Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Pediatric Surgery International 1/2007

01-01-2007 | Original Article

A unique service in UK delivering Plastibell® circumcision: review of 9-year results

Authors: Victor Palit, David K. Menebhi, Ian Taylor, Margaret Young, Yasser Elmasry, Tariq Shah

Published in: Pediatric Surgery International | Issue 1/2007

Login to get access

Abstract

Muslim infants undergo circumcision for religious reasons and Bradford has a high Muslim population. The National Health Service in UK does not provide religious circumcision, so in 1996 a nurse-delivered circumcision service led by consultant urologists was set up at a no-profit and cost-only basis. Plastibell circumcision was offered to all infants between 6 and 14 weeks old and performed under local anaesthesia. Information leaflets and videotapes about the procedure were available to parents prior to the procedure. A three monthly audit of the service was undertaken. Between July 1996 and June 2005 (9 years) 1,129 circumcisions were performed. The common complications were problems with the ring (3.6%) and bleeding (3%). Overall, there was 96% satisfaction rate among the service users. The Plastibell technique for circumcision is a simple method and can be safely performed by trained nurses with acceptable complication rates.
Literature
1.
go back to reference De Meo J (1989) The geography of genital mutilations. The Truth Seeker, pp 9–13 (Link to www.noharmm.org) De Meo J (1989) The geography of genital mutilations. The Truth Seeker, pp 9–13 (Link to www.noharmm.org)
2.
go back to reference Niku SD, Stock JA, Kaplan GW (1995) Neonatal circumcision. Urol Clin N Am 22:57–65 Niku SD, Stock JA, Kaplan GW (1995) Neonatal circumcision. Urol Clin N Am 22:57–65
3.
go back to reference Shah T, Raistrick J, Taylor I, Young M, Menebhi D, Stevens R (1999) A circumcision for religious reasons. BJU Int 83(7):807–809PubMedCrossRef Shah T, Raistrick J, Taylor I, Young M, Menebhi D, Stevens R (1999) A circumcision for religious reasons. BJU Int 83(7):807–809PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Williams N, Kapila L (1993) Why are infants referred for circumcision? Br Med J 28:306 Williams N, Kapila L (1993) Why are infants referred for circumcision? Br Med J 28:306
6.
go back to reference Kaplan GW (1983) Complications of circumcision. Urol Clin N Am 10:543–549 Kaplan GW (1983) Complications of circumcision. Urol Clin N Am 10:543–549
7.
go back to reference Upadhyay V, Hammodat HM, Pease PW (1998) Post-circumcision meatal stenosis. 12 years experience. NZ Med J 111:57–58 Upadhyay V, Hammodat HM, Pease PW (1998) Post-circumcision meatal stenosis. 12 years experience. NZ Med J 111:57–58
8.
go back to reference Manji PK (2000) Circumcision of the young infant in a developing country using the plastibell. Ann Trop Paediatr 20:101–104PubMed Manji PK (2000) Circumcision of the young infant in a developing country using the plastibell. Ann Trop Paediatr 20:101–104PubMed
9.
go back to reference Fraser IA, Allen MJ, Bagshaw PF, Johnstone M (1981) A randomised trial to assess childhood circumcision with the Plastibell device compared to conventional dissection technique: Br J Surg 68(8):593–595PubMed Fraser IA, Allen MJ, Bagshaw PF, Johnstone M (1981) A randomised trial to assess childhood circumcision with the Plastibell device compared to conventional dissection technique: Br J Surg 68(8):593–595PubMed
10.
go back to reference Duncan ND, Dundas SE, Brown B, Pinnock-Ramasaran C, Badal G (2004) Newborn circumcision using the plastibell device: an audit of practice. West Indian Med J 53(1):23–26PubMed Duncan ND, Dundas SE, Brown B, Pinnock-Ramasaran C, Badal G (2004) Newborn circumcision using the plastibell device: an audit of practice. West Indian Med J 53(1):23–26PubMed
11.
go back to reference Al-Samaraai AY, Mofti AB, Crankson SJ, Jawad A, Haque K, Al-Meshari A (1988) A review of a Plastibell device in neonatal circumcision in 2,000 instances. Surg Gynecol Obstet 167(4):341–343 (Review) Al-Samaraai AY, Mofti AB, Crankson SJ, Jawad A, Haque K, Al-Meshari A (1988) A review of a Plastibell device in neonatal circumcision in 2,000 instances. Surg Gynecol Obstet 167(4):341–343 (Review)
12.
go back to reference Gelbaum I (1992) Circumcision. To educate, not indoctrinate. J Nurse Midwives 37:97–113CrossRef Gelbaum I (1992) Circumcision. To educate, not indoctrinate. J Nurse Midwives 37:97–113CrossRef
Metadata
Title
A unique service in UK delivering Plastibell® circumcision: review of 9-year results
Authors
Victor Palit
David K. Menebhi
Ian Taylor
Margaret Young
Yasser Elmasry
Tariq Shah
Publication date
01-01-2007
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Pediatric Surgery International / Issue 1/2007
Print ISSN: 0179-0358
Electronic ISSN: 1437-9813
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-006-1805-6

Other articles of this Issue 1/2007

Pediatric Surgery International 1/2007 Go to the issue