Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Digestive Diseases and Sciences 8/2010

01-08-2010 | Original Article

A Prospective Randomized Study on Computed Virtual Chromoendoscopy Versus Conventional Colonoscopy for the Detection of Small Colorectal Adenomas

Authors: Jae Myung Cha, Joung Il Lee, Kwang Roo Joo, Sung Won Jung, Hyun Phil Shin

Published in: Digestive Diseases and Sciences | Issue 8/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Colonoscopy is considered to be the standard diagnostic test for detecting colonic neoplasia, particularly for small lesions. However, recent publications have suggested that 15–27% of small adenomas might be missed during conventional colonoscopy.

Aims

To determine whether computed virtual chromoendoscopy (CVC) can improve the detection of small adenomas as compared to conventional colonoscopy.

Methods

We examined 135 consecutive patients by total colonoscopy and 128 patients were randomized to compare white-light colonoscopy (65 patients) and CVC-mode colonoscopy (63 patients) after the exclusion of seven patients because of poor bowel preparation (n = 4) or other causes (one sigmoid colon cancer, two intestinal tuberculosis).

Results

There were no differences between the patient characteristics for the two study groups, i.e., age, sex, body mass index, quality of bowel preparations, indications for the procedure, conscious sedation, and examination times—both insertion time and withdrawal time. The groups did not differ in the number of patients with all polyps, adenomas, or hyperplastic polyps. In the patients with adenomas, however, there was a significant difference in the detection rate for the patients with small adenomas less than 5 mm in size (P = 0.006).

Conclusions

Colonoscopy with the CVC mode identified more patients with small colorectal adenomas than conventional white-light colonoscopy. Therefore, CVC might be a supplementary tool aiding the colonoscopist in the detection of small adenomas; however, further studies will need to demonstrate whether these results are reproducible across patients in varied clinical settings.
Literature
3.
go back to reference Atkin WS, Morson BC, Cuzick J. Long-term risk of colorectal cancer after excision of rectosigmoid adenomas. N Engl J Med. 1992;326:658–662.PubMedCrossRef Atkin WS, Morson BC, Cuzick J. Long-term risk of colorectal cancer after excision of rectosigmoid adenomas. N Engl J Med. 1992;326:658–662.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Bond JH. Is the small colorectal polyp clinically diminutive? Gastrointest Endosc. 1993;39:592–593.CrossRefPubMed Bond JH. Is the small colorectal polyp clinically diminutive? Gastrointest Endosc. 1993;39:592–593.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Blue MG, Sivak MV Jr, Achkar E, et al. Hyperplastic polyps seen at sigmoidoscopy are markers for additional adenomas seen at colonoscopy. Gastroenterology. 1991;100:564–566.PubMed Blue MG, Sivak MV Jr, Achkar E, et al. Hyperplastic polyps seen at sigmoidoscopy are markers for additional adenomas seen at colonoscopy. Gastroenterology. 1991;100:564–566.PubMed
10.
go back to reference Kiesslich R, von Bergh M, Hahn M, et al. Chromoendoscopy with indigocarmine improves the detection of adenomatous and nonadenomatous lesions in the colon. Endoscopy. 2001;33:1001–1006. doi:10.1055/s-2001-18932.CrossRefPubMed Kiesslich R, von Bergh M, Hahn M, et al. Chromoendoscopy with indigocarmine improves the detection of adenomatous and nonadenomatous lesions in the colon. Endoscopy. 2001;33:1001–1006. doi:10.​1055/​s-2001-18932.CrossRefPubMed
12.
15.
go back to reference Adler A, Pohl H, Papanikolaou IS, et al. A prospective randomised study on narrow-band imaging versus conventional colonoscopy for adenoma detection: does narrow-band imaging induce a learning effect? Gut. 2008;57:59–64. doi:10.1136/gut.2007.123539.CrossRefPubMed Adler A, Pohl H, Papanikolaou IS, et al. A prospective randomised study on narrow-band imaging versus conventional colonoscopy for adenoma detection: does narrow-band imaging induce a learning effect? Gut. 2008;57:59–64. doi:10.​1136/​gut.​2007.​123539.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Pohl J, May A, Rabenstein T, et al. Comparison of computed virtual chromoendoscopy and conventional chromoendoscopy with acetic acid for detection of neoplasia in Barrett’s esophagus. Endoscopy. 2007;39:594–598. doi:10.1055/s-2007-966649.CrossRefPubMed Pohl J, May A, Rabenstein T, et al. Comparison of computed virtual chromoendoscopy and conventional chromoendoscopy with acetic acid for detection of neoplasia in Barrett’s esophagus. Endoscopy. 2007;39:594–598. doi:10.​1055/​s-2007-966649.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Participants in the Paris Workshop. The Paris endoscopic classification of superficial neoplastic lesions: esophagus, stomach, and colon: November 30 to December 1, 2002. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;58:S3–S43. doi:10.1016/S0016-5107(03)02159-X.CrossRef Participants in the Paris Workshop. The Paris endoscopic classification of superficial neoplastic lesions: esophagus, stomach, and colon: November 30 to December 1, 2002. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;58:S3–S43. doi:10.​1016/​S0016-5107(03)02159-X.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Helbig C. Chromoendoscopy and its alternatives for colonoscopy: useful in the United States? Rev Gastroenterol Disord. 2006;6:209–220.PubMed Helbig C. Chromoendoscopy and its alternatives for colonoscopy: useful in the United States? Rev Gastroenterol Disord. 2006;6:209–220.PubMed
22.
go back to reference Hamilton SR, Aaltonen LA, eds. World Health Organization Classification of Tumours: Pathology and Genetics of Tumours of the Digestive System. Lyon, France: IARC Press; 2000:104–109. Hamilton SR, Aaltonen LA, eds. World Health Organization Classification of Tumours: Pathology and Genetics of Tumours of the Digestive System. Lyon, France: IARC Press; 2000:104–109.
33.
go back to reference Froehlich F, Wietlisbach V, Gonvers JJ, et al. Impact of colonic cleansing on quality and diagnostic yield of colonoscopy: the European Panel of Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy European multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;61:378–384. doi:10.1016/S0016-5107(04)02776-2.CrossRefPubMed Froehlich F, Wietlisbach V, Gonvers JJ, et al. Impact of colonic cleansing on quality and diagnostic yield of colonoscopy: the European Panel of Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy European multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;61:378–384. doi:10.​1016/​S0016-5107(04)02776-2.CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Kim DH, Lee SY, Choi KS, et al. The usefulness of colonoscopy as a screening test for detecting colorectal polyps. Hepatogastroenterology. 2007;54:2240–2242.PubMed Kim DH, Lee SY, Choi KS, et al. The usefulness of colonoscopy as a screening test for detecting colorectal polyps. Hepatogastroenterology. 2007;54:2240–2242.PubMed
35.
go back to reference Adler A, Roll S, Marowski B, et al. Appropriateness of colonoscopy in the era of colorectal cancer screening: a prospective, multicenter study in a private-practice setting (Berlin Colonoscopy Project 1, BECOP 1). Dis Colon Rectum. 2007;50:1628–1638. doi:10.1007/s10350-007-9029-y.CrossRefPubMed Adler A, Roll S, Marowski B, et al. Appropriateness of colonoscopy in the era of colorectal cancer screening: a prospective, multicenter study in a private-practice setting (Berlin Colonoscopy Project 1, BECOP 1). Dis Colon Rectum. 2007;50:1628–1638. doi:10.​1007/​s10350-007-9029-y.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
A Prospective Randomized Study on Computed Virtual Chromoendoscopy Versus Conventional Colonoscopy for the Detection of Small Colorectal Adenomas
Authors
Jae Myung Cha
Joung Il Lee
Kwang Roo Joo
Sung Won Jung
Hyun Phil Shin
Publication date
01-08-2010
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Digestive Diseases and Sciences / Issue 8/2010
Print ISSN: 0163-2116
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2568
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-009-1003-1

Other articles of this Issue 8/2010

Digestive Diseases and Sciences 8/2010 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine