Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Neurology and Therapy 2/2014

Open Access 01-12-2014 | Original Research

A Prospective Study of Patients with Brain MRI Showing Incidental T2 Hyperintensities Addressed as Multiple Sclerosis: a Lot of Work to do Before Treating

Authors: Christine Lebrun, Mikael Cohen, Annabelle Chaussenot, Lydiane Mondot, Stephane Chanalet

Published in: Neurology and Therapy | Issue 2/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

With the development of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and publications about radiologically isolated syndrome (RIS), a lot of patients are referred to multiple sclerosis (MS) tertiary centers to confirm diagnosis of RIS or MS when brain T2 abnormalities are identified, whatever their characteristics. We evaluate prospectively the occurrence of RIS or MS and sensitivity, specificity and predictive value of McDonald criteria in diagnosis for patients presenting with incidental brain MRI T2 lesions.

Methods

The authors ran standardized procedures on 220 consecutive patients addressed by general practitioners or neurologists to confirm RIS or MS diagnosis on brain MRI and give a therapeutic advice. All patients underwent neurological tests, extensive blood screening, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) examination, visual evoked potential (VEP) and follow-up MRI after 3, 6, 12 and 24 months to consider dissemination in time and space.

Results

Patient characteristics were: 165 women and 55 men, mean age: 42.7 years old (23–59). The major symptom motivating MRI was headaches (39%), sensitive atypical manifestations or pain (12%), mood disorders (10%), transient visual symptoms (9%), fatigue (8%), hormonal screening (6%), vertigo (6%), cranial trauma (5%), and dummy run for clinical study (5%). After a structured analysis of T2 lesions, the suspected diagnosis was: inflammatory disease 45%, vascular 33%, non-pathological 19%, genetic 2%, and metabolic 1%. Extensive screening confirmed the proposed diagnosis in 97% of cases. Among all the 220 proposed RIS patients, only 35.4% fulfilled the 2010 McDonald criteria, and 8% can be categorized as RIS. Dissemination in time criteria was present for 82.7% of MS patients and 36% of RIS patients but none of the vascular or non-pathological T2 abnormalities.

Conclusion

Even if RIS was initially suspected on MRI, only a third of the patients had an inflammatory disease. Most of the patients had either non-specific T2 lesions or a non-inflammatory disease. Others were initially well categorized but had experienced clinical symptoms that could possibly be considered as a first clinical event. Overdiagnosis of MS can lead to propose an inappropriate disease-modifying therapy.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference McDonald WI, Compston A, Edan G, et al. Recommended diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: guidelines from the International Panel on the Diagnosis of Multiple Sclerosis. Ann Neurol. 2001;50:121–7.PubMedCrossRef McDonald WI, Compston A, Edan G, et al. Recommended diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: guidelines from the International Panel on the Diagnosis of Multiple Sclerosis. Ann Neurol. 2001;50:121–7.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Barkhof F, Filippi M, Miller DH, et al. Comparison of MRI criteria at first presentation to predict conversion to clinically definite multiple sclerosis. Brain. 1997;120:2059–69.PubMedCrossRef Barkhof F, Filippi M, Miller DH, et al. Comparison of MRI criteria at first presentation to predict conversion to clinically definite multiple sclerosis. Brain. 1997;120:2059–69.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Polman CH, Reingold SC, Banwell B, et al. Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2010 Revisions to the McDonald criteria. Ann Neurol. 2011;69(2):292–302.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Polman CH, Reingold SC, Banwell B, et al. Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2010 Revisions to the McDonald criteria. Ann Neurol. 2011;69(2):292–302.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Tintoré M, Rovira A, Martinez M, et al. Isolated demyelinating syndromes: comparison of different MR imaging criteria to predict conversion to clinically definite multiple sclerosis. Am J Neuroradiol. 2000;21:702–6.PubMed Tintoré M, Rovira A, Martinez M, et al. Isolated demyelinating syndromes: comparison of different MR imaging criteria to predict conversion to clinically definite multiple sclerosis. Am J Neuroradiol. 2000;21:702–6.PubMed
5.
go back to reference Tintoré M, Rovira A, Rio J, et al. New diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: application in first demyelinating episode. Neurology. 2003;60:27–30.PubMedCrossRef Tintoré M, Rovira A, Rio J, et al. New diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: application in first demyelinating episode. Neurology. 2003;60:27–30.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Frohman EM, Goodin DS, Calabresi PA, et al. The utility of MRI in suspected MS: report of the Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology. 2003;61:602–11.PubMedCrossRef Frohman EM, Goodin DS, Calabresi PA, et al. The utility of MRI in suspected MS: report of the Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology. 2003;61:602–11.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Swanton JK, Rovira A, Tintoré M, et al. MRI criteria for multiple sclerosis in patients presenting with clinically isolated syndromes: a multicentre retrospective study. Lancet Neurol. 2007;6:677–86.PubMedCrossRef Swanton JK, Rovira A, Tintoré M, et al. MRI criteria for multiple sclerosis in patients presenting with clinically isolated syndromes: a multicentre retrospective study. Lancet Neurol. 2007;6:677–86.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Nielsen JM, Korteweg T, Barkhof F, et al. Overdiagnosis of multiple sclerosis and magnetic resonance criteria. Ann Neurol. 2005;58:781–3.PubMedCrossRef Nielsen JM, Korteweg T, Barkhof F, et al. Overdiagnosis of multiple sclerosis and magnetic resonance criteria. Ann Neurol. 2005;58:781–3.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Nielsen JM, Uitdehaag BM, Polman CH. Long-term follow-up of suspected though unconfirmed MS. Mult Scler. 2008;14(7):985–7 Epub 2008 Jun 23.PubMedCrossRef Nielsen JM, Uitdehaag BM, Polman CH. Long-term follow-up of suspected though unconfirmed MS. Mult Scler. 2008;14(7):985–7 Epub 2008 Jun 23.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Charil A, Yousry TA, Rovaris M, et al. MRI and the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: expanding the concept of no better explanation. Lancet Neurol. 2006;5:841–52.PubMedCrossRef Charil A, Yousry TA, Rovaris M, et al. MRI and the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: expanding the concept of no better explanation. Lancet Neurol. 2006;5:841–52.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Korteweg T, Tintoré M, Uitdehaag B, et al. MRI criteria for dissemination in space in patients with clinically isolated syndromes: a multicentre follow-up study. Lancet Neurol. 2006;5:221–7.PubMedCrossRef Korteweg T, Tintoré M, Uitdehaag B, et al. MRI criteria for dissemination in space in patients with clinically isolated syndromes: a multicentre follow-up study. Lancet Neurol. 2006;5:221–7.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Okuda DT, Mowry EM, Beheshtian A, et al. Incidental MRI anomalies suggestive of multiple sclerosis: the radiologically isolated syndrome. Neurology. 2009;72(9):800–5.PubMedCrossRef Okuda DT, Mowry EM, Beheshtian A, et al. Incidental MRI anomalies suggestive of multiple sclerosis: the radiologically isolated syndrome. Neurology. 2009;72(9):800–5.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Fazekas F, Offenbacher H, Fuchs S, et al. Criteria for an increased specificity of MRI interpretation in elderly subjects with suspected multiple sclerosis. Neurology. 1988;38:1822–5.PubMedCrossRef Fazekas F, Offenbacher H, Fuchs S, et al. Criteria for an increased specificity of MRI interpretation in elderly subjects with suspected multiple sclerosis. Neurology. 1988;38:1822–5.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Paty DW, Oger JJ, Kastrukoff LF, et al. MRI in the diagnosis of MS: a prospective study with comparison of clinical evaluation, evoked potentials, oligoclonal banding, and CT. Neurology. 1988;38:180–5.PubMedCrossRef Paty DW, Oger JJ, Kastrukoff LF, et al. MRI in the diagnosis of MS: a prospective study with comparison of clinical evaluation, evoked potentials, oligoclonal banding, and CT. Neurology. 1988;38:180–5.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Miller DH, Filippi M, Fazekas F, et al. Role of magnetic resonance imaging within diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol. 2004;56:273–8.PubMedCrossRef Miller DH, Filippi M, Fazekas F, et al. Role of magnetic resonance imaging within diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol. 2004;56:273–8.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Filippini G, Comi GC, Cosi V, et al. Sensitivities and predictive values of paraclinical tests for diagnosing multiple sclerosis. J Neurol. 1994;241:132–7.PubMedCrossRef Filippini G, Comi GC, Cosi V, et al. Sensitivities and predictive values of paraclinical tests for diagnosing multiple sclerosis. J Neurol. 1994;241:132–7.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Carmosino MJ, Brousseau KM, Arciniegas DB, Corboy JR. Initial evaluations for multiple sclerosis in a university multiple sclerosis center: outcomes and role of magnetic resonance imaging in referral. Arch Neurol. 2005;62:585–90.PubMedCrossRef Carmosino MJ, Brousseau KM, Arciniegas DB, Corboy JR. Initial evaluations for multiple sclerosis in a university multiple sclerosis center: outcomes and role of magnetic resonance imaging in referral. Arch Neurol. 2005;62:585–90.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Gout O, Moreau T, Debouverie M, Allouche S, on behalf of the Club Francophone de la sclérose en plaques. Pedias: pilot multicentre observational study aiming to standardize diagnosis of an inflammatory neurological event leading patient to consult for the first time. Mult Scler. 2007;13: P370. Gout O, Moreau T, Debouverie M, Allouche S, on behalf of the Club Francophone de la sclérose en plaques. Pedias: pilot multicentre observational study aiming to standardize diagnosis of an inflammatory neurological event leading patient to consult for the first time. Mult Scler. 2007;13: P370.
19.
go back to reference Mushlin AI, Mooney C, Grow V, Phelps CE. The value of diagnostic information to patients with suspected multiple sclerosis. Rochester Toronto MRI Study Group. Arch Neurol. 1994;51:67–72.PubMedCrossRef Mushlin AI, Mooney C, Grow V, Phelps CE. The value of diagnostic information to patients with suspected multiple sclerosis. Rochester Toronto MRI Study Group. Arch Neurol. 1994;51:67–72.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Lebrun C, Bensa C, Debouverie M, et al. Unexpected multiple sclerosis: follow-up of 30 patients with magnetic resonance imaging and clinical conversion profile. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2008;79(2):195–8.PubMedCrossRef Lebrun C, Bensa C, Debouverie M, et al. Unexpected multiple sclerosis: follow-up of 30 patients with magnetic resonance imaging and clinical conversion profile. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2008;79(2):195–8.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Lebrun C, Bensa C, Debouverie M, et al. Association between clinical conversion to multiple sclerosis in radiologically isolated syndrome and magnetic resonance imaging, cerebrospinal fluid, and visual evoked potential: follow-up of 70 patients. Arch Neurol. 2009;66(7):841–6.PubMedCrossRef Lebrun C, Bensa C, Debouverie M, et al. Association between clinical conversion to multiple sclerosis in radiologically isolated syndrome and magnetic resonance imaging, cerebrospinal fluid, and visual evoked potential: follow-up of 70 patients. Arch Neurol. 2009;66(7):841–6.PubMedCrossRef
22.
24.
go back to reference Nakamura M, Morris M, Cerghet M, et al. Longitudinal follow-up of a cohort of patients with incidental abnormal magnetic resonance imaging findings at presentation and their risk of developing multiple sclerosis. Int J MS Care. 2014;16:111–5.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Nakamura M, Morris M, Cerghet M, et al. Longitudinal follow-up of a cohort of patients with incidental abnormal magnetic resonance imaging findings at presentation and their risk of developing multiple sclerosis. Int J MS Care. 2014;16:111–5.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Cooney BS, Grossman RI, Farber RE, Goin JE, Galetta SL. Frequency of magnetic resonance imaging abnormalities in patients with migraine. Headache. 1996;36:616–21.PubMedCrossRef Cooney BS, Grossman RI, Farber RE, Goin JE, Galetta SL. Frequency of magnetic resonance imaging abnormalities in patients with migraine. Headache. 1996;36:616–21.PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Pavese N, Canapicchi R, Nuti A, et al. White matter MRI hyperintensities in a hundred and twenty-nine consecutive migraine patients. Cephalalgia. 1994;14(5):342–5.PubMedCrossRef Pavese N, Canapicchi R, Nuti A, et al. White matter MRI hyperintensities in a hundred and twenty-nine consecutive migraine patients. Cephalalgia. 1994;14(5):342–5.PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Liu S, Kullnat J, Bourdette D, et al. Prevalence of brain magnetic resonance imaging meeting Barkhof and McDonald criteria for dissemination in space among headache patients. Mult Scler. 2013;19(8):1101–5.PubMedCrossRef Liu S, Kullnat J, Bourdette D, et al. Prevalence of brain magnetic resonance imaging meeting Barkhof and McDonald criteria for dissemination in space among headache patients. Mult Scler. 2013;19(8):1101–5.PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Freedman MS, Thompson EJ, Deisenhammer F, et al. Recommended standard of cerebrospinal fluid analysis in the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: a consensus statement. Arch Neurol. 2005;62(6):865–70.PubMed Freedman MS, Thompson EJ, Deisenhammer F, et al. Recommended standard of cerebrospinal fluid analysis in the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: a consensus statement. Arch Neurol. 2005;62(6):865–70.PubMed
29.
go back to reference Gronseth GS, Ashman EJ. Practice parameter: the usefulness of evoked potentials in identifying clinically silent lesions in patients with suspected multiple sclerosis (an evidence-based review). Report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology. 2000; 9; 54(9): 1720–1725. Gronseth GS, Ashman EJ. Practice parameter: the usefulness of evoked potentials in identifying clinically silent lesions in patients with suspected multiple sclerosis (an evidence-based review). Report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology. 2000; 9; 54(9): 1720–1725.
30.
go back to reference Tintoré M, Rovira A, Río J, et al. Do oligoclonal bands add information to MRI in first attacks of multiple sclerosis? Neurology. 2008;70(13 Pt 2):1079–83.PubMed Tintoré M, Rovira A, Río J, et al. Do oligoclonal bands add information to MRI in first attacks of multiple sclerosis? Neurology. 2008;70(13 Pt 2):1079–83.PubMed
31.
go back to reference Villar LM, García-Barragán N, Sádaba MC, et al. Accuracy of CSF and MRI criteria for dissemination in space in the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Sci. 2008; 15; 266(1–2): 34–7. Villar LM, García-Barragán N, Sádaba MC, et al. Accuracy of CSF and MRI criteria for dissemination in space in the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Sci. 2008; 15; 266(1–2): 34–7.
Metadata
Title
A Prospective Study of Patients with Brain MRI Showing Incidental T2 Hyperintensities Addressed as Multiple Sclerosis: a Lot of Work to do Before Treating
Authors
Christine Lebrun
Mikael Cohen
Annabelle Chaussenot
Lydiane Mondot
Stephane Chanalet
Publication date
01-12-2014
Publisher
Springer Healthcare
Published in
Neurology and Therapy / Issue 2/2014
Print ISSN: 2193-8253
Electronic ISSN: 2193-6536
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40120-014-0024-7

Other articles of this Issue 2/2014

Neurology and Therapy 2/2014 Go to the issue