Top

International Orthopaedics

Published in:

23-08-2023 | Original Paper

A Retrospective analysis of peri-implant fractures: insights from a large volume clinical Study

Authors: Manuela Poroh, Bogdan Puha, Teodor S. Gheorghevici, Constantin Jemna, Norin Forna, Paul Sirbu, Ovidiu Alexa

Published in: International Orthopaedics | Issue 11/2023

Abstract

Purpose

Peri-implant fractures (PIFs) are a concept in evolution for which different diagnostic criteria have been proposed and modified over time. They have not been extensively reported. PIFs are usually located in the distal part of previous osteosynthesis, where fragile bone is in contact with the rigid implant and are a significant complication after orthopaedic surgery, which requires careful management and treatment. This clinical study presents findings from a retrospective analysis of PIF’s, providing description of characteristics and outcomes. They provide information about the associated risk factors and description of the effectiveness of various treatments.

Materials and methods

A retrospective analysis was performed in a clinical study involving patients with PIFs. Data from medical records, radiographic images, and surgical reports were collected and analyzed. The study included patients with refracture of pre-existing osteosynthesis admitted to the hospital between 2015 and 2022. Demographic information, fracture characteristics, surgical interventions, and post-operative outcomes were assessed. Each case was followed for a minimum of one year after surgery, and a critical analysis was performed by senior surgeons. Furthermore, the PIFs were classified according to the type of initial implant and the position of the new fracture in relation to the original implant.

Results

Between 2015 and 2022, out of 18,813 fractures treated at a Level 1 traumatology hospital, a total of 85 patients with PIF’s were identified. Fracture characteristics varied, including location, fracture pattern, and implant type. Most of the PIFs, 71 cases (83.53%), occurred in the femur. Additionally, there were seven cases (8.24%) involving the humerus, four cases (4.71%) affecting the tibia/fibula, two cases (2.35%) in the radius, and one case (1.18%) involving the clavicle. Surgical management was the primary attitude in treatment. Various techniques were used, including the use of longer and stronger implants to achieve high-quality fixation, facilitating early rehabilitation and return to previous activities. Postoperative complications after surgery for PIFs were observed in 16 cases (18.8%).

Conclusions

Peri-implant fractures (PIF) are a distinct topic and a challenging condition with a high rate of postoperative complications. Complications after the second surgery may be severe and life threatening in older patients. A classification can be useful to make decisions about the optimal treatment in different anatomic areas and type of implant used for primary osteosynthesis. Currently there are no standardized protocols for management, therefore each case should be carefully discussed and planned before surgery.

Müller F, Galler M, Zellner M, Bäuml C, Marzouk A, Füchtmeier B (2016) Peri-implant femoral fractures: The risk is more than three times higher within PFN compared with DHS. Injury 47:2189–2194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2016.04.042CrossRefPubMed

Bartl R, Bartl C (2019) Falls and Fall Prevention. The Osteoporosis Manual. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 263–263CrossRef

Chan LWM, Gardner AW, Wong MK, Chua K, Kwek EBK (2018) Non-prosthetic peri-implant fractures: classification, management and outcomes. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 138:791–802. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-018-2905-1CrossRefPubMed

Della Rocca GJ, Leung KS, Pape H-C (2011) Periprosthetic Fractures: Epidemiology and Future Projections. J Orthop Trauma 25:S66–S70. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0b013e31821b8c28CrossRefPubMed

Ruchholtz S, El-Zayat B, Kreslo D, Bücking B, Lewan U, Krüger A, Zettl R (2013) Less invasive polyaxial locking plate fixation in periprosthetic and peri-implant fractures of the femur—A prospective study of 41 patients. Injury 44:239–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2012.10.035CrossRefPubMed

Skála-Rosenbaum J, Džupa V, Bartoška R, Douša P, Waldauf P, Krbec M (2016) Distal locking in short hip nails: Cause or prevention of peri-implant fractures? Injury 47:887–892. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2016.02.009CrossRefPubMed

Jennison T, Yarlagadda R (2018) Mortality in patients sustaining a periprosthetic fracture following a previous extracapsular hip fracture fixation. Injury 49:702–704. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.INJURY.2018.01.001CrossRefPubMed

Koval KJ, Frankel VH, Kummer F, Green (1994) Complications of fracture fixation device. Epps CH (ed) Complications in Orthopaedics Surgery, 3rd ed. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott, pp 131–154

Perskin CR, Seetharam A, Mullis BH, Marcantonio AJ, Garfi J, Ment AJ, Egol KA (2022) Peri-implant fractures of the upper and lower extremities: a case series of 61 fractures. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 32:467–474. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-021-03005-0CrossRefPubMed

10.

Egol KA, Carlock KD, Kelly EA, Seetharam A, Mullis BH, Marcantonio AJ, Bramlett KJ, Nchako CM, Watson JT, Cannada LK, Konda SR (2019) Previous Implant Fractures: A New Descriptive Classification System. J Orthop Trauma 33:423–427. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000001499CrossRefPubMed

11.

Toro G, Moretti A, Ambrosio D, Pezzella R, De Cicco A, Landi G, Tammaro N, Florio P, Cecere AB, Braile A, Medici A, Siano A, Di Maggio B, Calabrò G, Gagliardo N, Di Fino C, Bruno G, Pellegrino A, Negri G, Monaco V, Gison M, Toro A, Schiavone Panni A, Tarantino U, Iolascon G (2021) Fractures around Trochanteric Nails: The “vergilius Classification System.” Adv Orthop 2021. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/7532583

12.

Videla-Cés M, Romero-Pijoan E, Sales-Pérez JM, Sánchez-Navés R, Pallarés N, Videla S (2021) A pilot agreement study of a new classification system for Peri-implant femoral fractures. Injury 52:1908–1917. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2021.04.021CrossRefPubMed

13.

Velasco BT, Briceño J, Miller CP, Ye MY, Savage-Elliott I, Ellington JK, Kwon JY (2020) Peri-implant fractures around hindfoot fusion nails: A systematic literature review and classification system. Injury 51:1497–1508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2020.04.019CrossRefPubMed

14.

Goldberg VM, Figgie MP (1990) The results of treatment of supracondylar fracture above total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 5:267–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-5403(08)80082-4CrossRefPubMed

15.

Brand S, Ettinger M, Omar M, Hawi N, Krettek C, Petri M (2015) Concepts and Potential Future Developments for Treatment of Periprosthetic Proximal Femoral Fractures. Open Orthop J 9:405–411. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874325001509010405CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

16.

Zak L, Tiefenboeck TM, Wozasek GE (2019) Traumatic periimplant fracture after nail arthrodesis of the knee in a limb reconstruction case. Trauma Case Rep 20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcr.2019.100173

17.

Stramazzo L, Cioffi A, Rovere G, Vigni GE, Galvano N, Sallì M, D'Arienzo A, Camarda L, D'Arienzo M (2021) A rare case of peri-implant distal radius fracture. Trauma Case Rep 31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcr.2020.100387

18.

Kanji R, Nutt J, Stavropoulos S, Elmorsy A, Schneider HJ (2017) Distal radius re-fracture with bending of implant and neurovascular compromise. J Clin Orthop Trauma 8:S40–S42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcot.2017.08.009CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

19.

Barrera-Ochoa S, Nuñez JH, Mir X (2018) Peri-implant radial and ulnar shaft fractures after volar locking plate fixation of the distal radius. The Journal of hand surgery, European 43:209–210. https://doi.org/10.1177/1753193417709988CrossRef

20.

Mounasamy V, Desai P (2013) Peri-implant fracture of the distal tibia after intra-medullary nailing of a tibial fracture: a report of two cases. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 23 Suppl 2: https://doi.org/10.1007/S00590-012-1066-0

21.

Vieira Lima G, Sousa Santos Filho N, Pimentel Furlan CA, Murachovsky J, La Banca V, Ikemoto RY (2021) Peri-implant distal clavicle fracture: Case report (overlaying plate fixation: Solution for peri-implant clavicle fractures). Int J Surg Case Rep 87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijscr.2021.106411

22.

Hackl M, Wegmann K, Taibah S, Burkhart KJ, Scaal M, Müller LP (2015) Peri-implant failure in dual plating of the distal humerus - A biomechanical analysis with regard to screw and plate positioning. Injury 46:2142–2145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2015.08.015CrossRefPubMed

23.

Halonen LM, Stenroos A, Vasara H, Kosola J (2022) Peri-implant fracture: a rare complication after intramedullary fixation of trochanteric femoral fracture. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 142:3715–3720. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-021-04193-4CrossRefPubMed

24.

Bidolegui F, Pereira S, Munera MA, Garabano G, Pesciallo CA, Pires RE, Giordano V (2022) Peri-implant femoral fractures: Challenges, outcomes and proposal of a treatment algorithm. Chin J Traumatol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjtee.2022.10.001CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

25.

Ma CH, Chiu YC, Wu CH, Tsai KL, Wen TK, Jou IM, Tu YK (2019) Plate-on-plate technique for treating peri-implant fractures of distal femoral locking plate: a retrospective study of 11 patients. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 139:1245–1251. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-019-03185-9CrossRefPubMed

26.

Butt MS, Krikler SJ, Nafie S, Ali MS (1995) Comparison of dynamic hip screw and gamma nail: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Injury 26:615–618. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-1383(95)00126-TCrossRefPubMed

27.

Li X, Zhang L, Hou Z, Meng Z, Chen W, Wang P, Zhang Y (2015) Distal locked and unlocked nailing for perthrochanteric fractures—a prospective comparative randomized study. Int Orthop 39:1645–1652. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-015-2771-1CrossRefPubMed

28.

Radford P, Needoff M, Webb J (1993) A prospective randomised comparison of the dynamic hip screw and the gamma locking nail. J Bone Joint Surg Br 75-B:789–793. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.75B5.8376441

29.

de Lucas P, Seral B, Beano Á, Almodóvar JA, Domínguez I, Rodríguez J, Moro E (2005) Fractures of the Proximal Femur. The Gamma Nail versus Plate. Osteosynthesis Trauma Care 13:18–25. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2005-836371CrossRef

30.

Videla-Cés M, Sales-Pérez JM, Sánchez-Navés R, Romero-Pijoan E, Videla S (2019) Proposal for the classification of peri-implant femoral fractures: Retrospective cohort study. Injury 50:758–763. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2018.10.042CrossRefPubMed

31.

Lua J, Tan VH, Sivasubramanian H, Kwek E (2017) Complications of Open Tibial Fracture Management: Risk Factors and Treatment. Malaysian Orthop J 11:18–22. https://doi.org/10.5704/MOJ.1703.006CrossRef

32.

Clement ND, Yousif F, Duckworth AD, Teoh KH, Porter DE (2012) Retention of forearm plates: risks and benefits in a paediatric population. J Bone Joint Surg Br 94:134–137. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.94B1.27155CrossRefPubMed

33.

Yamamoto N, Tomita Y, Noda T, Inoue T, Mochizuki Y, Ozaki T (2021) Reduction quality and nail fixation ratio as bone-implant stability factors associated with reoperation for trochanteric fractures. Injury 52:1813–1818. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2021.04.048CrossRefPubMed

34.

Marmor M, Guenthner G, Rezaei A, Saam M, Matityahu A (2021) Reporting on quality of reduction and fixation of intertrochanteric fractures-A systematic review. Injury 52:324–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2021.02.014CrossRefPubMed

35.

Yang S, Nguyen ND, Center JR, Center JR, Eisman JA, Nguyen TV (2014) Association between hypertension and fragility fracture: A longitudinal study. Osteoporos Int 25:97–103. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-013-2457-8CrossRefPubMed

36.

Kelly RR, Sidles SJ, LaRue AC (2020) Effects of Neurological Disorders on Bone Health. Front Psychol 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.612366

37.

Sharda N, Colón-Emeric C (2022) Falls and fracture risk assessment-The role of osteoporosis, obesity, and sarcopenia. In: Osteosarcopenia. Elsevier, pp 147–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-820088-9.00004-4

Title: A Retrospective analysis of peri-implant fractures: insights from a large volume clinical Study
Authors: Manuela Poroh
Bogdan Puha
Teodor S. Gheorghevici
Constantin Jemna
Norin Forna
Paul Sirbu
Ovidiu Alexa
Publication date: 23-08-2023
Publisher: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in: International Orthopaedics / Issue 11/2023
Print ISSN: 0341-2695
Electronic ISSN: 1432-5195
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-023-05939-y

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

A Retrospective analysis of peri-implant fractures: insights from a large volume clinical Study

Abstract

Purpose

Materials and methods

Results

Conclusions

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Purpose

Materials and methods

Results

Conclusions

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 11/2023

Efficacy and safety of postoperative single-dose anticoagulant treatment in preventing venous thromboembolism after revision hip arthroplasty: a retrospective cohort study

Retraction Note: Computer-aided design combined with 3D-printed osteotomy guide-assisted derotational distal femoral osteotomy for treating recurrent patellar dislocation with increased femoral anteversion angle: a retrospective study

Comparison study of periprosthetic bone remodeling between simultaneous bilateral total hip arthroplasty and unilateral total hip arthroplasty: a matched cohort study

Survival in Mudejar Spain in the Middle Ages (thirteenth–fourteenth centuries): Ancient Rare Diseases—an uncommon diagnosis in archaeological human remains

Intraoperative immediate strength recovery following lacertus fibrosus release in patients with proximal median nerve compression at the elbow

Letter to editor regarding article “Outcomes of drain versus no drain in total knee arthroplasty: a retrospective cohort study”