Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Abdominal Radiology 5/2017

01-05-2017

Abdominal wall endometriosis: differentiation from other masses using CT features

Authors: Gail Yarmish, Evis Sala, Debra A. Goldman, Yulia Lakhman, Robert A. Soslow, Hedvig Hricak, Ginger J. Gardner, H. Alberto Vargas

Published in: Abdominal Radiology | Issue 5/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To assess the utility of morphologic and quantitative CT features in differentiating abdominal wall endometriosis (AWE) from other masses of the abdominal wall.

Methods

Retrospective IRB-approved study of 105 consecutive women from two institutions who underwent CT and biopsy/resection of abdominal wall masses. CTs were independently reviewed by two radiologists blinded to final histopathologic diagnoses. Associations between CT features and pathology were tested using Fisher’s Exact Test. Sensitivity, specificity, positive, and negative predictive values were calculated. P values were adjusted for multiple variable testing.

Results

24.8% (26/105) of patients had histologically proven abdominal wall endometriosis. The other most common diagnoses included adenocarcinoma NOS (21%; 22/105), desmoid (14.3%; 15/105), and leiomyosarcoma (8.6%; 9/105). CT features significantly associated with endometriosis for both readers were location below the umbilicus (P = 0.0188), homogeneous density (P = 0.0188), and presence of linear infiltration irradiating peripherally from a central soft tissue nodule (i.e., “gorgon” sign) (P < 0.0001). The highest combined sensitivity (0.69, 95% CI: 0.48–0.86) and specificity (0.97, 95% CI: 0.91–1.00) for both readers occurred for patients having all three of these features present. Border type (P = 0.0199) was only significant for R2, peritoneal extension (P = 0.0188) was only significantly for R1, and the remainder of features were insignificant (P = 0.06–60). There was overlap in Hounsfield units on non-contrast CT (N = 26) between AWE (median: 45HU, range: 39–54) and other abdominal wall masses (median: 38.5HU, range: 15–58).

Conclusion

CT features are helpful in differentiating AWE from other abdominal wall soft tissue masses. Such differentiation may assist decisions regarding possible biopsy and treatment planning.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Horton JD, Dezee KJ, Ahnfeldt EP, Wagner M (2008) Abdominal wall endometriosis: a surgeon’s perspective and review of 445 cases. Am J Surg 196(2):207–212CrossRef Horton JD, Dezee KJ, Ahnfeldt EP, Wagner M (2008) Abdominal wall endometriosis: a surgeon’s perspective and review of 445 cases. Am J Surg 196(2):207–212CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Granese R, Cucinella G, Barresi V, et al. (2009) Isolated endometriosis on the rectus abdominis muscle in women without a history of abdominal surgery: a rare and intriguing finding. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 16(6):798–801CrossRef Granese R, Cucinella G, Barresi V, et al. (2009) Isolated endometriosis on the rectus abdominis muscle in women without a history of abdominal surgery: a rare and intriguing finding. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 16(6):798–801CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Matter M, Schneider N, McKee T (2003) Cystadenocarcinoma of the abdominal wall following caesarean section: case report and review of the literature. Gynecol Oncol 91(2):438–443CrossRef Matter M, Schneider N, McKee T (2003) Cystadenocarcinoma of the abdominal wall following caesarean section: case report and review of the literature. Gynecol Oncol 91(2):438–443CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Gidwaney R, Badler RL, Yam BL, et al. (2012) Endometriosis of abdominal and pelvic wall scars: multimodality imaging findings, pathologic correlation, and radiologic mimics. Radiographics 32(7):2031–2043CrossRef Gidwaney R, Badler RL, Yam BL, et al. (2012) Endometriosis of abdominal and pelvic wall scars: multimodality imaging findings, pathologic correlation, and radiologic mimics. Radiographics 32(7):2031–2043CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Hensen JH, Van Breda Vriesman AC, Puvlaert J (2006) Abdominal wall endometriosis: clinical presentation and imaging features with emphasis on sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 186:616–620CrossRef Hensen JH, Van Breda Vriesman AC, Puvlaert J (2006) Abdominal wall endometriosis: clinical presentation and imaging features with emphasis on sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 186:616–620CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Zhu Z, Al-Beiti MA, Tang L, Liu X, Lu X (2008) Clinical characteristic analysis of 32 patients with abdominal incision endometriosis. J Obstet Gynaecol 28:742–745CrossRef Zhu Z, Al-Beiti MA, Tang L, Liu X, Lu X (2008) Clinical characteristic analysis of 32 patients with abdominal incision endometriosis. J Obstet Gynaecol 28:742–745CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Busard MP, Mijatovic V, van Kuijk C, Hompes PG, van Waesberghe JH (2010) Appearance of abdominal wall endometriosis on MR imaging. Eur Radiol 20:1267–1276CrossRef Busard MP, Mijatovic V, van Kuijk C, Hompes PG, van Waesberghe JH (2010) Appearance of abdominal wall endometriosis on MR imaging. Eur Radiol 20:1267–1276CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Ahn SE, Park SJ, Moon SK, Lee DH, Lim JW (2016) Sonography of abdominal wall masses and masslike lesions: correlation with computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. J Ultrasound Med 35(1):189–208CrossRef Ahn SE, Park SJ, Moon SK, Lee DH, Lim JW (2016) Sonography of abdominal wall masses and masslike lesions: correlation with computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. J Ultrasound Med 35(1):189–208CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Francica G (2012) Reliable clinical and sonographic findings in the diagnosis of abdominal wall endometriosis near cesarean section scar. World J Radiol 4(4):135–140CrossRef Francica G (2012) Reliable clinical and sonographic findings in the diagnosis of abdominal wall endometriosis near cesarean section scar. World J Radiol 4(4):135–140CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Savelli L, Manuzzi L, Di Donato N, et al. (2012) Endometriosis of the abdominal wall: ultrasonographic and Doppler characteristics. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 39:336–340CrossRef Savelli L, Manuzzi L, Di Donato N, et al. (2012) Endometriosis of the abdominal wall: ultrasonographic and Doppler characteristics. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 39:336–340CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Coley BD, Casola G (1993) Incisional endometrioma involving the rectus abdominis muscle and subcutaneous tissues: cT appearance. AJR Am J Roentgenol 160(3):549–550CrossRef Coley BD, Casola G (1993) Incisional endometrioma involving the rectus abdominis muscle and subcutaneous tissues: cT appearance. AJR Am J Roentgenol 160(3):549–550CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Giudice LC, Swiersz LM, Burney RO (2010) Endometriosis. In: Jameson JL, De Groot LJ (eds) Endocrinology, 6th edn. New York: Elsevier, pp 2356–2370 Giudice LC, Swiersz LM, Burney RO (2010) Endometriosis. In: Jameson JL, De Groot LJ (eds) Endocrinology, 6th edn. New York: Elsevier, pp 2356–2370
13.
go back to reference Aytac HO, Aytac PC, Parlakgumus HA (2015) Scar endometriosis is a gynecological complication that general surgeons have to deal with. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol 42(3):292–294PubMed Aytac HO, Aytac PC, Parlakgumus HA (2015) Scar endometriosis is a gynecological complication that general surgeons have to deal with. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol 42(3):292–294PubMed
14.
go back to reference Cornelius F, Petipierre F, Lasserre E, et al. (2014) Percutaneous cryoablation of symptomatic abdominal scar endometrioma: initial reports. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol 37(6):1575CrossRef Cornelius F, Petipierre F, Lasserre E, et al. (2014) Percutaneous cryoablation of symptomatic abdominal scar endometrioma: initial reports. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol 37(6):1575CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Carrafiello G, Fontana F, Pellegrino C, et al. (2009) Radiofrequency ablation of abdominal wall endometrioma. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol 32(6):1300CrossRef Carrafiello G, Fontana F, Pellegrino C, et al. (2009) Radiofrequency ablation of abdominal wall endometrioma. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol 32(6):1300CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Abdominal wall endometriosis: differentiation from other masses using CT features
Authors
Gail Yarmish
Evis Sala
Debra A. Goldman
Yulia Lakhman
Robert A. Soslow
Hedvig Hricak
Ginger J. Gardner
H. Alberto Vargas
Publication date
01-05-2017
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Abdominal Radiology / Issue 5/2017
Print ISSN: 2366-004X
Electronic ISSN: 2366-0058
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-016-0998-y

Other articles of this Issue 5/2017

Abdominal Radiology 5/2017 Go to the issue

Classics in Abdominal Imaging

The “Sister Mary Joseph Nodule”

Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine