Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 1/2013

Open Access 01-12-2013 | Research

A UK validation of a general measure of subjective well-being: the modified BBC subjective well-being scale (BBC-SWB)

Authors: Eleanor Pontin, Matthias Schwannauer, Sara Tai, Peter Kinderman

Published in: Health and Quality of Life Outcomes | Issue 1/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The BBC Subjective Well-being scale (BBC-SWB) is a recently developed questionnaire designed to measure people’s subjective experiences across the wide breadth of domains commonly included in definitions of well-being. Although it has previously been shown to be a reliable and valid measure of subjective well-being in the general population with good psychometric properties, a limitation of the initial version was that it was developed using responses on a 4-point Likert-style scale. This paper presents the psychometric properties, validity and reliability of a revised version of the scale conducted using 5-point Likert-style responses and tests the hypothesis that the scale measures three underlying dimensions of well-being; psychological; physical health; and relationships.

Methods

A sample of 23,341 participants completed the revised BBC-SWB as part of an on-line open-access battery of self-report measures. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to test the pre-hypothesised three factor structure, and internal consistency was investigated using Cronbach’s alpha. Concurrent validity was assessed through analysis of correlations with demographic variables, scores on the Goldberg Anxiety and Depression Scales, and the List of Threatening Experiences Questionnaire.

Results

Confirmatory factor analysis supported three factor structure of the measure in the whole sample and for subsamples of males and females. Both the total 24-item scale and the three subscales had good internal consistency, showed no evidence of floor and ceiling effects and correlated significantly with measures of concurrent validity.

Conclusions

This study provided further confirmation of the validity and utility of the BBC Subjective Well-being scale. The modified version is a reliable and valid measure for the online assessment of subjective well-being in the general population with good psychometric properties.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference McGillivray M: Human well-being: issues, concepts and measures. In Human well-being: concept and measurement. Edited by: McGillivray M. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2007:1–23. McGillivray M: Human well-being: issues, concepts and measures. In Human well-being: concept and measurement. Edited by: McGillivray M. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2007:1–23.
2.
go back to reference Beddington J, Cooper CL, Field J, Goswami U, Huppert FA, Jenkins J, Jones HS, Kirkwood TBL, Sahakian BJ, Thomas SM: The mental wealth of nations. Nature 2008, 455: 1057–1060. 10.1038/4551057aPubMedCrossRef Beddington J, Cooper CL, Field J, Goswami U, Huppert FA, Jenkins J, Jones HS, Kirkwood TBL, Sahakian BJ, Thomas SM: The mental wealth of nations. Nature 2008, 455: 1057–1060. 10.1038/4551057aPubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Ryff CD, Keyes CLM: The structure of psychological well-being revisited. J Perso Soc Psychol 1995, 69: 719–727.CrossRef Ryff CD, Keyes CLM: The structure of psychological well-being revisited. J Perso Soc Psychol 1995, 69: 719–727.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Kashdan TB: The assessment of subjective well-being (issues raised by the Oxford happiness questionnaire). Pers Indiv Differ 2004, 36: 1225–1232. 10.1016/S0191-8869(03)00213-7CrossRef Kashdan TB: The assessment of subjective well-being (issues raised by the Oxford happiness questionnaire). Pers Indiv Differ 2004, 36: 1225–1232. 10.1016/S0191-8869(03)00213-7CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Kahneman D, Krueger AB: Developments in the measurement of subjective well-being. J Econ Perspect 2006, 20: 3–24.CrossRef Kahneman D, Krueger AB: Developments in the measurement of subjective well-being. J Econ Perspect 2006, 20: 3–24.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Diener E: Assessing well-being: defining and measuring subjective well-being (social indicators research series). New York: Springer; 2009.CrossRef Diener E: Assessing well-being: defining and measuring subjective well-being (social indicators research series). New York: Springer; 2009.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference New Economic Foundation: Measuring well-being: a guide for practitioners. London: New Economic Foundation; 2012. New Economic Foundation: Measuring well-being: a guide for practitioners. London: New Economic Foundation; 2012.
8.
go back to reference Office for National Statistics: Spotlight on subjective well-being. Cardiff: Office for National Statistics; 2010. Office for National Statistics: Spotlight on subjective well-being. Cardiff: Office for National Statistics; 2010.
9.
go back to reference Layard R: Happiness: lessons from a new science. London: Penguin; 2005. Layard R: Happiness: lessons from a new science. London: Penguin; 2005.
10.
go back to reference New Economic Foundation: Well-being: evidence for policy. London: New Economic Foundation; 2012. New Economic Foundation: Well-being: evidence for policy. London: New Economic Foundation; 2012.
11.
12.
go back to reference Group WHOQOL: The World Health Organisation Quality of Life Assessment (WHOQOL): development and general psychometric properties. Soc Scic Med 1998, 46: 1569–1585. 10.1016/S0277-9536(98)00009-4CrossRef Group WHOQOL: The World Health Organisation Quality of Life Assessment (WHOQOL): development and general psychometric properties. Soc Scic Med 1998, 46: 1569–1585. 10.1016/S0277-9536(98)00009-4CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Group WHOQOL: Development of the World Heatlh Organisation WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment. Psychol Med 1998, 28: 551–558.CrossRef Group WHOQOL: Development of the World Heatlh Organisation WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment. Psychol Med 1998, 28: 551–558.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference The Euroqol Group: Euroqol- a new facility for the measurement of health related quality of life. Health Policy 1990, 16: 199–208.CrossRef The Euroqol Group: Euroqol- a new facility for the measurement of health related quality of life. Health Policy 1990, 16: 199–208.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Diener E, Emmons RA, Larson RJ, Griffin S: The satisfaction with life scale. J Pers Asses 1985, 49: 71–75. 10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13CrossRef Diener E, Emmons RA, Larson RJ, Griffin S: The satisfaction with life scale. J Pers Asses 1985, 49: 71–75. 10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Lyubomirsky S, Lepper HS: A measure of subjective happiness: preliminary reliability and construct validation. Soc Ind Res 1999, 46: 137–155. 10.1023/A:1006824100041CrossRef Lyubomirsky S, Lepper HS: A measure of subjective happiness: preliminary reliability and construct validation. Soc Ind Res 1999, 46: 137–155. 10.1023/A:1006824100041CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Kinderman P, Schwannauer M, Pontin E, Tai S: The development and validation of a general measure of well-being: the BBC well-being scale. Qual Life Res 2011, 20: 1035–1042. 10.1007/s11136-010-9841-zPubMedCrossRef Kinderman P, Schwannauer M, Pontin E, Tai S: The development and validation of a general measure of well-being: the BBC well-being scale. Qual Life Res 2011, 20: 1035–1042. 10.1007/s11136-010-9841-zPubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Ryff C: Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. J Pers Soc Psychol 1989, 57: 1069–1081.CrossRef Ryff C: Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. J Pers Soc Psychol 1989, 57: 1069–1081.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Tennant R, Hiller L, Fishwick R, Platt S, Joseph S, Weich S, Parkinson J, Secker J, Stewart-Brown S: The Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS): development and UK validation. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2007, 5: 63. 10.1186/1477-7525-5-63PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Tennant R, Hiller L, Fishwick R, Platt S, Joseph S, Weich S, Parkinson J, Secker J, Stewart-Brown S: The Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS): development and UK validation. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2007, 5: 63. 10.1186/1477-7525-5-63PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Beck AT: Depression: clinical, experimental, and theoretical aspects. New York: Harper & Row; 1967. Beck AT: Depression: clinical, experimental, and theoretical aspects. New York: Harper & Row; 1967.
21.
go back to reference Preston CC, Colman AM: Optimal number of response categories in rating scales: reliability, validity, discriminating power, and respondent preferences. Acta Psychol (Amst) 2000, 104: 1–15. 10.1016/S0001-6918(99)00050-5CrossRef Preston CC, Colman AM: Optimal number of response categories in rating scales: reliability, validity, discriminating power, and respondent preferences. Acta Psychol (Amst) 2000, 104: 1–15. 10.1016/S0001-6918(99)00050-5CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Osteras N, Gulbrandsen P, Garatt A, Benth JS, Dahl FA, Natvig B, Brage S: A randomised comparison of a four-and a five-point scale version of the Norwegian function assessment scale. Health Qual Life Out 2008, 6: 14–22. 10.1186/1477-7525-6-14CrossRef Osteras N, Gulbrandsen P, Garatt A, Benth JS, Dahl FA, Natvig B, Brage S: A randomised comparison of a four-and a five-point scale version of the Norwegian function assessment scale. Health Qual Life Out 2008, 6: 14–22. 10.1186/1477-7525-6-14CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Goldberg D, Bridges K, Duncan-Jones P, Grayson D: Detecting anxiety and depression in general medical settings. BMJ 1988,8(297):897–899.CrossRef Goldberg D, Bridges K, Duncan-Jones P, Grayson D: Detecting anxiety and depression in general medical settings. BMJ 1988,8(297):897–899.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Brugha TS, Cragg D: the list of threatening experiences: the reliability and validity of a brief life events questionnaire. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1990, 82: 77–81. 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1990.tb01360.xPubMedCrossRef Brugha TS, Cragg D: the list of threatening experiences: the reliability and validity of a brief life events questionnaire. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1990, 82: 77–81. 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1990.tb01360.xPubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Bentler PM: EQS structural equations program manual. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software; 2006. Bentler PM: EQS structural equations program manual. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software; 2006.
28.
go back to reference Mardia KV: Applications of some measures of multivariate skewness and kurtosis in testing normality and robustness studies. Sankhya Series B 1974, 36: 115–128. Mardia KV: Applications of some measures of multivariate skewness and kurtosis in testing normality and robustness studies. Sankhya Series B 1974, 36: 115–128.
29.
go back to reference Micceri T: The unicorn, the normal curve, and other improbable creatures. Psychol Bull 1989, 105: 156–166.CrossRef Micceri T: The unicorn, the normal curve, and other improbable creatures. Psychol Bull 1989, 105: 156–166.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Bentler PM: Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychol Bull 1990, 107: 256–259.CrossRef Bentler PM: Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychol Bull 1990, 107: 256–259.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Byrne BM: Structural equation modelling with AMOS: basic concepts, applications and programming. London: SAGE Publications Inc; 2001. Byrne BM: Structural equation modelling with AMOS: basic concepts, applications and programming. London: SAGE Publications Inc; 2001.
32.
go back to reference Browne MW, Cudeck R: Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In Testing structural equation models. Edited by: Bollen K, Long JS. Newbury, CA: Sage; 1993:132–162. Browne MW, Cudeck R: Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In Testing structural equation models. Edited by: Bollen K, Long JS. Newbury, CA: Sage; 1993:132–162.
33.
go back to reference Campell DT, Fiske DW: Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychol Bull 1995, 56: 81–105.CrossRef Campell DT, Fiske DW: Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychol Bull 1995, 56: 81–105.CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Cronbach IJ: Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrica 1951, 16: 297–334. 10.1007/BF02310555CrossRef Cronbach IJ: Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrica 1951, 16: 297–334. 10.1007/BF02310555CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) for windows version 20. Chicago, USA: SPSS Inc; 2012. Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) for windows version 20. Chicago, USA: SPSS Inc; 2012.
Metadata
Title
A UK validation of a general measure of subjective well-being: the modified BBC subjective well-being scale (BBC-SWB)
Authors
Eleanor Pontin
Matthias Schwannauer
Sara Tai
Peter Kinderman
Publication date
01-12-2013
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes / Issue 1/2013
Electronic ISSN: 1477-7525
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-11-150

Other articles of this Issue 1/2013

Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 1/2013 Go to the issue