Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Research

A randomized placebo controlled clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of minocycline in patients with Angelman syndrome (A-MANECE study)

Authors: Belén Ruiz-Antoran, Aranzazu Sancho-López, Rosario Cazorla-Calleja, Luis Fernando López-Pájaro, Ágata Leiva, Gema Iglesias-Escalera, Maria Esperanza Marín-Serrano, Marta Rincón-Ortega, Julián Lara-Herguedas, Teresa Rossignoli-Palomeque, Sara Valiente-Rodríguez, Javier González-Marques, Enriqueta Román-Riechmann, Cristina Avendaño-Solá

Published in: Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Minocycline is an old tetracycline antibiotic that has shown antiinflammatory and antiapoptotic properties in different neurological disease mouse models. Previous single arm study in humans demonstrated benefits in individuals with Angelman Syndrome (AS); however, its efficacy in patients with Angelman Syndrome has not been assessed in a controlled trial.
This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial in individuals with AS, aged 6 years to 30 years (n = 32, mean age 12 [SD 6·29] years). Participants were randomized to minocycline or placebo for 8 weeks and then switched to the other treatment (a subset of 22 patients) or to receive minocycline for up to 16 weeks (10 patients). After week 16, all patients entered a wash-out 8-week follow-up period.

Results

Thirty-six subjects were screened and 34 were randomized. Thirty two subjects (94·1%) completed at least the first period and all of them completed the full trial. Intention-to-treat analysis demonstrated the lack of significantly greater improvements in the primary outcome, mean changes in age equivalent of the development index of the Merrill-Palmer Revised Scale after minocycline compared with placebo (1·90 ± 3·16 and 2·00 ± 3·28, respectively, p = 0·937). Longer treatment duration up to 16 weeks did not result in better treatment outcomes (1·86 ± 3·35 for 8 weeks treatment vs 1·20 ± 5·53 for 16 weeks treatment, p = 0·667). Side effects were not significantly different during minocycline and placebo treatments. No serious adverse events occurred on minocycline.

Conclusions

Minocycline treatment for up to 16 weeks in children and young adults with AS resulted in lack of significant improvements in development indexes compared to placebo treatment. Treatment with minocycline appears safe and well tolerated; even if it cannot be completely ruled out that longer trials might be required for a potential minocycline effect to be expressed, available results and lack of knowledge on the actual mechanism of action do not support this hypothesis.

Trial registration

European Clinical Trial database (EudraCT 2013-002154-67), registered 16th September 2013; US Clinical trials database (NCT02056665), registered 6th February 2014.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Magenis RE, Brown MG, Lacy DA, Budden S, LaFranchi S. Is Angelman syndrome an alternate result of del (15) (q11q13)? Am J Med Genet. 1987;28(4):829–38.CrossRefPubMed Magenis RE, Brown MG, Lacy DA, Budden S, LaFranchi S. Is Angelman syndrome an alternate result of del (15) (q11q13)? Am J Med Genet. 1987;28(4):829–38.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Margolis SS, Salogiannis J, Lipton DM, Mandel-Brehm C, Wills ZP, Mardinly AR, et al. EphB-mediated degradation of the RhoA GEF Ephexin5 relieves a developmental brake on excitatory synapse formation. Cell. 2010;143(3):442–55.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Margolis SS, Salogiannis J, Lipton DM, Mandel-Brehm C, Wills ZP, Mardinly AR, et al. EphB-mediated degradation of the RhoA GEF Ephexin5 relieves a developmental brake on excitatory synapse formation. Cell. 2010;143(3):442–55.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
4.
go back to reference Buckley RH, Dinno N, Weber P. Angelman syndrome: are the estimates too low? Am J Med Genet. 1998;80(4):385–90.CrossRefPubMed Buckley RH, Dinno N, Weber P. Angelman syndrome: are the estimates too low? Am J Med Genet. 1998;80(4):385–90.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Petersen MB, Brondum-Nielsen K, Hansen LK, Wulff K. Clinical, cytogenetic, and molecular diagnosis of Angelman syndrome: estimated prevalence rate in a Danish county. Am J Med Genet. United States. 1995;60:261–2.CrossRef Petersen MB, Brondum-Nielsen K, Hansen LK, Wulff K. Clinical, cytogenetic, and molecular diagnosis of Angelman syndrome: estimated prevalence rate in a Danish county. Am J Med Genet. United States. 1995;60:261–2.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Lossie AC, Whitney MM, Amidon D, Dong HJ, Chen P, Theriaque D, et al. Distinct phenotypes distinguish the molecular classes of Angelman syndrome. J Med Genet. 2001;38(12):834–45.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lossie AC, Whitney MM, Amidon D, Dong HJ, Chen P, Theriaque D, et al. Distinct phenotypes distinguish the molecular classes of Angelman syndrome. J Med Genet. 2001;38(12):834–45.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
9.
go back to reference Thibert RL, Conant KD, Braun EK, Bruno P, Said RR, Nespeca MP, et al. Epilepsy in Angelman syndrome: a questionnaire-based assessment of the natural history and current treatment options. Epilepsia. 2009;50(11):2369–76.CrossRefPubMed Thibert RL, Conant KD, Braun EK, Bruno P, Said RR, Nespeca MP, et al. Epilepsy in Angelman syndrome: a questionnaire-based assessment of the natural history and current treatment options. Epilepsia. 2009;50(11):2369–76.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Tan W-H, Bird LM. Angelman syndrome:current and emerging therapies in 2016. Am J Med Genet. 2016;172(4):384–401. Available at https://dpo-prg (10-1002/ajmg.c.31536CrossRefPubMed Tan W-H, Bird LM. Angelman syndrome:current and emerging therapies in 2016. Am J Med Genet. 2016;172(4):384–401. Available at https://​dpo-prg (10-1002/ajmg.c.31536CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Brundula V, Rewcastle NB, Metz LM, Bernard CC, Yong VW. Targeting leukocyte MMPs and transmigration: minocycline as a potential therapy for multiple sclerosis. Brain. 2002;125(Pt 6):1297–308.CrossRefPubMed Brundula V, Rewcastle NB, Metz LM, Bernard CC, Yong VW. Targeting leukocyte MMPs and transmigration: minocycline as a potential therapy for multiple sclerosis. Brain. 2002;125(Pt 6):1297–308.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Kim H-S, Suh Y-H. Minocycline and neurodegenerative diseases. Behav Brain Res. 2009;196(2):168–79.CrossRefPubMed Kim H-S, Suh Y-H. Minocycline and neurodegenerative diseases. Behav Brain Res. 2009;196(2):168–79.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Leigh MJS, Nguyen DV, Mu Y, Winarni TI, Schneider A, Chechi T, et al. A randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of minocycline in children and adolescents with fragile x syndrome. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2013;34(3):147–55.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Leigh MJS, Nguyen DV, Mu Y, Winarni TI, Schneider A, Chechi T, et al. A randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of minocycline in children and adolescents with fragile x syndrome. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2013;34(3):147–55.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
go back to reference Yong VW, Wells J, Giuliani F, Casha S, Power C, Metz LM. The promise of minocycline in neurology. Lancet Neurol. 2004;3(12):744–51.CrossRefPubMed Yong VW, Wells J, Giuliani F, Casha S, Power C, Metz LM. The promise of minocycline in neurology. Lancet Neurol. 2004;3(12):744–51.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Grieco JC, Ciarlone SL, Gieron-Korthals M, Schoenberg MR, Smith AG, Philpot RM, et al. An open-label pilot trial of minocycline in children as a treatment for Angelman syndrome. BMC Neurol. 2014;14:232.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Grieco JC, Ciarlone SL, Gieron-Korthals M, Schoenberg MR, Smith AG, Philpot RM, et al. An open-label pilot trial of minocycline in children as a treatment for Angelman syndrome. BMC Neurol. 2014;14:232.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
A randomized placebo controlled clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of minocycline in patients with Angelman syndrome (A-MANECE study)
Authors
Belén Ruiz-Antoran
Aranzazu Sancho-López
Rosario Cazorla-Calleja
Luis Fernando López-Pájaro
Ágata Leiva
Gema Iglesias-Escalera
Maria Esperanza Marín-Serrano
Marta Rincón-Ortega
Julián Lara-Herguedas
Teresa Rossignoli-Palomeque
Sara Valiente-Rodríguez
Javier González-Marques
Enriqueta Román-Riechmann
Cristina Avendaño-Solá
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 1750-1172
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13023-018-0891-6

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases 1/2018 Go to the issue