Top

Supportive Care in Cancer

Published in:

01-10-2008 | Original Article

A study of work changes due to cancer in tumor-free primary-treated cancer patients. A NOCWO study

Authors: Sævar Berg Gudbergsson, Sophie D. Fosså, Alv A. Dahl

Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer | Issue 10/2008

Abstract

Goals of work

The goal of this study is to explore the characteristics of tumor-free cancer survivors (CSs) who after their primary treatment were still working but made work changes due to cancer and compare them to survivors who did not.

Patients and methods

The sample consisted of 431 CSs (219 females with breast cancer, 212 males with testicular (N = 150) or prostate cancer (N = 62)) diagnosed 2–6 years prior to the study. All CSs had good prognosis and had returned to work after primary treatment. All CSs filled in a mailed questionnaire covering demography, morbidity, life style, mental distress, fatigue, quality of life and job strain.

Results

Seventy-two CSs (17%) had made work changes due to cancer during the observation period, and 359 (83%) had not. Among CSs who made work changes, significantly more were females; they showed significantly poorer physical and mental work ability, worked fewer hours per week, reported more comorbidity, and had lower physical and mental quality of life and more neuroticism, compared to the nonchange group. Work changes were moderately correlated with current work ability.

Conclusions

The majority of CSs did not report any work changes due to cancer during the 2–6-year observation period, which is an encouraging finding. A minority had done work changes, and this group consisted mainly of women and was also characterized by poorer physical and mental quality of life and poorer mental work ability due to cancer. The issue of work changes and work ability should be considered in the follow-up of cancer survivors.

Amir Z, Moran T, Walsh L, Iddende R, Luker K (2007) Return to work after cancer: a British experience. J Cancer Surviv 1:129–136PubMedCrossRef

Bjelland I, Dahl AA, Haug TT, Neckelmann D (2002) The validity of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. An updated literature review. J Psychosom Res 52:69–77PubMedCrossRef

Bradley CJ, Bednarek HL (2002) Employment patterns of long-term cancer survivors. Psychooncology 11:88–98

Bradley CJ, Neuman KD, Luo Z, Bednarek H, Schenk M (2005) Employment outcome of men treated for prostate cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 97:958–965PubMedCrossRef

Bradley CJ, Oberst K, Schenk M (2006) Absenteeism from work: the experience of employed breast and prostate cancer patients in the months following diagnosis. Psychooncology 15:739–747PubMedCrossRef

Cancer Registry of Norway, Institute of Population-based Cancer Research (2006) Cancer in Norway 2005. Cancer Registry of Norway, Institute of Population-based Cancer Research, Oslo

De Lange A, Taris T, Kompier M, Houtman I, Bongers P (2003) The very best of the millennium, longitudinal research and the Demand–Control–(Support) Model. J Occup Health Psychol 8:282–305PubMedCrossRef

Erikson R, Goldtorpe JH (1992) The constant flux. A study of class mobility in industrial societies. Clarendon, Oxford

Eysenck SBG, Tambs K (1990) Cross-cultural comparison of personality: Norway and England. Scand J Psychol 31:191–197CrossRef

10.

Gudbergsson SB, Fossaa SD, Boregeraas E, Dahl AA (2006) A comparative study of living conditions in cancer patients who have returned to work after curative treatment. Support Care Cancer 14:1020–1029PubMedCrossRef

11.

Gudbergsson SB, Fossaa SD, Sanne B, Dahl AA (2007) A controlled study of job strain in primary-treated caner patients without metastases. Acta Oncol 46:534–544PubMedCrossRef

12.

Gudbergsson SB, Fossaa SD, Ganz PA, Zebrack BJ, Dahl AA (2007) The association between living conditions, demography, and the ‘impact of cancer scale’ in tumor-free cancer survivors: a NOCWO study. Support Care Cancer 15:1309–1318PubMedCrossRef

13.

Hewitt M, Breesn DS (1999) Cancer prevalence and survivorship issues: analyses of the 1992 National Health Interview Survey. J Natl Cancer Inst 91:1480–1486PubMedCrossRef

14.

Hewitt M, Rowland JH, Yancik R (2003) Cancer survivors in the United States. Age, health, and disability. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 58:82–91PubMed

15.

Ilmarinen J (2001) Aging workers. Occup Environ Med 58:546–552PubMedCrossRef

16.

Ilmarinen J, Tuomi K (2004) Past, present and future of work ability. In: Ilmarinen J, Lehtinen S (eds) Past, present and future of work ability. People and work, research reports 65. Finnish Institute of Occupational Health Finland, Helsinki, pp 1–25

17.

Ilmarinen J, Tuomi K, Klockars M (1997) Changes in the work ability of active employees over an 11-year period. Scand J Work Environ Health 23(suppl 1):49–57PubMed

18.

Karaksek RA (1985) Job content instrument: questionnaire and user’s guide. University of South California, Los Angeles

19.

Karpansalo M, Manninen P, Kauhanen J, Lakka TA, Salonen JT (2004) Perceived health as a predictor of early retirement. Scand J Work Environ Health 30:287–292PubMed

20.

Krokstad S, Westin S (2002) Health inequalities by socioeconomic status among men in the Nord–Trøndelag Health Study, Norway. Scan J Public Health 30:113–124

21.

Lipsey MW, Wilson DB (2001) Practical meta-analysis. Sage, Thousand Oaks

22.

Nordic Council of Minister (2006) Nordic Statistical Yearbook 2006, Nord 2006: 1. Nordic Council of Ministers, Copenhagen

23.

Office for National Statistic (2000) Standard occupational classification 2000 (SOC2000). http://www.statistics.gov.uk/methods_quality/ns_sec/soc2000.asp

24.

Pryce J, Munir F, Haslam C (2007) Cancer survivorship and work: symptoms, supervisor response, co-worker disclosure and work adjustment. J Occup Rehabil 17:83–92PubMedCrossRef

25.

Reiso H, Nygard JF, Brage S, Gulbrandsen P, Tellnes G (2000) Work ability assessed by patients and their GPs in new episodes of sickness certification. Fam Pract 17:139–144PubMedCrossRef

26.

Sanne B, Torp S, Mykletun A, Dahl AA (2005) The Swedish Demands–Control–Support Questionnaire (DCSQ): factor structure, item analyse, and internal consistency in a large population. Scand J Public Health 33:166–174PubMedCrossRef

27.

Schou I, Ekeberg Ø, Ruland CM, Sandvik L, Kåresen R (2004) Pessimism as a predictor of emotional morbidity one year following breast cancer surgery. Psychooncology 13:309–320PubMedCrossRef

28.

Schultz PN, Beck ML, Stava C, Sellin R (2002) Cancer survivors. Work related issues. AAOHN J 50:220–226PubMed

29.

Short PF, Vasey JJ, Tunceli K (2005) Employment pathways in a large cohort of adult survivors. Cancer 103:1292–1301PubMedCrossRef

30.

Short PF, Vasey JJ, BeLue R (2007) Work disability associated with cancer survivorship and other chronic conditions. Psychooncology 17:91–97

31.

Sloan JA, Vargas-Chanas KCC, Sargent DJ, Novotny P, Athertum P, Allmer C, Fridley L, (2003) Detecting worms, ducks, and elephants: A simple approach for defining clinically relevant effects in quality-of-life measures. J Cancer Integr Med 1:41–47

32.

Spelten ER, Sprangers MAG, Verbeek JHAM (2002) Factors reported to influence the return to work of cancer survivors: A litterature review. Psychooncology 11:124–131PubMedCrossRef

33.

Spelten ER, Verbeek JH, Uitterhoeve AL, Ansink AC, van der Lelie J, de Riejke TM, Kammeijer M, de Haes JC, Sprangers MA (2003) Cancer, fatigue and the return of patients to work—a prospective cohort study. Eur J Cancer 39:1562–1567PubMedCrossRef

34.

Steiner JF, Cavender TA, Main DS, Bradley CJ (2005) Assessing the impact of cancer on work outcomes. What are the research needs? Cancer 8:1703–1711

35.

Steiner JF, Cavender TA, Nawels CT, Beaty BL, Bradley CJ et al (2007) The impact of physical and psychosocial factors on work characteristic after cancer. Psychooncology 17:138–147

36.

Taskila T, Lindbohm M-L (2007) Factors affecting cancer survivors’ employment and work ability. Acta Oncol 46:446–451PubMedCrossRef

37.

Taskila T, Martikainen R, Virtanen SV, Pukkala E, Hietanen P, Lindbohm M-L (2004) The impact of education and occupation on employment status of cancer survivors. Eur J Cancer 40:2488–2493CrossRef

38.

Taskila T, Martikainen R, Hietanen P, Lindbohom M-L (2007) Comparative study of work ability between cancer survivors and their referents. Eur J Cancer 43:914–920PubMedCrossRef

39.

Taskila-Åbrandt T, Pukkala E, Martikainen R, Karjalainen A, Hietanen A (2005) Employment status of Finnish cancer patients in 1997. Psychooncolgy 14:221–226CrossRef

40.

Ware JE, Kosinski M, Keller SD (1996) A 12-item short-form health survey: construction of scales and preliminary test of reliability and validity. Med Care 34:220–233PubMedCrossRef

41.

Tuomi K, Ilmarinen J, Martikainen R, Aalto L, Klockars M (1997) Aging, work, life-style and work ability among Finnish municipal workers in 1981–1992. Scand J Work Environ Health 23(suppl 1):58–65PubMed

42.

Tuomi K, Ilmarinen J, Seitsam J, Huuhtanen P, Martikainen R, Nygård C-H (1997) Summary of the Finnish research project (1981-1992) to promote the health and work ability of aging workers. Scand J Work Environ Health 23(suppl 1):66–71PubMed

43.

Tuomi K, Ilmarinen J, Jahkola A, Katajarinne L, Tulkki A (1998) Work ability index 2nd edition. Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Finland

Title: A study of work changes due to cancer in tumor-free primary-treated cancer patients. A NOCWO study
Authors: Sævar Berg Gudbergsson
Sophie D. Fosså
Alv A. Dahl
Publication date: 01-10-2008
Publisher: Springer-Verlag
Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer / Issue 10/2008
Print ISSN: 0941-4355
Electronic ISSN: 1433-7339
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-008-0407-3

Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Watch now

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras

Prof. Fabrice Barlesi

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Goals of work

Patients and methods

Results

Conclusions

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 10/2008

Internet use by cancer survivors: current use and future wishes

Fatigue in patients with advanced cancer: a pilot study of an intervention with infliximab

The nature of small intestinal mucositis: a video-capsule endoscopy study

What do we know about fatigue?

Health behaviors of Australian colorectal cancer survivors, compared with noncancer population controls

Association between fatigue and other cancer-related symptoms in patients with advanced cancer

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer