Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology 3/2011

01-09-2011 | Original Article

A phase I study of imatinib mesylate in combination with chlorambucil in previously treated chronic lymphocytic leukemia patients

Authors: Jonathan Hebb, Sarit Assouline, Caroline Rousseau, Pierre DesJardins, Stephen Caplan, Merrill J. Egorin, Lilian Amrein, Raquel Aloyz, Lawrence Panasci

Published in: Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology | Issue 3/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The tyrosine kinase inhibitor, imatinib, has the potential to indirectly inhibit DNA repair. This mechanism of action has been shown to mediate sensitization to chlorambucil in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). To evaluate this effect in vivo, we performed a phase I study of chlorambucil combined with imatinib in relapsed CLL patients.

Methods

The three dose levels studied included imatinib at 300, 400, or 600 mg/day. Imatinib was given on days 1–10, and chlorambucil (8 mg/m2 daily) was given on days 3–7 of a 28-day cycle (up to 6 cycles).

Results

Eleven patients participated in this study. Low-grade gastrointestinal toxicities were observed in a dose-dependent manner. Forty-five percent of patients responded (two unconfirmed CRs and three PRs). Two responding patients were fludarabine refractory. The in vitro IC50 of chlorambucil alone or in the presence of 5 μM imatinib in CLL lymphocytes correlated with the decrease in lymphocyte counts on day 15. Imatinib plasma concentrations achieved in patients were in the range of those effective in in vitro sensitization studies.

Conclusion

The combination of chlorambucil and imatinib in patients with previously treated CLL was well tolerated and showed evidence of clinical efficacy. Based on our results, we recommend the 400 mg daily dose of imatinib on days 1–10 with 8 mg/m3 chlorambucil on days 3–7 every 28 days as the phase II dose. This represents the first clinical trial examining the potential synergy between a tyrosine kinase inhibitor and a conventional alkylating agent for the treatment of CLL.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Dighiero G (2005) CLL biology and prognosis. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program 278–284 Dighiero G (2005) CLL biology and prognosis. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program 278–284
2.
go back to reference Eichhorst B, Goede V, Hallek M (2009) Treatment of elderly patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Leuk Lymphoma 50:171–178PubMedCrossRef Eichhorst B, Goede V, Hallek M (2009) Treatment of elderly patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Leuk Lymphoma 50:171–178PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Begleiter A, Mowat M, Israels L, Johnston J (1996) Chlorambucil in chronic lymphocytic leukemia: mechanism of action. Leuk Lymphoma 123:187–201CrossRef Begleiter A, Mowat M, Israels L, Johnston J (1996) Chlorambucil in chronic lymphocytic leukemia: mechanism of action. Leuk Lymphoma 123:187–201CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Panasci L, Paiement J, Christodoulopoulos G, Belenkov A, Malapetsa A, Aloyz R (2001) Chlorambucil drug resistance in chronic lymphocytic leukemia: the emerging role of DNA repair. Clin Cancer Res 7:454–461PubMed Panasci L, Paiement J, Christodoulopoulos G, Belenkov A, Malapetsa A, Aloyz R (2001) Chlorambucil drug resistance in chronic lymphocytic leukemia: the emerging role of DNA repair. Clin Cancer Res 7:454–461PubMed
5.
go back to reference Torres-Garcia S, Cousineau L, Caplan S, Panasci L (1989) Correlation of resistance to nitrogen mustards in chronic lymphocytic leukemia with enhanced removal of melphalan-induced DNA cross-links. Biochem Pharmacol 38:3122–3123PubMedCrossRef Torres-Garcia S, Cousineau L, Caplan S, Panasci L (1989) Correlation of resistance to nitrogen mustards in chronic lymphocytic leukemia with enhanced removal of melphalan-induced DNA cross-links. Biochem Pharmacol 38:3122–3123PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Takenaka T, Yoshino I, Kouso H, Ohba T, Yohena T, Osoegawa A et al (2007) Combined evaluation of Rad51 and ERCC1 expressions for sensitivity to platinum agents in non-small cell lung cancer. Int J Cancer 121:895–900PubMedCrossRef Takenaka T, Yoshino I, Kouso H, Ohba T, Yohena T, Osoegawa A et al (2007) Combined evaluation of Rad51 and ERCC1 expressions for sensitivity to platinum agents in non-small cell lung cancer. Int J Cancer 121:895–900PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Chen G, Yuan S, Liu W, Xu Y, Trujillo K, Song B et al (1999) Radiation-induced assembly of Rad51 and Rad52 recombination complex requires ATM and c-Abl. J Biol Chem 274:12748–12752PubMedCrossRef Chen G, Yuan S, Liu W, Xu Y, Trujillo K, Song B et al (1999) Radiation-induced assembly of Rad51 and Rad52 recombination complex requires ATM and c-Abl. J Biol Chem 274:12748–12752PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Yuan S, Chang H, Lee E (2003) Ionizing radiation-induced Rad51 nuclear focus formation is cell cycle-regulated and defective in both ATM(−/−) and c-Abl(−/−) cells. Mutat Res 525:85–92PubMed Yuan S, Chang H, Lee E (2003) Ionizing radiation-induced Rad51 nuclear focus formation is cell cycle-regulated and defective in both ATM(−/−) and c-Abl(−/−) cells. Mutat Res 525:85–92PubMed
9.
go back to reference Shimizu H, Popova M, Fleury F, Kobayashi M, Hayashi N, Sakane I et al (2009) c-ABL tyrosine kinase stabilizes RAD51 chromatin association. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 382:286–291PubMedCrossRef Shimizu H, Popova M, Fleury F, Kobayashi M, Hayashi N, Sakane I et al (2009) c-ABL tyrosine kinase stabilizes RAD51 chromatin association. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 382:286–291PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Drabløs F, Feyzi E, Aas P, Vaagbø C, Kavli B, Bratlie M et al (2004) Alkylation damage in DNA and RNA–repair mechanisms and medical significance. DNA Repair (Amst) 3:1389–1407CrossRef Drabløs F, Feyzi E, Aas P, Vaagbø C, Kavli B, Bratlie M et al (2004) Alkylation damage in DNA and RNA–repair mechanisms and medical significance. DNA Repair (Amst) 3:1389–1407CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Miyagawa K (2008) Clinical relevance of the homologous recombination machinery in cancer therapy. Cancer Sci 99:187–194PubMedCrossRef Miyagawa K (2008) Clinical relevance of the homologous recombination machinery in cancer therapy. Cancer Sci 99:187–194PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Goldman J (2009) Initial treatment for patients with CML. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program 9:453–460 Goldman J (2009) Initial treatment for patients with CML. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program 9:453–460
13.
go back to reference An X, Tiwari AK, Sun Y, Ding PR, Ashby CR Jr, Chen ZS (2010) BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase inhibitors in the treatment of Philadelphia chromosome positive chronic myeloid leukemia. A review. Leuk Res 34(10):1255–1268PubMedCrossRef An X, Tiwari AK, Sun Y, Ding PR, Ashby CR Jr, Chen ZS (2010) BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase inhibitors in the treatment of Philadelphia chromosome positive chronic myeloid leukemia. A review. Leuk Res 34(10):1255–1268PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Aloyz R, Grzywacz K, Xu Z, Loignon M, Alaoui-Jamali M, Panasci L (2004) Imatinib sensitizes CLL lymphocytes to chlorambucil. Leukemia 18:409–414PubMedCrossRef Aloyz R, Grzywacz K, Xu Z, Loignon M, Alaoui-Jamali M, Panasci L (2004) Imatinib sensitizes CLL lymphocytes to chlorambucil. Leukemia 18:409–414PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Russell J, Brady K, Burgan W, Cerra M, Oswald K, Camphausen K et al (2003) Gleevec-mediated inhibition of Rad51 expression and enhancement of tumor cell radiosensitivity. Cancer Res 63:7377–7383PubMed Russell J, Brady K, Burgan W, Cerra M, Oswald K, Camphausen K et al (2003) Gleevec-mediated inhibition of Rad51 expression and enhancement of tumor cell radiosensitivity. Cancer Res 63:7377–7383PubMed
16.
go back to reference Rai K, Peterson B, Appelbaum F, Kolitz J, Elias L, Shepherd L et al (2000) Fludarabine compared with chlorambucil as primary therapy for chronic lymphocytic leukemia. N Engl J Med 343:1750–1757PubMedCrossRef Rai K, Peterson B, Appelbaum F, Kolitz J, Elias L, Shepherd L et al (2000) Fludarabine compared with chlorambucil as primary therapy for chronic lymphocytic leukemia. N Engl J Med 343:1750–1757PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Cheson B, Bennett J, Grever M, Kay N, Keating M, O’Brien S et al (1996) National Cancer Institute-sponsored working group guidelines for chronic lymphocytic leukemia: revised guidelines for diagnosis and treatment. Blood 87:4990–4997PubMed Cheson B, Bennett J, Grever M, Kay N, Keating M, O’Brien S et al (1996) National Cancer Institute-sponsored working group guidelines for chronic lymphocytic leukemia: revised guidelines for diagnosis and treatment. Blood 87:4990–4997PubMed
18.
go back to reference Parise R, Ramanathan R, Hayes M, Egorin M (2003) Liquid chromatographic-mass spectrometric assay for quantitation of imatinib and its main metabolite (CGP 74588) in plasma. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci 791:39–44PubMedCrossRef Parise R, Ramanathan R, Hayes M, Egorin M (2003) Liquid chromatographic-mass spectrometric assay for quantitation of imatinib and its main metabolite (CGP 74588) in plasma. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci 791:39–44PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Peng B, Lloyd P, Schran H (2005) Clinical pharmacokinetics of imatinib. Clin Pharmacokinet 44:879–894PubMedCrossRef Peng B, Lloyd P, Schran H (2005) Clinical pharmacokinetics of imatinib. Clin Pharmacokinet 44:879–894PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Friedberg J, Sharman J, Sweetenham J, Johnston P, Vose J, Lacasce A et al (2010) Inhibition of Syk with fostamatinib disodium has significant clinical activity in non-Hodgkin lymphoma and chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Blood 115:2578–2585PubMedCrossRef Friedberg J, Sharman J, Sweetenham J, Johnston P, Vose J, Lacasce A et al (2010) Inhibition of Syk with fostamatinib disodium has significant clinical activity in non-Hodgkin lymphoma and chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Blood 115:2578–2585PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Lin K, Glenn M, Harris R, Duckworth A, Dennett S, Cawley J et al (2006) c-Abl expression in chronic lymphocytic leukemia cells: clinical and therapeutic implications. Cancer Res 66:7801–7809PubMedCrossRef Lin K, Glenn M, Harris R, Duckworth A, Dennett S, Cawley J et al (2006) c-Abl expression in chronic lymphocytic leukemia cells: clinical and therapeutic implications. Cancer Res 66:7801–7809PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Sawitsky A, Rai K, Glidewell O, Silver R (1977) Comparison of daily versus intermittent chlorambucil and prednisone therapy in the treatment of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Blood 50:1049–1059PubMed Sawitsky A, Rai K, Glidewell O, Silver R (1977) Comparison of daily versus intermittent chlorambucil and prednisone therapy in the treatment of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Blood 50:1049–1059PubMed
23.
go back to reference Bassan R, Rossi G, Pogliani E, Di Bona E, Angelucci E, Cavattoni I et al (2010) Chemotherapy-phased imatinib pulses improve long-term outcome of adult patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia: northern Italy leukemia group protocol 09/00. J Clin Oncol 28:3644–3652PubMedCrossRef Bassan R, Rossi G, Pogliani E, Di Bona E, Angelucci E, Cavattoni I et al (2010) Chemotherapy-phased imatinib pulses improve long-term outcome of adult patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia: northern Italy leukemia group protocol 09/00. J Clin Oncol 28:3644–3652PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
A phase I study of imatinib mesylate in combination with chlorambucil in previously treated chronic lymphocytic leukemia patients
Authors
Jonathan Hebb
Sarit Assouline
Caroline Rousseau
Pierre DesJardins
Stephen Caplan
Merrill J. Egorin
Lilian Amrein
Raquel Aloyz
Lawrence Panasci
Publication date
01-09-2011
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology / Issue 3/2011
Print ISSN: 0344-5704
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0843
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-010-1530-7

Other articles of this Issue 3/2011

Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology 3/2011 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine