Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Radiology 6/2017

Open Access 01-06-2017 | Magnetic Resonance

A systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the contribution of mr imaging to the diagnosis of foetal brain abnormalities In Utero

Authors: Debbie Jarvis, Cara Mooney, Judith Cohen, Diana Papaioannou, Mike Bradburn, Anthea Sutton, Paul D. Griffiths

Published in: European Radiology | Issue 6/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Objectives

This systematic review was undertaken to define the diagnostic performance of in utero MR (iuMR) imaging when attempting to confirm, exclude or provide additional information compared with the information provided by prenatal ultrasound scans (USS) when there is a suspicion of foetal brain abnormality.

Methods

Electronic databases were searched as well as relevant journals and conference proceedings. Reference lists of applicable studies were also explored. Data extraction was conducted by two reviewers independently to identify relevant studies for inclusion in the review. Inclusion criteria were original research that reported the findings of prenatal USS and iuMR imaging and findings in terms of accuracy as judged by an outcome reference diagnosis for foetal brain abnormalities.

Results

34 studies met the inclusion criteria which allowed diagnostic accuracy to be calculated in 959 cases, all of which had an outcome reference diagnosis determined by postnatal imaging, surgery or autopsy. iuMR imaging gave the correct diagnosis in 91 % which was an increase of 16 % above that achieved by USS alone.

Conclusion

iuMR imaging makes a significant contribution to the diagnosis of foetal brain abnormalities, increasing the diagnostic accuracy achievable by USS alone.

Key points

• Ultrasound is the primary modality for monitoring foetal brain development during pregnancy
• iuMRI used together with ultrasound is more accurate for detecting foetal brain abnormalities
• iuMR imaging is most helpful for detecting midline brain abnormalities
• The moderate heterogeneity of reviewed studies may compromise findings
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
2.
go back to reference Chung JH, Pelayo R, Hatfield TJ, Speir VJ, Wu J, Caughey AB (2012) Limitations of the fetal anatomic survey via ultrasound in the obese obstetrical population. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 25:1945–9CrossRefPubMed Chung JH, Pelayo R, Hatfield TJ, Speir VJ, Wu J, Caughey AB (2012) Limitations of the fetal anatomic survey via ultrasound in the obese obstetrical population. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 25:1945–9CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Whitby EH, Paley MN, Sprigg A et al (2004) Comparison of ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in 100 singleton pregnancies with suspected brain abnormalities. BJOG 111:784–92CrossRefPubMed Whitby EH, Paley MN, Sprigg A et al (2004) Comparison of ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in 100 singleton pregnancies with suspected brain abnormalities. BJOG 111:784–92CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Papaioannou G, Loggitsi D, Kampas I (2010) Imaging findings and utility of fetal central nervous system MRI. Pediatr Radiol 40(6):1126 Papaioannou G, Loggitsi D, Kampas I (2010) Imaging findings and utility of fetal central nervous system MRI. Pediatr Radiol 40(6):1126
5.
go back to reference Patenaude Y, Pugash D, Lim K et al (2014) The use of magnetic resonance imaging in the obstetric patient. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 36:349–55CrossRefPubMed Patenaude Y, Pugash D, Lim K et al (2014) The use of magnetic resonance imaging in the obstetric patient. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 36:349–55CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Nabavizadeh SA, Zarnow D, Bilaniuk LT, Schwartz ES, Zimmerman RA, Vossough A (2014) Correlation of prenatal and postnatal MRI findings in schizencephaly. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3872 Nabavizadeh SA, Zarnow D, Bilaniuk LT, Schwartz ES, Zimmerman RA, Vossough A (2014) Correlation of prenatal and postnatal MRI findings in schizencephaly. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. doi:10.​3174/​ajnr.​A3872
7.
go back to reference Egana-Ugrinovic G, Sanz-Cortes M, Couve-Perez C, Figueras F, Gratacos E (2014) Corpus callosum differences assessed by fetal MRI in late-onset intrauterine growth restriction and its association with neurobehavior. Prenat Diagn. doi:10.1002/pd.4381 PubMed Egana-Ugrinovic G, Sanz-Cortes M, Couve-Perez C, Figueras F, Gratacos E (2014) Corpus callosum differences assessed by fetal MRI in late-onset intrauterine growth restriction and its association with neurobehavior. Prenat Diagn. doi:10.​1002/​pd.​4381 PubMed
8.
go back to reference Kubik-Huch RA, Huisman TA, Wisser J et al (2000) Ultrafast MR imaging of the fetus. AJR Am J Roentgenol 174:1599–606CrossRefPubMed Kubik-Huch RA, Huisman TA, Wisser J et al (2000) Ultrafast MR imaging of the fetus. AJR Am J Roentgenol 174:1599–606CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Rossi AC, Prefumo F (2013) The efficacy of fetal magnetic resonance imaging in assessing central nervous system malformations: a systematic literature review. Prenat Diagn 33:40 Rossi AC, Prefumo F (2013) The efficacy of fetal magnetic resonance imaging in assessing central nervous system malformations: a systematic literature review. Prenat Diagn 33:40
10.
go back to reference van Doorn M, Oude Rengerink K, Newsum EA, Reneman L, Majoie CB, Pajkrt E (2015) Added value of fetal MRI in fetuses with suspected brain abnormalities on neurosonography: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. doi:10.3109/14767058.2015.1109621:1-13 PubMed van Doorn M, Oude Rengerink K, Newsum EA, Reneman L, Majoie CB, Pajkrt E (2015) Added value of fetal MRI in fetuses with suspected brain abnormalities on neurosonography: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. doi:10.​3109/​14767058.​2015.​1109621:​1-13 PubMed
11.
go back to reference Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. J Clin Epidemiol 62:1006–12CrossRefPubMed Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. J Clin Epidemiol 62:1006–12CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Whiting PF, Rutjes AW, Westwood ME et al (2011) QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. Ann Intern Med 155:529–36CrossRefPubMed Whiting PF, Rutjes AW, Westwood ME et al (2011) QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. Ann Intern Med 155:529–36CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Corp LS (2011) Stata Statistical Software Release 12. Stata Corp, College Station Corp LS (2011) Stata Statistical Software Release 12. Stata Corp, College Station
14.
go back to reference Elbourne DR, Altman DG, Higgins JP, Curtin F, Worthington HV, Vail A (2002) Meta-analyses involving cross-over trials: methodological issues. Int J Epidemiol 31:140–9CrossRefPubMed Elbourne DR, Altman DG, Higgins JP, Curtin F, Worthington HV, Vail A (2002) Meta-analyses involving cross-over trials: methodological issues. Int J Epidemiol 31:140–9CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Becker MP, Balagtas CC (1993) Marginal modeling of binary cross-over data. Biometrics 49:997–1009CrossRefPubMed Becker MP, Balagtas CC (1993) Marginal modeling of binary cross-over data. Biometrics 49:997–1009CrossRefPubMed
16.
17.
18.
go back to reference Amini H, Axelsson O, Raiend M, Wikstrom J (2010) The clinical impact of fetal magnetic resonance imaging on management of CNS anomalies in the second trimester of pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 89:1571–81CrossRefPubMed Amini H, Axelsson O, Raiend M, Wikstrom J (2010) The clinical impact of fetal magnetic resonance imaging on management of CNS anomalies in the second trimester of pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 89:1571–81CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Hamisa M, Dabees N, Ataalla WM, Ziada DH (2013) Magnetic resonance imaging versus Ultrasound examination in detection of prenatal fetal brain anomalies. Egypt J Radiol Nucl Med 44:665–72CrossRef Hamisa M, Dabees N, Ataalla WM, Ziada DH (2013) Magnetic resonance imaging versus Ultrasound examination in detection of prenatal fetal brain anomalies. Egypt J Radiol Nucl Med 44:665–72CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Kul S, Korkmaz HA, Cansu A et al (2012) Contribution of MRI to ultrasound in the diagnosis of fetal anomalies. J Magn Reson Imaging 35:882–90CrossRefPubMed Kul S, Korkmaz HA, Cansu A et al (2012) Contribution of MRI to ultrasound in the diagnosis of fetal anomalies. J Magn Reson Imaging 35:882–90CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Rajeswaran R, Chandrasekharan A, Joseph S, Venkata Sai P, Dev B, Reddy S (2009) Ultrasound versus MRI in the diagnosis of fetal head and trunk anomalies. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 22:115–23CrossRefPubMed Rajeswaran R, Chandrasekharan A, Joseph S, Venkata Sai P, Dev B, Reddy S (2009) Ultrasound versus MRI in the diagnosis of fetal head and trunk anomalies. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 22:115–23CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Resta M, Greco P, D'Addario V et al (1994) Magnetic resonance imaging in pregnancy: study of fetal cerebral malformations. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 4:7–20CrossRefPubMed Resta M, Greco P, D'Addario V et al (1994) Magnetic resonance imaging in pregnancy: study of fetal cerebral malformations. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 4:7–20CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Simon EM, Goldstein RB, Coakley FV et al (2000) Fast MR imaging of fetal CNS anomalies in utero. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 21:1688–98PubMed Simon EM, Goldstein RB, Coakley FV et al (2000) Fast MR imaging of fetal CNS anomalies in utero. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 21:1688–98PubMed
24.
go back to reference Blaicher W, Prayer D, Mittermayer C et al (2003) Magnetic resonance imaging in foetuses with bilateral moderate ventriculomegaly and suspected anomaly the corpus callosum on ultrasound scan. Ultraschall Med 24:255–60CrossRefPubMed Blaicher W, Prayer D, Mittermayer C et al (2003) Magnetic resonance imaging in foetuses with bilateral moderate ventriculomegaly and suspected anomaly the corpus callosum on ultrasound scan. Ultraschall Med 24:255–60CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Doneda C, Parazzini C, Righini A et al (2010) Early cerebral lesions in cytomegalovirus infection: prenatal MR imaging. Radiology 255:613–21CrossRefPubMed Doneda C, Parazzini C, Righini A et al (2010) Early cerebral lesions in cytomegalovirus infection: prenatal MR imaging. Radiology 255:613–21CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Lipitz S, Hoffmann C, Feldman B, Tepperberg-Dikawa M, Schiff E, Weisz B (2010) Value of prenatal ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in assessment of congenital primary cytomegalovirus infection. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 36:709–17CrossRefPubMed Lipitz S, Hoffmann C, Feldman B, Tepperberg-Dikawa M, Schiff E, Weisz B (2010) Value of prenatal ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in assessment of congenital primary cytomegalovirus infection. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 36:709–17CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Manganaro L, Bernardo S, La Barbera L et al (2012) Role of foetal MRI in the evaluation of ischaemic-haemorrhagic lesions of the foetal brain. J Perinat Med 40:419–26CrossRefPubMed Manganaro L, Bernardo S, La Barbera L et al (2012) Role of foetal MRI in the evaluation of ischaemic-haemorrhagic lesions of the foetal brain. J Perinat Med 40:419–26CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Saleem SN, Said AH, Abdel-Raouf M et al (2009) Fetal MRI in the evaluation of fetuses referred for sonographically suspected neural tube defects (NTDs): Impact on diagnosis and management decision. Neuroradiology 51:761–72CrossRefPubMed Saleem SN, Said AH, Abdel-Raouf M et al (2009) Fetal MRI in the evaluation of fetuses referred for sonographically suspected neural tube defects (NTDs): Impact on diagnosis and management decision. Neuroradiology 