Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 5/2007

01-10-2007 | ORIGINAL ARTICLE

A Retrospective Study Examining the Socioeconomic Backgrounds of Women Undergoing Bilateral Breast Augmentation at a Private Independent Hospital in the United Kingdom

Authors: Matthew Wong, Jamil Moledina, Alan Park

Published in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery | Issue 5/2007

Login to get access

Abstract

Cosmetic breast augmentation is becoming increasingly popular and acceptable to women in the United Kingdom. This study examined the socioeconomic backgrounds of women undergoing breast augmentation who live in North Warwickshire in the Midlands. The case notes of 98 consecutive breast augmentations performed at a private independent hospital were retrospectively reviewed. The average age of the patient was 34 years (range, 17–53 years). They were requesting, on the average, an increase of 2 bra cup sizes (range, 1–3 cup sizes). The preoperative bra cup size was A/B (range, AA–C), and the postoperative bra cup size was C/D (range, B–E). The average size of the implant used was 270 ml (range, 160–410 ml). The average implant size used currently is considerably larger than that reported in studies 30 years ago. What women perceive as a “natural-appearing” breast has changed over time. The findings show that women from all across the socioeconomic spectrum are undergoing breast augmentation. In particular, the authors found that the largest proportion (34%) of their patients have come from social class IIIn. This is particularly interesting in that this social class is not overrepresented in North Warwickshire. The findings of this study may have implications for cosmetic surgery providers and may document the change in the attitudes of the authors’ society toward cosmetic breast augmentation.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Collis N, Coleman D, Foo IT, Sharpe DT (2000) Ten-year review of a prospective randomized controlled trial of textured versus smooth subglandular silicone gel breast implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 106:786–791CrossRefPubMed Collis N, Coleman D, Foo IT, Sharpe DT (2000) Ten-year review of a prospective randomized controlled trial of textured versus smooth subglandular silicone gel breast implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 106:786–791CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Courtiss EH, Goldwyn RM, Anastasi GW (1979) The fate of breast implants with infections around them. Plast Reconstr Surg 63:812–816CrossRefPubMed Courtiss EH, Goldwyn RM, Anastasi GW (1979) The fate of breast implants with infections around them. Plast Reconstr Surg 63:812–816CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Czerny V (1895) Plastic replacement of the breast with a lipoma. Chir Kong Verhandl 2:216 Czerny V (1895) Plastic replacement of the breast with a lipoma. Chir Kong Verhandl 2:216
4.
go back to reference Duncan CO, Ho-Asjoe M, Hittinger R, Nishikawa H, Waterhouse N, Coghlan B, Jones B (2004) Demographics and macroeconomic effects in aesthetic surgery in the UK. Br J Plast Surg 57:561–566CrossRefPubMed Duncan CO, Ho-Asjoe M, Hittinger R, Nishikawa H, Waterhouse N, Coghlan B, Jones B (2004) Demographics and macroeconomic effects in aesthetic surgery in the UK. Br J Plast Surg 57:561–566CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Kilmann PR, Sattler JI, Taylor J (1993) The impact of augmentation mammaplasty: A follow-up study. Plast Reconstr Surg 91:404–407CrossRef Kilmann PR, Sattler JI, Taylor J (1993) The impact of augmentation mammaplasty: A follow-up study. Plast Reconstr Surg 91:404–407CrossRef
6.
go back to reference OPCS (1991) Standard occupational classification, Vol. 3. HMSO, London OPCS (1991) Standard occupational classification, Vol. 3. HMSO, London
7.
go back to reference Pollock H (1993) Breast capsular contracture: A retrospective study of textured versus smooth silicone implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 91:404–407CrossRefPubMed Pollock H (1993) Breast capsular contracture: A retrospective study of textured versus smooth silicone implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 91:404–407CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Rose D (1995) Social research update, Issue 9. Department of Sociology, University of Surrey, England Rose D (1995) Social research update, Issue 9. Department of Sociology, University of Surrey, England
9.
go back to reference UK Breast implant registry annual report 2005. Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency of the UK Department of Health, 2006, London, England, UK UK Breast implant registry annual report 2005. Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency of the UK Department of Health, 2006, London, England, UK
10.
go back to reference UK Census 2001 Office for National Statistics, Newport UK Census 2001 Office for National Statistics, Newport
11.
go back to reference Williams JE (1972) Experiences with a large series of silastic breast implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 49:253–258CrossRefPubMed Williams JE (1972) Experiences with a large series of silastic breast implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 49:253–258CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
A Retrospective Study Examining the Socioeconomic Backgrounds of Women Undergoing Bilateral Breast Augmentation at a Private Independent Hospital in the United Kingdom
Authors
Matthew Wong
Jamil Moledina
Alan Park
Publication date
01-10-2007
Publisher
Springer New York
Published in
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery / Issue 5/2007
Print ISSN: 0364-216X
Electronic ISSN: 1432-5241
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-006-0226-1

Other articles of this Issue 5/2007

Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 5/2007 Go to the issue