Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Patient Safety in Surgery 1/2016

Open Access 01-12-2016 | Research

A survey on patients’ knowledge and expectations during informed consent for spinal surgery: can we improve the shared decision-making process?

Authors: Sebastian Weckbach, Tugrul Kocak, Heiko Reichel, Friederike Lattig

Published in: Patient Safety in Surgery | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The informed medical consent in surgery requires to some point basic medical knowledge. The treating physicians while explaining the details and risks of the recommended procedure often imply this. We hypothesized, that patients do not have adequate medical understanding to decide about the ongoing therapy and its potential complications based on knowledge jeopardizing the patients’ safety.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective analysis of a prospective database using a multiple choice questionnaire with 10 basic questions about anatomy, clinical symptoms and therapies of spinal diseases in our spine clinic at a German university hospital. Included were all patients at the spine clinic who agreed to the study and to fill in the questionnaire. Furthermore the patients age, mother tongue, the past spinal surgical history, the length of duration of symptoms and the patients education were inquired. The data were analyzed descriptive.

Results

Included were 248 patients with an average age of 59 years (16–88 a). 70 % of all patients used German as their mother tongue. 30 % of the included patients already had spinal surgery and suffered on average for 13.4 years because of their spinal disorder. Overall 32.6 % of all questions were answered correctly (range 0.8–68 %). A correlation of correctly answered questions and the patients’ age, duration of symptoms, mother tongue, education and past surgical history could not be described.

Conclusion

The percentage of correctly answered questions is almost as low as the likelihood of nearness in guessing. Having this in mind the patients do not choose any treatment option based on knowledge. The physicians need to provide more basic knowledge to the patients. This would increase the amount of successful therapies, content patients and the patients safety.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Paruch JL, Ko CY, Bilimoria KY. An opportunity to improve informed consent and shared decision making: the role of the ACS NSQIP Surgical Risk Calculator in oncology. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21:5–7.CrossRefPubMed Paruch JL, Ko CY, Bilimoria KY. An opportunity to improve informed consent and shared decision making: the role of the ACS NSQIP Surgical Risk Calculator in oncology. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21:5–7.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Theologis AA, Anaya A, Sabatini C, Sucato DJ, Parent S, Erickson M, Diab M. Surgical consent of children and guardians for the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis is incompletely informed. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016;41:53–61.CrossRef Theologis AA, Anaya A, Sabatini C, Sucato DJ, Parent S, Erickson M, Diab M. Surgical consent of children and guardians for the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis is incompletely informed. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016;41:53–61.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Raper SE, Sarwer DB. Informed consent issues in the conduct of bariatric surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2008;4:60–8.CrossRefPubMed Raper SE, Sarwer DB. Informed consent issues in the conduct of bariatric surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2008;4:60–8.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Shekelle PG, Wachter RM, Pronovost PJ, Schoelles K, McDonald KM, Dy SM, Shojania K, Reston J, Berger Z, Johnsen B, Larkin JW, Lucas S, Martinez K, Motala A, Newberry SJ, Noble M, Pfoh E, Ranji SR, Rennke S, Schmidt E, Shanman R, Sullivan N, Sun F, Tipton K, Treadwell JR, Tsou A, Vaiana ME, Weaver SJ, Wilson R, Winters BD. Making health care safer II: an updated critical analysis of the evidence for patient safety practices. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2013:1–945. Shekelle PG, Wachter RM, Pronovost PJ, Schoelles K, McDonald KM, Dy SM, Shojania K, Reston J, Berger Z, Johnsen B, Larkin JW, Lucas S, Martinez K, Motala A, Newberry SJ, Noble M, Pfoh E, Ranji SR, Rennke S, Schmidt E, Shanman R, Sullivan N, Sun F, Tipton K, Treadwell JR, Tsou A, Vaiana ME, Weaver SJ, Wilson R, Winters BD. Making health care safer II: an updated critical analysis of the evidence for patient safety practices. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2013:1–945.
6.
go back to reference Guinand J, Gapany C, Simon JP, Wasserfallen JB, Joseph JM. A survey on surgeons’ perceived quality of the informed consent process in a Swiss paediatric surgery unit. Patient Saf Surg. 2015;9:30.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Guinand J, Gapany C, Simon JP, Wasserfallen JB, Joseph JM. A survey on surgeons’ perceived quality of the informed consent process in a Swiss paediatric surgery unit. Patient Saf Surg. 2015;9:30.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference Joolaee S, Jafarian Amiri SR, Farahani MA, Varaei S. Iranian nursing students’ preparedness for clinical training: A qualitative study. Nurse Educ Today. 2015;35:e13–7.CrossRefPubMed Joolaee S, Jafarian Amiri SR, Farahani MA, Varaei S. Iranian nursing students’ preparedness for clinical training: A qualitative study. Nurse Educ Today. 2015;35:e13–7.CrossRefPubMed
8.
9.
go back to reference Habiba M, Jackson C, Akkad A, Kenyon S, Dixon-Woods M. Women’s accounts of consenting to surgery: is consent a quality problem? Qual Saf Health Care. 2004;13:422–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Habiba M, Jackson C, Akkad A, Kenyon S, Dixon-Woods M. Women’s accounts of consenting to surgery: is consent a quality problem? Qual Saf Health Care. 2004;13:422–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference Barry MJ, Edgman-Levitan S. Shared decision making--pinnacle of patient-centered care. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:780–1.CrossRefPubMed Barry MJ, Edgman-Levitan S. Shared decision making--pinnacle of patient-centered care. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:780–1.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Ford S, Schofield T, Hope T. Are patients’ decision-making preferences being met? Health Expect. 2003;6:72–80.CrossRefPubMed Ford S, Schofield T, Hope T. Are patients’ decision-making preferences being met? Health Expect. 2003;6:72–80.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Ripley BA, Tiffany D, Lehmann LS, Silverman SG. Improving the informed consent conversation: a standardized checklist that is patient centered, quality driven, and legally sound. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2015;26:1639–46.CrossRefPubMed Ripley BA, Tiffany D, Lehmann LS, Silverman SG. Improving the informed consent conversation: a standardized checklist that is patient centered, quality driven, and legally sound. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2015;26:1639–46.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Santema TB, Stubenrouch FE, Koelemay MJ, Vahl AC, Vermeulen CF, Visser MJ, Ubbink DT. Shared decision making in vascular surgery: an exploratory study. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2016;51:587–93.CrossRefPubMed Santema TB, Stubenrouch FE, Koelemay MJ, Vahl AC, Vermeulen CF, Visser MJ, Ubbink DT. Shared decision making in vascular surgery: an exploratory study. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2016;51:587–93.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Rothberg MB, Sivalingam SK, Ashraf J, Visintainer P, Joelson J, Kleppel R, Vallurupalli N, Schweiger MJ. Patients‘and cardiologists’ perceptions of the benefits of percutaneous coronary intervention for stable coronary disease. Ann Intern Med. 2010;153:307–13.CrossRefPubMed Rothberg MB, Sivalingam SK, Ashraf J, Visintainer P, Joelson J, Kleppel R, Vallurupalli N, Schweiger MJ. Patients‘and cardiologists’ perceptions of the benefits of percutaneous coronary intervention for stable coronary disease. Ann Intern Med. 2010;153:307–13.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Schenker Y, Fernandez A, Sudore R, Schillinger D. Interventions to improve patient comprehension in informed consent for medical and surgical procedures: a systematic review. Med Decis Making. 2011;31:151–73.CrossRefPubMed Schenker Y, Fernandez A, Sudore R, Schillinger D. Interventions to improve patient comprehension in informed consent for medical and surgical procedures: a systematic review. Med Decis Making. 2011;31:151–73.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Schenker Y, Meisel A. Informed consent in clinical care: practical considerations in the effort to achieve ethical goals. JAMA. 2011;305:1130–1.CrossRefPubMed Schenker Y, Meisel A. Informed consent in clinical care: practical considerations in the effort to achieve ethical goals. JAMA. 2011;305:1130–1.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Akkad A, Jackson C, Kenyon S, Dixon-Woods M, Taub N, Habiba M. Informed consent for elective and emergency surgery: questionnaire study. BJOG. 2004;111:1133–8.CrossRefPubMed Akkad A, Jackson C, Kenyon S, Dixon-Woods M, Taub N, Habiba M. Informed consent for elective and emergency surgery: questionnaire study. BJOG. 2004;111:1133–8.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Braddock 3rd CH, Edwards KA, Hasenberg NM, Laidley TL, Levinson W. Informed decision making in outpatient practice: time to get back to basics. JAMA. 1999;282:2313–20.CrossRefPubMed Braddock 3rd CH, Edwards KA, Hasenberg NM, Laidley TL, Levinson W. Informed decision making in outpatient practice: time to get back to basics. JAMA. 1999;282:2313–20.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Marvel MK, Epstein RM, Flowers K, Beckman HB. Soliciting the patient’s agenda: have we improved? JAMA. 1999;281:283–7.CrossRefPubMed Marvel MK, Epstein RM, Flowers K, Beckman HB. Soliciting the patient’s agenda: have we improved? JAMA. 1999;281:283–7.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Paasche-Orlow MK, Parker RM, Gazmararian JA, Nielsen-Bohlman LT, Rudd RR. The prevalence of limited health literacy. J Gen Intern Med. 2005;20:175–84.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Paasche-Orlow MK, Parker RM, Gazmararian JA, Nielsen-Bohlman LT, Rudd RR. The prevalence of limited health literacy. J Gen Intern Med. 2005;20:175–84.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
22.
go back to reference Bass 3rd PF, Wilson JF, Griffith CH, Barnett DR. Residents’ ability to identify patients with poor literacy skills. Acad Med. 2002;77:1039–41.CrossRefPubMed Bass 3rd PF, Wilson JF, Griffith CH, Barnett DR. Residents’ ability to identify patients with poor literacy skills. Acad Med. 2002;77:1039–41.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Parikh NS, Parker RM, Nurss JR, Baker DW, Williams MV. Shame and health literacy: the unspoken connection. Patient Educ Couns. 1996;27:33–9.CrossRefPubMed Parikh NS, Parker RM, Nurss JR, Baker DW, Williams MV. Shame and health literacy: the unspoken connection. Patient Educ Couns. 1996;27:33–9.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
A survey on patients’ knowledge and expectations during informed consent for spinal surgery: can we improve the shared decision-making process?
Authors
Sebastian Weckbach
Tugrul Kocak
Heiko Reichel
Friederike Lattig
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Patient Safety in Surgery / Issue 1/2016
Electronic ISSN: 1754-9493
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13037-016-0103-z

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

Patient Safety in Surgery 1/2016 Go to the issue