Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
Published in: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 1/2015

Open Access 01-12-2015 | Research article

A questioned authority meets well-informed pregnant women – a qualitative study examining how midwives perceive their role in dietary counselling

Authors: Anna-Lena Wennberg, Åsa Hörnsten, Katarina Hamberg

Published in: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth | Issue 1/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

During pregnancy and afterward, a healthy diet is beneficial for the expecting mother and her foetus. Midwives in antenatal care have an ideal position for promoting healthy diets. Dietary counselling is however complex and recommendations can be controversial. While pregnant women struggle with dietary recommendations, midwives struggle with a lack of authority. The aim of the study was therefore to describe how midwives perceive their role and their significance in dietary counselling of pregnant women.

Methods

An interview study was conducted that involved twenty-one (21) experienced midwives, who worked in the Swedish prenatal health care. A qualitative content analysis was conducted.

Results

Pregnant women were perceived to be well informed, but they needed guidance to interpret information on the Internet. They were described as rigorous and eager information seekers who needed guidance to interpret information as they were worried and emotional. The midwives saw themselves as a questioned authority who lacked support. This meant being informative and directive though not always updated or listened to. Their impact was uncertain and they could also lack sufficient competence to counsel in delicate issues.

Conclusion

The midwives’ directive role may obstruct the women’s needs to manage the dietary recommendations and risk evaluation in a women-centred dialogue. Midwives need to acknowledge pregnant women as both well informed and skilled if they are going to develop woman-centred antenatal care. Ongoing training and self-reflection will be needed to make this change.
Literature
1.
Girard AW, Olude O. Nutrition education and counselling provided during pregnancy. Effects on maternal, neonatal and child health outcomes. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2012;26(S.1):191–204.CrossRefPubMed
2.
Hermansson E, Mårtensson L. Empowerment in midwifery context - a concept analysis. Midwifery. 2011;27(6):811–6.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Huberty J, Dinkel D, Beets M, Coleman J. Describing the use of the Internet for health, physical activity, and nutrition information in pregnant women. Matern Child Health J. 2013;17(8):1363–72.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Langan BM, Sinclair M, Kernohan WG. What is the impact of the Internet on decision-making in pregnancy? A global study. Birth. 2011;38(4):336–45.CrossRef
5.
Bert F, Gualano MR, Brusaferro S, de Vito E, de Waure C, la Torre G, et al. Pregnancy e-health: a multicenter Italian cross-sectional study on Internet use and decision-making among pregnant women. J Epidemiol Community. 2013;67(12):1013–8.CrossRef
6.
Larsson M. A descriptive study of the use of Internet by women seeking pregnancy-related information. Midwifery. 2009;25:14–20.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Olander EK, Atkinson L, Edmunds JK, French DP. Promoting healthy eating in pregnancy: what kind of support services do women say they want? Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2012;13:237–43.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Lupattelli A, Picinardi M, Einarson A, Nordeng H. Health literacy and its association with perception of teratogenic risks and health behavior during pregnancy. Patient Educ Counsel. 2014;96(2):171–8.CrossRef
9.
Nutbeam D. Health literacy as a public health goal: a challenge for contemporary health education and communication strategies into the 21st century. Health Promot Int. 2000;15:259–67.CrossRef
10.
Schulz PJ, Nakamoto K. Patient behavior and the benefits of artificial intelligence: the perils of “dangerous” literacy and illusory patient empowerment. Patient Educ Counsel. 2013;92(2):223–8.CrossRef
11.
Ekman I, Swedberg K, Taft C, Lindseth A, Norberg A, Brink E, et al. Person-centered care – ready for prime time. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2011;10:248–51.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Berg M, Ólafsdóttir O, Lundgren I. A midwifery model of woman-centered childbirth care – in Swedish and Icelandic settings. Sex & Reprod Healthc. 2012;3(2):79–87.CrossRef
13.
Shields SG, Candib LM. Woman-centered care in pregnancy and childbirth. Oxford: Radcliffe Publishing; 2010.
14.
15.
Kapur K, Kapur A, Ramachandran S, Mohan V, Aravind SR, Badgandi M, et al. Barriers to changing dietary behavior. J Assoc Phys India. 2008;56:27–32.
16.
Lee DJ, Haynes CL, Garrod D. Exploring the midwife’s role in health promotion practice. Br J Midwifery. 2012;20(3):178–86.CrossRef
17.
Nicholls L, Webb C. What makes a good midwife? An integrative review of methodologically diverse research. J Adv Nurs. 2006;56(4):414–29.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Brembeck H. Preventing anxiety. A qualitative study of fish consumption and pregnancy. Critical Public Health. 2011;21(4):497–508.CrossRef
19.
Oliver EM, Grimshaw KEC, Schoemaker AA, Keil T, McBride D, Sprikkelman AB, et al. Dietary habits and supplement use in relation to national pregnancy recommendations: data from the EuroPrevall birth cohort. Matern Child Health J. 2014;18(10):2408–25.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Wennberg AL, Lundqvist A, Högberg U, Sandström H, Hamberg K. Women’s experiences of dietary advice and dietary changes during pregnancy. Midwifery. 2013;29(9):1027–34.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Wennberg AL, Hamberg K, Hörnsten Å. Midwives’ experiences of problematic dietary counseling during pregnancy. Sex & Reprod Healthc. 2014;5(3):107–12.CrossRef
22.
Lyerly AD, Mitchell LM, Mitchell Armstrong E, Harris LH, Kukla R, Kuppermann M, et al. Risk and the pregnant body. Hastings Cent Rep. 2009;39(6):34–42.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
23.
Lindgren BM, Sundbaum J, Eriksson M, Graneheim UH. Looking at the world through a frosted window: experiences of loneliness among persons with mental ill-health. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2014;21:114–20.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Kippendorf K. Content analysis: an introduction to its methodology. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2013. p. 82–96.
25.
Graneheim UH, Lundman B. Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Educ Today. 2004;24:105–12.CrossRefPubMed
26.
27.
Hellmark-Lindgren B. Pregnoscape. Den gravida kroppen som arena för motstridiga perspektiv på risk, kön och medicinsk teknik. Diss. Uppsala University, Sweden. Stockholm: Godab; 2006 [in Swedish with an English summery].
28.
Lupton D. Foucault and the medicalization critique. In: Petersen A, Bunton R, editors. Foucault, health and medicine. London and NY: Routledge; 1997. p. 95–109.
29.
Schmied VA, Duff M, Dahlen HG, Mills AE, Kolt GS. ‘Not waving but drowning’: a study of experiences and concerns of midwives and other health professionals caring for obese childbearing women. Midwifery. 2011;27:424–30.CrossRefPubMed
30.
Heslehurst N, Russell S, McCormack S, Sedgewick G, Bell R, Rankin J. Midwives perspectives of their training and education requirements in maternal obesity: a qualitative study. Midwifery. 2013;29:736–44.CrossRefPubMed
31.
Bilton T, Bonnett K, Jones P, Lawson T, Skinner D, Stanworth M, et al. Health illness and medicine Ch. 13. In: Introductory sociology. 4th ed. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan Ltd; 2002. p. 355–79.
32.
Larsson M, Aldegarmann U, Aarts C. Professional role and identity in a changing society: three paradoxes in Swedish midwives’ experiences. Midwifery. 2009;25:373–81.CrossRefPubMed
33.
Street RL, Epstein RM. Key interpersonal functions and health outcomes: lessons from theory and research on clinician-patient communication. In: Glanz K, Rimer BK, Viswanath K, editors. Health behavior and health education theory, research and practice. 4th ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2008. p. 237–69.
34.
Alaszewski A. A person-centered approach to communicating risk. PLoS Med. 2005;2(2):93–5.CrossRef
35.
MacKenzie BH, van Teijlingen E. Risk, theory, social and medical models: a critical analysis of the concept of risk in maternity care. Midwifery. 2010;26(5):488–96.CrossRef
36.
Holmström I, Röing M. The relation between patient-centeredness and patient empowerment: a discussion on concepts. Patient Educ Counsel. 2010;79(2):167–72.CrossRef
37.
Malterud K. Power inequalities in health care – empowerment revisited. Patient Educ Counsel. 2010;79(2):139–40.CrossRef
38.
Boström E, Hörnsten Å, Lundman B, Stenlund H, Isaksson U. Role clarity and role conflict among Swedish diabetes specialist nurses. Prim Care Diabetes. 2013;7:207–12.CrossRefPubMed
39.
Hyde A, Roche-Reid B. Midwifery practice and the crisis of modernity: implications for the role of the midwife. Soc Sci Med. 2004;58(12):2613–23.CrossRefPubMed
40.
Hunter B, Berg M, Lundgren I, Ólafsdóttir OA, Kirkman M. Relationship: the hidden threads in the tapestry of maternity care. Midwifery. 2008;24:132–7.CrossRefPubMed
41.
Sandelowsky M. Unmixing mixed-methods research. Res Nurs Health. 2014;37:3–8.CrossRef
42.
Mealer M, Jones J. Methodological issues related to qualitative telephone interviews on sensitive topics. Nurse Res. 2014;21(4):32–7.CrossRefPubMed
43.
Irvine A, Drew P, Sainsbury R. ‘Am I answering your question properly?’ Clarifications adequacy and responsiveness in semi-structured telephone and face-to-face-interviews. Qual Res. 2012;13(1):87–106.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
A questioned authority meets well-informed pregnant women – a qualitative study examining how midwives perceive their role in dietary counselling
Authors
Anna-Lena Wennberg
Åsa Hörnsten
Katarina Hamberg
Publication date
01-12-2015
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth / Issue 1/2015
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2393
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-015-0523-2

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 1/2015 Go to the issue

Research article

Determinants of use of care provided by complementary and alternative health care practitioners to pregnant women in primary midwifery care: a prospective cohort study

Research article

Agreement between transperineal ultrasound measurements and digital examinations of cervical dilatation during labor

Research article

How do Malawian women rate the quality of maternal and newborn care? Experiences and perceptions of women in the central and southern regions

Research article

Consumption of indigenous medicines by pregnant women in North India for selecting sex of the foetus: what can it lead to?

Research article

Correlating mechanical work with energy consumption during gait throughout pregnancy

Research article

Relationship between body mass index and mean arterial pressure in normotensive and chronic hypertensive pregnant women: a prospective, longitudinal study