Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 9/2007

01-09-2007

A two-center experience with the exclusive use of laparoscopic transperitoneal nephrectomy for benign renal disease in children

Authors: A. A. Mahomed, C. Hoare, F. Welsh, C. P. Driver

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 9/2007

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

This study aimed to evaluate a two-center experience with pediatric transperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy, specifically focusing on the outcome parameters of operative time, complication, analgesic requirement, and postoperative stay.

Methods

This ambispective study was conducted over a 4-year period between May 2001 and May 2005 in two tertiary pediatric surgical centers. Data were prospectively recorded from an in-house expanded medical audit system (EMAS) and a Microsoft Excel database. Information on patient demographics, operative time, complications, analgesic requirement, and length of hospital stay were retrieved and analyzed.

Results

A total of 30 consecutive patients with a mean age of 4.43 years (range, 3 months to 15 years) underwent laparoscopic nephrectomy. All the patients underwent unilateral nephrectomy/nephroureterectomy for multidysplastic kidney (n = 12), reflux nephropathy (n = 13), pelvicoureteric junction obstruction (n = 4), or cystic disease of indeterminate cause (n = 1). The mean operative time was 93 ± 30 min. The principal hemostatic devices used were the Harmonic Scalpel (20 cases), liga clips (5 cases), and hook diathermy and endoshears exclusively (4 cases). There were no conversions, but the intraoperative complications of bleeding (n = 2), difficult location (n = 1), difficult extraction (n = 1), and requirement for a liver retractor (n = 2) were encountered. An additional five patients had problems in the immediate postoperative period, two of whom went on to have long term difficulties with recurrent urinary tract infections resulting from a residual ureteric stump, which required surgery. Nearly one-third of the patients required morphine for analgesia in the immediate postoperative period, with the figure falling to 20% by day 1. The median postoperative hospital stay was 1 day (range, 0–16 days). At this writing, all the patients remain under surveillance with a mean follow-up period of 2.88 years, and no patients have experienced complications secondary to intraabdominal adhesions.

Conclusion

Transperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy is technically feasible in most cases of benign renal disease. The intraoperative complications are minimal, and recovery for most is robust. Two-thirds of the patients are discharged within 24 h. In this study, narcotic analgesics were prescribed in about a one-third of all the cases for a limited period. Further problems may be seen when refluxing ureters are incompletely excised. However, the transperitoneal approach does not mitigate against complete excision because the exposure to the pelvis is adequate. At the midterm follow-up assessment, adhesive obstruction was not encountered, confirming this approach as a tenable alternative to other laparoscopic approaches for nephrectomy.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Allaf ME, Bhayani SB, Kavoussi LR (2004) Taking the side of transperitoneal access for surgery in upper urinary tract. Curr Urol Rep 5: 87–92PubMedCrossRef Allaf ME, Bhayani SB, Kavoussi LR (2004) Taking the side of transperitoneal access for surgery in upper urinary tract. Curr Urol Rep 5: 87–92PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Borzi PA (2001) A comparison of the lateral and posterior retroperitoneoscopic approach for complete and partial nephroureterectomy in children. BJU Int 87: 517–520PubMedCrossRef Borzi PA (2001) A comparison of the lateral and posterior retroperitoneoscopic approach for complete and partial nephroureterectomy in children. BJU Int 87: 517–520PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Borzi PA, Yeung CK (2004) Selective approach for transperitoneal and extraperitoneal endoscopic nephrectomy in children. J Urol 171: 814–816PubMedCrossRef Borzi PA, Yeung CK (2004) Selective approach for transperitoneal and extraperitoneal endoscopic nephrectomy in children. J Urol 171: 814–816PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Clayman RV, Mc Dougall EM, Kerbl K, Anderson K, Kavoussi LR (1994) Laparoscopic nephrectomy: transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal (abstract 459). J Urol 151: 342A Clayman RV, Mc Dougall EM, Kerbl K, Anderson K, Kavoussi LR (1994) Laparoscopic nephrectomy: transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal (abstract 459). J Urol 151: 342A
5.
go back to reference Desai MM, Strzempkowski B, Matin SF, Steinberg AP, Ng C, Meraney AM, Kaouk JH, Gill 1S (2005) Prospective randomized comparison of transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy. J Urol 173: 38–41PubMedCrossRef Desai MM, Strzempkowski B, Matin SF, Steinberg AP, Ng C, Meraney AM, Kaouk JH, Gill 1S (2005) Prospective randomized comparison of transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy. J Urol 173: 38–41PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference El Goneimi A, Valla JS, Steyaert H Grainy AL (1998) Renal surgery via a retroperitoneal approach in children. J Urol 160: 1138–1141CrossRef El Goneimi A, Valla JS, Steyaert H Grainy AL (1998) Renal surgery via a retroperitoneal approach in children. J Urol 160: 1138–1141CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Gill IS, Clayman RV, Albala DM, Aso Y, Chiu AW, Das S, Donovan JF, Fuchs GJ, Gaur DD, Go H, Gomella LG, Grune MT, Harewood LM, Janetschek G, Knapp PM, McDougall EM, Nakada SY, Preminger GM, Puppo P, Rassweiler JJ, Royce PL, Thomas R, Urban DA, Winfield HN (1998) Retroperitoneal and pelvic extraperitoneal laparoscopy: an international perspective. Urology 52: 566–571PubMedCrossRef Gill IS, Clayman RV, Albala DM, Aso Y, Chiu AW, Das S, Donovan JF, Fuchs GJ, Gaur DD, Go H, Gomella LG, Grune MT, Harewood LM, Janetschek G, Knapp PM, McDougall EM, Nakada SY, Preminger GM, Puppo P, Rassweiler JJ, Royce PL, Thomas R, Urban DA, Winfield HN (1998) Retroperitoneal and pelvic extraperitoneal laparoscopy: an international perspective. Urology 52: 566–571PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Hemal AK, Wadhwa SN, Kumar M, Gupta NP (1999) Transperitoneal and retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy for giant hydronephrosis. J Urol 162: 35–39PubMedCrossRef Hemal AK, Wadhwa SN, Kumar M, Gupta NP (1999) Transperitoneal and retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy for giant hydronephrosis. J Urol 162: 35–39PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Hoznek A, Salomon L, Gettman M, Stolzenburg J, Abbou C (2004) Justification of extraperitoneal laparoscopic access for surgery of the upper urinary tract. Curr Urol Rep 5: 93–99PubMedCrossRef Hoznek A, Salomon L, Gettman M, Stolzenburg J, Abbou C (2004) Justification of extraperitoneal laparoscopic access for surgery of the upper urinary tract. Curr Urol Rep 5: 93–99PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Kapoor R, Singh KJ, Suri A, Dubey D, Mandhani A, Srivastava A, Kumar A (2006) Hem-o-lok clips for vascular control during laparoscopic ablative nephrectomy: a single-center experience. J Endourol 20: 202–204PubMedCrossRef Kapoor R, Singh KJ, Suri A, Dubey D, Mandhani A, Srivastava A, Kumar A (2006) Hem-o-lok clips for vascular control during laparoscopic ablative nephrectomy: a single-center experience. J Endourol 20: 202–204PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Kumar M, Kumar R, Hemal AK, Gupta NP (2001) Complications of retroperitoneoscopic surgery at one centre. BJU Int 87: 607–612PubMedCrossRef Kumar M, Kumar R, Hemal AK, Gupta NP (2001) Complications of retroperitoneoscopic surgery at one centre. BJU Int 87: 607–612PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Martin SF, Gill SI (2002) Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: retroperitoneal versus transperitoneal approach. Curr Urol Rep 3: 164–171CrossRef Martin SF, Gill SI (2002) Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: retroperitoneal versus transperitoneal approach. Curr Urol Rep 3: 164–171CrossRef
13.
go back to reference McDougall EM, Clayman RV (1996) Laparoscopic nephrectomy for benign disease: comparison of the transperitoneal and retroperitoneal approaches. J Endourol 10: 45PubMedCrossRef McDougall EM, Clayman RV (1996) Laparoscopic nephrectomy for benign disease: comparison of the transperitoneal and retroperitoneal approaches. J Endourol 10: 45PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Ng CS, Abreu SC, Abou El-Fettouh HI, Kaouk JH, Desai MM, Goldfarb DA, Gill IS (2004) Right retroperitoneal versus left transperitoneal laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy. Urology 63: 857–861PubMedCrossRef Ng CS, Abreu SC, Abou El-Fettouh HI, Kaouk JH, Desai MM, Goldfarb DA, Gill IS (2004) Right retroperitoneal versus left transperitoneal laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy. Urology 63: 857–861PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Ng CS, Gill IS, Ramani AP,Steinberg AP, Spaliviero M, Abreu SC, Kaouk JH, Desai MM (2005) Transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: patient selection and perioperative outcomes. J Urol 174: 846–849PubMedCrossRef Ng CS, Gill IS, Ramani AP,Steinberg AP, Spaliviero M, Abreu SC, Kaouk JH, Desai MM (2005) Transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: patient selection and perioperative outcomes. J Urol 174: 846–849PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Ono Y, Katoh N, Kinukawa T, Matsuura O, Oshima S (1996) Laparoscopic nephrectomy via the retroperitoneoscopic approach. J Urol 156: 1101PubMedCrossRef Ono Y, Katoh N, Kinukawa T, Matsuura O, Oshima S (1996) Laparoscopic nephrectomy via the retroperitoneoscopic approach. J Urol 156: 1101PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Pattaras JG, Moore RG, Landman J, Clayman RV, Janetschek G, McDougall EM, Docimo SG, Parra RO, Kavoussi LR (2002) Incidence of postoperative adhesion formation after transperitoneal genitourinary laparoscopic surgery. Urology 59: 37–41PubMedCrossRef Pattaras JG, Moore RG, Landman J, Clayman RV, Janetschek G, McDougall EM, Docimo SG, Parra RO, Kavoussi LR (2002) Incidence of postoperative adhesion formation after transperitoneal genitourinary laparoscopic surgery. Urology 59: 37–41PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Rassweiler J, Frede T, Henkel TO, Stock C, Alken P (1998) Nephrectomy: A comparative study between the transperitoneal and retroperitoneal laparoscopic versus the open approach. Eur Urol 33: 489–496PubMedCrossRef Rassweiler J, Frede T, Henkel TO, Stock C, Alken P (1998) Nephrectomy: A comparative study between the transperitoneal and retroperitoneal laparoscopic versus the open approach. Eur Urol 33: 489–496PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
A two-center experience with the exclusive use of laparoscopic transperitoneal nephrectomy for benign renal disease in children
Authors
A. A. Mahomed
C. Hoare
F. Welsh
C. P. Driver
Publication date
01-09-2007
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 9/2007
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-006-9162-z

Other articles of this Issue 9/2007

Surgical Endoscopy 9/2007 Go to the issue