Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Journal of Plastic Surgery 2/2019

01-04-2019 | Original Paper

ABSI scoring system for burns: concerns and modifications in a developing country

Authors: Mostafa Ahmed Abo El Soud, Rama Ahmed Ali, Ahmed A. Taha, Seifeddine Marwan Khirfan

Published in: European Journal of Plastic Surgery | Issue 2/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Burns are a major health problem worldwide. In some countries, they are the fourth leading cause of death in trauma patients. Every year, more than 200,000 deaths occur because of diverse types of burns, and the majority of these deaths occur in low-income countries. The incidence of burn mortality depends on both patient factors (age, gender, and comorbidities) and burn factors (depth and total burn surface area (TBSA)). Mortality prediction for burn patients is important not only to determine the prognosis of individual patients but to assess the performance of the burn institute and the quality of the health care the patients receive. Many mortality or survival prediction models have been developed, modified, and validated. The abbreviated burn scoring index (ABSI) is one of the most commonly used scores for assessing patients’ mortality. It was reviewed, modified, and validated in this study.

Methods

This is a retrospective analysis of cases admitted to Kasr Al-Ainy Burn Unit (KABU), Cairo University Hospitals, Egypt, over a period of 5 years (January 2012 to December 2016). The data were analyzed using the ABSI scaling system.

Results

The predicted survival using the ABSI was the same as the actual survival for all age groups except children less than 10 years and pregnant females, who had actual survival rates that differed from those predicted.

Conclusion

ABSI is one of the best indicators of the mortality and well-being of burn patients. A modification of the ABSI score that added one point for children less than 10 years yielded closer predicted and actual survival rates and this change was statistically significant. A larger number of pregnant females is needed to validate the scoring system for pregnant patients. Close attention and care are always recommended for these two special high-risk groups.
Level of Evidence: Level II, risk / prognostic study.
Literature
1.
go back to reference World Health Organization (WHO) Global burden of DISEASE: 2004 summary tables. World Health Organization, Geneva World Health Organization (WHO) Global burden of DISEASE: 2004 summary tables. World Health Organization, Geneva
2.
go back to reference Tahir et al (2009) Prediction of mortality after major burn: physiological versus biochemical measures. Wounds 21(7):177–182 Tahir et al (2009) Prediction of mortality after major burn: physiological versus biochemical measures. Wounds 21(7):177–182
3.
go back to reference Dahal P et al (2015) Baux’s and abbreviated burn severity score for the prediction of mortality in patients with acute burn injury. J Coll Med Sci Nepal 11(4):24–27 Dahal P et al (2015) Baux’s and abbreviated burn severity score for the prediction of mortality in patients with acute burn injury. J Coll Med Sci Nepal 11(4):24–27
5.
go back to reference Osler T, Glance LG, Hosmer DW (2010) Simplified estimates of the probability of death after burn injuries: extending and updating the Baux score. J Trauma 68(3):690–697CrossRefPubMed Osler T, Glance LG, Hosmer DW (2010) Simplified estimates of the probability of death after burn injuries: extending and updating the Baux score. J Trauma 68(3):690–697CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Brusselaers N, Agbenorku P, Hoyte-Williams PE (2013) Assessment of mortality prediction models in a Ghanaian burn population. Burn 39(5):997–1003CrossRef Brusselaers N, Agbenorku P, Hoyte-Williams PE (2013) Assessment of mortality prediction models in a Ghanaian burn population. Burn 39(5):997–1003CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Tobiasen J, Hiebert JH, Edlich RF (1982) Prediction of burn mortality. Surg Gynecol Obstet 154(5):711–714PubMed Tobiasen J, Hiebert JH, Edlich RF (1982) Prediction of burn mortality. Surg Gynecol Obstet 154(5):711–714PubMed
8.
go back to reference Chan YH (2003) Biostatistics102: quantitative data – parametric & non-parametric tests. Singap Med J 44(8):391–396 Chan YH (2003) Biostatistics102: quantitative data – parametric & non-parametric tests. Singap Med J 44(8):391–396
9.
go back to reference Parikh P, Sunesara I, Lutz E et al (2015) Burns during pregnancy: implications for maternal-perinatal providers and guidelines for practice. Obstet Gynecol Surv 70(10):633–643CrossRefPubMed Parikh P, Sunesara I, Lutz E et al (2015) Burns during pregnancy: implications for maternal-perinatal providers and guidelines for practice. Obstet Gynecol Surv 70(10):633–643CrossRefPubMed
10.
Metadata
Title
ABSI scoring system for burns: concerns and modifications in a developing country
Authors
Mostafa Ahmed Abo El Soud
Rama Ahmed Ali
Ahmed A. Taha
Seifeddine Marwan Khirfan
Publication date
01-04-2019
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Journal of Plastic Surgery / Issue 2/2019
Print ISSN: 0930-343X
Electronic ISSN: 1435-0130
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-018-1475-3

Other articles of this Issue 2/2019

European Journal of Plastic Surgery 2/2019 Go to the issue