Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer 10/2014

01-10-2014 | Original Article

A pilot study: dose adaptation of capecitabine using mobile phone toxicity monitoring — supporting patients in their homes

Authors: Andrew Weaver, Sharon B. Love, Mark Larsen, Milensu Shanyinde, Rachel Waters, Lisa Grainger, Vanessa Shearwood, Claire Brooks, Oliver Gibson, Annie M. Young, Lionel Tarassenko

Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer | Issue 10/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Real-time symptom monitoring using a mobile phone is potentially advantageous for patients receiving oral chemotherapy. We therefore conducted a pilot study of patient dose adaptation using mobile phone monitoring of specific symptoms to investigate relative dose intensity of capecitabine, level of toxicity and perceived supportive care.

Methods

Patients with breast or colorectal cancer receiving capecitabine completed a symptom, temperature and dose diary twice a day using a mobile phone application. This information was encrypted and automatically transmitted in real time to a secure server, with moderate levels of toxicity automatically prompting self-care symptom management messages on the screen of the patient’s mobile phone or in severe cases, a call from a specialist nurse to advise on care according to an agreed protocol.

Results

Patients (n = 26) completed the mobile phone diary on 92.6 % of occasions. Twelve patients had a maximum toxicity grade of 3 (46.2 %). The average dose intensity for all patients as a percentage of standard dose was 90 %. In eight patients, the dose of capecitabine was reduced, and in eight patients, the dose of capecitabine was increased. Patients and healthcare professionals involved felt reassured by the novel monitoring system, in particular, during out of hours.

Conclusion

It is possible to optimise the individual dose of oral chemotherapy safely including dose increase and to manage chemotherapy side effects effectively using real-time mobile phone monitoring of toxicity parameters entered by the patient.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Brearley S et al (2010) Clinical features of oral chemotherapy: results of a longitudinal prospective study of breast and colorectal cancer patients receiving capecitabine in the UK. Eur J Cancer Care 19(4):425–433CrossRef Brearley S et al (2010) Clinical features of oral chemotherapy: results of a longitudinal prospective study of breast and colorectal cancer patients receiving capecitabine in the UK. Eur J Cancer Care 19(4):425–433CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Lyman GH et al (2004) Incidence and predictors of low chemotherapy dose-intensity in aggressive non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma: a nationwide study. J Clin Oncol 22(21):4302–4311PubMedCrossRef Lyman GH et al (2004) Incidence and predictors of low chemotherapy dose-intensity in aggressive non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma: a nationwide study. J Clin Oncol 22(21):4302–4311PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Citron ML (2004) Dose-density in adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. Cancer Investig 22(4):555–568CrossRef Citron ML (2004) Dose-density in adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. Cancer Investig 22(4):555–568CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Kimmel SRM, Kimmig R, Schmid P (2007) Dose-dense chemotherapy for primary breast cancer. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 19(1):75–81CrossRef Kimmel SRM, Kimmig R, Schmid P (2007) Dose-dense chemotherapy for primary breast cancer. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 19(1):75–81CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Evans WE et al (1998) Conventional compared with individualized chemotherapy for childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. N Engl J Med 338(8):499–505PubMedCrossRef Evans WE et al (1998) Conventional compared with individualized chemotherapy for childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. N Engl J Med 338(8):499–505PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Department of Health (2013) NHS Improvement and Macmillan Cancer Support, Living with & beyond cancer: taking action to improve outcomes. Department of Health Department of Health (2013) NHS Improvement and Macmillan Cancer Support, Living with & beyond cancer: taking action to improve outcomes. Department of Health
7.
go back to reference Weaver A et al (2007) Application of mobile phone technology for managing chemotherapy-associated side effects. Ann Oncol 18:1887–1892PubMedCrossRef Weaver A et al (2007) Application of mobile phone technology for managing chemotherapy-associated side effects. Ann Oncol 18:1887–1892PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference UKONS Oncology/haematology 24 hour triage rapid assessment and access tool kit. 2011. [online]. 2011 [cited 2013 01 February ]; Available from: <http://ukons.org/> UKONS Oncology/haematology 24 hour triage rapid assessment and access tool kit. 2011. [online]. 2011 [cited 2013 01 February ]; Available from: <http://​ukons.​org/​>
9.
go back to reference Adams R et al (2009) Toxicity associated with combination oxaliplatin plus fluoropyrimidine with or without cetuximab in the MRC COIN trial experience. Br J Cancer 100(2):251–258PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Adams R et al (2009) Toxicity associated with combination oxaliplatin plus fluoropyrimidine with or without cetuximab in the MRC COIN trial experience. Br J Cancer 100(2):251–258PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Cassidy J et al (2008) Randomized phase III study of capecitabine plus oxaliplatin compared with fluorouracil/folinic acid plus oxaliplatin as first-line therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 26(12):2006–2012PubMedCrossRef Cassidy J et al (2008) Randomized phase III study of capecitabine plus oxaliplatin compared with fluorouracil/folinic acid plus oxaliplatin as first-line therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 26(12):2006–2012PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Chang H et al (2011) Adjuvant chemotherapy using a tailored-dose strategy in elderly patients with colon cancer. Ann Oncol 23(4):911–918PubMedCrossRef Chang H et al (2011) Adjuvant chemotherapy using a tailored-dose strategy in elderly patients with colon cancer. Ann Oncol 23(4):911–918PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
A pilot study: dose adaptation of capecitabine using mobile phone toxicity monitoring — supporting patients in their homes
Authors
Andrew Weaver
Sharon B. Love
Mark Larsen
Milensu Shanyinde
Rachel Waters
Lisa Grainger
Vanessa Shearwood
Claire Brooks
Oliver Gibson
Annie M. Young
Lionel Tarassenko
Publication date
01-10-2014
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Supportive Care in Cancer / Issue 10/2014
Print ISSN: 0941-4355
Electronic ISSN: 1433-7339
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-014-2224-1

Other articles of this Issue 10/2014

Supportive Care in Cancer 10/2014 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine