Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Oral Health 1/2022

Open Access 01-12-2022 | Research

Acceptability of the Brushing RemInder 4 Good oral HealTh (BRIGHT) trial intervention: a qualitative study of perspectives of young people and school staff

Authors: Sarab Elyousfi, Nicola Innes, Heather Leggett, Hannah Ainsworth, Ivor G. Chestnutt, Peter Day, Mark Robertson, Sue Pavitt, Ian Kellar, Donna Dey, Zoe Marshman

Published in: BMC Oral Health | Issue 1/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The Brushing RemInder 4 Good oral HealTh (BRIGHT) trial is investigating the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a multi-component behaviour change intervention to reduce the prevalence of dental caries in young people from deprived areas aged 11–13 years. Mobile health has gained popularity in delivering behaviour change interventions for improving oral health. The intervention, based on behaviour change theory, consists of two components; a single classroom-based session embedded in the school curriculum and a series of follow-up text messages (SMS) delivered twice daily to participants. This element of the process evaluation aimed to explore the acceptability of the BRIGHT intervention for pupils and school staff.

Methods

Qualitative study, based on the concept of acceptability. Focus groups were conducted with 50 pupils, from six secondary schools across the UK, who had received the intervention. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 12 members of staff. Purposive maximum variation sampling was used. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed using a framework approach.

Results

In line with the theoretical framework of acceptability, affective attitude, perceived effectiveness, ethicality, burden and self-efficacy were identified as factors that affect the acceptability of the BRIGHT intervention. Pupil participants appreciated learning about the consequences of inadequate brushing particularly the photographs of carious teeth during the classroom-based session. More detailed information on brushing techniques and follow-up lessons on oral health were recommended by pupils. In terms of the SMS, the data suggest that pupil participants found them to be helpful reminders for brushing their teeth. To further improve acceptability, more choice over the timing of the messages and greater interactivity to reduce tedium were suggested. Staff participants recognised the value of the lesson and reported that in general the content was suitable for their pupils. Having the lesson material prepared for them, having the necessary support and whether it was included in the curriculum, were factors that improved acceptability.

Conclusion

Overall, pupils and staff found the BRIGHT intervention acceptable and made some suggestions which could be adopted in any subsequent implementation of the intervention.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Peres MA, et al. Oral diseases: a global public health challenge. The Lancet. 2019;394(10194):249–60.CrossRef Peres MA, et al. Oral diseases: a global public health challenge. The Lancet. 2019;394(10194):249–60.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Skinner J, et al. Factors associated with dental caries experience and oral health status among New South Wales adolescents. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2014;38(5):485–9.CrossRef Skinner J, et al. Factors associated with dental caries experience and oral health status among New South Wales adolescents. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2014;38(5):485–9.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Raitio M, Pienihäkkinen K, Scheinin A. Assessment of single risk indicators in relation to caries increment in adolescents. Acta Odontol Scand. 1996;54(2):113–7.CrossRef Raitio M, Pienihäkkinen K, Scheinin A. Assessment of single risk indicators in relation to caries increment in adolescents. Acta Odontol Scand. 1996;54(2):113–7.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Silk H, Kwok A. Addressing adolescent oral health: a review. Pediatr Rev. 2017;38(2):61–8.CrossRef Silk H, Kwok A. Addressing adolescent oral health: a review. Pediatr Rev. 2017;38(2):61–8.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference England PH. Local authorities improving oral health: commissioning better oral health for children and young people. An evidence-informed toolkit for local authorities. London: Public Health England; 2014. England PH. Local authorities improving oral health: commissioning better oral health for children and young people. An evidence-informed toolkit for local authorities. London: Public Health England; 2014.
6.
go back to reference Tsai C, et al. Health promotion interventions to improve oral health of adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Commun Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2020;48(6):549–60.CrossRef Tsai C, et al. Health promotion interventions to improve oral health of adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Commun Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2020;48(6):549–60.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Langford R, et al. The World Health Organization’s Health Promoting Schools framework: a Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Public Health. 2015;15(1):1–15.CrossRef Langford R, et al. The World Health Organization’s Health Promoting Schools framework: a Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Public Health. 2015;15(1):1–15.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Toniazzo MP, et al. Effect of mHealth in improving oral hygiene: a systematic review with meta-analysis. J Clin Periodontol. 2019;46(3):297–309.CrossRef Toniazzo MP, et al. Effect of mHealth in improving oral hygiene: a systematic review with meta-analysis. J Clin Periodontol. 2019;46(3):297–309.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Sharif MO, Newton T, Cunningham SJ. A systematic review to assess interventions delivered by mobile phones in improving adherence to oral hygiene advice for children and adolescents. Br Dent J. 2019;227(5):375–82.CrossRef Sharif MO, Newton T, Cunningham SJ. A systematic review to assess interventions delivered by mobile phones in improving adherence to oral hygiene advice for children and adolescents. Br Dent J. 2019;227(5):375–82.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Orr JA, King RJ. Mobile phone SMS messages can enhance healthy behaviour: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Health Psychol Rev. 2015;9(4):397–416.CrossRef Orr JA, King RJ. Mobile phone SMS messages can enhance healthy behaviour: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Health Psychol Rev. 2015;9(4):397–416.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Marshman Z, et al. Brushing RemInder 4 Good oral HealTh (BRIGHT) trial: does an SMS behaviour change programme with a classroom-based session improve the oral health of young people living in deprived areas? A study protocol of a randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2019;20(1):452.CrossRef Marshman Z, et al. Brushing RemInder 4 Good oral HealTh (BRIGHT) trial: does an SMS behaviour change programme with a classroom-based session improve the oral health of young people living in deprived areas? A study protocol of a randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2019;20(1):452.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Marshman Z, et al. Development of a secondary school-based digital behaviour change intervention to improve tooth brushing. BMC Oral Health. 2021;21(546):1–9. Marshman Z, et al. Development of a secondary school-based digital behaviour change intervention to improve tooth brushing. BMC Oral Health. 2021;21(546):1–9.
13.
go back to reference Sekhon M, Cartwright M, Francis JJ. Acceptability of healthcare interventions: an overview of reviews and development of a theoretical framework. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017;17(1):1–13.CrossRef Sekhon M, Cartwright M, Francis JJ. Acceptability of healthcare interventions: an overview of reviews and development of a theoretical framework. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017;17(1):1–13.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007;19(6):349–57.CrossRef Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007;19(6):349–57.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Ayala GX, Elder JP. Qualitative methods to ensure acceptability of behavioral and social interventions to the target population. J Public Health Dent. 2011;71:S69–79.CrossRef Ayala GX, Elder JP. Qualitative methods to ensure acceptability of behavioral and social interventions to the target population. J Public Health Dent. 2011;71:S69–79.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Ritchie J, et al. Qualitative research practice: a guide for social science students and researchers. London: Sage; 2013. Ritchie J, et al. Qualitative research practice: a guide for social science students and researchers. London: Sage; 2013.
17.
go back to reference MacDougall S, et al. Text message interventions in adolescent mental health and addiction services: scoping review. JMIR Ment Health. 2021;8(1):e16508.CrossRef MacDougall S, et al. Text message interventions in adolescent mental health and addiction services: scoping review. JMIR Ment Health. 2021;8(1):e16508.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Schwebel FJ, Larimer ME. Text message reminders as an adjunct to a substance use intervention for adolescents and young adults: pilot feasibility and acceptability findings. Digit Health. 2020;6:2055207620965052.PubMedPubMedCentral Schwebel FJ, Larimer ME. Text message reminders as an adjunct to a substance use intervention for adolescents and young adults: pilot feasibility and acceptability findings. Digit Health. 2020;6:2055207620965052.PubMedPubMedCentral
19.
go back to reference Badawy SM, Kuhns LM. Texting and mobile phone app interventions for improving adherence to preventive behavior in adolescents: a systematic review. JMIR mHealth uHealth. 2017;5(4):e50.CrossRef Badawy SM, Kuhns LM. Texting and mobile phone app interventions for improving adherence to preventive behavior in adolescents: a systematic review. JMIR mHealth uHealth. 2017;5(4):e50.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Department for Education. Changes to personal, social, health and economic (PSHE) and relationships and sex education (RSE). England; 2019. Department for Education. Changes to personal, social, health and economic (PSHE) and relationships and sex education (RSE). England; 2019.
21.
go back to reference Education Scotland. Curriculum for Excellence: Health and wellbeing-experiences and outcomes. Scotland; 2019. Education Scotland. Curriculum for Excellence: Health and wellbeing-experiences and outcomes. Scotland; 2019.
22.
go back to reference Loescher LJ, et al. A systematic review of interventions to enhance healthy lifestyle behaviors in adolescents delivered via mobile phone text messaging. Am J Health Promot. 2018;32(4):865–79.CrossRef Loescher LJ, et al. A systematic review of interventions to enhance healthy lifestyle behaviors in adolescents delivered via mobile phone text messaging. Am J Health Promot. 2018;32(4):865–79.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Muench F, Baumel A. More than a text message: dismantling digital triggers to curate behavior change in patient-centered health interventions. J Med Internet Resh. 2017;19(5):e147.CrossRef Muench F, Baumel A. More than a text message: dismantling digital triggers to curate behavior change in patient-centered health interventions. J Med Internet Resh. 2017;19(5):e147.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Kocielnik R, Hsieh G. Send me a different message: utilizing cognitive space to create engaging message triggers. In: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work and social computing. Association for Computing Machinery: Portland, Oregon, USA; 2017. p. 2193–207. Kocielnik R, Hsieh G. Send me a different message: utilizing cognitive space to create engaging message triggers. In: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work and social computing. Association for Computing Machinery: Portland, Oregon, USA; 2017. p. 2193–207.
25.
go back to reference Peng W, et al. A qualitative study of user perceptions of mobile health apps. BMC Public Health. 2016;16(1):1–11.CrossRef Peng W, et al. A qualitative study of user perceptions of mobile health apps. BMC Public Health. 2016;16(1):1–11.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Ramsey A, et al. Paving the way to successful implementation: identifying key barriers to use of technology-based therapeutic tools for behavioral health care. J Behav Health Serv Res. 2016;43(1):54–70.CrossRef Ramsey A, et al. Paving the way to successful implementation: identifying key barriers to use of technology-based therapeutic tools for behavioral health care. J Behav Health Serv Res. 2016;43(1):54–70.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Acceptability of the Brushing RemInder 4 Good oral HealTh (BRIGHT) trial intervention: a qualitative study of perspectives of young people and school staff
Authors
Sarab Elyousfi
Nicola Innes
Heather Leggett
Hannah Ainsworth
Ivor G. Chestnutt
Peter Day
Mark Robertson
Sue Pavitt
Ian Kellar
Donna Dey
Zoe Marshman
Publication date
01-12-2022
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Oral Health / Issue 1/2022
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6831
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-022-02073-w

Other articles of this Issue 1/2022

BMC Oral Health 1/2022 Go to the issue