Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Digital Imaging 2/2009

01-04-2009

A Technique for Simulating the Effect of Dose Reduction on Image Quality in Digital Chest Radiography

Authors: Wouter J.H. Veldkamp, Lucia J.M. Kroft, Jan Pieter A. van Delft, Jacob Geleijns

Published in: Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine | Issue 2/2009

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to provide a pragmatic tool for studying the relationship between dose and image quality in clinical chest images. To achieve this, we developed a technique for simulating the effect of dose reduction on image quality of digital chest images. Materials and Methods: The technique was developed for a digital charge-coupled-device (CCD) chest unit with slot-scan acquisition. Raw pixel values were scaled to a lower dose level, and a random number representing noise to each specific pixel value was added. After adding noise, raw images were post processed in the standard way. Validation was performed by comparing pixel standard deviation, as a measure of noise, in simulated images with images acquired at actual lower doses. To achieve this, a uniform test object and an anthropomorphic phantom were used. Additionally, noise power spectra of simulated and actual images were compared. Also, detectability of simulated lesions was investigated using a model observer. Results: The mean difference in noise values between simulated and real lower-dose phantom images was smaller than 5% for relevant clinical settings. Noise power spectra appeared to be comparable on average but simulated images showed slightly higher noise levels for higher spatial frequencies and slightly lower noise levels for lower spatial frequencies. Comparable detection performance was shown in simulated and actual images with slightly worse detectability for simulated lower dose images. Conclusion: We have developed and validated a method for simulating dose reduction. Our method seems an acceptable pragmatic tool for studying the relationship between dose and image quality.
Literature
1.
go back to reference European Commission. Council Directive 97/43/EURATOM of 30 June 1997 on health protection of individuals against the dangers of ionising radiation in relation to medical exposure, and repealing. Directive 84/466/ EURATOM. Official Journal of the European Communities L-180/22, 9 July 1997 European Commission. Council Directive 97/43/EURATOM of 30 June 1997 on health protection of individuals against the dangers of ionising radiation in relation to medical exposure, and repealing. Directive 84/466/ EURATOM. Official Journal of the European Communities L-180/22, 9 July 1997
2.
go back to reference Chotas HG, Dobbins JT, III, Ravin CE: Principles of digital radiography with large-area electronically readable detectors: a review of the basics. Radiology 210:595–599, 1999PubMed Chotas HG, Dobbins JT, III, Ravin CE: Principles of digital radiography with large-area electronically readable detectors: a review of the basics. Radiology 210:595–599, 1999PubMed
3.
go back to reference Treiber O, Wanninger F, Fuhr H, Panzer W, Regulla D, Winkler G: An adaptive algorithm for the detection of microcalcifications in simulated low-dose mammography. Phys Med Biol 48:449–466, 2003PubMedCrossRef Treiber O, Wanninger F, Fuhr H, Panzer W, Regulla D, Winkler G: An adaptive algorithm for the detection of microcalcifications in simulated low-dose mammography. Phys Med Biol 48:449–466, 2003PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Bath M, Hakansson M, Tingberg A, Mansson LG: Method of simulating dose reduction for digital radiographic systems. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 114:253–259, 2005PubMedCrossRef Bath M, Hakansson M, Tingberg A, Mansson LG: Method of simulating dose reduction for digital radiographic systems. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 114:253–259, 2005PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Saunders RS, Jr, Samei E: A method for modifying the image quality parameters of digital radiographic images. Med Phys 30:3006–3017, 2003PubMedCrossRef Saunders RS, Jr, Samei E: A method for modifying the image quality parameters of digital radiographic images. Med Phys 30:3006–3017, 2003PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference van Gelder RE, Venema HW, Florie J, Nio CY, Serlie IW, Schutter MP, van Rijn JC, Vos FM, Glas AS, Bossuyt PM, Bartelsman JF, Lameris JS, Stoker J: CT colonography: feasibility of substantial dose reduction—comparison of medium to very low doses in identical patients. Radiology 232:611–620, 2004PubMedCrossRef van Gelder RE, Venema HW, Florie J, Nio CY, Serlie IW, Schutter MP, van Rijn JC, Vos FM, Glas AS, Bossuyt PM, Bartelsman JF, Lameris JS, Stoker J: CT colonography: feasibility of substantial dose reduction—comparison of medium to very low doses in identical patients. Radiology 232:611–620, 2004PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference van Gelder RE, Venema HW, Serlie IW, et al: CT colonography at different radiation dose levels: feasibility of dose reduction. Radiology 224:25–33, 2002PubMedCrossRef van Gelder RE, Venema HW, Serlie IW, et al: CT colonography at different radiation dose levels: feasibility of dose reduction. Radiology 224:25–33, 2002PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Frush DP, Slack CC, Hollingsworth CL, Bisset GS, Donnelly LF, Hsieh J, Lavin-Wensell T, Mayo JR: Computer-simulated radiation dose reduction for abdominal multidetector CT of pediatric patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 179:1107–1113, 2002PubMed Frush DP, Slack CC, Hollingsworth CL, Bisset GS, Donnelly LF, Hsieh J, Lavin-Wensell T, Mayo JR: Computer-simulated radiation dose reduction for abdominal multidetector CT of pediatric patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 179:1107–1113, 2002PubMed
9.
go back to reference Mayo JR, Whittall KP, Leung AN, et al: Simulated dose reduction in conventional chest CT: validation study. Radiology 202:453–457, 1997PubMed Mayo JR, Whittall KP, Leung AN, et al: Simulated dose reduction in conventional chest CT: validation study. Radiology 202:453–457, 1997PubMed
10.
go back to reference Veldkamp WJ, Kroft LJ, Mertens BJ, Geleijns J: Comparison of image quality between a digital slot-scan CCD chest radiography system and AMBER and Bucky screen-film radiography chest systems. Radiology 235:857–866, 2005PubMedCrossRef Veldkamp WJ, Kroft LJ, Mertens BJ, Geleijns J: Comparison of image quality between a digital slot-scan CCD chest radiography system and AMBER and Bucky screen-film radiography chest systems. Radiology 235:857–866, 2005PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Samei E, Saunders RS, Lo JY, Dobbins JT, 3rd, Jesneck JL, Floyd CE, Ravin CE: Fundamental imaging characteristics of a slot-scan digital chest radiographic system. Med Phys 31:2687–1298, 2004PubMedCrossRef Samei E, Saunders RS, Lo JY, Dobbins JT, 3rd, Jesneck JL, Floyd CE, Ravin CE: Fundamental imaging characteristics of a slot-scan digital chest radiographic system. Med Phys 31:2687–1298, 2004PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Kroft LJ, Geleijns J, Mertens BJ, Veldkamp WJ, Zonderland HM, de Roos A: Digital slot-scan charged coupled device chest radiography versus AMBER and Bucky screen-film radiography: detection of simulated chest nodules and interstitial disease using a chest phantom. Radiology 231:156–163, 2004PubMedCrossRef Kroft LJ, Geleijns J, Mertens BJ, Veldkamp WJ, Zonderland HM, de Roos A: Digital slot-scan charged coupled device chest radiography versus AMBER and Bucky screen-film radiography: detection of simulated chest nodules and interstitial disease using a chest phantom. Radiology 231:156–163, 2004PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Kroft LJ, Veldkamp WJ, Mertens BJ, Boot MV, Geleijns J: Comparison of eight digital chest radiography systems: variation in detection of simulated chest disease. AJR 185:339–346, 2005PubMed Kroft LJ, Veldkamp WJ, Mertens BJ, Boot MV, Geleijns J: Comparison of eight digital chest radiography systems: variation in detection of simulated chest disease. AJR 185:339–346, 2005PubMed
14.
go back to reference Conway BJ, Butler PF, Duff JE, et al: Beam quality independent attenuation phantom for estimating patient exposure from x-ray automatic exposure controlled chest examinations. Med Phys 11:827–832, 1984PubMedCrossRef Conway BJ, Butler PF, Duff JE, et al: Beam quality independent attenuation phantom for estimating patient exposure from x-ray automatic exposure controlled chest examinations. Med Phys 11:827–832, 1984PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference International Electrotechnical Commission: Medical electrical equipment—characteristics of digital X-ray imaging devices—part 1: determination of the detective quantum efficiency, Geneva, Switzerland: International Electrotechnical Commission, 2003 International Electrotechnical Commission: Medical electrical equipment—characteristics of digital X-ray imaging devices—part 1: determination of the detective quantum efficiency, Geneva, Switzerland: International Electrotechnical Commission, 2003
16.
go back to reference te Brake GM, Karssemeijer N: Single and multiscale detection of masses in digital mammograms. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 18:628–639, 1999PubMedCrossRef te Brake GM, Karssemeijer N: Single and multiscale detection of masses in digital mammograms. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 18:628–639, 1999PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Bochud FO, Valley JF, Verdun FR, Hessler C, Schnyder P: Estimation of the noisy component of anatomical backgrounds. Med Phys 26:1365–1370, 1999PubMedCrossRef Bochud FO, Valley JF, Verdun FR, Hessler C, Schnyder P: Estimation of the noisy component of anatomical backgrounds. Med Phys 26:1365–1370, 1999PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Reiser I, Nishikawa RM: Identification of simulated microcalcifications in white noise and mammographic backgrounds. Med Phys 33:2905–2911, 2006PubMedCrossRef Reiser I, Nishikawa RM: Identification of simulated microcalcifications in white noise and mammographic backgrounds. Med Phys 33:2905–2911, 2006PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Veldkamp WJ, Kroft LJ, Boot MV, Mertens BJ, Geleijns J: Contrast-detail evaluation and dose assessment of eight digital chest radiography systems in clinical practice. Eur Radiol 16:333–341, 2006PubMedCrossRef Veldkamp WJ, Kroft LJ, Boot MV, Mertens BJ, Geleijns J: Contrast-detail evaluation and dose assessment of eight digital chest radiography systems in clinical practice. Eur Radiol 16:333–341, 2006PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Håkansson M, Båth M, Börjesson S, Kheddache S, Grahn A, Ruschin M, Tingberg A, Mattsson S, Månsson LG: Nodule detection in digital chest radiography: summary of the radius chest trial. Radiat Prot Dosim 114:114–120, 2005CrossRef Håkansson M, Båth M, Börjesson S, Kheddache S, Grahn A, Ruschin M, Tingberg A, Mattsson S, Månsson LG: Nodule detection in digital chest radiography: summary of the radius chest trial. Radiat Prot Dosim 114:114–120, 2005CrossRef
Metadata
Title
A Technique for Simulating the Effect of Dose Reduction on Image Quality in Digital Chest Radiography
Authors
Wouter J.H. Veldkamp
Lucia J.M. Kroft
Jan Pieter A. van Delft
Jacob Geleijns
Publication date
01-04-2009
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine / Issue 2/2009
Print ISSN: 2948-2925
Electronic ISSN: 2948-2933
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-008-9104-5

Other articles of this Issue 2/2009

Journal of Digital Imaging 2/2009 Go to the issue