niemann T, Kollmann T, Bongartz G (2008) Diagnostic performance of low-dose CT for the detection of urolithiasis: a meta-analysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 191(2):396–401PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Heidenreich A, Desgrandschamps F, Terrier F (2002) Modern approach of diagnosis and management of acute flank pain: review of all imaging modalities. Eur Urol 41(4):351–362 Heidenreich A, Desgrandschamps F, Terrier F (2002) Modern approach of diagnosis and management of acute flank pain: review of all imaging modalities. Eur Urol 41(4):351–362
13.
go back to reference Ritter M, Weiss C, Rassweiler MC, Michel MS, Häcker A (2013) Optimizing imaging quality in endourology with the Uro Dyna-CT: contrast agent dilution matters. World J Urol 31(5):1261–1266 Ritter M, Weiss C, Rassweiler MC, Michel MS, Häcker A (2013) Optimizing imaging quality in endourology with the Uro Dyna-CT: contrast agent dilution matters. World J Urol 31(5):1261–1266
14.
go back to reference Rassweiler MC, Banckwitz R, Koehler C, Mueller-Allissat B, Michel MS, Häcker A, Ritter M (2013) New developed urological protocols for the Uro Dyna-CT reduce radiation exposure of endourological patients below the levels of the low dose standard CT scans. World J Urol 30 [Epub ahead of print] Rassweiler MC, Banckwitz R, Koehler C, Mueller-Allissat B, Michel MS, Häcker A, Ritter M (2013) New developed urological protocols for the Uro Dyna-CT reduce radiation exposure of endourological patients below the levels of the low dose standard CT scans. World J Urol 30 [Epub ahead of print]
15.
go back to reference Michel MS, Ritter M, Schönberg S, Häcker A, Weisser G (2012) The Urological Dyna-CT: ex vivo feasibility study of interventional cross-sectional imaging in the endourological operation room. World J Urol 21 [Epub ahead of print] Michel MS, Ritter M, Schönberg S, Häcker A, Weisser G (2012) The Urological Dyna-CT: ex vivo feasibility study of interventional cross-sectional imaging in the endourological operation room. World J Urol 21 [Epub ahead of print]
16.
go back to reference Bland JM, Altman DG (1999) Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Methods Med Res 8:135–160CrossRef Bland JM, Altman DG (1999) Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Methods Med Res 8:135–160CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Cj Maloney (1970) Rastogi SC. Significance test for Grubb’s estimators. Biometrics 26:671–676CrossRef Cj Maloney (1970) Rastogi SC. Significance test for Grubb’s estimators. Biometrics 26:671–676CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Portis AJ, Laliberte MA, Drake S, Holtz C, Rosenberg, Bretzke CA (2006) Intraoperative fragment detection during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: evaluation of high magnification rotational fluoroscopy combined with aggressive nephroscopy. J Urol 175(3Pt1):1176 Portis AJ, Laliberte MA, Drake S, Holtz C, Rosenberg, Bretzke CA (2006) Intraoperative fragment detection during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: evaluation of high magnification rotational fluoroscopy combined with aggressive nephroscopy. J Urol 175(3Pt1):1176
19.
go back to reference Gücük A, Kemahlı E, Üyetürk U, Tuygun C, Yıldız M, Metin A (2013) Routine flexible nephroscopy for percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal stones with low density: a prospective, randomized study. J Urol 190(1):144–148PubMedCrossRef Gücük A, Kemahlı E, Üyetürk U, Tuygun C, Yıldız M, Metin A (2013) Routine flexible nephroscopy for percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal stones with low density: a prospective, randomized study. J Urol 190(1):144–148PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Kishore TA, Pedro RN, Hinck B, Monga M (2008) Estimation of size of distal ureteral stones: noncontrast CT scan versus actual size. Urology 72(4):761–764PubMedCrossRef Kishore TA, Pedro RN, Hinck B, Monga M (2008) Estimation of size of distal ureteral stones: noncontrast CT scan versus actual size. Urology 72(4):761–764PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Olcott W, Sommer FG, Napel S (1997) Accuracy of detection and measurement of renal calculi: in vitro comparison of three-dimensional spiral CT, radiography, and nephrotomography. Radiology 204(1):19–25PubMedCrossRef Olcott W, Sommer FG, Napel S (1997) Accuracy of detection and measurement of renal calculi: in vitro comparison of three-dimensional spiral CT, radiography, and nephrotomography. Radiology 204(1):19–25PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Rassweiler MC, Ritter M, Michel MS, Häcker A (2013) Influence of endourological devices on 3D reconstruction image quality using the Uro Dyna-CT. World J Urol 31(5):1291–1295PubMedCrossRef Rassweiler MC, Ritter M, Michel MS, Häcker A (2013) Influence of endourological devices on 3D reconstruction image quality using the Uro Dyna-CT. World J Urol 31(5):1291–1295PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Accuracy in detecting and measuring residual fragments with the Uro Dyna-CT
Authors
B. Meister
M. C. Rassweiler
C. Weiß
A. Häcker
M. Ritter
Publication date
01-07-2015
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
World Journal of Urology / Issue 7/2015
Print ISSN: 0724-4983
Electronic ISSN: 1433-8726
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-014-1385-3

Other articles of this Issue 7/2015

World Journal of Urology 7/2015 Go to the issue