Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 1/2012

01-01-2012 | Experimental Study

A prospective randomized comparison of irradiated and non-irradiated hamstring tendon allograft for ACL reconstruction

Authors: Kang Sun, Jihua Zhang, Yan Wang, Cailong Zhang, Changsuo Xia, Tengbo Yu, Shaoqi Tian

Published in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy | Issue 1/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To analyze the outcome of arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with irradiated versus non-irradiated hamstring tendon allograft.

Methods

All hamstring tendon allografts were obtained from a single certified tissue bank, and the irradiated allografts were sterilized with 2.5 Mrad of irradiation prior to distribution. A total of 78 patients who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria of the study were prospectively randomized consecutively into two groups (Non-ir-Allo vs. Ir-Allo). All the operations were done by the same senior surgeon. Before surgery and at follow-up, patients were evaluated by the same observer according to clinical evaluations including the Lachman test, ADT, pivot shift test, varus/valgus stress test, the instrumented KT-2000 arthrometer testing, vertical jump test, one-leg hop test, ROM of knee, Cincinnati knee score, IKDC Subjective Knee Form, Tegner activity score, modified Lysholm knee scoring scale, and the standard knee ligament evaluation form of the IKDC.

Results

Of these patients, 69 (Non-ir-Allo 38, Ir-Allo 31) were available for full evaluation. When compared the Ir-Allo group with Non-ir-Allo group at the final follow-up by Lachman test, ADT, pivot shift test, and KT-2000 arthrometer testing, statistically significant differences were found (P < 0.05). Most importantly, 84% of patients in the Non-ir-Auto group and just only 32% in the Ir-Allo group had a side-to-side difference of less than 3 mm according to KT-2000. The anterior and rotational stability decreased significantly in the Ir-Allo group. According to the overall IKDC, functional, subjective evaluations, and activity level testing, no statistically significant differences were found between the two groups (n.s.). As to the osteoarthritis (OA) rate, for the Non-ir-Allo group, there was no significant difference (n.s.) in development of OA between the operated knee and contralateral knee at the final follow-up. While for the Ir-Allo group, significant difference (P < 0.05) was found in development of OA between the operated knee and contralateral knee. There was statistical difference (P < 0.05) between the Non-ir-Allo and Ir-Allo groups when comparing the development of OA of the operated knees at the final follow-up.

Conclusion

There was a significant difference in knee stability between the two groups (in favor of Non-ir-Allo), but no differences in functional scores should be pointed out clearly.

Level of evidence

I.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ahldén M, Kartus J, Ejerhed L et al (2009) Knee laxity measurements after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, using either bone-patellar-tendon-bone or hamstring tendon autografts, with special emphasis on comparison over time. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 17:1117–1124PubMedCrossRef Ahldén M, Kartus J, Ejerhed L et al (2009) Knee laxity measurements after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, using either bone-patellar-tendon-bone or hamstring tendon autografts, with special emphasis on comparison over time. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 17:1117–1124PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Carey JL, Dunn WR, Dahm DL et al (2009) A systematic review of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with autograft compared with allograft. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91:2242–2250PubMedCrossRef Carey JL, Dunn WR, Dahm DL et al (2009) A systematic review of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with autograft compared with allograft. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91:2242–2250PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Curran AR, Adams DJ, Gill JL et al (2004) The biomechanical effects of low-dose irradiation on bone-patellar tendon-bone allografts. Am J Sports Med 32:1131–1135PubMedCrossRef Curran AR, Adams DJ, Gill JL et al (2004) The biomechanical effects of low-dose irradiation on bone-patellar tendon-bone allografts. Am J Sports Med 32:1131–1135PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Drogset JO, Strand T, Uppheim G et al (2010) Autologous patellar tendon and quadrupled hamstring grafts in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective randomized multicenter review of different fixation methods. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18:1085–1093PubMedCrossRef Drogset JO, Strand T, Uppheim G et al (2010) Autologous patellar tendon and quadrupled hamstring grafts in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective randomized multicenter review of different fixation methods. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18:1085–1093PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Edgar CM, Zimmer S, Kakar S et al (2008) Prospective comparison of auto and allograft hamstring tendon constructs for ACL reconstruction. Clin Orthop Relat Res 466:2238–2246PubMedCrossRef Edgar CM, Zimmer S, Kakar S et al (2008) Prospective comparison of auto and allograft hamstring tendon constructs for ACL reconstruction. Clin Orthop Relat Res 466:2238–2246PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Fideler BM, Vangsness CT Jr, Lu B et al (1995) Gamma irradiation: effects on biomechanical properties of human bone-patellar tendon- bone allografts. Am J Sports Med 23:643–646PubMedCrossRef Fideler BM, Vangsness CT Jr, Lu B et al (1995) Gamma irradiation: effects on biomechanical properties of human bone-patellar tendon- bone allografts. Am J Sports Med 23:643–646PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Forster MC, Forster IW (2005) Patellar tendon or four-strand hamstring? A systematic review of autografts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee 12:225–230PubMed Forster MC, Forster IW (2005) Patellar tendon or four-strand hamstring? A systematic review of autografts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee 12:225–230PubMed
9.
go back to reference Goldblatt JP, Fitzsimmons SE, Balk E et al (2005) Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament: meta-analysis of patellar tendon versus hamstring tendon autograft. Arthroscopy 21:791–803PubMedCrossRef Goldblatt JP, Fitzsimmons SE, Balk E et al (2005) Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament: meta-analysis of patellar tendon versus hamstring tendon autograft. Arthroscopy 21:791–803PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Grieb TA, Forng RY, Bogdansky S et al (2006) High-dose gamma irradiation for soft tissue allografts: high margin of safety with biomechanical integrity. J Orthop Res 24:1011–1018PubMedCrossRef Grieb TA, Forng RY, Bogdansky S et al (2006) High-dose gamma irradiation for soft tissue allografts: high margin of safety with biomechanical integrity. J Orthop Res 24:1011–1018PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Harner CD, Honkamp NJ, Ranawat AS (2008) Anteromedial portal technique for creating the anterior cruciate ligament femoral tunnel. Arthroscopy 24:113–115PubMedCrossRef Harner CD, Honkamp NJ, Ranawat AS (2008) Anteromedial portal technique for creating the anterior cruciate ligament femoral tunnel. Arthroscopy 24:113–115PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Jagodzinski M, Geiges B, von Falck C et al (2010) Biodegradable screw versus a press-fit bone plug fixation for hamstring anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective randomized study. Am J Sports Med 38:501–508PubMedCrossRef Jagodzinski M, Geiges B, von Falck C et al (2010) Biodegradable screw versus a press-fit bone plug fixation for hamstring anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective randomized study. Am J Sports Med 38:501–508PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Kousa P, Jarvinen TL, Vihavainen M et al (2003) The fixation strength of six hamstring tendon graft fixation devices in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Part I: femoral site. Am J Sports Med 31:174–181PubMed Kousa P, Jarvinen TL, Vihavainen M et al (2003) The fixation strength of six hamstring tendon graft fixation devices in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Part I: femoral site. Am J Sports Med 31:174–181PubMed
14.
go back to reference Kousa P, Jarvinen TL, Vihavainen M et al (2003) The fixation strength of six hamstring tendon graft fixation devices in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Part II: tibial site. Am J Sports Med 31:182–188PubMed Kousa P, Jarvinen TL, Vihavainen M et al (2003) The fixation strength of six hamstring tendon graft fixation devices in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Part II: tibial site. Am J Sports Med 31:182–188PubMed
15.
go back to reference Krych AJ, Jackson JD, Hoskin TL et al (2008) A meta-analysis of patellar tendon autograft versus patellar tendon allograft in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 24:292–298PubMedCrossRef Krych AJ, Jackson JD, Hoskin TL et al (2008) A meta-analysis of patellar tendon autograft versus patellar tendon allograft in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 24:292–298PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Liden M, Sernert N, Rostgard-Christensen L et al (2008) Osteoarthritic changes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using bone–patellar tendon–bone or hamstring tendon autografts: a retrospective, 7-year radiographic and clinical follow-up study. Arthroscopy 24:899–908PubMedCrossRef Liden M, Sernert N, Rostgard-Christensen L et al (2008) Osteoarthritic changes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using bone–patellar tendon–bone or hamstring tendon autografts: a retrospective, 7-year radiographic and clinical follow-up study. Arthroscopy 24:899–908PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Lohmander LS, Ostenberg A, Englund M (2004) High prevalence of knee osteoarthritis, pain, and functional limitations in female soccer players twelve years after anterior cruciate ligament injury. Arthritis Rheum 50:3145–3152PubMedCrossRef Lohmander LS, Ostenberg A, Englund M (2004) High prevalence of knee osteoarthritis, pain, and functional limitations in female soccer players twelve years after anterior cruciate ligament injury. Arthritis Rheum 50:3145–3152PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Nakamura N, Horibe S, Sasaki S et al (2002) Evaluation of active knee flexion and hamstring strength after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using hamstring tendons. Arthroscopy 18:598–602PubMedCrossRef Nakamura N, Horibe S, Sasaki S et al (2002) Evaluation of active knee flexion and hamstring strength after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using hamstring tendons. Arthroscopy 18:598–602PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Pinczewski LA, Lyman J, Salmon LJ et al (2007) A 10-year comparison of anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions with Hamstring tendon and patellar tendon autograft: a controlled, prospective trial. Am J Sports Med 35:564–574PubMedCrossRef Pinczewski LA, Lyman J, Salmon LJ et al (2007) A 10-year comparison of anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions with Hamstring tendon and patellar tendon autograft: a controlled, prospective trial. Am J Sports Med 35:564–574PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Plaweski S, Rossi J, Merloz P (2009) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: assessment of the hamstring autograft femoral fixation using the EndoButton CL. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 95:606–613PubMedCrossRef Plaweski S, Rossi J, Merloz P (2009) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: assessment of the hamstring autograft femoral fixation using the EndoButton CL. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 95:606–613PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Prodromos CC, Fu FH, Howell SM et al (2008) Controversies in soft tissue anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: graft, bundles, tunnels, fixation, and harvest. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 16:376–384PubMed Prodromos CC, Fu FH, Howell SM et al (2008) Controversies in soft tissue anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: graft, bundles, tunnels, fixation, and harvest. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 16:376–384PubMed
22.
go back to reference Prodromos CC, Joyce B, Shi K (2007) A meta-analysis of stability of autografts compared to allografts after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 15:851–856PubMedCrossRef Prodromos CC, Joyce B, Shi K (2007) A meta-analysis of stability of autografts compared to allografts after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 15:851–856PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Rappe` M, Horodyski M, Meister K et al (2007) Nonirradiated versus irradiated Achilles allograft: in vivo failure comparison. Am J Sports Med 35:1653–1658PubMedCrossRef Rappe` M, Horodyski M, Meister K et al (2007) Nonirradiated versus irradiated Achilles allograft: in vivo failure comparison. Am J Sports Med 35:1653–1658PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Rihn JA, Irrgang JJ, Chhabra A et al (2006) Does irradiation affect the clinical outcome of patellar tendon allograft ACL reconstruction? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 14:885–896PubMedCrossRef Rihn JA, Irrgang JJ, Chhabra A et al (2006) Does irradiation affect the clinical outcome of patellar tendon allograft ACL reconstruction? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 14:885–896PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Sanders B, Rolf R, McClelland W et al (2007) Prevalence of saphenous nerve injury after autogenous hamstring harvest: an anatomic and clinical study of sartorial branch injury. Arthroscopy 23:956–963PubMedCrossRef Sanders B, Rolf R, McClelland W et al (2007) Prevalence of saphenous nerve injury after autogenous hamstring harvest: an anatomic and clinical study of sartorial branch injury. Arthroscopy 23:956–963PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Segawa H, Omori G, Koga Y et al (2002) Rotational muscle strength of the limb after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using semitendinosus and gracilis tendon. Arthroscopy 18:177–182PubMedCrossRef Segawa H, Omori G, Koga Y et al (2002) Rotational muscle strength of the limb after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using semitendinosus and gracilis tendon. Arthroscopy 18:177–182PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Sun K, Tian SQ, Zhang JH et al (2009) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft versus allograft. Arthroscopy 25:750–759PubMedCrossRef Sun K, Tian SQ, Zhang JH et al (2009) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft versus allograft. Arthroscopy 25:750–759PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Sun K, Tian S, Zhang J et al (2009) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with BPTB autograft, irradiated versus non-irradiated allograft: a prospective randomized clinical study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 17:464–474PubMedCrossRef Sun K, Tian S, Zhang J et al (2009) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with BPTB autograft, irradiated versus non-irradiated allograft: a prospective randomized clinical study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 17:464–474PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference van der Hart CP, van den Bekerom MPJ, Patt TW (2008) The occurrence of osteoarthritis at a minimum of ten years after reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. J Orthop Surg 3:1749–1759 van der Hart CP, van den Bekerom MPJ, Patt TW (2008) The occurrence of osteoarthritis at a minimum of ten years after reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. J Orthop Surg 3:1749–1759
30.
go back to reference von Porat A, Roos EM, Roos H (2004) High prevalence of osteoarthritis 14 years after an anterior cruciate ligament tear in male soccer players: a study of radiographic and patient relevant outcomes. Ann Rheum Dis 63:269–273CrossRef von Porat A, Roos EM, Roos H (2004) High prevalence of osteoarthritis 14 years after an anterior cruciate ligament tear in male soccer players: a study of radiographic and patient relevant outcomes. Ann Rheum Dis 63:269–273CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Wagner M, Kääb MJ, Schallock J et al (2005) Hamstring tendon versus patellar tendon anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using biodegradable interference fit fixation: a prospective matched-group analysis. Am J Sports Med 33:1327–1336PubMedCrossRef Wagner M, Kääb MJ, Schallock J et al (2005) Hamstring tendon versus patellar tendon anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using biodegradable interference fit fixation: a prospective matched-group analysis. Am J Sports Med 33:1327–1336PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Wittstein JR, Wilson JB, Moorman CT (2006) Complications related to hamstring tendon harvest. Oper Tech Sports Med 14:15–19CrossRef Wittstein JR, Wilson JB, Moorman CT (2006) Complications related to hamstring tendon harvest. Oper Tech Sports Med 14:15–19CrossRef
Metadata
Title
A prospective randomized comparison of irradiated and non-irradiated hamstring tendon allograft for ACL reconstruction
Authors
Kang Sun
Jihua Zhang
Yan Wang
Cailong Zhang
Changsuo Xia
Tengbo Yu
Shaoqi Tian
Publication date
01-01-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy / Issue 1/2012
Print ISSN: 0942-2056
Electronic ISSN: 1433-7347
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-010-1393-9

Other articles of this Issue 1/2012

Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 1/2012 Go to the issue