Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology 2/2018

01-02-2018 | Original Article

A phase II trial of Ifosfamide combination with recommended supportive therapy for recurrent SCLC in second-line and heavily treated setting

Authors: Ichidai Tanaka, Kenji Kawada, Masahiro Morise, Tetsunari Hase, Hiroaki Hayashi, Akihiko Sokai, Asuki Fukatsu, Masashi Kondo, Fumio Nomura, Yoshinori Hasegawa

Published in: Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology | Issue 2/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The response rate of ifosfamide (IFM) monotherapy for small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is reported as 42.4% in Japanese package insert. However, these efficacy data are based on clinical studies conducted in 1970s. This phase II study evaluated the efficacy and safety of IFM combination with recommended current supportive therapy for recurrent SCLC in second-line and heavily treated setting.

Methods

Recurrent SCLC patients pretreated with one to three prior regimens received IFM monotherapy (1.5 g/m2 for 3 days every 3 weeks). Treatment was continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary end point was objective response rate.

Results

Twelve patients were enrolled in the study from June 2009 to January 2013. The study was early terminated at interim analysis due to futility stop. Patient characteristics were as follows: median age was 65 years, 11 were males (91.7%) and eight (66.7%) and four (33.3%) were Performance Status 0 and 1, respectively. Four patients (33.3%) enrolled in second-line setting were all refractory relapse SCLC and 8 (66.7%) were heavily treated patients. No patient showed objective response. Stable disease was observed in 3 patients. Median progression-free survival and overall survival were 0.9 months (95% CI, 0.3–1.5) and 4.8 months (95% CI, 1.6–9.9), respectively. Although one grade 4 amylase increase possibly related to IFM was observed, toxicity profile was totally favorable.

Conclusions

IFM monotherapy should not be used for refractory relapse or heavily treated SCLC, and no further investigation is required in these populations.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Govindan R, Page N, Morgensztern D et al (2006) Changing epidemiology of small-cell lung cancer in the United States over the last 30 years: analysis of the surveillance, epidemiologic, and end results database. J Clin Oncol 24:4539–4544CrossRefPubMed Govindan R, Page N, Morgensztern D et al (2006) Changing epidemiology of small-cell lung cancer in the United States over the last 30 years: analysis of the surveillance, epidemiologic, and end results database. J Clin Oncol 24:4539–4544CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Ardizzoni A, Hansen H, Dombernowsky P et al (1997) Topotecan, a new active drug in the second-line treatment of small-cell lung cancer: a phase II study in patients with refractory and sensitive disease. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Early Clinical Studies Group and New Drug Development Office, and the Lung Cancer Cooperative Group. J Clin Oncol 15:2090–2096CrossRefPubMed Ardizzoni A, Hansen H, Dombernowsky P et al (1997) Topotecan, a new active drug in the second-line treatment of small-cell lung cancer: a phase II study in patients with refractory and sensitive disease. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Early Clinical Studies Group and New Drug Development Office, and the Lung Cancer Cooperative Group. J Clin Oncol 15:2090–2096CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference O’Brien ME, Ciuleanu TE, Tsekov H et al (2006) Phase III trial comparing supportive care alone with supportive care with oral topotecan in patients with relapsed small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 24:5441–5447CrossRefPubMed O’Brien ME, Ciuleanu TE, Tsekov H et al (2006) Phase III trial comparing supportive care alone with supportive care with oral topotecan in patients with relapsed small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 24:5441–5447CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Onoda S, Masuda N, Seto T et al (2006) Phase II trial of amrubicin for treatment of refractory or relapsed small-cell lung cancer: Thoracic Oncology Research Group Study 0301. J Clin Oncol 24:5448–5453CrossRefPubMed Onoda S, Masuda N, Seto T et al (2006) Phase II trial of amrubicin for treatment of refractory or relapsed small-cell lung cancer: Thoracic Oncology Research Group Study 0301. J Clin Oncol 24:5448–5453CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Inoue A, Sugawara S, Yamazaki K et al (2008) Randomized phase II trial comparing amrubicin with topotecan in patients with previously treated small-cell lung cancer: North Japan Lung Cancer Study Group Trial 0402. J Clin Oncol 26:5401–5406CrossRefPubMed Inoue A, Sugawara S, Yamazaki K et al (2008) Randomized phase II trial comparing amrubicin with topotecan in patients with previously treated small-cell lung cancer: North Japan Lung Cancer Study Group Trial 0402. J Clin Oncol 26:5401–5406CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Ettinger DS, Jotte R, Lorigan P et al (2010) Phase II study of amrubicin as second-line therapy in patients with platinum-refractory small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 28:2598–603CrossRefPubMed Ettinger DS, Jotte R, Lorigan P et al (2010) Phase II study of amrubicin as second-line therapy in patients with platinum-refractory small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 28:2598–603CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Masuda N, Fukuoka M, Kusunoki Y et al (1992) CPT-11: a new derivative of camptothecin for the treatment of refractory or relapsed small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 10:1225–1229CrossRefPubMed Masuda N, Fukuoka M, Kusunoki Y et al (1992) CPT-11: a new derivative of camptothecin for the treatment of refractory or relapsed small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 10:1225–1229CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Issels RD, Prenninger SW, Nagele A et al (1990) Ifosfamide plus etoposide combined with regional hyperthermia in patients with locally advanced sarcomas: a phase II study. J Clin Oncol 8:1818–1829CrossRefPubMed Issels RD, Prenninger SW, Nagele A et al (1990) Ifosfamide plus etoposide combined with regional hyperthermia in patients with locally advanced sarcomas: a phase II study. J Clin Oncol 8:1818–1829CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Lund B, Hansen M, Hansen OP et al (1990) Combined high-dose carboplatin and cisplatin, and ifosfamide in previously untreated ovarian cancer patients with residual disease. J Clin Oncol 8:1226–1230CrossRefPubMed Lund B, Hansen M, Hansen OP et al (1990) Combined high-dose carboplatin and cisplatin, and ifosfamide in previously untreated ovarian cancer patients with residual disease. J Clin Oncol 8:1226–1230CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Maki Y, Tsushima T, Nasu Y et al (1998) Combination chemotherapy with cis-platinum and ifosfamide for hormone unresponsive prostate cancer. Nippon Hinyokika Gakkai Zasshi 89:657–664PubMed Maki Y, Tsushima T, Nasu Y et al (1998) Combination chemotherapy with cis-platinum and ifosfamide for hormone unresponsive prostate cancer. Nippon Hinyokika Gakkai Zasshi 89:657–664PubMed
12.
go back to reference Kaku H, Saika T, Tsushima T et al (2006) Combination chemotherapy with estramustine phosphate, ifosfamide and cisplatin for hormone-refractory prostate cancer. Acta Med Okayama 60:43–49PubMed Kaku H, Saika T, Tsushima T et al (2006) Combination chemotherapy with estramustine phosphate, ifosfamide and cisplatin for hormone-refractory prostate cancer. Acta Med Okayama 60:43–49PubMed
13.
go back to reference Turner AR, Duong CD, Good DJ (2003) Methylene blue for the treatment and prophylaxis of ifosfamide-induced encephalopathy. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 15:435–439CrossRef Turner AR, Duong CD, Good DJ (2003) Methylene blue for the treatment and prophylaxis of ifosfamide-induced encephalopathy. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 15:435–439CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Elias AD, Eder JP, Shea T et al (1990) High-dose ifosfamide with mesna uroprotection: a phase I study. J Clin Oncol 8:170–178CrossRefPubMed Elias AD, Eder JP, Shea T et al (1990) High-dose ifosfamide with mesna uroprotection: a phase I study. J Clin Oncol 8:170–178CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Mukouda K, Morikawa E, Hasegawa K et al (1983) Ifosfamide in the treatment of small cell carcinoma of the lung. Gan To Kagaku Ryoho 10:1293–1298PubMed Mukouda K, Morikawa E, Hasegawa K et al (1983) Ifosfamide in the treatment of small cell carcinoma of the lung. Gan To Kagaku Ryoho 10:1293–1298PubMed
16.
go back to reference Eckardt JR, von Pawel J, Pujol JL et al (2007) Phase III study of oral compared with intravenous topotecan as second-line therapy in small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 25:2086–2092CrossRefPubMed Eckardt JR, von Pawel J, Pujol JL et al (2007) Phase III study of oral compared with intravenous topotecan as second-line therapy in small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 25:2086–2092CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference von Pawel J, Schiller JH, Shepherd FA et al (1999) Topotecan versus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and vincristine for the treatment of recurrent small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 17:658–667CrossRef von Pawel J, Schiller JH, Shepherd FA et al (1999) Topotecan versus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and vincristine for the treatment of recurrent small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 17:658–667CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Solomon BJ, Mok T, Kim DW et al (2014) First-line crizotinib versus chemotherapy in ALK-positive lung cancer. N Engl J Med 371:2167–2177CrossRefPubMed Solomon BJ, Mok T, Kim DW et al (2014) First-line crizotinib versus chemotherapy in ALK-positive lung cancer. N Engl J Med 371:2167–2177CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Maemondo M, Inoue A, Kobayashi K et al (2010) Gefitinib or chemotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer with mutated EGFR. N Engl J Med 362:2380–2388CrossRefPubMed Maemondo M, Inoue A, Kobayashi K et al (2010) Gefitinib or chemotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer with mutated EGFR. N Engl J Med 362:2380–2388CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Mitsudomi T, Morita S, Yatabe Y et al (2010) Gefitinib versus cisplatin plus docetaxel in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer harbouring mutations of the epidermal growth factor receptor (WJTOG3405): an open label, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 11:121–128CrossRefPubMed Mitsudomi T, Morita S, Yatabe Y et al (2010) Gefitinib versus cisplatin plus docetaxel in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer harbouring mutations of the epidermal growth factor receptor (WJTOG3405): an open label, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 11:121–128CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Ready NE, Pang HH, Gu L et al (2015) Chemotherapy with or without maintenance sunitinib for untreated extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase II study-CALGB 30504 (alliance). J Clin Oncol 33:1660–1665CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ready NE, Pang HH, Gu L et al (2015) Chemotherapy with or without maintenance sunitinib for untreated extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase II study-CALGB 30504 (alliance). J Clin Oncol 33:1660–1665CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
22.
go back to reference Pujol JL, Lavole A, Quoix E et al (2015) Randomized phase II-III study of bevacizumab in combination with chemotherapy in previously untreated extensive small-cell lung cancer: results from the IFCT-0802 trialdagger. Ann Oncol 26:908–914CrossRefPubMed Pujol JL, Lavole A, Quoix E et al (2015) Randomized phase II-III study of bevacizumab in combination with chemotherapy in previously untreated extensive small-cell lung cancer: results from the IFCT-0802 trialdagger. Ann Oncol 26:908–914CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Lo-Coco F, Avvisati G, Vignetti M et al (2013) Retinoic acid and arsenic trioxide for acute promyelocytic leukemia. N Engl J Med 369:111–21CrossRefPubMed Lo-Coco F, Avvisati G, Vignetti M et al (2013) Retinoic acid and arsenic trioxide for acute promyelocytic leukemia. N Engl J Med 369:111–21CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
A phase II trial of Ifosfamide combination with recommended supportive therapy for recurrent SCLC in second-line and heavily treated setting
Authors
Ichidai Tanaka
Kenji Kawada
Masahiro Morise
Tetsunari Hase
Hiroaki Hayashi
Akihiko Sokai
Asuki Fukatsu
Masashi Kondo
Fumio Nomura
Yoshinori Hasegawa
Publication date
01-02-2018
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology / Issue 2/2018
Print ISSN: 0344-5704
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0843
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-017-3497-0

Other articles of this Issue 2/2018

Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology 2/2018 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine