Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -) 2/2011

01-06-2011 | Review Article

A practical guide to using the World Federation for Medical Education Standards. WFME 3: assessment of students

Author: G. R. MacCarrick

Published in: Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -) | Issue 2/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Preparing a medical school for institutional review of all aspects of a medical school’s programs requires an understanding of the international standards being used and adequate preparation and planning (MacCarrick et al. in Med Teach 32 (5):e227, 2010). This series examines each of the nine standards developed by the World Federation for Medical Education (World Federation for Medical Education Basic Medical Education WFME Global Standards for Quality Improvement. WFME Office: University of Copenhagen, Denmark, 2003) with practical advice on their use in both self-review and independent accreditation processes.

Conclusion

The WFME Standard 3 (Assessment of Students) examines in detail the manner in which student learning is assessed. Evidence of alignment between stated learning outcomes, methods of delivery and assessment is critical. Assessment methods should be regularly evaluated to ensure reliability and validity. Investment in faculty development will ensure necessary technical expertise which is maintained within the school.
Footnotes
1
Assessment can be broadly classified as formative (assessment which provides feedback and guides and motivates future learning) or summative (assessment which makes an overall judgment about fitness to progress by acting as a barrier to further practice or training).
 
Literature
1.
go back to reference MacCarrick G, Kelly C, Conroy R (2010) Preparing for an institutional self review using the WFME standards—an international medical school case study. Med Teach 32(5):e227–e232PubMedCrossRef MacCarrick G, Kelly C, Conroy R (2010) Preparing for an institutional self review using the WFME standards—an international medical school case study. Med Teach 32(5):e227–e232PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference MacCarrick GR (2010) A practical guide to using the World Federation for Medical Education (WFME) standards. WFME 1: mission and objectives. Ir J Med Sci 179(4):483–487 MacCarrick GR (2010) A practical guide to using the World Federation for Medical Education (WFME) standards. WFME 1: mission and objectives. Ir J Med Sci 179(4):483–487
3.
go back to reference MacCarrick GR (2010) A practical guide to using the World Federation for Medical Education standards. WFME 2: educational program. Ir J Med Sci 179(4):489–491PubMedCrossRef MacCarrick GR (2010) A practical guide to using the World Federation for Medical Education standards. WFME 2: educational program. Ir J Med Sci 179(4):489–491PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference World Federation for Medical Education (WFME) (2003) Basic Medical Education: WFME Global Standards for Quality Improvement. Denmark: WFME Office: University of Copenhagen, Denmark World Federation for Medical Education (WFME) (2003) Basic Medical Education: WFME Global Standards for Quality Improvement. Denmark: WFME Office: University of Copenhagen, Denmark
6.
go back to reference van der Vleuten CP (1996) The assessment of professional competence: developments, research and practical implications. Adv Health Sci Educ 1(1):41–67CrossRef van der Vleuten CP (1996) The assessment of professional competence: developments, research and practical implications. Adv Health Sci Educ 1(1):41–67CrossRef
8.
go back to reference van der Vleuten CP, Schuwirth LW (2005) Assessing professional competence: from methods to programmes. Med Educ 39(3):309–317PubMedCrossRef van der Vleuten CP, Schuwirth LW (2005) Assessing professional competence: from methods to programmes. Med Educ 39(3):309–317PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Coderre S, Woloschuk W, McLaughlin K (2009) Twelve tips for blueprinting. Med Teach 31(4):322–324PubMedCrossRef Coderre S, Woloschuk W, McLaughlin K (2009) Twelve tips for blueprinting. Med Teach 31(4):322–324PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Miller GE (1990) The assessment of clinical skills/competence/performance. Acad Med 65(9 Suppl):S63–S67PubMedCrossRef Miller GE (1990) The assessment of clinical skills/competence/performance. Acad Med 65(9 Suppl):S63–S67PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
A practical guide to using the World Federation for Medical Education Standards. WFME 3: assessment of students
Author
G. R. MacCarrick
Publication date
01-06-2011
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -) / Issue 2/2011
Print ISSN: 0021-1265
Electronic ISSN: 1863-4362
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-010-0669-x

Other articles of this Issue 2/2011

Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -) 2/2011 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine