Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Nuclear Medicine 9/2010

01-11-2010 | Original Article

A practical method of determining cross-calibration factors of PET scanners by moving a point-like 22Na radioactive source

Authors: Tomoyuki Hasegawa, Keiichi Oda, Yasuhiro Wada, Yasushi Sato, Takahiro Yamada, Eiji Yoshida, Hideo Murayama, Kyoko Saito, Tohoru Takeda, Kei Kikuchi

Published in: Annals of Nuclear Medicine | Issue 9/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Thus far, cylindrical phantoms with 18F or 68Ge/68Ga have been used in the standard techniques for determining the cross-calibration factors (CCFs) of PET scanners. This paper describes a new practical method that uses a point-like 22Na radioactive source for determining CCFs.

Methods

A point-like 22Na radioactive source (about 700 kBq) was equipped with a spherical aluminium absorber capsule to ensure the symmetry of the emitted photons. During measurements, the source was moved in the axial direction to cover the whole axial field of view (FOV) of a clinical PET scanner, SET-2400 W. The region-of-interest (ROI) values obtained in reconstructed images without scatter and attenuation corrections were used to calculate the CCFs of the PET scanner.

Results

The CCFs obtained by the proposed method agreed with those obtained by the standard cross-calibration (CC) method within a precision of 1.5% (σ). The temporal variations in the CCFs by the standard CC method were reproduced by the proposed method with a precision better than 1%.

Conclusion

The CC method with a moving 22Na point-like radioactive source is practically useful for determining the CCFs of PET scanners and monitoring their variations.
Literature
1.
go back to reference National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA). Performance measurements of positron emission tomographs. NEMA Standards Publication. 1994, NU2-1994, pp. 1–28. National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA). Performance measurements of positron emission tomographs. NEMA Standards Publication. 1994, NU2-1994, pp. 1–28.
2.
go back to reference Industries Association of Radiation Apparatus (JESRA). A method of PET performance evaluation (in Japanese). JESRA. 1993;X-73. Industries Association of Radiation Apparatus (JESRA). A method of PET performance evaluation (in Japanese). JESRA. 1993;X-73.
3.
go back to reference Japan Radioisotope Association (JRIA). A guideline of PET performance evaluation (in Japanese). Radioisotopes. 1994;43:115–35. Japan Radioisotope Association (JRIA). A guideline of PET performance evaluation (in Japanese). Radioisotopes. 1994;43:115–35.
4.
go back to reference International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC). Radionuclide imaging devices—characteristics and test conditions. Part 1: Positron emission tomographs. IEC Standard. 1998;61675-1. International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC). Radionuclide imaging devices—characteristics and test conditions. Part 1: Positron emission tomographs. IEC Standard. 1998;61675-1.
5.
go back to reference National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA). Performance measurements of positron emission tomographs. NEMA Standards Publication. 2001; NU2-2001, pp. 1–40. National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA). Performance measurements of positron emission tomographs. NEMA Standards Publication. 2001; NU2-2001, pp. 1–40.
6.
go back to reference National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA). Performance measurements of positron emission tomographs. NEMA Standards Publication. 2007;NU2-2007, pp. 1–33. National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA). Performance measurements of positron emission tomographs. NEMA Standards Publication. 2007;NU2-2007, pp. 1–33.
7.
go back to reference Bailey DL, Jones T. A method for calibrating three-dimensional positron emission tomography without scatter correction. Eur J Nucl Med. 1997;24:660–4.PubMed Bailey DL, Jones T. A method for calibrating three-dimensional positron emission tomography without scatter correction. Eur J Nucl Med. 1997;24:660–4.PubMed
8.
go back to reference Hasegawa T, Yoshida E, Sato Y, Oda K, Wada Y, Yamada T, et al. Point-like radioactive source with multiple absorber capsules for evaluating PET scanners. Ann Nucl Med. 2010;24:427–32.CrossRefPubMed Hasegawa T, Yoshida E, Sato Y, Oda K, Wada Y, Yamada T, et al. Point-like radioactive source with multiple absorber capsules for evaluating PET scanners. Ann Nucl Med. 2010;24:427–32.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA). Performance measurements of small animal positron emission tomographs. NEMA Standards Publication. 2008;NU4-2008, pp. 1–23. National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA). Performance measurements of small animal positron emission tomographs. NEMA Standards Publication. 2008;NU4-2008, pp. 1–23.
10.
go back to reference Geant4 Collaboration. Geant4-a simulation toolkit. Nucl Instrum Method. 2003;A506:250–303. Geant4 Collaboration. Geant4-a simulation toolkit. Nucl Instrum Method. 2003;A506:250–303.
11.
go back to reference Fujiwara T, Watanuki S, Yamamoto S, Miyake M, Seo S, Itoh M, et al. Performance evaluation of a large axial field-of-view PET scanner: SET-2400W. Ann Nucl Med. 1997;11:307–13.CrossRefPubMed Fujiwara T, Watanuki S, Yamamoto S, Miyake M, Seo S, Itoh M, et al. Performance evaluation of a large axial field-of-view PET scanner: SET-2400W. Ann Nucl Med. 1997;11:307–13.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Watanuki S, Fujiwara T, Ishii K, Miyake M, Itoh M, Kitamura K. Investigation of the resolution and count recovery coefficients of a whole-body PET scanner (Shimadzu SET-2400 W) in 2D and 3D mode image. Kakuigaku. 2000;37:35–41. Watanuki S, Fujiwara T, Ishii K, Miyake M, Itoh M, Kitamura K. Investigation of the resolution and count recovery coefficients of a whole-body PET scanner (Shimadzu SET-2400 W) in 2D and 3D mode image. Kakuigaku. 2000;37:35–41.
13.
go back to reference Inoue K, Oda K, Fukushi M. Effects of transmission counts on image quality during simultaneous emission/transmission scan. Nippon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi. 2006;62:815–21.PubMed Inoue K, Oda K, Fukushi M. Effects of transmission counts on image quality during simultaneous emission/transmission scan. Nippon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi. 2006;62:815–21.PubMed
14.
go back to reference Bailey DL et al. The theory and practice of 3D PET In: Bendriem B, Townsend D, editors. London: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1998. pp. 55–109. Bailey DL et al. The theory and practice of 3D PET In: Bendriem B, Townsend D, editors. London: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1998. pp. 55–109.
15.
go back to reference Geworski L, Knoop BO, de Wit M, Ivancević V, Bares R, Munz DL. Multicenter comparison of calibration and cross calibration of PET scanners. J Nucl Med. 2002;43:635–9.PubMed Geworski L, Knoop BO, de Wit M, Ivancević V, Bares R, Munz DL. Multicenter comparison of calibration and cross calibration of PET scanners. J Nucl Med. 2002;43:635–9.PubMed
16.
go back to reference Sato Y, Murayama H, Yamada T, Hasegawa T, Oda K, Unno Y, Yunoki A. Monte Carlo simulation of the standardization of 22Na using scintillation detector arrays. Appl Radiat Isot. 2010;68:1354–7.CrossRefPubMed Sato Y, Murayama H, Yamada T, Hasegawa T, Oda K, Unno Y, Yunoki A. Monte Carlo simulation of the standardization of 22Na using scintillation detector arrays. Appl Radiat Isot. 2010;68:1354–7.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
A practical method of determining cross-calibration factors of PET scanners by moving a point-like 22Na radioactive source
Authors
Tomoyuki Hasegawa
Keiichi Oda
Yasuhiro Wada
Yasushi Sato
Takahiro Yamada
Eiji Yoshida
Hideo Murayama
Kyoko Saito
Tohoru Takeda
Kei Kikuchi
Publication date
01-11-2010
Publisher
Springer Japan
Published in
Annals of Nuclear Medicine / Issue 9/2010
Print ISSN: 0914-7187
Electronic ISSN: 1864-6433
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12149-010-0403-9

Other articles of this Issue 9/2010

Annals of Nuclear Medicine 9/2010 Go to the issue