Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Medical Research Methodology 1/2005

Open Access 01-12-2005 | Research article

A randomised controlled trial to assess the effectiveness of offering study results as an incentive to increase response rates to postal questionnaires [ISRCTN26118436]

Authors: Sarah Cockayne, David J Torgerson

Published in: BMC Medical Research Methodology | Issue 1/2005

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Postal questionnaires are widely used to collect outcome data on participants. However, a poor response to questionnaires will reduce the statistical power of the study and may introduce bias. A meta analysis of ten trials offering study results, largely in the fields of education and marketing, was shown to be ineffective, with the odds ratio for response with offering research findings is 0.92 (95% CI 0.75 to 1.11). However uncertainty still exists as it is uncertain whether results from such trials can be extrapolated to that of a health care setting. The aim of this study was to assess whether offering participants study results increases the response rates to postal questionnaires.

Methods

1038 women aged over 70 years were remotely randomised by computer in a 3:1 ratio. 250 participants did not receive the offer of knowing the results of the trial and 788 participants were offered the results of the trial in a postal questionnaire. The main outcome measure was response rate. Chi square test was used to evaluate the overall differences in response rate between the two groups. An adjusted analysis, adjusting for whether the participant was taking calcium and age was also undertaken.

Results

The response rates were not significantly different Odds Ratio 0.88 (95% confidence intervals 0.48 to 1.63) p = 0.69.

Conclusion

Offering study results to women living in the community aged over 70 does not increase response rates to postal questionnaires. Although researchers have an ethical obligation to offer participants study results, since 10% of women did not wish to receive the results, investigators should give participants the option to opt out of receiving the study's results.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Fernandez CV, Kodish K, Weijer C: Informing study participants of research results: an ethical imperative. Ethics and Human Research. 2003, 3: 12-19.CrossRef Fernandez CV, Kodish K, Weijer C: Informing study participants of research results: an ethical imperative. Ethics and Human Research. 2003, 3: 12-19.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Partridge AH: Informing Clinical Trial Participants About Study Results. JAMA. 2002, 288: 363-365. 10.1001/jama.288.3.363.CrossRefPubMed Partridge AH: Informing Clinical Trial Participants About Study Results. JAMA. 2002, 288: 363-365. 10.1001/jama.288.3.363.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Edwards P, Roberts I, Clarke M, DiGuiseppi C, Pratap S, Wentz R, Kwan I: Increasing response rates to postal questionnaires: systematic review. BMJ. 2002, 324: 1183-1185. 10.1136/bmj.324.7347.1183.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Edwards P, Roberts I, Clarke M, DiGuiseppi C, Pratap S, Wentz R, Kwan I: Increasing response rates to postal questionnaires: systematic review. BMJ. 2002, 324: 1183-1185. 10.1136/bmj.324.7347.1183.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
5.
go back to reference Mullner RM, Levy PS, Byre CS, Matthews D: Effects on characteristics of the survey instrument on response rates to a mail survey of community hospitals. Public Health Rep. 1982, 97: 465-9.PubMedPubMedCentral Mullner RM, Levy PS, Byre CS, Matthews D: Effects on characteristics of the survey instrument on response rates to a mail survey of community hospitals. Public Health Rep. 1982, 97: 465-9.PubMedPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference Porthouse J, Cockayne S, King C, Saxon L, Steele E, Aspray T, Baverstock M, Birks Y, Dumville J, Francis R, Iglesias C, Puffer S, Sutcliffe A, Watt I, Torgerson DJ: Randomised Controlled Trial of Calcium and Vitamin D Supplementation for Fracture Prevention in Primary Care. BMJ. 2005, 330: 1003-1008. 10.1136/bmj.330.7498.1003.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Porthouse J, Cockayne S, King C, Saxon L, Steele E, Aspray T, Baverstock M, Birks Y, Dumville J, Francis R, Iglesias C, Puffer S, Sutcliffe A, Watt I, Torgerson DJ: Randomised Controlled Trial of Calcium and Vitamin D Supplementation for Fracture Prevention in Primary Care. BMJ. 2005, 330: 1003-1008. 10.1136/bmj.330.7498.1003.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference Birks YF, Porthouse J, Addie C, Loughney K, Saxon L, Baverstock M, Francis RM, Reid DM, Watt I, Torgerson DJ, Primary Care Hip Protector Trial Group: Randomized controlled trial of hip protectors among women living in the community. Osteoporosis International. 2004, 9: 701-6. Birks YF, Porthouse J, Addie C, Loughney K, Saxon L, Baverstock M, Francis RM, Reid DM, Watt I, Torgerson DJ, Primary Care Hip Protector Trial Group: Randomized controlled trial of hip protectors among women living in the community. Osteoporosis International. 2004, 9: 701-6.
Metadata
Title
A randomised controlled trial to assess the effectiveness of offering study results as an incentive to increase response rates to postal questionnaires [ISRCTN26118436]
Authors
Sarah Cockayne
David J Torgerson
Publication date
01-12-2005
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology / Issue 1/2005
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2288
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-5-34

Other articles of this Issue 1/2005

BMC Medical Research Methodology 1/2005 Go to the issue