Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 10/2012

01-10-2012 | Rhinology

A time-saving method for recording chemosensory event-related potentials

Authors: Friederike Schaub, Michael Damm

Published in: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology | Issue 10/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

The objective of this study was to reduce the recording duration of chemosensory event-related potentials (CSERP) and thereby to make the method more suitable for routine clinical use. Measurements were performed in the Department of Otorhinolaryngology of the university hospital of Cologne. Two protocols with different sequences [inter-stimulus intervals (ISI)-standard sequence: 30 s; PRS-15: pseudo-randomized sequence, mean ISI of 15 s] were applied to 40 volunteers to record CSERPs. To compare CSERP recordings under optimal and adverse test conditions, 20 younger/normosmic adults and 20 older/hyposmic participants were included in this study. Olfactory function was gauged using the “Sniffin’Sticks” test. For CSERP recordings, phenylethyl alcohol, hydrogen sulfide and carbon dioxide were used for olfactory or trigeminal stimulation, respectively. Both ISI protocols allowed recording CSERPs under optimal and adverse test conditions and distinguishing both groups by latencies (p ≤ 0.015). The time requirement for the recording of CSERPs with the PRS-15 sequence was less than 30 min. The pseudo-randomized sequence allowed the recording of diagnostically conclusive CSERPs in both groups and saved approximately 40% of the measuring time. This seems to be especially useful in cases where a yes/no answer (e.g., medical reports, exclusion of anosmia) is required. Shortening the time requirement significantly allows applying CSERPs to larger populations of patients with olfactory impairment.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Hummel T, Sekinger B, Wolf SR, Pauli E, Kobal G (1997) Sniffin’ Sticks: olfactory performance assessed by the combined testing of odor identification, odor discrimination and olfactory threshold. Chem Senses 22:39–52PubMedCrossRef Hummel T, Sekinger B, Wolf SR, Pauli E, Kobal G (1997) Sniffin’ Sticks: olfactory performance assessed by the combined testing of odor identification, odor discrimination and olfactory threshold. Chem Senses 22:39–52PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Hummel T, Kobal G, Gudziol H, Mackay-Sim A (2007) Normative data for the “Sniffin’ Sticks” including tests of odor identification, odor discrimination, and olfactory thresholds: an upgrade based on a group of more than 3,000 subjects. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 264:237–243PubMedCrossRef Hummel T, Kobal G, Gudziol H, Mackay-Sim A (2007) Normative data for the “Sniffin’ Sticks” including tests of odor identification, odor discrimination, and olfactory thresholds: an upgrade based on a group of more than 3,000 subjects. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 264:237–243PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Kobal G (1981) Elektrophysiologische untersuchungen des menschlichen geruchssinns. Georg Thieme Verlag, Stuttgart Kobal G (1981) Elektrophysiologische untersuchungen des menschlichen geruchssinns. Georg Thieme Verlag, Stuttgart
4.
go back to reference Hummel T, Kobal G (2001) Olfactory event-related potentials. In: Simon SA, Nicolelis MAL (eds) Methods and frontiers in chemosensory research. CRC, Florida, pp 429–464 Hummel T, Kobal G (2001) Olfactory event-related potentials. In: Simon SA, Nicolelis MAL (eds) Methods and frontiers in chemosensory research. CRC, Florida, pp 429–464
5.
go back to reference Kassab A, Schaub F, Vent J, Huttenbrink KB, Damm M (2009) Effects of short inter-stimulus intervals on olfactory and trigeminal event-related potentials. Acta Otolaryngol 129:1250–1256PubMedCrossRef Kassab A, Schaub F, Vent J, Huttenbrink KB, Damm M (2009) Effects of short inter-stimulus intervals on olfactory and trigeminal event-related potentials. Acta Otolaryngol 129:1250–1256PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Huart C, Eloy P, Collet S, Rombaux P (2011) Chemosensory function assessed with psychophysical testing and event-related potentials in patients with atrophic rhinitis Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Huart C, Eloy P, Collet S, Rombaux P (2011) Chemosensory function assessed with psychophysical testing and event-related potentials in patients with atrophic rhinitis Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol
7.
go back to reference Tateyama T, Hummel T, Roscher S, Post H, Kobal G (1998) Relation of olfactory event-related potentials to changes in stimulus concentration. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 108:449–455PubMedCrossRef Tateyama T, Hummel T, Roscher S, Post H, Kobal G (1998) Relation of olfactory event-related potentials to changes in stimulus concentration. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 108:449–455PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Boesveldt S, Haehner A, Berendse HW, Hummel T (2007) Signal-to-noise ratio of chemosensory event-related potentials. Clin Neurophysiol 118:690–695PubMedCrossRef Boesveldt S, Haehner A, Berendse HW, Hummel T (2007) Signal-to-noise ratio of chemosensory event-related potentials. Clin Neurophysiol 118:690–695PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Scheibe M, Opatz O, Hummel T (2009) Are there sex-related differences in responses to repetitive olfactory/trigeminal stimuli? Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 266:1323–1326PubMedCrossRef Scheibe M, Opatz O, Hummel T (2009) Are there sex-related differences in responses to repetitive olfactory/trigeminal stimuli? Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 266:1323–1326PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Covington JW, Polich J (1996) P300, stimulus intensity, and modality. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 100:579–584PubMedCrossRef Covington JW, Polich J (1996) P300, stimulus intensity, and modality. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 100:579–584PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Hawkes CH, Shephard BC, Daniel SE (1997) Olfactory dysfunction in Parkinson’s disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 62:436–446PubMedCrossRef Hawkes CH, Shephard BC, Daniel SE (1997) Olfactory dysfunction in Parkinson’s disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 62:436–446PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Hummel T, Barz S, Pauli E, Kobal G (1998) Chemosensory event-related potentials change with age. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 108:208–217PubMedCrossRef Hummel T, Barz S, Pauli E, Kobal G (1998) Chemosensory event-related potentials change with age. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 108:208–217PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Livermore A, Hummel T (2004) The influence of training on chemosensory event-related potentials and interactions between the olfactory and trigeminal systems. Chem Senses 29:41–51PubMedCrossRef Livermore A, Hummel T (2004) The influence of training on chemosensory event-related potentials and interactions between the olfactory and trigeminal systems. Chem Senses 29:41–51PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Krauel K, Pause BM, Sojka B, Schott P, Ferstl R (1998) Attentional modulation of central odor processing. Chem Senses 23:423–432PubMedCrossRef Krauel K, Pause BM, Sojka B, Schott P, Ferstl R (1998) Attentional modulation of central odor processing. Chem Senses 23:423–432PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
A time-saving method for recording chemosensory event-related potentials
Authors
Friederike Schaub
Michael Damm
Publication date
01-10-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology / Issue 10/2012
Print ISSN: 0937-4477
Electronic ISSN: 1434-4726
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-011-1921-3

Other articles of this Issue 10/2012

European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 10/2012 Go to the issue