Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
Published in: BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 1/2013

Open Access 01-12-2013 | Research article

A Study on Pubmed Search Tag Usage Pattern: Association Rule Mining of a Full-day Pubmed Query Log

Authors: Abu Saleh Mohammad Mosa, Illhoi Yoo

Published in: BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making | Issue 1/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The practice of evidence-based medicine requires efficient biomedical literature search such as PubMed/MEDLINE. Retrieval performance relies highly on the efficient use of search field tags. The purpose of this study was to analyze PubMed log data in order to understand the usage pattern of search tags by the end user in PubMed/MEDLINE search.

Methods

A PubMed query log file was obtained from the National Library of Medicine containing anonymous user identification, timestamp, and query text. Inconsistent records were removed from the dataset and the search tags were extracted from the query texts. A total of 2,917,159 queries were selected for this study issued by a total of 613,061 users. The analysis of frequent co-occurrences and usage patterns of the search tags was conducted using an association mining algorithm.

Results

The percentage of search tag usage was low (11.38% of the total queries) and only 2.95% of queries contained two or more tags. Three out of four users used no search tag and about two-third of them issued less than four queries. Among the queries containing at least one tagged search term, the average number of search tags was almost half of the number of total search terms. Navigational search tags are more frequently used than informational search tags. While no strong association was observed between informational and navigational tags, six (out of 19) informational tags and six (out of 29) navigational tags showed strong associations in PubMed searches.

Conclusions

The low percentage of search tag usage implies that PubMed/MEDLINE users do not utilize the features of PubMed/MEDLINE widely or they are not aware of such features or solely depend on the high recall focused query translation by the PubMed’s Automatic Term Mapping. The users need further education and interactive search application for effective use of the search tags in order to fulfill their biomedical information needs from PubMed/MEDLINE.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group: Evidence-based medicine: a new approach to teaching the practice of medicine. JAMA. 1992, 268: 2420-5. 10.1001/jama.1992.03490170092032.CrossRef
2.
Ebbert JO, Dupras DM, Erwin PJ: Searching the medical literature using PubMed: a tutorial. Mayo Clinic proceedings. Mayo Clinic. 2003, 78: 87-91. 10.4065/78.1.87.CrossRef
3.
Sood A, Erwin PJ, Ebbert JO: Using advanced search tools on PubMed for citation retrieval. Mayo Clinic proceedings. Mayo Clinic. 2004, 79: 1295-9. 10.4065/79.10.1295.CrossRef
4.
Sood A, Ghosh AK: Literature search using PubMed: an essential tool for practicing evidence-based medicine. The Journal of the Association of Physicians of India. 2006, 54: 303-8.PubMed
5.
Mattox D: Welcome to ARCHIVES CME. Archives of otolaryngology--head & neck surgery. 2000, 126: 914-CrossRef
6.
Bahaadinbeigy K, Yogesan K, Wootton R: MEDLINE versus EMBASE and CINAHL for telemedicine searches. Telemedicine journal and e-health: the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association. 2010, 16: 916-9. 10.1089/tmj.2010.0046.CrossRef
7.
Yoo I, Marinov M: Recent research for MEDLINE/PubMed: short review. Proceedings of the ACM fourth international workshop on Data and text mining in biomedical informatics. 2010, Toronto: ACM, 69-70.
8.
Haux R, Grothe W, Runkel M, Schackert H, Windeler H, Winter A, Wirtz R, Herfarth C, Kunze S: Knowledge retrieval as one type of knowledge-based decision support in medicine: results of an evaluation study. International journal of bio-medical computing. 1996, 41: 69-86. 10.1016/0020-7101(96)01160-9.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Nankivell C, Wallis P, Mynott G: Networked information and clinical decision making: the experience of Birmingham Heartlands and Solihull National Health Service Trust (Teaching). Medical education. 2001, 35: 167-72. 10.1046/j.1365-2923.2001.00839.x.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Baker NC, Hemminger BM: Mining connections between chemicals, proteins, and diseases extracted from Medline annotations. Journal of biomedical informatics. 2010, 43: 510-9. 10.1016/j.jbi.2010.03.008.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
Ely JW, Osheroff JA, Chambliss ML, Ebell MH, Rosenbaum ME: Answering physicians’ clinical questions: obstacles and potential solutions. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association: JAMIA. 2005, 12: 217-24.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
Hoogendam A, Stalenhoef AFH, Robbé PFDV, JPM Oa: Analysis of queries sent to PubMed at the point of care: observation of search behaviour in a medical teaching hospital. BMC medical informatics and decision making. 2008, 8: 42-10.1186/1472-6947-8-42.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
14.
15.
Gallagher PE, Allen TY, Wyer PC: How to find evidence when you need it, part 2: a clinician’s guide to MEDLINE: the basics. Annals of emergency medicine. 2002, 39: 436-40. 10.1067/mem.2002.122774.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Muin M, Fontelo P, Liu F, Ackerman M: SLIM: an alternative Web interface for MEDLINE/PubMed searches - a preliminary study. BMC medical informatics and decision making. 2005, 5: 37-10.1186/1472-6947-5-37.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
18.
Giglia E: New year, new PubMed. European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine. 2009, 45: 155-9.PubMed
19.
Gault LV, Shultz M, Davies KJ: Variations in Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) mapping: from the natural language of patron terms to the controlled vocabulary of mapped lists. Journal of the Medical Library Association: JMLA. 2002, 90: 173-80.PubMedPubMedCentral
20.
Smith AM: An examination of PubMed’s ability to disambiguate subject queries and journal title queries. Journal of the Medical Library Association: JMLA. 2004, 92: 97-100.PubMedPubMedCentral
21.
Shultz M: Mapping of medical acronyms and initialisms to Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) across selected systems. Journal of the Medical Library Association: JMLA. 2006, 94: 410-4.PubMedPubMedCentral
22.
Sáez Gómez JM, Aguinaga Ontoso E, Negro Alvarez JM, Guillén-Grima F, Ivancevich JC, Bozzola CM: Efficient bibliographic searches on allergology using PubMed. Allergologia et immunopathologia. 2007, 35: 264-75. 10.1157/13112994.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Sriganesh V: Using PubMed in radiology: ten useful tips for radiologists. Indian Journal of Radiology and Imaging. 2011, 21: 162-10.4103/0971-3026.85362.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
24.
Chang A, Heskett KM, Davidson TM: Searching the literature using medical subject headings versus text word with PubMed. The Laryngoscope. 2006, 116: 336-40. 10.1097/01.mlg.0000195371.72887.a2.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Motschall E, Falck-Ytter Y: Searching the MEDLINE literature database through PubMed: a short guide. Onkologie. 2005, 28: 517-22. 10.1159/000087186.PubMed
26.
Thirion B, Robu I, Darmoni SJ: Optimization of the PubMed automatic term mapping. Studies in health technology and informatics. 2009, 150: 238-42.PubMed
27.
Anders ME, Evans DP: Comparison of PubMed and google scholar literature searches. Respiratory care. 2010, 55: 578-83.PubMed
28.
Broder A: A taxonomy of web search. SIGIR Forum. 2002, 36: 3-10. 10.1145/792550.792552.CrossRef
29.
Herskovic JR, Tanaka LY, Hersh W, Bernstam EV: A day in the life of PubMed: analysis of a typical day’s query log. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association: JAMIA. 2007, 14: 212-20. 10.1197/jamia.M2191.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
30.
Silverstein C, Marais H, Henzinger M, Moricz M: Analysis of a very large web search engine query log. In ACM SIGIR Forum. ACM. 1999, 33: 6-12. 10.1145/331403.331405.CrossRef
31.
Jansen BJ, Spink A, Saracevic T: Real life, real users, and real needs: a study and analysis of user queries on the web. Information Processing & Management. 2000, 36: 207-227. 10.1016/S0306-4573(99)00056-4.CrossRef
32.
Facca F, Lanzi P: Mining interesting knowledge from weblogs: a survey. Data & Knowledge Engineering. 2005, 53: 225-241. 10.1016/j.datak.2004.08.001.CrossRef
33.
Murray G: Query log analysis: social and technological challenges (WWW 2007 Workshop Report). ACM SIGIR Forum. 2007, 41: 112-120. 10.1145/1328964.1328985.CrossRef
34.
Doğan RI, Murray GC, Névéol A, Lu Z: Understanding PubMed user search behavior through log analysis 2009. Database: the journal of biological databases and curation. 2009, 2009: bap018-
35.
Doğan RI, Murray GC, Névéol A, Lu Z, Library N: Characterizing User Search Behavior in PubMed. AMIA 2010 Annual Symposium. 2010, Washington: American Medical Informatics Association
36.
Lacroix E-M, Mehnert R: The US National Library of Medicine in the 21st century: expanding collections, nontraditional formats, new audiences. Health information and libraries journal. 2002, 19: 126-32. 10.1046/j.1471-1842.2002.00382.x.CrossRefPubMed
37.
Lu Z, Wilbur WJ: Improving accuracy for identifying related PubMed queries by an integrated approach. Journal of biomedical informatics. 2009, 42: 831-8. 10.1016/j.jbi.2008.12.006.CrossRefPubMed
38.
Névéol A, Islamaj Doğan R, Lu Z: Semi-automatic semantic annotation of PubMed queries: a study on quality, efficiency, satisfaction. Journal of biomedical informatics. 2011, 44: 310-8. 10.1016/j.jbi.2010.11.001.CrossRefPubMed
39.
Lu Z, Xie N, Wilbur WJ: Identifying related journals through log analysis. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England). 2009, 25: 3038-9. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp529.CrossRefPubMedCentral
40.
Lu Z, Wilbur WJ, McEntyre JR, Iskhakov A, Szilagyi L: Finding query suggestions for PubMed. AMIA Symposium. 2009, 2009: 396-400.PubMedPubMedCentral
41.
Yoo I, Alafaireet P, Marinov M, Pena-Hernandez K, Gopidi R, Chang J-F, Hua L: Data mining in healthcare and biomedicine: a survey of the literature. Journal of medical systems. 2012, 36: 2431-48. 10.1007/s10916-011-9710-5.CrossRefPubMed
42.
Chen T-J, Chou L-F, Hwang S-J: Application of a data-mining technique to analyze coprescription patterns for antacids in Taiwan. Clinical Therapeutics. 2003, 25: 2453-63. 10.1016/S0149-2918(03)80287-4.CrossRefPubMed
43.
Tai Y-M, Chiu H-W: Comorbidity study of ADHD: applying association rule mining (ARM) to National Health Insurance Database of Taiwan. International journal of medical informatics. 2009, 78: e75-83. 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2009.09.005.CrossRefPubMed
44.
Wong PC, Whitney P, Thomas J: Visualizing association rules for text mining. 1999 IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization (InfoVis ’99). 1999, San Francisco, California: IEEE Comput. Soc, 120-123.CrossRef
45.
Dimitrijević M, Bošnjak Z, Subotica S: Discovering interesting association rules in the web log usage data. Interdisciplinary Journal of Information, Knowledge, and Management. 2010, 5: 191-207.
46.
Hall M, Frank E, Holmes G, Pfahringer B, Reutemann P, Witten IH: The WEKA data mining software: an update. ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter. 2009, 11: 10-18. 10.1145/1656274.1656278.CrossRef
47.
Agrawal R, Imielinski T, Swami A: Mining association rules between sets of items in large databases. ACM SIGMOD Record. 1993, 22: 207-216. 10.1145/170036.170072.CrossRef
48.
Agrawal R, Srikant R: Fast algorithms for mining association rules. Proc. 20th Int. Conf. Very Large Data Bases, VLDB. 1994, 1215: 487-499.
49.
Han J, Pei J: Mining frequent patterns without candidate generation. ACM SIGMOD Record. 2000, 29: 1-12. 10.1145/335191.335372.CrossRef
50.
Han J, Pei J, Yin Y: Mining frequent patterns without candidate generation: a frequent-pattern tree approach. Data mining and knowledge discovery. 2004, 8: 53-87.CrossRef
51.
52.
53.
54.
Haynes RB, McKibbon KA, Walker CJ, Ryan N, Fitzgerald D, Ramsden MF: Online access to MEDLINE in clinical settings. a study of use and usefulness. Annals of internal medicine. 1990, 112: 78-84.CrossRefPubMed
55.
Bernstam E, Kamvar S, Meric F, Dugan J, Chizek S, Stave C: Oncology patient interface to MEDLINE. In Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol. 2001, 20: 244a-
Metadata
Title
A Study on Pubmed Search Tag Usage Pattern: Association Rule Mining of a Full-day Pubmed Query Log
Authors
Abu Saleh Mohammad Mosa
Illhoi Yoo
Publication date
01-12-2013
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making / Issue 1/2013
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6947
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-13-8

Other articles of this Issue 1/2013

BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 1/2013 Go to the issue

Technical advance

Pseudonymization of patient identifiers for translational research

Research article

Criteria for assessing high-priority drug-drug interactions for clinical decision support in electronic health records

Research article

Information technology systems in public sector health facilities in developing countries: the case of South Africa

Research article

Increasing utilization of Internet-based resources following efforts to promote evidence-based medicine: a national study in Taiwan

Research article

Decision support for hospital bed management using adaptable individual length of stay estimations and shared resources

Research article

A preliminary exploration of the feasibility of offering men information about potential prostate cancer treatment options before they know their biopsy results