Top

Chiropractic & Manual Therapies

Published in:

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Research

A preliminary investigation examining patient reported outcome measures for low back pain and utilisation amongst chiropractors in Australia: facilitators and barriers to clinical implementation

Authors: Natalie Clohesy, Anthony Schneiders

Published in: Chiropractic & Manual Therapies | Issue 1/2018

Abstract

Background

The current utilisation of patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) for low back pain (LBP) within the Australian Chiropractic profession is unknown. The aims of this study were to determine the current utilisation of LBP PROMs amongst Chiropractors in Australia and to identify the potential barriers and facilitators of using PROMs for LBP in Chiropractic practice.

Methods

A cross sectional online survey was distributed to Chiropractors in Australia who were members of the Chiropractic Association of Australia (CAA) and Chiropractic Australia (CA) between June–August 2016. Three thousand fourteen CAA members and 930 CA members were invited to participate totaling 3944 potential participants.

Results

The findings from this survey provides baseline data for the prevalence of LBP PROMs within the Australian Chiropractic profession. A total of 558 participants completed the survey reflecting a response rate of 14.1%. 72.5% of respondents used LBP PROMs in clinical practice. PROMs were categorised into pain, function and health. At initial patient consultations the most commonly used pain PROMs were the pain diagram, Visual Analogue Scale and Numeric Rating Scale. Most commonly used functional LBP PROMs were the Oswestry Disability Index, Functional Rating Index and Roland Morris Questionnaire. The Health Status Questionnaire (HSQ) was the most commonly used health LBP PROM followed by RAND Health Questionnaires.

Conclusion

Most of the survey respondents use PROMs in clinical practice. The most common barrier chiropractors identified that prevent LBP PROM utilisation was the lack of operational definition surrounding PROMs, as well as how to use them and the perception that they are time consuming. Facilitatory factors to implement PROMs included using simple administration systems, utilising electronic forms and consistent implementation. This research indicates that there is a potential need to further educate the Chiropractic profession regarding PROMs.

Hoy D, March L, Brooks P, Blyth F, Woolf A, Bain C, Williams G, Smith E, Vos T, Barendregt J, Murray C, Burstein R, Buchbinder R. The global burden of low back pain: estimates from the global burden of disease 2010 study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014;73:968–74. https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-204428.CrossRefPubMed

Vassilaki M, Hurwitz EL. Insights in public health: perspectives on pain in the low back and neck: global burden, epidemiology, and management. Hawaii J Med Public Health. 2014;73(4):122–6.PubMedPubMedCentral

Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) 2011–12 Health status report. 2012. http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/Lookup/1301.0Main+Features2292012 Accessed 10 Sept 2017.

Phillips CJ. The cost and burden of chronic pain. Rev Pain. 2009;3(1):2–5. https://doi.org/10.1177/204946370900300102.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Dennison AK, Kyte D, Calvert M, Burr JM. An introduction to patient-reported outcome measures in ophthalmic research. Eye (Lond). 2014;28(6):637–45. https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.2014.41.CrossRef

Yeomans S, Liebensen C. Applying outcome measures. JNMS. 1997;5:1.

Clohesy N, Schendiers A, Eaton S. The utilisation of patient reported outcome measures in Chiropractic literature: JMPT; 2017.

Hinton PM, McLeod R, Broker B, MacLellan CE. Outcome measures and their everyday use in chiropractic practice. J Can Chiropr Assoc. 2010;54(2):118–31.PubMedPubMedCentral

Abrams D, Davidson M, Harrick J, Harcourt P, Zylinski M, Clancy J. Monitoring the change: current trends in outcome measure usage in physiotherapy. Man Ther. 2006;11:46–53.CrossRefPubMed

10.

Efficace F, Lo-Coco F. Using patient-reported health status to improve prognostic assessment in patients with acute myeloid leukemia: current challenges and future applications. Haematol J. 2013;98(1):7–9. https://doi.org/10.3324/haematol.2012.078501.CrossRef

11.

Fairbank JC, Couper J, Davies JB. The Oswestry low back pain questionnaire. Physiotherapy. 1980;66(8):271–3.PubMed

12.

Yeomans S. The clinical application of outcome assessments. Stamford: Appleton & Lange; 2000.

13.

Wolpert M. Uses and abuses of Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs): potential iatrogenic impact of PROMs implementation and how it can be mitigated. Admin Pol Ment Health. 2014;41:p141–5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0509-1.CrossRef

14.

Delaney LJ. Patient-centred care as an approach to improving health care in Australia. Collegian. 2018;25(1):p119–23.CrossRef

15.

Ogden K, Barr J, Greenfield D. A conceptual map for patient-centred care requirements: enhancing the approach of systems to achieving patient-centred care. Int J Qual Health Care. 2018;29 https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzx125.65.CrossRef

16.

Thompson C, Sansoni J, Morris D, Capell J, Williams K. Patient-reported outcome measures: an environmental scan of the Australian healthcare sector. Sydney: ACSQHC; 2016. https://www.safetyandquality.gov.au/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/PROMs-Environmental-Scan-December-2016.pdf. Accessed on 15 Jan 2017

17.

