Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 3/2011

01-03-2011 | Pancreatic Tumors

A Qualitative Assessment of a Provincial Quality Improvement Strategy for Pancreatic Cancer Surgery

Authors: Frances C. Wright, MD, Margaret Fitch, PhD, Angela J. Coates, MEd, Marko Simunovic, MD

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 3/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

A study released in Ontario, Canada (1999) found a positive relationship between surgical volume and patient outcomes after pancreatic resection for cancer. In response, a province-level quality improvement (QI) strategy was initiated, which included the development and dissemination of a standards document and an audit and feedback exercise with surgeons. We assessed perceptions and actions of Ontario surgeons to this QI strategy.

Methods

We conducted semistructured interviews with surgeons and chiefs of surgery at three types of hospitals providing pancreatic cancer surgery, including hospitals that provided high volumes of surgery after 2001, hospitals that provided low volumes of surgery after 2001, and hospitals that provided low volumes of surgery before 2001 and stopped after year 2001. High-volume hospitals performed ten or more surgeries annually. The interview guide was based on Pathman’s model of physician practice change (i.e., awareness, agreement, adoption, and adherence). Grounded theory guided data collection and analysis.

Results

Twenty-four interviews were completed. All groups were aware of the 1999 province-level QI strategy and agreed in principle with the standards document recommendations. Many surgeons had concerns regarding the number of cases necessary to be considered high-volume. Decisions to cease pancreas cancer surgery were occurring before 1999 and made at the surgeon level, often with input from the chief of surgery, but rarely with input from hospital administration.

Conclusions

Surgeons were aware of and agreed in principle with the province-level QI strategy for pancreas cancer surgery. Decisions to continue or cease performing surgery were made by individual surgeons.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Simunovic M, To T, Theriault T, Langer B. Relation between hospital surgical volume and outcome for pancreatic resection for neoplasm in a publicly funded health care system. CMAJ. 1999;160(5):643–8.PubMed Simunovic M, To T, Theriault T, Langer B. Relation between hospital surgical volume and outcome for pancreatic resection for neoplasm in a publicly funded health care system. CMAJ. 1999;160(5):643–8.PubMed
2.
go back to reference Bachmann MO, Alderson D, Peters TJ, Bedford C, Edwards D, Wotton S, Harvey IM. Influence of specialization on the management and outcome of patients with pancreatic cancer. Br J Surg. 2003;90(2):171–7.PubMedCrossRef Bachmann MO, Alderson D, Peters TJ, Bedford C, Edwards D, Wotton S, Harvey IM. Influence of specialization on the management and outcome of patients with pancreatic cancer. Br J Surg. 2003;90(2):171–7.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Sosa JA, Bowman HM, Gordon TA, et al. Importance of hospital volume in the overall management of pancreatic cancer. Ann Surg. 1998;228:429–38.PubMedCrossRef Sosa JA, Bowman HM, Gordon TA, et al. Importance of hospital volume in the overall management of pancreatic cancer. Ann Surg. 1998;228:429–38.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Simunovic M, Urbach D, Major D, et al. Assessing the volume outcome hypothesis: a natural experiment involving pancreas cancer surgery in two Canadian provinces. Ann Surg Oncol. (in press). Simunovic M, Urbach D, Major D, et al. Assessing the volume outcome hypothesis: a natural experiment involving pancreas cancer surgery in two Canadian provinces. Ann Surg Oncol. (in press).
5.
go back to reference Pathman DE, Konrad TR, Freed GL, Freeman VA, Koch GG. The awareness-to-adherence model of the steps to clinical guideline compliance: the case of pediatric vaccine recommendations. Med Care. 1996;34(9):873–89.PubMedCrossRef Pathman DE, Konrad TR, Freed GL, Freeman VA, Koch GG. The awareness-to-adherence model of the steps to clinical guideline compliance: the case of pediatric vaccine recommendations. Med Care. 1996;34(9):873–89.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Hutchison SA. Grounded theory: the method. In: Munhall PL, Oiler C, editors. Nursing research: a qualitative perspective. Norwalk, CT: Appleton-Century-Crofts; 1986. p. 111–30. Hutchison SA. Grounded theory: the method. In: Munhall PL, Oiler C, editors. Nursing research: a qualitative perspective. Norwalk, CT: Appleton-Century-Crofts; 1986. p. 111–30.
8.
go back to reference Auerbach CF, Silverstein LB. Qualitative data: an introduction to coding and analysis. New York: New York University Press; 2003. Auerbach CF, Silverstein LB. Qualitative data: an introduction to coding and analysis. New York: New York University Press; 2003.
9.
go back to reference Grol R, Grimshaw J. From best evidence to best practice: effective implementation of change in patients’ care. Lancet. 2003;262:1225–30.CrossRef Grol R, Grimshaw J. From best evidence to best practice: effective implementation of change in patients’ care. Lancet. 2003;262:1225–30.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Grol R, Dalhuijsen J, Thomas S, Veld C, Rutten G, Mokkink H. Attributes of clinical guidelines that influence use of guidelines in general practice: observational study. BMJ. 1998;317(7162):858–61.PubMed Grol R, Dalhuijsen J, Thomas S, Veld C, Rutten G, Mokkink H. Attributes of clinical guidelines that influence use of guidelines in general practice: observational study. BMJ. 1998;317(7162):858–61.PubMed
11.
go back to reference Foy R, MacLennan G, Grimshaw J, Penney G, Campbell M, Grol R. Attributes of clinical recommendations that influence change in practice following audit and feedback. J Clin Epidemiol. 2002;55:717–22.PubMedCrossRef Foy R, MacLennan G, Grimshaw J, Penney G, Campbell M, Grol R. Attributes of clinical recommendations that influence change in practice following audit and feedback. J Clin Epidemiol. 2002;55:717–22.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Stitzenberg KB, Sheldon GF. Progressive specialization within general surgery: adding to the complexity of workforce planning. JACS. 2005;201(6):925–32. Stitzenberg KB, Sheldon GF. Progressive specialization within general surgery: adding to the complexity of workforce planning. JACS. 2005;201(6):925–32.
13.
14.
go back to reference Berwick DM, Godfrey AB, Roessner J. 10 key lessons for quality improvement. In: Berwick DM, Godfrey AB, Roessner J, (eds) Curing health care: new strategies for quality improvement. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2002. p. 144–58. Berwick DM, Godfrey AB, Roessner J. 10 key lessons for quality improvement. In: Berwick DM, Godfrey AB, Roessner J, (eds) Curing health care: new strategies for quality improvement. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2002. p. 144–58.
15.
go back to reference West E, Barron DN, Dowsett J, Newton JN. Hierarchies and cliques in the social networks of health care professionals: Implications for the design of dissemination strategies. Soc Sci Med. 1999;48(5):633–46.PubMedCrossRef West E, Barron DN, Dowsett J, Newton JN. Hierarchies and cliques in the social networks of health care professionals: Implications for the design of dissemination strategies. Soc Sci Med. 1999;48(5):633–46.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Jamtvedt G, Young JM, Kristoffersen DT, et al. Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. doi:10/1002/14651858. CD000259.pub2 [Online June 21, 2009]. Jamtvedt G, Young JM, Kristoffersen DT, et al. Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. doi:10/​1002/​14651858. CD000259.pub2 [Online June 21, 2009].
17.
go back to reference van Heek NT, Kuhlmann KFD, Scholten RJ, et al. Hospital volume and mortality after pancreatic resection: a systematic review and an evaluation of intervention in The Netherlands. Ann Surg. 2005;242(6):781–90.PubMedCrossRef van Heek NT, Kuhlmann KFD, Scholten RJ, et al. Hospital volume and mortality after pancreatic resection: a systematic review and an evaluation of intervention in The Netherlands. Ann Surg. 2005;242(6):781–90.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Turaga K, Kaushik M, Forse RA, Sasson AR. In hospital outcomes after pancreatectomies: an analysis of national database from 1996 to 2004. J Surg Oncol. 2008;98:156–60.PubMedCrossRef Turaga K, Kaushik M, Forse RA, Sasson AR. In hospital outcomes after pancreatectomies: an analysis of national database from 1996 to 2004. J Surg Oncol. 2008;98:156–60.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Kahn JM, Asch RJ, Iwashyna TJ, Rubenfeld GD, Angus DC, Asch DA. Perceived barriers to the regionalization of adult critical care in the United States: a qualitative preliminary study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2008;8:239.PubMedCrossRef Kahn JM, Asch RJ, Iwashyna TJ, Rubenfeld GD, Angus DC, Asch DA. Perceived barriers to the regionalization of adult critical care in the United States: a qualitative preliminary study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2008;8:239.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
A Qualitative Assessment of a Provincial Quality Improvement Strategy for Pancreatic Cancer Surgery
Authors
Frances C. Wright, MD
Margaret Fitch, PhD
Angela J. Coates, MEd
Marko Simunovic, MD
Publication date
01-03-2011
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 3/2011
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-010-1337-0

Other articles of this Issue 3/2011

Annals of Surgical Oncology 3/2011 Go to the issue

Healthcare Policy and Outcomes

Quality Measurement in Cancer Care Delivery