Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology 1/2007

01-06-2007 | Original Article

A phase II trial of cisplatin and irinotecan alternating with doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide and etoposide in previously untreated patients with extensive-disease small-cell lung cancer

Authors: Masahiro Tabata, Katsuyuki Kiura, Niro Okimoto, Yoshihiko Segawa, Tetsu Shinkai, Toshiro Yonei, Shoichi Kuyama, Shingo Harita, Katsuyuki Hotta, Hiroshi Ueoka, Mitsune Tanimoto

Published in: Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology | Issue 1/2007

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this trial was to investigate the efficacy and safety of cisplatin (P) and irinotecan (I) (PI) alternating with doxorubicin (A), cyclophosphamide (C) and etoposide (E) (ACE) in patients with extensive-disease small-cell lung cancer (ED-SCLC).

Patients and Methods

Patients with previously untreated ED-SCLC were enrolled in this trial. In the first, third and fifth cycles, PI (P: 60 mg/m2 on day 1; I: 60 mg/m2/day on days 1, 8 and 15) was administered, whereas ACE (A: 50 mg/m2 on day 1; C: 750 mg/m2 on day 1; E 80 mg/m2/day on days 1–3) was given in the second, fourth and sixth cycles. Each cycle was repeated every 4 weeks. At the end of six cycles, patients who had obtained a complete response were given prophylactic cranial irradiation.

Results

In total, 28 patients were enrolled, of whom 27 were assessable for efficacy and safety. Objective responses, including 4 (15%) complete responses, were observed in 25 patients (93%). Median survival time was 12.9 months. The principal toxicity was myelosuppression; grade 4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were observed in 89 and 4%, respectively. Febrile neutropenia occurred in 30% of patients. Diarrhea was mild (grade 3–4; 4%). All toxicities were reversible and there were no treatment-related deaths. The mean percentage of the delivered doses, relative to the projected doses, of PI and ACE were 84.6 and 91.1%, respectively.

Conclusions

These results indicate the PI–ACE regimen to have promising activity against ED-SCLC with moderate toxicities.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Goldie JH, Coldman AJ (1979) A mathematic model for relating the drug sensitivity of tumors to their spontaneous mutation rate. Cancer Treat Rep 63(11–12):1727–1733PubMed Goldie JH, Coldman AJ (1979) A mathematic model for relating the drug sensitivity of tumors to their spontaneous mutation rate. Cancer Treat Rep 63(11–12):1727–1733PubMed
3.
go back to reference Fukuoka M, Furuse K, Saijo N, Nishiwaki Y, Ikegami H, Tamura T, Shimoyama M, Suemasu K (1991) Randomized trial of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and vincristine versus cisplatin and etoposide versus alternation of these regimens in small-cell lung cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 83(12):855–861PubMedCrossRef Fukuoka M, Furuse K, Saijo N, Nishiwaki Y, Ikegami H, Tamura T, Shimoyama M, Suemasu K (1991) Randomized trial of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and vincristine versus cisplatin and etoposide versus alternation of these regimens in small-cell lung cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 83(12):855–861PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Roth BJ, Johnson DH, Einhorn LH, Schacter LP, Cherng NC, Cohen HJ, Crawford J, Randolph JA, Goodlow JL, Broun GO (1992) Randomized study of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and vincristine versus etoposide and cisplatin versus alternation of these two regimens in extensive small-cell lung cancer: a phase III trial of the Southeastern Cancer Study Group. J Clin Oncol 10(2):282–291PubMed Roth BJ, Johnson DH, Einhorn LH, Schacter LP, Cherng NC, Cohen HJ, Crawford J, Randolph JA, Goodlow JL, Broun GO (1992) Randomized study of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and vincristine versus etoposide and cisplatin versus alternation of these two regimens in extensive small-cell lung cancer: a phase III trial of the Southeastern Cancer Study Group. J Clin Oncol 10(2):282–291PubMed
5.
go back to reference Noda K, Nishiwaki Y, Kawahara M, Negoro S, Sugiura T, Yokoyama A, Fukuoka M, Mori K, Watanabe K, Tamura T, Yamamoto S, Saijo N (2002) Irinotecan plus cisplatin compared with etoposide plus cisplatin for extensive small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 346(2):85–91PubMedCrossRef Noda K, Nishiwaki Y, Kawahara M, Negoro S, Sugiura T, Yokoyama A, Fukuoka M, Mori K, Watanabe K, Tamura T, Yamamoto S, Saijo N (2002) Irinotecan plus cisplatin compared with etoposide plus cisplatin for extensive small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 346(2):85–91PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Ando M, Kobayashi K, Yoshimura A, Kurimoto F, Seike M, Nara M, Moriyama G, Mizutani H, Hibino S, Gemma A, Okano T, Shibuya M, Kudoh S (2004) Weekly administration of irinotecan (CPT-11) plus cisplatin for refractory or relapsed small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer 44(1):121–127PubMedCrossRef Ando M, Kobayashi K, Yoshimura A, Kurimoto F, Seike M, Nara M, Moriyama G, Mizutani H, Hibino S, Gemma A, Okano T, Shibuya M, Kudoh S (2004) Weekly administration of irinotecan (CPT-11) plus cisplatin for refractory or relapsed small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer 44(1):121–127PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Bunn PA Jr, Greco FA, Einhorn L (1986) Cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and etoposide as first-line therapy in the treatment of small-cell lung cancer. Semin Oncol 13(Suppl 3):45–53PubMed Bunn PA Jr, Greco FA, Einhorn L (1986) Cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and etoposide as first-line therapy in the treatment of small-cell lung cancer. Semin Oncol 13(Suppl 3):45–53PubMed
8.
go back to reference Miller AB, Hoogstraten B, Staquet M, Winkler A (1981) Reporting results of cancer treatment. Cancer 47(1):207–214PubMedCrossRef Miller AB, Hoogstraten B, Staquet M, Winkler A (1981) Reporting results of cancer treatment. Cancer 47(1):207–214PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Kudoh S, Fujiwara Y, Takada Y, Yamamoto H, Kinoshita A, Ariyoshi Y, Furuse K, Fukuoka M (1998) Phase II study of irinotecan combined with cisplatin in patients with previously untreated small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 16(3):1068–1074PubMed Kudoh S, Fujiwara Y, Takada Y, Yamamoto H, Kinoshita A, Ariyoshi Y, Furuse K, Fukuoka M (1998) Phase II study of irinotecan combined with cisplatin in patients with previously untreated small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 16(3):1068–1074PubMed
10.
go back to reference Longo DL, Duffey PL, DeVita VT Jr, Wesley MN, Hubbard SM, Young RC (1991) The calculation of actual or received dose intensity: a comparison of published methods. J Clin Oncol 9(11):2042–2051PubMed Longo DL, Duffey PL, DeVita VT Jr, Wesley MN, Hubbard SM, Young RC (1991) The calculation of actual or received dose intensity: a comparison of published methods. J Clin Oncol 9(11):2042–2051PubMed
11.
go back to reference Hanna N, Bunn PA Jr, Langer C, Einhorn L, Guthrie T Jr, Beck T, Ansari R, Ellis P, Byrne M, Morrison M, Hariharan S, Wang B, Sandler A (2006) Randomized phase III trial comparing irinotecan/cisplatin with etoposide/cisplatin in patients with previously untreated extensive-stage disease small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 24(13):2038–43PubMedCrossRef Hanna N, Bunn PA Jr, Langer C, Einhorn L, Guthrie T Jr, Beck T, Ansari R, Ellis P, Byrne M, Morrison M, Hariharan S, Wang B, Sandler A (2006) Randomized phase III trial comparing irinotecan/cisplatin with etoposide/cisplatin in patients with previously untreated extensive-stage disease small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 24(13):2038–43PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Tan KB, Mattern MR, Eng WK, McCabe FL, Johnson RK (1989) Nonproductive rearrangement of DNA topoisomerase I and II genes: correlation with resistance to topoisomerase inhibitors. J Natl Cancer Inst 81(22):1732–1735PubMedCrossRef Tan KB, Mattern MR, Eng WK, McCabe FL, Johnson RK (1989) Nonproductive rearrangement of DNA topoisomerase I and II genes: correlation with resistance to topoisomerase inhibitors. J Natl Cancer Inst 81(22):1732–1735PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Sugimoto Y, Tsukahara S, Oh-hara T, Liu LF, Tsuruo T (1990) Elevated expression of DNA topoisomerase II in camptothecin-resistant human tumor cell lines. Cancer Res 50(24):7962–7965PubMed Sugimoto Y, Tsukahara S, Oh-hara T, Liu LF, Tsuruo T (1990) Elevated expression of DNA topoisomerase II in camptothecin-resistant human tumor cell lines. Cancer Res 50(24):7962–7965PubMed
14.
go back to reference Masuda N, Matsui K, Negoro S, Takifuji N, Takeda K, Yana T, Kobayashi M, Hirashima T, Kusunoki Y, Ushijima S, Kawase I, Tada T, Sawaguchi H, Fukuoka M (1998) Combination of irinotecan and etoposide for treatment of refractory or relapsed small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 16(10):3329–3334PubMed Masuda N, Matsui K, Negoro S, Takifuji N, Takeda K, Yana T, Kobayashi M, Hirashima T, Kusunoki Y, Ushijima S, Kawase I, Tada T, Sawaguchi H, Fukuoka M (1998) Combination of irinotecan and etoposide for treatment of refractory or relapsed small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 16(10):3329–3334PubMed
15.
go back to reference Evans WK, Osoba D, Feld R, Shepherd FA, Bazos MJ, DeBoer G (1985) Etoposide (VP-16) and cisplatin: an effective treatment for relapse in small cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 3(1):65–71PubMed Evans WK, Osoba D, Feld R, Shepherd FA, Bazos MJ, DeBoer G (1985) Etoposide (VP-16) and cisplatin: an effective treatment for relapse in small cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 3(1):65–71PubMed
Metadata
Title
A phase II trial of cisplatin and irinotecan alternating with doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide and etoposide in previously untreated patients with extensive-disease small-cell lung cancer
Authors
Masahiro Tabata
Katsuyuki Kiura
Niro Okimoto
Yoshihiko Segawa
Tetsu Shinkai
Toshiro Yonei
Shoichi Kuyama
Shingo Harita
Katsuyuki Hotta
Hiroshi Ueoka
Mitsune Tanimoto
Publication date
01-06-2007
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology / Issue 1/2007
Print ISSN: 0344-5704
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0843
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-006-0336-0

Other articles of this Issue 1/2007

Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology 1/2007 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine