Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Robotic Surgery 2/2017

01-06-2017 | Original Article

A new training model for robot-assisted urethrovesical anastomosis and posterior muscle-fascial reconstruction: the Verona training technique

Authors: G. Cacciamani, V. De Marco, S. Siracusano, D. De Marchi, L. Bizzotto, M. A. Cerruto, G. Motton, A. B. Porcaro, W. Artibani

Published in: Journal of Robotic Surgery | Issue 2/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

A training model is usually needed to teach robotic surgical technique successfully. In this way, an ideal training model should mimic as much as possible the “in vivo” procedure and allow several consecutive surgical simulations. The goal of this study was to create a “wet lab” model suitable for RARP training programs, providing the simulation of the posterior fascial reconstruction. The second aim was to compare the original “Venezuelan” chicken model described by Sotelo to our training model. Our training model consists of performing an anastomosis, reproducing the surgical procedure in “vivo” as in RARP, between proventriculus and the proximal portion of the esophagus. A posterior fascial reconstruction simulating Rocco’s stitch is performed between the tissues located under the posterior surface of the esophagus and the tissue represented by the serosa of the proventriculus. From 2014 to 2015, during 6 different full-immersion training courses, thirty-four surgeons performed the urethrovesical anastomosis using our model and the Sotelo’s one. After the training period, each surgeon was asked to fill out a non-validated questionnaire to perform an evaluation of the differences between the two training models. Our model was judged the best model, in terms of similarity with urethral tissue and similarity with the anatomic unit urethra-pelvic wall. Our training model as reported by all trainees is easily reproducible and anatomically comparable with the urethrovesical anastomosis as performed during radical prostatectomy in humans. It is suitable for performing posterior fascial reconstruction reported by Rocco. In this context, our surgical training model could be routinely proposed in all robotic training courses to develop specific expertise in urethrovesical anastomosis with the reproducibility of the Rocco stitch.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Sotelo RJ, Astigueta JC, Carmona et al (2009) Chicken gizzard as a new model for laparoscopic urethrovesical anastomosis training. Acta Urol Espagnol 33:1083–1087CrossRef Sotelo RJ, Astigueta JC, Carmona et al (2009) Chicken gizzard as a new model for laparoscopic urethrovesical anastomosis training. Acta Urol Espagnol 33:1083–1087CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Yang RM, Bellman GC (2006) Laparoscopic urethrovesical anastomosis: a model to assess surgical competency. J Endourol 20:679–682CrossRefPubMed Yang RM, Bellman GC (2006) Laparoscopic urethrovesical anastomosis: a model to assess surgical competency. J Endourol 20:679–682CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Sanchez C, Kikanov V (2000) Chicken as the experimental model for practicing of the urethro-vesical anastomosis during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 3:777–780 Sanchez C, Kikanov V (2000) Chicken as the experimental model for practicing of the urethro-vesical anastomosis during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 3:777–780
4.
go back to reference Nadu A, Olsson LE, Abbou CC (2003) Simple model for training in the laparoscopic vesicourethral running anastomosis. J Endourol 17:481–484CrossRefPubMed Nadu A, Olsson LE, Abbou CC (2003) Simple model for training in the laparoscopic vesicourethral running anastomosis. J Endourol 17:481–484CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Laguna MP, Arce-Alcazar A, Mochtar CA et al (2006) Construct validity of the chicken model in the simulation of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy suture. J Endourol 20:69–73CrossRefPubMed Laguna MP, Arce-Alcazar A, Mochtar CA et al (2006) Construct validity of the chicken model in the simulation of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy suture. J Endourol 20:69–73CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Jiang C, Lin T, Zhang C et al (2008) A training model for laparoscopic urethrovesical anastomosis. J Endourol 22:1541–1545CrossRefPubMed Jiang C, Lin T, Zhang C et al (2008) A training model for laparoscopic urethrovesical anastomosis. J Endourol 22:1541–1545CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Rocco F, Gadda F, Acquati P et al (2001) Personal research: reconstruction of the urethral striated sphincter. Arch Ital Urol Androl 73:127–137PubMed Rocco F, Gadda F, Acquati P et al (2001) Personal research: reconstruction of the urethral striated sphincter. Arch Ital Urol Androl 73:127–137PubMed
8.
go back to reference Katz R, Hoznek A, Antiphon P, Velthoven Van et al (2003) Cadaveric versus porcine models in urological laparoscopic training. Urol Int 71:310–315CrossRefPubMed Katz R, Hoznek A, Antiphon P, Velthoven Van et al (2003) Cadaveric versus porcine models in urological laparoscopic training. Urol Int 71:310–315CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Van Velthoven RF, Hoffmann P (2006) Methods for laparoscopic training using animal models. Curr Urol Rep 7:114–119CrossRefPubMed Van Velthoven RF, Hoffmann P (2006) Methods for laparoscopic training using animal models. Curr Urol Rep 7:114–119CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Patel VR, Coelho RF, Palmer KJ, Rocco B (2009) Periurethral suspension stitch during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: description of the technique and continence outcomes. Eur Urol 56(3):472–478CrossRef Patel VR, Coelho RF, Palmer KJ, Rocco B (2009) Periurethral suspension stitch during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: description of the technique and continence outcomes. Eur Urol 56(3):472–478CrossRef
Metadata
Title
A new training model for robot-assisted urethrovesical anastomosis and posterior muscle-fascial reconstruction: the Verona training technique
Authors
G. Cacciamani
V. De Marco
S. Siracusano
D. De Marchi
L. Bizzotto
M. A. Cerruto
G. Motton
A. B. Porcaro
W. Artibani
Publication date
01-06-2017
Publisher
Springer London
Published in
Journal of Robotic Surgery / Issue 2/2017
Print ISSN: 1863-2483
Electronic ISSN: 1863-2491
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-016-0626-4

Other articles of this Issue 2/2017

Journal of Robotic Surgery 2/2017 Go to the issue