Published in:
01-10-2016 | Original Article
A validation study on the traditional Chinese version of Spinal Appearance Questionnaire for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis
Authors:
Jing Guo, Ajax Hong Yin Lau, Jack Chau, Bobby Kin Wah Ng, Kwong Man Lee, Yong Qiu, Jack Chun Yiu Cheng, Tsz Ping Lam
Published in:
European Spine Journal
|
Issue 10/2016
Login to get access
Abstract
Purpose
“Simplified Chinese” version of Spinal Appearance Questionnaire (SC-SAQ) for patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) was available but did not fit for communities
using “Traditional Chinese” as their primary language. We developed a traditional Chinese version of SAQ (TC-SAQ) and evaluated its reliability and validity.
Methods
TC-SAQ was administered to 112 AIS patients, of which 101 bilingual (English and Chinese) patients completed E-SAQ and the traditional Chinese version of Scoliosis Research Society-22 questionnaire (TC-SRS-22). Internal consistency and test–retest reliability were evaluated. Concurrent validity was evaluated by comparing TC-SAQ score with E-SAQ score, and convergent validity by comparing TC-SAQ score with TC-SRS-22 self-image domain score, and discriminant validity by analyzing the relationship between TC-SAQ score and patients’ characteristics.
Results
Internal consistency of individual TC-SAQ domain was high (Cronbach’s α = 0.785 to 0.940), except for general (Cronbach’s α = 0.665) and shoulders (Cronbach’s α = 0.421) domain. Test–retest reliability of TC-SAQ was good (ICCs of each domain from 0.798 to 0.865). Concurrent validity demonstrated an excellent correlation between TC-SAQ and E-SAQ scores (r = 0.820 to 0.954, P < 0.0001 for all domains). Correlation between TC-SAQ domains and TC-SRS-22 self-image domain was weak to moderate. TC-SAQ total score and individual domain scores (except waist and chest domains) were positively correlated to major curve magnitude.
Conclusions
TC-SAQ had good internal consistency and test–retest reliability. Concurrent validity evaluated against the original English version was excellent. TC-SAQ was both reliable and valid for clinical use for AIS patients using traditional Chinese as their primary language.