Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Cancer Education 3/2011

01-09-2011

A Qualitative Study of an Internet-Based Support Group for Women with Sexual Distress Due to Gynecologic Cancer

Authors: David Wiljer, Sara Urowitz, Lisa Barbera, Meredith L. Chivers, Naa Kwarley Quartey, Sarah E. Ferguson, Matthew To, Catherine C. Classen

Published in: Journal of Cancer Education | Issue 3/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Internet-based support groups for cancer patients have been studied extensively; very few have focused on gynecologic cancer. We pilot-tested a web-based support group for gynecologic cancer patients and assessed women’s perceptions of the intervention. Twenty-seven gynecologic cancer patients were randomized to an immediate intervention or a waitlist control group. Women participated in a 12-week, web-based support group focusing on sexuality-related topics. Semi-structured interviews were conducted to investigate the feasibility and efficacy of the intervention. Women reported benefits to participating in the intervention, including receiving support from group members and moderators, increased emotional well-being, improved feelings of body image and sexuality, and comfort in discussing sexuality online. Web-based support groups are both feasible and accepted by gynecologic cancer patients with psychosexual distress. The online format provided women with easy access to the support group and anonymity in discussing psychosexual concerns. Women with gynecologic cancer may benefit from participating in online support groups which provide an environment of relative anonymity to discuss psychosexual concerns.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Hoskins W, UN, Trimble EC (2001) Report of the gynecologic cancers progress review group. National Cancer Institute Publications, Bethesda Hoskins W, UN, Trimble EC (2001) Report of the gynecologic cancers progress review group. National Cancer Institute Publications, Bethesda
2.
go back to reference Canadian Cancer Society/National Cancer Institute of Canada: Canadian Cancer Statistics 2007, Toronto, Canada, 2007. Canadian Cancer Society/National Cancer Institute of Canada: Canadian Cancer Statistics 2007, Toronto, Canada, 2007.
3.
go back to reference Evans DL et al (1986) Depression in women treated for gynecological cancer: clinical and neuroendocrine assessment. Am J Psychiatry 143(4):447–452PubMed Evans DL et al (1986) Depression in women treated for gynecological cancer: clinical and neuroendocrine assessment. Am J Psychiatry 143(4):447–452PubMed
4.
go back to reference Corney RH et al (1992) Psychosocial adjustment following major gynaecological surgery for carcinoma of the cervix and vulva. J Psychosom Res 36(6):561–568PubMedCrossRef Corney RH et al (1992) Psychosocial adjustment following major gynaecological surgery for carcinoma of the cervix and vulva. J Psychosom Res 36(6):561–568PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Lagana L, McGarvey E, Classen C, Koopman C (2001) Psychosexual dysfunction among gynecological cancer survivors. J Clin Psychol Med Settings 8(2):73–84CrossRef Lagana L, McGarvey E, Classen C, Koopman C (2001) Psychosexual dysfunction among gynecological cancer survivors. J Clin Psychol Med Settings 8(2):73–84CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Andersen BL, Anderson B, deProsse C (1989) Controlled prospective longitudinal study of women with cancer: I. Sexual functioning outcomes. J Consult Clin Psychol 57(6):683–691PubMedCrossRef Andersen BL, Anderson B, deProsse C (1989) Controlled prospective longitudinal study of women with cancer: I. Sexual functioning outcomes. J Consult Clin Psychol 57(6):683–691PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Weijmar Schultz WCM, Bransfield DD, Van de Wiel HBM, Bouma J (1992) Sexual outcome following female genital cancer treatment: a critical review of methods of investigation and results. Sex Marital Ther 7(1):29–64 Weijmar Schultz WCM, Bransfield DD, Van de Wiel HBM, Bouma J (1992) Sexual outcome following female genital cancer treatment: a critical review of methods of investigation and results. Sex Marital Ther 7(1):29–64
8.
go back to reference Stead ML (2003) Sexual dysfunction after treatment for gynaecologic and breast malignancies. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 15(1):57–61PubMedCrossRef Stead ML (2003) Sexual dysfunction after treatment for gynaecologic and breast malignancies. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 15(1):57–61PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Andersen BL, Anderson B, deProsse C (1989) Controlled prospective longitudinal study of women with cancer: II. Psychological outcomes. J Consult Clin Psychol 57(6):692–697PubMedCrossRef Andersen BL, Anderson B, deProsse C (1989) Controlled prospective longitudinal study of women with cancer: II. Psychological outcomes. J Consult Clin Psychol 57(6):692–697PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Capone MA et al (1980) Psychosocial rehabilitation of gynecologic oncology patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 61(3):128–132PubMed Capone MA et al (1980) Psychosocial rehabilitation of gynecologic oncology patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 61(3):128–132PubMed
11.
go back to reference Houts PS et al (1986) Former cancer patients as counselors of newly diagnosed cancer patients. J Natl Cancer Inst 76(5):793–796PubMed Houts PS et al (1986) Former cancer patients as counselors of newly diagnosed cancer patients. J Natl Cancer Inst 76(5):793–796PubMed
12.
go back to reference Schover LR, Evans RB, von Eschenbach AC (1987) Sexual rehabilitation in a cancer center: diagnosis and outcome in 384 consultations. Arch Sex Behav 16(6):445–461PubMedCrossRef Schover LR, Evans RB, von Eschenbach AC (1987) Sexual rehabilitation in a cancer center: diagnosis and outcome in 384 consultations. Arch Sex Behav 16(6):445–461PubMedCrossRef
13.
14.
go back to reference Wenzel LB, Robinson SE, Blake DD (1995) J Ment Health Couns 17(1):81–93 Wenzel LB, Robinson SE, Blake DD (1995) J Ment Health Couns 17(1):81–93
15.
go back to reference Bos-Branolte G et al (1988) Psychotherapy in patients cured of gynecological cancers. Recent Results Cancer Res 108:277–288PubMed Bos-Branolte G et al (1988) Psychotherapy in patients cured of gynecological cancers. Recent Results Cancer Res 108:277–288PubMed
16.
go back to reference Brotto LA et al (2007) A psychoeducational intervention for sexual dysfunction in women with gynecologic cancer. Arch Sex Behav 37(2):317–329PubMedCrossRef Brotto LA et al (2007) A psychoeducational intervention for sexual dysfunction in women with gynecologic cancer. Arch Sex Behav 37(2):317–329PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Caldwell R, Classen C, Lagana L et al (2003) Changes in sexual functioning and mood among women treated for gynecological cancer who receive group therapy: a pilot study. J Clin Psychol Med Settings 10(3):149–156CrossRef Caldwell R, Classen C, Lagana L et al (2003) Changes in sexual functioning and mood among women treated for gynecological cancer who receive group therapy: a pilot study. J Clin Psychol Med Settings 10(3):149–156CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Davison KP, Pennebaker JW, Dickerson SS (2000) Who talks? The social psychology of illness support groups. Am Psychol 55(2):205–217PubMedCrossRef Davison KP, Pennebaker JW, Dickerson SS (2000) Who talks? The social psychology of illness support groups. Am Psychol 55(2):205–217PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Lieberman MA et al (2003) Electronic support groups for breast carcinoma: a clinical trial of effectiveness. Cancer 97(4):920–925PubMedCrossRef Lieberman MA et al (2003) Electronic support groups for breast carcinoma: a clinical trial of effectiveness. Cancer 97(4):920–925PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Winzelberg AJ et al (2003) Evaluation of an internet support group for women with primary breast cancer. Cancer 97(5):1164–1173PubMedCrossRef Winzelberg AJ et al (2003) Evaluation of an internet support group for women with primary breast cancer. Cancer 97(5):1164–1173PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Klemm P, Hardie T (2002) Depression in internet and face-to-face cancer support groups: a pilot study. Oncol Nurs Forum 29(4):E45–E51PubMedCrossRef Klemm P, Hardie T (2002) Depression in internet and face-to-face cancer support groups: a pilot study. Oncol Nurs Forum 29(4):E45–E51PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Walther JB et al (2005) Attributes of interactive online health information systems. J Med Internet Res 7(3):e33PubMedCrossRef Walther JB et al (2005) Attributes of interactive online health information systems. J Med Internet Res 7(3):e33PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Spiegel D, Classen C (2000) Group therapy for cancer patients: a research-based handbook of psychosocial care. Basic Books, New York Spiegel D, Classen C (2000) Group therapy for cancer patients: a research-based handbook of psychosocial care. Basic Books, New York
24.
go back to reference Schover LR (1997) Sexuality and fertility after cancer. Wiley, New York Schover LR (1997) Sexuality and fertility after cancer. Wiley, New York
25.
go back to reference Gottlieb BH, Wachala ED (2007) Cancer support groups: a critical review of empirical studies. Psychooncology 16(5):379–400PubMedCrossRef Gottlieb BH, Wachala ED (2007) Cancer support groups: a critical review of empirical studies. Psychooncology 16(5):379–400PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Klemm P et al (2003) Online cancer support groups: a review of the research literature. Comput Inform Nurs 21(3):136–142PubMedCrossRef Klemm P et al (2003) Online cancer support groups: a review of the research literature. Comput Inform Nurs 21(3):136–142PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Preece J, Nonnecke B, Andrews D (2004) The top five reasons for lurking: improving community experiences for everyone. Comput Hum Behav 20(2):201–223CrossRef Preece J, Nonnecke B, Andrews D (2004) The top five reasons for lurking: improving community experiences for everyone. Comput Hum Behav 20(2):201–223CrossRef
28.
go back to reference IM EO et al (2007) Patients’ attitudes toward internet cancer support groups. Oncol Nurs Forum 34(3):705–712PubMedCrossRef IM EO et al (2007) Patients’ attitudes toward internet cancer support groups. Oncol Nurs Forum 34(3):705–712PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
A Qualitative Study of an Internet-Based Support Group for Women with Sexual Distress Due to Gynecologic Cancer
Authors
David Wiljer
Sara Urowitz
Lisa Barbera
Meredith L. Chivers
Naa Kwarley Quartey
Sarah E. Ferguson
Matthew To
Catherine C. Classen
Publication date
01-09-2011
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Journal of Cancer Education / Issue 3/2011
Print ISSN: 0885-8195
Electronic ISSN: 1543-0154
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-011-0215-1

Other articles of this Issue 3/2011

Journal of Cancer Education 3/2011 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine