Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Medical Systems 6/2010

01-12-2010 | Original Paper

A Wavelet-Based Mammographic Image Denoising and Enhancement with Homomorphic Filtering

Authors: Pelin Gorgel, Ahmet Sertbas, Osman N. Ucan

Published in: Journal of Medical Systems | Issue 6/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

Breast cancer continues to be a significant public health problem in the world. The diagnosing mammography method is the most effective technology for early detection of the breast cancer. However, in some cases, it is difficult for radiologists to detect the typical diagnostic signs, such as masses and microcalcifications on the mammograms. This paper describes a new method for mammographic image enhancement and denoising based on wavelet transform and homomorphic filtering. The mammograms are acquired from the Faculty of Medicine of the University of Akdeniz and the University of Istanbul in Turkey. Firstly wavelet transform of the mammograms is obtained and the approximation coefficients are filtered by homomorphic filter. Then the detail coefficients of the wavelet associated with noise and edges are modeled by Gaussian and Laplacian variables, respectively. The considered coefficients are compressed and enhanced using these variables with a shrinkage function. Finally using a proposed adaptive thresholding the fine details of the mammograms are retained and the noise is suppressed. The preliminary results of our work indicate that this method provides much more visibility for the suspicious regions.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Mencattini, A., Salmeri, M., et al., Mammographic images enhancement and denoising for breast cancer detection using dyadic wavelet processing. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 57 (7)1422–1430, 2008.CrossRef Mencattini, A., Salmeri, M., et al., Mammographic images enhancement and denoising for breast cancer detection using dyadic wavelet processing. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 57 (7)1422–1430, 2008.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Ucan, O., Osman, O., Ertas, G., et al., Breast MR segmentation and lesion detection with cellular neural networks and 3D template matching. Comput. Biol. Med. 38 (1)116–126, 2008.CrossRef Ucan, O., Osman, O., Ertas, G., et al., Breast MR segmentation and lesion detection with cellular neural networks and 3D template matching. Comput. Biol. Med. 38 (1)116–126, 2008.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Ucan, O., Osman, O., and Ozekes, S., Nodule detection in a lung region that’s segmented with using genetic cellular neural networks and 3D template matching with fuzzy rule based thresholding. Korean J. Radiol. 9:1–9, 2008.CrossRef Ucan, O., Osman, O., and Ozekes, S., Nodule detection in a lung region that’s segmented with using genetic cellular neural networks and 3D template matching with fuzzy rule based thresholding. Korean J. Radiol. 9:1–9, 2008.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Wirth, M., Fraschini, M., Lyon, J., Contrast enhancement of microcalcifications in mammograms using morphological enhancement and non-flat structuring elements. 17th IEEE Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems, 2004. Wirth, M., Fraschini, M., Lyon, J., Contrast enhancement of microcalcifications in mammograms using morphological enhancement and non-flat structuring elements. 17th IEEE Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems, 2004.
5.
go back to reference Li, H., and Liu, K. J., Fractal modeling and segmentation for the enhancement of microcalcifications in digital mammograms. IEEE Trans. Med. Imag. 16 (6)785–797, 1997.CrossRef Li, H., and Liu, K. J., Fractal modeling and segmentation for the enhancement of microcalcifications in digital mammograms. IEEE Trans. Med. Imag. 16 (6)785–797, 1997.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Sakellaropoulos, P., Costaridou, L., and Panayiotakis, G., An adaptive wavelet-based method for mammographic image enhancement. Digit. Signal Process. 17:453–456, 2002. Sakellaropoulos, P., Costaridou, L., and Panayiotakis, G., An adaptive wavelet-based method for mammographic image enhancement. Digit. Signal Process. 17:453–456, 2002.
7.
go back to reference Elsherif, M., and Elsayad, A., Wavelet packet denoising for mammogram enhancement. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory. 10:180–184, 2001. Elsherif, M., and Elsayad, A., Wavelet packet denoising for mammogram enhancement. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory. 10:180–184, 2001.
9.
go back to reference Dominguez, A. R., and Nandi, K., Detection of masses in mammograms via statistically based enhancement, multilevel-thresholding segmentation, and region selection. Comput. Med. Imaging Graph. 32:304–315, 2008.CrossRef Dominguez, A. R., and Nandi, K., Detection of masses in mammograms via statistically based enhancement, multilevel-thresholding segmentation, and region selection. Comput. Med. Imaging Graph. 32:304–315, 2008.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Scharcanski, J., and Jung, C., Denoising and enhancing digital mammographic images for visual screening. Comput. Med. Imaging Graph. 30:243–254, 2006.CrossRef Scharcanski, J., and Jung, C., Denoising and enhancing digital mammographic images for visual screening. Comput. Med. Imaging Graph. 30:243–254, 2006.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Mencattini, A., and Caselli, F., Wavelet based adaptive algorithm for mammographic images enhancement and denoising. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory. 20:150–158, 2005. Mencattini, A., and Caselli, F., Wavelet based adaptive algorithm for mammographic images enhancement and denoising. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory. 20:150–158, 2005.
12.
go back to reference Gonzales, R., and Woods, R., Digital image processing. Prentice Hall, USA, pp. 191–193, 2002. total page: 793, chapter 4. Gonzales, R., and Woods, R., Digital image processing. Prentice Hall, USA, pp. 191–193, 2002. total page: 793, chapter 4.
13.
go back to reference Mayo, P., Rodenas, F., Verdu, G., Comparing methods to denoise mammographic images. Proceedings of the 26th Annual International Conference of the IEEE EMBS, San Francisco, CA, USA, 2004. Mayo, P., Rodenas, F., Verdu, G., Comparing methods to denoise mammographic images. Proceedings of the 26th Annual International Conference of the IEEE EMBS, San Francisco, CA, USA, 2004.
14.
go back to reference Cheng, H. D., and Shi, X. J., Approaches for automated detection and classification of masses in mammograms. Pattern Recogn. 39:646–668, 2006.CrossRef Cheng, H. D., and Shi, X. J., Approaches for automated detection and classification of masses in mammograms. Pattern Recogn. 39:646–668, 2006.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Birge, L., and Massart, P., From model selection to adaptive estimation. Festchrift for Lucien Le Cam. 2:55–88, 1997.MathSciNet Birge, L., and Massart, P., From model selection to adaptive estimation. Festchrift for Lucien Le Cam. 2:55–88, 1997.MathSciNet
16.
go back to reference Kong, N., Improving the visual quality of abdominal magnetic resonance images using histogram equalization. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Information Technology and Application in Biomedicine, Shenzhen, China, pp. 138–139, 2008. Kong, N., Improving the visual quality of abdominal magnetic resonance images using histogram equalization. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Information Technology and Application in Biomedicine, Shenzhen, China, pp. 138–139, 2008.
17.
go back to reference Zhang, G., Yan, P., et al., A contrast enhancement algorithm for low-dose CT images based on local histogram equalization. IEEE International Conference on Image Processing, pp. 2462–2465, 2008. Zhang, G., Yan, P., et al., A contrast enhancement algorithm for low-dose CT images based on local histogram equalization. IEEE International Conference on Image Processing, pp. 2462–2465, 2008.
19.
go back to reference Mouloud, A., Daniel, Z., et al., Filtering noise on mammographic phantom images using local contrast modification functions. Image Vis. Comput. 26:1219–1229, 2008.CrossRef Mouloud, A., Daniel, Z., et al., Filtering noise on mammographic phantom images using local contrast modification functions. Image Vis. Comput. 26:1219–1229, 2008.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Sivaramakrishna, R., Obuchowski, N. A., et al., Comparing the performance of mammographic enhancement: a preference study. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 175:45–51, 2000. Sivaramakrishna, R., Obuchowski, N. A., et al., Comparing the performance of mammographic enhancement: a preference study. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 175:45–51, 2000.
21.
go back to reference Kim, M., and Chung, G., Recursively separated and weighted histogram equalization for brightness preservation and contrast enhancement. IEEE Trans. Consum. Electron. 54:1389–1397, 2008.CrossRefMathSciNet Kim, M., and Chung, G., Recursively separated and weighted histogram equalization for brightness preservation and contrast enhancement. IEEE Trans. Consum. Electron. 54:1389–1397, 2008.CrossRefMathSciNet
22.
go back to reference Kim, T., and Paik, J., Adaptive contrast enhancement using gain-controllable clipped histogram equalization. IEEE Trans. Consum. Electron. 54:1803–1810, 2008.CrossRef Kim, T., and Paik, J., Adaptive contrast enhancement using gain-controllable clipped histogram equalization. IEEE Trans. Consum. Electron. 54:1803–1810, 2008.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
A Wavelet-Based Mammographic Image Denoising and Enhancement with Homomorphic Filtering
Authors
Pelin Gorgel
Ahmet Sertbas
Osman N. Ucan
Publication date
01-12-2010
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Medical Systems / Issue 6/2010
Print ISSN: 0148-5598
Electronic ISSN: 1573-689X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-009-9316-3

Other articles of this Issue 6/2010

Journal of Medical Systems 6/2010 Go to the issue