51:761–72CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Twickler DM, Magee KP, Caire J, Zaretsky M, Fleckenstein JL, Ramus RM (2003) Second-opinion magnetic resonance imaging for suspected fetal central nervous system abnormalities. Am J Obstet Gynecol 188:492–6CrossRefPubMed Twickler DM, Magee KP, Caire J, Zaretsky M, Fleckenstein JL, Ramus RM (2003) Second-opinion magnetic resonance imaging for suspected fetal central nervous system abnormalities. Am J Obstet Gynecol 188:492–6CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Whitby EH, Variend S, Rutter S et al (2004) Corroboration of in utero MRI using post-mortem MRI and autopsy in foetuses with CNS abnormalities. Clin Radiol 59:1114–20CrossRefPubMed Whitby EH, Variend S, Rutter S et al (2004) Corroboration of in utero MRI using post-mortem MRI and autopsy in foetuses with CNS abnormalities. Clin Radiol 59:1114–20CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Yuh WT, Nguyen HD, Fisher DJ et al (1994) MR of fetal central nervous system abnormalities. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 15:459–64PubMed Yuh WT, Nguyen HD, Fisher DJ et al (1994) MR of fetal central nervous system abnormalities. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 15:459–64PubMed
32.
go back to reference Malinger G, Ben-Sira L, Lev D, Ben-Aroya Z, Kidron D, Lerman-Sagie T (2004) Fetal brain imaging: a comparison between magnetic resonance imaging and dedicated neurosonography. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 23:333–40CrossRefPubMed Malinger G, Ben-Sira L, Lev D, Ben-Aroya Z, Kidron D, Lerman-Sagie T (2004) Fetal brain imaging: a comparison between magnetic resonance imaging and dedicated neurosonography. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 23:333–40CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Benacerraf BR, Shipp TD, Bromley B, Levine D (2007) What does magnetic resonance imaging add to the prenatal sonographic diagnosis of ventricidomegaly? J Ultrasound Med 26:1513–22CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Benacerraf BR, Shipp TD, Bromley B, Levine D (2007) What does magnetic resonance imaging add to the prenatal sonographic diagnosis of ventricidomegaly? J Ultrasound Med 26:1513–22CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
34.
go back to reference D'Ercole C, Girard N, Cravello L et al (1998) Prenatal diagnosis of fetal corpus callosum agenesis by ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging. Prenat Diagn 18:247–53CrossRefPubMed D'Ercole C, Girard N, Cravello L et al (1998) Prenatal diagnosis of fetal corpus callosum agenesis by ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging. Prenat Diagn 18:247–53CrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference Frates MC, Kumar AJ, Benson CB, Ward VL, Tempany CM (2004) Fetal anomalies: comparison of MR imaging and US for diagnosis. Radiology 232:398–404CrossRefPubMed Frates MC, Kumar AJ, Benson CB, Ward VL, Tempany CM (2004) Fetal anomalies: comparison of MR imaging and US for diagnosis. Radiology 232:398–404CrossRefPubMed
36.
go back to reference Benoist G, Salomon LJ, Mohlo M, Suarez B, Jacquemard F, Ville Y (2008) Cytomegalovirus-related fetal brain lesions: comparison between targeted ultrasound examination and magnetic resonance imaging. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 32:900–5CrossRefPubMed Benoist G, Salomon LJ, Mohlo M, Suarez B, Jacquemard F, Ville Y (2008) Cytomegalovirus-related fetal brain lesions: comparison between targeted ultrasound examination and magnetic resonance imaging. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 32:900–5CrossRefPubMed
37.
go back to reference Glenn OA, Goldstein RB, Li KC et al (2005) Fetal magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of fetuses referred for sonographically suspected abnormalities of the corpus callosum. J Ultrasound Med 24:791–804CrossRefPubMed Glenn OA, Goldstein RB, Li KC et al (2005) Fetal magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of fetuses referred for sonographically suspected abnormalities of the corpus callosum. J Ultrasound Med 24:791–804CrossRefPubMed
38.
go back to reference Colleoni GG, Contro E, Carletti A et al (2012) Prenatal diagnosis and outcome of fetal posterior fossa fluid collections. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 39:625–31CrossRef Colleoni GG, Contro E, Carletti A et al (2012) Prenatal diagnosis and outcome of fetal posterior fossa fluid collections. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 39:625–31CrossRef
39.
go back to reference Garcia-Flores J, Recio M, Uriel M et al (2013) Fetal magnetic resonance imaging and neurosonography in congenital neurological anomalies: supplementary diagnostic and postnatal prognostic value. J Matern Fetal Neonat Med 26:1517–23CrossRef Garcia-Flores J, Recio M, Uriel M et al (2013) Fetal magnetic resonance imaging and neurosonography in congenital neurological anomalies: supplementary diagnostic and postnatal prognostic value. J Matern Fetal Neonat Med 26:1517–23CrossRef
40.
go back to reference Hagmann CF, Robertson NJ, Leung WC, Chong KW, Chitty LS (2008) Foetal brain imaging: ultrasound or MRI. A comparison between magnetic resonance imaging and a dedicated multidisciplinary neurosonographic opinion. Acta Paediatr 97:414–9CrossRefPubMed Hagmann CF, Robertson NJ, Leung WC, Chong KW, Chitty LS (2008) Foetal brain imaging: ultrasound or MRI. A comparison between magnetic resonance imaging and a dedicated multidisciplinary neurosonographic opinion. Acta Paediatr 97:414–9CrossRefPubMed
