Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 10/2019

Open Access 01-10-2019 | Dynamic Manuscript

A new modular mechanism that allows full detachability and cleaning of steerable laparoscopic instruments

Authors: Sem F. Hardon, Frank Schilder, Jaap Bonjer, Jenny Dankelman, Tim Horeman

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 10/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Ever since the introduction of laparoscopic surgery, researchers have been trying to add steerability to instruments to allow the surgeon to operate with better reachability and less tissue interaction force. Traditional solutions to introduce this often use a combination of springs, cables, pulleys, and guiding structures, resulting in instruments that cannot be properly cleaned and thus are very costly to manufacture and maintain. The aim of the study is to develop a novel affordable, sustainable, cableless, and fully steerable laparoscopic grasper, and to test its ease of assembly, disassembly, and use.

Methods

A set of requirements was defined to ensure that the instrument can be handled efficiently at the sterilization unit and in the operating room. Based on these, a multisteerable, cableless 5 mm laparoscopic instrument that operates based on shaft rotations was developed. To test its assembly and disassembly, ten participants were asked to fully dismantle the instrument and reassemble it a total of 60 times. In addition, ten medical students were asked to use the grasper in the ForceSense box-trainer system on a newly developed 3D pick-and-place task, to determine the control effort based on learning curves of steering errors, task time, instrument path length, and maximum tissue interaction force.

Results

All important design requirements were met. The recorded data indicates that ten engineering students were able to fully dismantle and reassemble the instrument shaft in 12 s (SD7) and 65 s (SD43) seconds at the sixth attempt. The learning-curve data indicates that three attempts were needed before the ten medical students started to use all steering functions. At the sixth attempt, on average only 1.25 (SD0.7) steering errors were made. The steepest slope in the learning curves for steering errors, path length, and task time was experienced during the first three attempts. In respect of the interaction force, no learning effect was observed.

Conclusion

The multi-DOF (degree of freedom) cableless grasper can be assembled and disassembled for cleaning and sterilization within an acceptable time frame. The handle interface proved to be intuitive enough for novices to conduct a complex 3D pick-and-place task in a training setting.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Braga M, Vignali A, Gianotti L, Zuliani W, Radaelli G, Gruarin P, Dellabona P, Carlo VD (2002) Laparoscopic versus open colorectal surgery: a randomized trial on short-term outcome. Ann Surg 236(6):759–767CrossRef Braga M, Vignali A, Gianotti L, Zuliani W, Radaelli G, Gruarin P, Dellabona P, Carlo VD (2002) Laparoscopic versus open colorectal surgery: a randomized trial on short-term outcome. Ann Surg 236(6):759–767CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Breedveld P, Stassen HG, Meijer DW, Jakimowicz JJ (1999) Manipulation in laparoscopic surgery: overview of impeding effects and supporting aids. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 9(6):469–480CrossRef Breedveld P, Stassen HG, Meijer DW, Jakimowicz JJ (1999) Manipulation in laparoscopic surgery: overview of impeding effects and supporting aids. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 9(6):469–480CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Khoorjestan SM, Najarian S, Simforoosh N, Farkoush SH (2010) Design and modeling of a novel flexible surgical instrument applicable in minimally invasive surgery. Int J Nat Eng Sci 4(1):53–60 Khoorjestan SM, Najarian S, Simforoosh N, Farkoush SH (2010) Design and modeling of a novel flexible surgical instrument applicable in minimally invasive surgery. Int J Nat Eng Sci 4(1):53–60
4.
go back to reference Minor M, Mukherjee R (1999) A mechanism for dexterous end-effector placement during minimally invasive surgery. ASME J Mech Des 121(4):472–479CrossRef Minor M, Mukherjee R (1999) A mechanism for dexterous end-effector placement during minimally invasive surgery. ASME J Mech Des 121(4):472–479CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Velanovich V (2000) Laparoscopic vs. open surgery. Surg Endosc 14(1):16–21CrossRef Velanovich V (2000) Laparoscopic vs. open surgery. Surg Endosc 14(1):16–21CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Lanfranco A, Castellanos A, Desai J, Meyers W (2004) Robotic surgery. Ann Surg 239(1):14–21CrossRef Lanfranco A, Castellanos A, Desai J, Meyers W (2004) Robotic surgery. Ann Surg 239(1):14–21CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Ruurda J, van Vroonhoven T, Broeders I (2002) Robot-assisted surgical systems: a new era in laparoscopic surgery. Ann R Coll Surg 84(4):223–226CrossRef Ruurda J, van Vroonhoven T, Broeders I (2002) Robot-assisted surgical systems: a new era in laparoscopic surgery. Ann R Coll Surg 84(4):223–226CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Taylor R, Stoianovici D (2003) Medical robotics in computer-integrated surgery. IEEE Trans Robot Autom 19(5):765–781CrossRef Taylor R, Stoianovici D (2003) Medical robotics in computer-integrated surgery. IEEE Trans Robot Autom 19(5):765–781CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Ghanem M, Senagore AJ, Shaheen S (2015) Cost and outcomes in robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery. In: Ross HM et al (eds) Robotic approaches to colorectal surgery. Springer International Publishing, Berlin, pp 267–273CrossRef Ghanem M, Senagore AJ, Shaheen S (2015) Cost and outcomes in robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery. In: Ross HM et al (eds) Robotic approaches to colorectal surgery. Springer International Publishing, Berlin, pp 267–273CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Jelínek F, Arkenbout EA, Henselmans PW, Pessers R, Breedveld P (2015) Classification of joints used in steerable instruments for minimally invasive surgery—a review of the state of the art. J Med Devices 9(1):010801CrossRef Jelínek F, Arkenbout EA, Henselmans PW, Pessers R, Breedveld P (2015) Classification of joints used in steerable instruments for minimally invasive surgery—a review of the state of the art. J Med Devices 9(1):010801CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Arkenbout EA, Henselmans PW, Jelínek F, Breedveld P (2015) A state of the art review and categorization of multi-branched instruments for NOTES and SILS. Surg Endosc 29(6):1281–1296CrossRef Arkenbout EA, Henselmans PW, Jelínek F, Breedveld P (2015) A state of the art review and categorization of multi-branched instruments for NOTES and SILS. Surg Endosc 29(6):1281–1296CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Gerboni G, Henselmans PW, Arkenbout EA, van Furth WR, Breedveld P (2015) HelixFlex: bioinspired maneuverable instrument for skull base surgery. Bioinspiration Biomime 10(6):066013CrossRef Gerboni G, Henselmans PW, Arkenbout EA, van Furth WR, Breedveld P (2015) HelixFlex: bioinspired maneuverable instrument for skull base surgery. Bioinspiration Biomime 10(6):066013CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Stone KT, Walters TM, Kaiser RA (2007) Steerable suture passing device. U. S. Patent no. 2007/0038230 Stone KT, Walters TM, Kaiser RA (2007) Steerable suture passing device. U. S. Patent no. 2007/0038230
14.
go back to reference Shelton FE, Ortiz MS (2013) Articulatable surgical device with rotary driven cutting member. U. S. Patent no. 2013/0197556 Shelton FE, Ortiz MS (2013) Articulatable surgical device with rotary driven cutting member. U. S. Patent no. 2013/0197556
15.
go back to reference Lee W, Chamorro A, Ailinger R, Meglan D (2010) Robotically controlled surgical instruments. U. S. Patent no. 7,699,835 Lee W, Chamorro A, Ailinger R, Meglan D (2010) Robotically controlled surgical instruments. U. S. Patent no. 7,699,835
16.
go back to reference Breedveld P, Scheltes JS (2008) Instrument for fine-mechanical or surgical applications. U. S. Patent no. 2008/0234545 Breedveld P, Scheltes JS (2008) Instrument for fine-mechanical or surgical applications. U. S. Patent no. 2008/0234545
17.
go back to reference Madhani AJ, Salisbury JK (1998) Articulated surgical instrument for performing minimally invasive surgery with enhanced dexterity and sensitivity. U. S. Patent no. 5792135 Madhani AJ, Salisbury JK (1998) Articulated surgical instrument for performing minimally invasive surgery with enhanced dexterity and sensitivity. U. S. Patent no. 5792135
18.
go back to reference Herder JL, Horward MJ, Sjoerdsma W (1997) A laparoscopic grasper with force perception. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 6(4):279–286CrossRef Herder JL, Horward MJ, Sjoerdsma W (1997) A laparoscopic grasper with force perception. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 6(4):279–286CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Jelínek F, Pessers R, Breedveld P (2014) DragonFlex smart steerable laparoscopic instrument. J Med Devices 8(1):015001CrossRef Jelínek F, Pessers R, Breedveld P (2014) DragonFlex smart steerable laparoscopic instrument. J Med Devices 8(1):015001CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Awtar S, Trutna TT, Nielsen JM, Abani R, Geiger J (2010) FlexDex™: a minimally invasive surgical tool with enhanced dexterity and intuitive control. J Med Devices 4(3):035003CrossRef Awtar S, Trutna TT, Nielsen JM, Abani R, Geiger J (2010) FlexDex™: a minimally invasive surgical tool with enhanced dexterity and intuitive control. J Med Devices 4(3):035003CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Vigneswaran H, Crivellaro S (2018) V07-03—a novel technique using the articulating FlexDex (tm) laparoscopic instrument for partial nephrectomy. J Urol 199(4):e742 Vigneswaran H, Crivellaro S (2018) V07-03—a novel technique using the articulating FlexDex (tm) laparoscopic instrument for partial nephrectomy. J Urol 199(4):e742
22.
go back to reference Horeman T, Schilder F, Aguirre M, Kerkhoffs GMMJ, Tuijthof GJM (2015) Design and preliminary evaluation of a stiff steerable cutter for arthroscopic procedures. J Med Devices 9(4):044503CrossRef Horeman T, Schilder F, Aguirre M, Kerkhoffs GMMJ, Tuijthof GJM (2015) Design and preliminary evaluation of a stiff steerable cutter for arthroscopic procedures. J Med Devices 9(4):044503CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Horeman T, Kment C, Kerkhoffs GM, Tuijthof GJ (2017) Design and stepwise user evaluation of an ergonomic 2 DOF arthroscopic cutter. Cogent Eng 4(1):1410996CrossRef Horeman T, Kment C, Kerkhoffs GM, Tuijthof GJ (2017) Design and stepwise user evaluation of an ergonomic 2 DOF arthroscopic cutter. Cogent Eng 4(1):1410996CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Winter A, Govindarajan V (2015) Engineering reverse innovations: principles for creating successful products for emerging markets. Harv Bus Rev 93(7–8):80–89 Winter A, Govindarajan V (2015) Engineering reverse innovations: principles for creating successful products for emerging markets. Harv Bus Rev 93(7–8):80–89
25.
go back to reference Buchholz B, Armstrong TJ, Goldstein SA (1992) Anthropometric data for describing the kinematics of the human hand. Ergonomics 35(3):261–273CrossRef Buchholz B, Armstrong TJ, Goldstein SA (1992) Anthropometric data for describing the kinematics of the human hand. Ergonomics 35(3):261–273CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Heijnsdijk EAM, De Visser H, Dankelman J, Gouma DJ (2004) Slip and damage properties of jaws of laparoscopic graspers. Surg Endosc Other Interv Tech 18(6):974–979CrossRef Heijnsdijk EAM, De Visser H, Dankelman J, Gouma DJ (2004) Slip and damage properties of jaws of laparoscopic graspers. Surg Endosc Other Interv Tech 18(6):974–979CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Manasnayakorn S, Cuschieri A, Hanna GB (2008) Ideal manipulation angle and instrument length in hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 22(4):924–929CrossRef Manasnayakorn S, Cuschieri A, Hanna GB (2008) Ideal manipulation angle and instrument length in hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 22(4):924–929CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Okrainec A, Soper NJ, Swanstrom LL, Fried GM (2011) Trends and results of the first 5 years of Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery (FLS) certification testing. Surg Endosc 25(4):1192–1198CrossRef Okrainec A, Soper NJ, Swanstrom LL, Fried GM (2011) Trends and results of the first 5 years of Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery (FLS) certification testing. Surg Endosc 25(4):1192–1198CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Stegemann AP, Ahmed K, Syed JR, Rehman S, Ghani K, Autorino R, Hassett JM et al (2013) Fundamental skills of robotic surgery: a multi-institutional randomized controlled trial for validation of a simulation-based curriculum. Urology 81(4):767–774CrossRef Stegemann AP, Ahmed K, Syed JR, Rehman S, Ghani K, Autorino R, Hassett JM et al (2013) Fundamental skills of robotic surgery: a multi-institutional randomized controlled trial for validation of a simulation-based curriculum. Urology 81(4):767–774CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Horeman T, Rodrigues SP, Jansen FW, Dankelman J, van den Dobbelsteen JJ (2012) Force parameters for skills assessment in laparoscopy. IEEE Trans Haptics 5(4):312–322CrossRef Horeman T, Rodrigues SP, Jansen FW, Dankelman J, van den Dobbelsteen JJ (2012) Force parameters for skills assessment in laparoscopy. IEEE Trans Haptics 5(4):312–322CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Horeman T, Dankelman J, Jansen FW, van den Dobbelsteen JJ (2014) Assessment of laparoscopic skills based on force and motion parameters. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 61(3):805–813CrossRef Horeman T, Dankelman J, Jansen FW, van den Dobbelsteen JJ (2014) Assessment of laparoscopic skills based on force and motion parameters. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 61(3):805–813CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Feldman LS, Cao J, Andalib A, Fraser S, Fried GM (2009) A method to characterize the learning curve for performance of a fundamental laparoscopic simulator task: defining “learning plateau” and “learning rate”. Surgery 146(2):381–386CrossRef Feldman LS, Cao J, Andalib A, Fraser S, Fried GM (2009) A method to characterize the learning curve for performance of a fundamental laparoscopic simulator task: defining “learning plateau” and “learning rate”. Surgery 146(2):381–386CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Horeman T, van Delft F, Blikkendaal MD, Dankelman J, van den Dobbelsteen JJ, Jansen FW (2014) Learning from visual force feedback in box trainers: tissue manipulation in laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 28(6):1961–1970PubMed Horeman T, van Delft F, Blikkendaal MD, Dankelman J, van den Dobbelsteen JJ, Jansen FW (2014) Learning from visual force feedback in box trainers: tissue manipulation in laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 28(6):1961–1970PubMed
34.
go back to reference Kowalewski KF, Schmidt MW, Proctor T, Pohl M, Wennberg E, Karadza E, Nickel F (2018) Skills in minimally invasive and open surgery show limited transferability to robotic surgery: results from a prospective stud. Surg Endosc 32(4):1656–1667CrossRef Kowalewski KF, Schmidt MW, Proctor T, Pohl M, Wennberg E, Karadza E, Nickel F (2018) Skills in minimally invasive and open surgery show limited transferability to robotic surgery: results from a prospective stud. Surg Endosc 32(4):1656–1667CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Peters BS, Armijo PR, Krause C, Choudhury SA, Oleynikov D (2018) Review of emerging surgical robotic technology. Surg Endosc 32(4):1636–1655CrossRef Peters BS, Armijo PR, Krause C, Choudhury SA, Oleynikov D (2018) Review of emerging surgical robotic technology. Surg Endosc 32(4):1636–1655CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Blencowe NS, Waldon R, Vipond MN (2018) Management of patients after laparoscopic procedures. BMJ 360:k120CrossRef Blencowe NS, Waldon R, Vipond MN (2018) Management of patients after laparoscopic procedures. BMJ 360:k120CrossRef
Metadata
Title
A new modular mechanism that allows full detachability and cleaning of steerable laparoscopic instruments
Authors
Sem F. Hardon
Frank Schilder
Jaap Bonjer
Jenny Dankelman
Tim Horeman
Publication date
01-10-2019
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 10/2019
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-06849-0

Other articles of this Issue 10/2019

Surgical Endoscopy 10/2019 Go to the issue