Cresswell JW. Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. London: Sage; 2009.

18.

Frankfort-Nachmias C, Nachmias D. Research methods in the social sciences. New York: St Martin’s Press; 1996.

19.

Lavrakas PJ. Questionnaire design. In: Encyclopedia of survey research methods encyclopedia; 2008. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412963947.n425.CrossRef

20.

Kronsik JA, Presser S. Question and questionnaire design. Handbook of survey research. 2nd ed. San Diego: Elsevier; 2009.

21.

Converse MJ, Presser S. Survey questions: handcrafting the standardized questionnaire. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications; 1986.CrossRef

22.

Jarvis M. Encyclopedia of survey research methods. 2010;24(1):26–7. https://doi.org/10.1108/09504121011011879 CrossRef

23.

Lemon J. The effect of reminder intervals on response rates for web surveys. Survey and statistical computing IV. The impact of technology on the survey process; 2007.

24.

Hoddinott S, Bass M. The Dillman total design survey method. Can Fam Physician. 1986;32:2366–8.PubMedPubMedCentral

25.

Hopkins WG. Measures of reliability in sports medicine and science. Sports Med. 2000;30:1–15.CrossRefPubMed

26.

Australian Health Practitioner Regulatory Agency (AHPRA). Statistics; chiropractic registrant data. 2016; http://www.chiropracticboard.gov.au/About-the-Board/Statistics.aspx. Accessed on 3 Dec 2017.

27.

Adams J, Lauche R, Peng W, Steel A, Moore C, Amorin-Woods L, Sibbritt D. A workforce survey of Australian chiropractic: the profile and practice features of a nationally representative sample of 2,005 chiropractors. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2017;17:14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12906-016-1542-x.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

28.

Schamber E, Takemoto S, Chenok K. Bozic K, Barriers to completion of patient reported outcome measures. J Arthroplast. 2013; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2013.06.025.CrossRefPubMed

29.

Deshpande P, Rajan S, Sudeepthi B, Nazir CP. Patient-reported outcomes: A new era in clinical research. Perspect Clin Res. 2011;2(4):137–44. https://doi.org/10.4103/2229-3485.86879.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

30.

Holmes M, Lewith G, Newell D, Field J, Bishop F. The impact of patient-reported outcome measures in clinical practice for pain: a systematic review. Qual Life Res. 2017;26(2):245–57.CrossRefPubMed

31.

Victorian government Work safe. Outcome measures. 2017. http://www.worksafe.vic.gov.au/pages/health-professionals/treating-injured-workers/outcome-measures. Accessed on 29 Nov 2017.

32.

Kyte DG, Calvert M, Van der Wees PJ, Hove R, Tolan S, Hill JC. An introduction to patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in physiotherapy. Physiotherapy. 2015;101(2):119–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physio.2014.11.003.CrossRefPubMed

33.

Lippa J, Fügener A, Arora J, Sterrett I, Elkan A, Glaser A, Higley J, Lundström M, Wright P, Vickers A, Ratchford D, van Maasakkers L, Singh A, Stoefs J. Electronic PROMs: What’s the right solution for your organization? Cambridge: International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement (ICHOM); 2014.

34.

Palmer D, Ndosi M. PROMs and patient education. In: El Miedany Y, editor. Patient reported outcome measures in rheumatic diseases. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2016. p. 389–403. ISBN 9783319328492.CrossRef

35.

Brannon L, Feist J, Updegraff J. Health psychology: an introduction to behavior and health 9th edition chapter 17 understanding and managing pain; 2017. p. 161.

36.

Southerst D, Côté P, Stupar M, Stern P, Mior S. The reliability of body pain diagrams in the quantitative measurement of pain distribution and location in patients with musculoskeletal pain: a systematic review. J Manip Physiol Ther. 2013;36(7):450–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmpt.2013.05.021.CrossRef

37.

Gould D. Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). J Clin Nurs. 2001;10:697–706.CrossRefPubMed

38.

Pagare V. Visual analogue scale. 2017;http://www.physio-pedia.com/Visual_Analogue_Scale. Accessed 28 Nov 2017.

39.

Hawker G, Mian S, Kendzerska T, French M. Measures of adult pain. Visual Analog Scale for Pain (VAS Pain), Numeric Rating Scale for Pain (NRS Pain), McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ), Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ), Chronic Pain Grade Scale (CPGS), Short Form-36 Bodily Pain Scale (SF-36 BPS), and Measure of Intermittent and Constant Osteoarthritis Pain (ICOAP). Arthritis Care Res. 2011;63(S11):S240–52. https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.20543MEASURES.CrossRef

40.

Krebs E, Carey T, Weinberger M. Accuracy of the pain numeric rating scale as a screening test in primary care. J Gen Intern Med. 2007;22(10):1453–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

41.

Ferreira-Valente M, Pais-Ribeiro J, Jensen M. Validity of four pain intensity rating scales. Pain J. 2011;152:2399–404.CrossRef

42.

Longo U, Loppini M, Denaro L, Maffulli N, Denaro V. Rating scales for low back pain. Br Med Bull. 2010;94:81–144. https://doi.org/10.1093/bmb/ldp052.CrossRefPubMed

43.

Clarkson H. Joint motion and function assessment; a research-based practical guide. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkinson; 2005. p. 12.

44.

Torenbeek M, Caulfield B, Garrett M, Van Harten W. Current use of outcome measures for stroke and low back pain rehabilitation in five European countries: first results of the across project. Int J Rehabil Res. 2001;24(2):95–101.CrossRefPubMed

45.

Maughan E, Lewis J. Outcome measures in chronic low back pain. Eur Spine J. 2010;19:1484–94.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

46.

Clement RC, Welander A, Stowell C, Cha TD, Chen JL, Davies M, et al. A proposed set of metrics for standardized outcome reporting in the management of low back pain. Acta Orthop. 2015;86(5):523–33. https://doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2015.1036696.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

47.

Chapman JR, Norvell DC, Hermsmeyer JT, Bransford RJ, DeVine J, McGirt MJ, et al. Evaluating common outcomes for measuring treatment success for chronic low back pain. Spine. 2011;36(21 Suppl):S54–68.CrossRefPubMed

48.

Bayar K, Bayar B, Yakut E, Yakut Y. Reliability and construct validity of the Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire in the elderly with low back pain. Pain Clinic. 2013;(15) https://doi.org/10.1163/156856903321196500.CrossRef

49.

Froud R, Ellard D, Patel S, Eldridge S, Underwood M. Primary outcome measure use in back pain trials may need radical reassessment. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2015;16:88. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-015-0534-1.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

50.

Glatzer W, Camfield L, Moller V, Rojas M. Global handbook of quality of life; Exploration of well-being of nations and continents; 2015. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9178-6_1.CrossRef

51.

De Jong K, Van Sluis P, Nugter MA, Heiser WJ, Spinhoven P. Understanding the differential impact of outcome monitoring: therapist variables that moderate feedback effects in a randomized clinical trial. Psychother Res. 2012;22(4):464–74.CrossRefPubMed

52.

Snyder Valier A, Jennings AL, Parsons JT, Vela LI. Benefits of and barriers to using patient-rated outcome measures in athletic training. J Athl Train. 2014;49(5):674–83. https://doi.org/10.4085/1062-6050-49.3.15 CrossRef

53.

Duncan EA, Murray J. The barriers and facilitators to routine outcome measurement by allied health professionals in practice: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012;12:96.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

54.

Batty MJ, Moldavsky M, Foroushani PS, Pass S, Marriot M, Sayal K, et al. Implementing routine outcome measures in child and adolescent mental health services: from present to future practice. Child and Adolescence. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2012;23(4):239–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-013-0454-2.CrossRef

55.

Wagel NW. Implementing patient-reported outcome measures. Boston: NEJM Catalyst; 2016.

56.

Cunningham CT, Quan H, Hemmelgarn B, Noseworthy T, Beck CA, Dixon E, Samuel S, Ghali WA, Sykes LL, Jetté N. Exploring physician specialist response rates to web-based surveys. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2015;15:32.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

57.

Wiebe ER, Kaczorowski J, MacKay J. Why are response rates in clinician surveys declining? Can Fam Physician. 2012;58(4):225–8.

58.

Frohlich MT. Techniques for improving response rates in OM survey research. J Oper Manag. 2002;20:53–62.CrossRef

59.

Choi BCK, Pak AWP. A catalog of biases in questionnaires. Prev Chronic Dis. 2005;2(1):A13.PubMed

60.

Van Otterloo J, Richards JL, Seib K, Weiss P, Omer SB. Gift card incentives and non-response bias in a survey of vaccine providers: the role of geographic and demographic factors. Timmer A, ed. PLoS ONE. 2011;6:11. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0028108.CrossRef

Title: A preliminary investigation examining patient reported outcome measures for low back pain and utilisation amongst chiropractors in Australia: facilitators and barriers to clinical implementation
Authors: Natalie Clohesy
Anthony Schneiders
Publication date: 01-12-2018
Publisher: BioMed Central
Published in: Chiropractic & Manual Therapies / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 2045-709X
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12998-018-0208-9

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

A preliminary investigation examining patient reported outcome measures for low back pain and utilisation amongst chiropractors in Australia: facilitators and barriers to clinical implementation

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

Failure to define low back pain as a disease or an episode renders research on causality unsuitable: results of a systematic review

Spinal manipulation in the treatment of patients with MRI-confirmed lumbar disc herniation and sacroiliac joint hypomobility: a quasi-experimental study

A Mokken scale analysis of the peer physical examination questionnaire

The effect of chiropractic treatment on infantile colic: study protocol for a single-blind randomized controlled trial

Assessment of variability in traction interventions for patients with low back pain: a systematic review

Outcomes indicators and a risk classification system for spinal manipulation under anesthesia: a narrative review and proposal