41.
go back to reference Ismail KM, Ashworth JR, Martin WL et al (2002) Fetal magnetic resonance imaging in prenatal diagnosis of central nervous system abnormalities: 3-year experience. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 12:185–90CrossRefPubMed Ismail KM, Ashworth JR, Martin WL et al (2002) Fetal magnetic resonance imaging in prenatal diagnosis of central nervous system abnormalities: 3-year experience. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 12:185–90CrossRefPubMed
42.
go back to reference Paladini D, Quarantelli M, Sglavo G et al (2014) Accuracy of neurosonography and MRI in clinical management of fetuses referred with central nervous system abnormalities. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 44:188–96PubMed Paladini D, Quarantelli M, Sglavo G et al (2014) Accuracy of neurosonography and MRI in clinical management of fetuses referred with central nervous system abnormalities. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 44:188–96PubMed
43.
go back to reference Malinger G, Lev D, Ben-Sira L et al (2011) Can syndromic macrocephaly be diagnosed in utero? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 37:72–81CrossRefPubMed Malinger G, Lev D, Ben-Sira L et al (2011) Can syndromic macrocephaly be diagnosed in utero? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 37:72–81CrossRefPubMed
44.
go back to reference Peruzzi P, Corbitt RJ, Raffel C (2010) Magnetic resonance imaging versus ultrasonography for the in utero evaluation of central nervous system anomalies. J Neurosurg Pediatr 6:340–5CrossRefPubMed Peruzzi P, Corbitt RJ, Raffel C (2010) Magnetic resonance imaging versus ultrasonography for the in utero evaluation of central nervous system anomalies. J Neurosurg Pediatr 6:340–5CrossRefPubMed
45.
go back to reference Phua HT, Chiou LO, Stringer D, Tan JVK, Yeo GSH (2009) Magnetic resonance imaging of the fetal central nervous system in Singapore. Ann Acad Med Singapore 38:774–81 Phua HT, Chiou LO, Stringer D, Tan JVK, Yeo GSH (2009) Magnetic resonance imaging of the fetal central nervous system in Singapore. Ann Acad Med Singapore 38:774–81
47.
go back to reference We JS, Young L, Park IY, Shin JC, Im SA (2012) Usefulness of additional fetal magnetic resonance imaging in the prenatal diagnosis of congenital abnormalities. Arch Gynecol Obstet 286:1443–52CrossRefPubMed We JS, Young L, Park IY, Shin JC, Im SA (2012) Usefulness of additional fetal magnetic resonance imaging in the prenatal diagnosis of congenital abnormalities. Arch Gynecol Obstet 286:1443–52CrossRefPubMed
48.
go back to reference Hosny IA, Elghawabi HS (2010) Ultrafast MRI of the fetus: an increasingly important tool in prenatal diagnosis of congenital anomalies. Magn Reson Imaging 28:1431–9CrossRefPubMed Hosny IA, Elghawabi HS (2010) Ultrafast MRI of the fetus: an increasingly important tool in prenatal diagnosis of congenital anomalies. Magn Reson Imaging 28:1431–9CrossRefPubMed
49.
go back to reference Wang GB, Shan RQ, Ma YX et al (2006) Fetal central nervous system anomalies: comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasonography for diagnosis. Chin Med J 119:1272–7PubMed Wang GB, Shan RQ, Ma YX et al (2006) Fetal central nervous system anomalies: comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasonography for diagnosis. Chin Med J 119:1272–7PubMed
50.
go back to reference Rubod C, Robert Y, Tillouche N, Devisme L, Houfflin-Debarge V, Puech F (2005) Role of fetal ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in the prenatal diagnosis of migration disorders. Prenat Diagn 25:1181–7CrossRefPubMed Rubod C, Robert Y, Tillouche N, Devisme L, Houfflin-Debarge V, Puech F (2005) Role of fetal ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in the prenatal diagnosis of migration disorders. Prenat Diagn 25:1181–7CrossRefPubMed
52.
go back to reference Prayer D, Brugger PC, Prayer L (2004) Fetal MRI: techniques and protocols. Pediatr Radiol 34:685–93CrossRefPubMed Prayer D, Brugger PC, Prayer L (2004) Fetal MRI: techniques and protocols. Pediatr Radiol 34:685–93CrossRefPubMed
53.
go back to reference Malinger G, Lev D, Lerman-Sagie T (2004) Fetal central nervous system: MR imaging versus dedicated US—need for prospective, blind, comparative studies. Radiology 232:306, author reply 306-307 CrossRefPubMed Malinger G, Lev D, Lerman-Sagie T (2004) Fetal central nervous system: MR imaging versus dedicated US—need for prospective, blind, comparative studies. Radiology 232:306, author reply 306-307 CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
A systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the contribution of mr imaging to the diagnosis of foetal brain abnormalities In Utero
Authors
Debbie Jarvis
Cara Mooney
Judith Cohen
Diana Papaioannou
Mike Bradburn
Anthea Sutton
Paul D. Griffiths
Publication date
01-06-2017
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Radiology / Issue 6/2017
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-016-4563-4

Other articles of this Issue 6/2017

European Radiology 6/2017 Go to the issue