Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Quality of Life Research
Published in: Quality of Life Research 6/2011

Open Access 01-08-2011

A new test of the construct validity of the CarerQol instrument: measuring the impact of informal care giving

Authors: Renske J. Hoefman, N. Job A. van Exel, Sandra Looren de Jong, W. Ken Redekop, Werner B. F. Brouwer

Published in: Quality of Life Research | Issue 6/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Most economic evaluations of health care programmes do not consider the effects of informal care, while this could lead to suboptimal policy decisions. This study investigates the construct validity of the CarerQol instrument, which measures and values carer effects, in a new population of informal caregivers.

Methods

A questionnaire was distributed by mail (n = 1,100, net response rate = 21%) to regional informal care support centers throughout the Netherlands. Two types of construct validity, i.e., convergent and clinical validity, have been analyzed. Convergent validity was assessed with Spearman’s correlation coefficients and multivariate correlation between the burden dimensions (CarerQol-7D) and the valuation component (CarerQol-VAS) of the CarerQol. Additionally, convergent validity was analyzed with Spearman’s correlation coefficients between the CarerQol and other measures of subjective caregiver burden (SRB, PU). Clinical validity was evaluated with multivariate correlation between CarerQol-VAS and CarerQol-7D, characteristics of caregivers, care recipients and care situation among the whole sample of caregivers and subgroups.

Results

The positive (negative) dimensions of CarerQol-7D were positively (negatively) related to CarerQol-VAS, and almost all had moderate strength of convergent validity. CarerQol-VAS was positively associated with PU and negatively with SRB. The CarerQol-VAS reflects differences in important background characteristics of informal care: type of relationship, age of the care recipient and duration of care giving were associated with higher CarerQol-VAS scores. These results confirmed earlier tests of the construct validity of the CarerQol. Furthermore, the dimensions of CarerQol-7D significantly explained differences in CarerQol-VAS scores among subgroups of carers.

Conclusion

Notwithstanding the limitations of our study, such as the low response rate, this study shows that the CarerQol provides a valid means to measure carer effects for use in economic evaluations. Future research should derive a valuation set for the CarerQol and further address the instrument’s content validity, sensitivity and reliability.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
Schellingerhout, R. (2003). The informal caregiver. In J. Timmermans (Ed.), Informal care. Care of and to informal carers (pp. 33–57). The Hague: SCP.
2.
Schulz, R., & Beach, S. R. (1999). Caregiving as a risk factor for mortality: The caregiver health effects study. Journal of the American Medical Association, 282(23), 2215–2219.PubMedCrossRef
3.
Broese van Groenou, M., & De Boer, A. (2009). Findings: Burden of informal carers. In A. De Boer, M. Broese, J. van Groenou, & J. Timmermans (Eds.), Informal care. An overview of the support given by and to informal carers in 2007 (pp. 144–165). The Hague: SCP.
4.
Schellingerhout, R. (2003). Extra expenses and loss of income. In J. Timmermans (Ed.), Informal care. Care of and to informal carers (pp. 163–206). The Hague: SCP.
5.
Hoefman, R. (2009). Care providers. In A. De Boer, M. Broese, J. van Groenou, & J. Timmermans (Eds.), Informal care. An overview of the support given by and to informal carers in 2007 (pp. 29–44). The Hague: SCP.
6.
Brouwer, W. B., van Exel, N. J., van den Berg, B., van den Bos, G. A., & Koopmanschap, M. A. (2005). Process utility from providing informal care: The benefit of caring. Health Policy, 74(1), 85–99.PubMedCrossRef
7.
Broese van Groenou, M., & De Boer, A. (2009). Findings: Positive experiences. In A. De Boer, M. Broese, J. van Groenou, & J. Timmermans (Eds.), Informal care. An overview of the support given by and to informal carers in 2007 (pp. 167–183). The Hague: SCP.
8.
Gold, M. R., Siegel, J. E., Russell, L. B., & Weinstein, M. (1996). Cost-effectiveness in health and medicine. New York: Oxford University Press.
9.
Drummond, M. F., Sculpher, M. J., Torrance, G. W., O’Brien, B. J., & Stoddart, G. L. (2005). Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes. New York: Oxford University Press.
10.
Jacobs, P., Ohinmaa, A., & Brady, B. (2005). Providing systematic guidance in pharmacoeconomic guidelines for analysing costs. PharmacoEconomics, 23(2), 143–153.PubMedCrossRef
11.
College voor Zorgverzekeringen (CVZ). (2005). Guidelines for pharmaco-economic research; evaluation and actualisation [richtlijnen voor farmaco-economisch onderzoek; evaluatie en actualisatie]. Diemen: CVZ.
12.
van Exel, J., Koopmanschap, M., & Brouwer, W. (2003). Kostbaar ontslag. Korte verpleegduur brengt mantelzorgers in de problemen. Medisch Contact, 58(34), 1272–1274.
13.
National Institute for Clinical Excellence. (2008). Guide to the methods of technology appraisal. London: NICE.
14.
National Institute for Clinical Excellence. (2009). NICE technology appraisal guidance 111. Donepezil, galantamine, rivastigmine (review) and memantine for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease (amended). London: NICE.
15.
Stone, P. W., Chapman, R. H., Sandberg, E. A., Liljas, B., & Neumann, P. J. (2000). Measuring costs in cost-utility analyses. Variations in the literature. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 16(1), 111–124.PubMedCrossRef
16.
van den Berg, B., Brouwer, W. B., & Koopmanschap, M. A. (2004). Economic valuation of informal care. An overview of methods and applications. The European Journal of Health Economics, 5(1), 36–45.PubMedCrossRef
17.
van den Berg, B., Brouwer, W., van Exel, J., Koopmanschap, M., van den Bos, G. A., & Rutten, F. (2006). Economic valuation of informal care: Lessons from the application of the opportunity costs and proxy good methods. Social Science and Medicine, 62(4), 835–845.PubMedCrossRef
18.
Koopmanschap, M. A., van Exel, J. N., van den Berg, B., & Brouwer, W. B. (2008). An overview of methods and applications to value informal care in economic evaluations of healthcare. PharmacoEconomics, 26(4), 269–280.PubMedCrossRef
19.
van den Berg, B., Bleichrodt, H., & Eeckhoudt, L. (2005). The economic value of informal care: A study of informal caregivers’ and patients’ willingness to pay and willingness to accept for informal care. Health Economics, 14(4), 363–376.PubMedCrossRef
20.
de Meijer, C., Brouwer, W., Koopmanschap, M., van den Berg, B., & van Exel, J. (2009). The value of informal care-a further investigation of the feasibility of contingent valuation in informal caregivers. Health Economics, 19, 755–771.CrossRef
21.
van den Berg, B., Al, M., van Exel, J., Koopmanschap, M., & Brouwer, W. (2008). Economic valuation of informal care: Conjoint analysis applied in a heterogeneous population of informal caregivers. Value in Health, 11(7), 1041–1050.PubMedCrossRef
22.
van den Berg, B., & Ferrer-I-Carbonell, A. (2007). Monetary valuation of informal care: The well-being valuation method. Health Economics, 16(11), 1227–1244.PubMedCrossRef
23.
Vernooij-Dassen, M. J., Persoon, J. M., & Felling, A. J. (1996). Predictors of sense of competence in caregivers of demented persons. Social Science and Medicine, 43(1), 41–49.PubMedCrossRef
24.
Scholte op Reimer, W. J., de Haan, R. J., Pijnenborg, J. M., Limburg, M., & van den Bos, G. A. (1998). Assessment of burden in partners of stroke patients with the sense of competence questionnaire. Stroke, 29(2), 373–379.PubMedCrossRef
25.
EuroQol Group. (1990). EuroQol—a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy, 16(3), 199–208.CrossRef
26.
Brouwer, W. B. F., Van Exel, N. J. A., & Tilford, M. J. (2010). Incorporating caregiver and family effects in economic evaluations of child health. In W. J. Ungar (Ed.), Economic evaluation in child health. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
27.
Brouwer, W. B., van Exel, N. J., van Gorp, B., & Redekop, W. K. (2006). The CarerQol instrument: A new instrument to measure care-related quality of life of informal caregivers for use in economic evaluations. Quality of Life Research, 15(6), 1005–1021.PubMedCrossRef
28.
Al-Janabi, H., Coast, J., & Flynn, T. N. (2008). What do people value when they provide unpaid care for an older person? A meta-ethnography with interview follow-up. Social Science and Medicine, 67(1), 111–121.PubMedCrossRef
29.
Robinson, B. C. (1983). Validation of a caregiver strain index. Journal of Gerontology, 38(3), 344–348.PubMed
30.
van Exel, N. J., Scholte op Reimer, W. J., Brouwer, W. B., van den Berg, B., Koopmanschap, M. A., & van den Bos, G. A. (2004). Instruments for assessing the burden of informal caregiving for stroke patients in clinical practice: A comparison of CSI, CRA, SCQ and self-rated burden. Clinical Rehabilitation, 18(2), 203–214.PubMedCrossRef
31.
van Exel, J., de Graaf, G., & Brouwer, W. (2008). Give me a break! Informal caregiver attitudes towards respite care. Health Policy, 88(1), 73–87.PubMedCrossRef
32.
Frey, B. S., & Stutzer, A. (2002). What can economists learn from happiness research? Journal of Economic Literature, 40, 402–435.CrossRef
33.
Ferrer-i-Carbonell, A., & Frijters, P. (2004). How important is methodology for the estimates of the determinants of happiness? The Economic Journal, 114, 641–659.CrossRef
34.
Veenhoven, R. (1984). Conditions of happiness. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
35.
van Exel, N. J., Brouwer, W. B., van den Berg, B., Koopmanschap, M. A., & van den Bos, G. A. (2004). What really matters: An inquiry into the relative importance of dimensions of informal caregiver burden. Clinical Rehabilitation, 18(6), 683–693.PubMedCrossRef
36.
De Vaus, D. A. (2002). Surveys in social research. St. Leonards: Allen & Unwin.
37.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
38.
39.
Bobinac, A., van Exel, N. J., Rutten, F. F., & Brouwer, W. B. (2010). Caring for and caring about: Disentangling the caregiver effect and the family effect. Journal of Health Economics, 29, 549–556.PubMedCrossRef
40.
Svensson, E. (2000). Comparison of the quality of assessments using continuous and discrete ordinal rating scales. Biometrical Journal, 4, 417–434.CrossRef
41.
Lamers, L. M., McDonnell, J., Stalmeier, P. F., Krabbe, P. F., & Busschbach, J. J. (2006). The Dutch tariff: Results and arguments for an effective design for national EQ-5D valuation studies. Health Economics, 15(10), 1121–1132.PubMedCrossRef
42.
Dolan, P. (1997). Modeling valuations for EuroQol health states. Medical Care, 35(11), 1095–1108.PubMedCrossRef
43.
van Exel, J., Moree, M., Koopmanschap, M., Goedheijt, T. S., & Brouwer, W. (2006). Respite care—an explorative study of demand and use in Dutch informal caregivers. Health Policy, 78(2–3), 194–208.PubMed
44.
van Exel, N. J., Koopmanschap, M. A., van den Berg, B., Brouwer, W. B., & van den Bos, G. A. (2005). Burden of informal caregiving for stroke patients. Identification of caregivers at risk of adverse health effects. Cerebrovascular Diseases, 19(1), 11–17.PubMedCrossRef
45.
Metadata
Title
A new test of the construct validity of the CarerQol instrument: measuring the impact of informal care giving
Authors
Renske J. Hoefman
N. Job A. van Exel
Sandra Looren de Jong
W. Ken Redekop
Werner B. F. Brouwer
Publication date
01-08-2011
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
Quality of Life Research / Issue 6/2011
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-010-9829-8

Other articles of this Issue 6/2011

Quality of Life Research 6/2011 Go to the issue

Brief Communication

Some psychometric properties of the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory™ Version 4.0 Generic Core Scales (PedsQLTM) in the general Serbian population

OriginalPaper

Quality of life after stroke: a prospective longitudinal study

Brief Communication

Estimation of the impact of diabetes-related complications on health utilities for patients with type 2 diabetes in Ontario, Canada

OriginalPaper

Weight loss and changes in generic and weight-specific quality of life in obese adolescents

OriginalPaper

Influence of maternal dental anxiety on oral health–related quality of life of preschool children

OriginalPaper

Trait anxiety predicts disease-specific health status in early-stage breast cancer patients