Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Drug Safety 12/2005

01-12-2005 | Correspondence

A New Algorithm to Identify the Causality of Adverse Drug Reactions

Authors: Yvonne Koh, Shu Chuen Li

Published in: Drug Safety | Issue 12/2005

Login to get access

Excerpt

Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) are recognised as a major contributor in iatrogenic illness. They are known to complicate existing disease, affect quality of life and may delay cure of the original disease.[1] The clinical, legal and financial consequences of ADRs have made reporting a major initiative for healthcare organisations,[2] and pharmacovigilance has become an integral part of governmental drug regulation.[3] However, for the regulatory authorities, assessing causality of a reported ADR unambiguously remains a major challenge. To assess causality, differential diagnosis of ADRs can usually be achieved with the use of clinical judgements and/or algorithms.[4] Algorithms are either flowcharts or questionnaires that attempt to determine drug causation in the occurrence of an ADR. They are preferred over clinical judgment for assigning ADR causalities because of their systematic approach to information acquisition, which helps to improve the reliability of assessments, as well as intra- and inter-rater agreement.[5,6] However, the problem of uncertainties pertaining to the causal involvement of the suspected drugs still remains because of the structure or data requirement of several commonly used algorithms. Therefore, a new or improved algorithm that can provide more consistent risk probability and differential diagnosis assessment of a plausible adverse drug event, but without the disadvantages of the existing algorithms, would be beneficial. …
Literature
1.
go back to reference Pirmohamed M, Breckenridge AM, Kitteringham NR, et al. Adverse drug reactions. BMJ 1998; 316(7140): 1295–8PubMedCrossRef Pirmohamed M, Breckenridge AM, Kitteringham NR, et al. Adverse drug reactions. BMJ 1998; 316(7140): 1295–8PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Schumock GT, Thornton JP. Focusing on the preventability of adverse drug reactions. Hosp Pharm 1992; 27(6): 538PubMed Schumock GT, Thornton JP. Focusing on the preventability of adverse drug reactions. Hosp Pharm 1992; 27(6): 538PubMed
3.
go back to reference Stephens MDB. The detection of new adverse drug reactions. 2nd ed. Basingstoke: MacMillan Press, 1988 Stephens MDB. The detection of new adverse drug reactions. 2nd ed. Basingstoke: MacMillan Press, 1988
4.
go back to reference Naranjo CA, Shear NH, Lanctot KL. Advances in the diagnosis of adverse drug reactions. J Clin Pharmacol 1992; 32(10): 897–904PubMed Naranjo CA, Shear NH, Lanctot KL. Advances in the diagnosis of adverse drug reactions. J Clin Pharmacol 1992; 32(10): 897–904PubMed
5.
go back to reference Meyboom RH, Hekster YA, Egberts AC, et al. Causal or casual? The role of causality assessment in pharmacovigilance. Drug Saf 1997; 17(6): 374–89PubMedCrossRef Meyboom RH, Hekster YA, Egberts AC, et al. Causal or casual? The role of causality assessment in pharmacovigilance. Drug Saf 1997; 17(6): 374–89PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Naranjo CA, Busto U, Sellers EM, et al. A method for estimating the probability of adverse drug reactions. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1981; 30(2): 239–45PubMedCrossRef Naranjo CA, Busto U, Sellers EM, et al. A method for estimating the probability of adverse drug reactions. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1981; 30(2): 239–45PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Kramer MS, Leventhal JM, Hutchinson TA, et al. An algorithm for the operational assessment of adverse drug reactions. I: Background, description, and instructions for use. JAMA 1979; 242(7): 623–32PubMedCrossRef Kramer MS, Leventhal JM, Hutchinson TA, et al. An algorithm for the operational assessment of adverse drug reactions. I: Background, description, and instructions for use. JAMA 1979; 242(7): 623–32PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Karch FE, Lasagna L. Toward the operational identification of adverse drug reactions. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1977; 21(3): 247–54PubMed Karch FE, Lasagna L. Toward the operational identification of adverse drug reactions. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1977; 21(3): 247–54PubMed
9.
go back to reference Jones JK. Adverse drug reactions in the community health setting: approaches to recognizing, counseling, and reporting. Fam Community Health 1982; 5(2): 58–67PubMedCrossRef Jones JK. Adverse drug reactions in the community health setting: approaches to recognizing, counseling, and reporting. Fam Community Health 1982; 5(2): 58–67PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Begaud B, Evreux JC, Jouglard J, et al. Imputation of the unexpected or toxic effects of drugs: actualization of the method used in France [in French]. Therapie 1985; 40(2): 111–8PubMed Begaud B, Evreux JC, Jouglard J, et al. Imputation of the unexpected or toxic effects of drugs: actualization of the method used in France [in French]. Therapie 1985; 40(2): 111–8PubMed
11.
go back to reference Mashford ML The Australian method of drug-event assessment. Drug Inf J 1984; 18(3-4): 271–3PubMed Mashford ML The Australian method of drug-event assessment. Drug Inf J 1984; 18(3-4): 271–3PubMed
12.
go back to reference WHO-UMC Causality Assessment System [online]. Available from URL: http://www.who-umc.org/pdfs/Causality.pdf [Accessed 2004 Jul 16] WHO-UMC Causality Assessment System [online]. Available from URL: http://​www.​who-umc.​org/​pdfs/​Causality.​pdf [Accessed 2004 Jul 16]
Metadata
Title
A New Algorithm to Identify the Causality of Adverse Drug Reactions
Authors
Yvonne Koh
Shu Chuen Li
Publication date
01-12-2005
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Drug Safety / Issue 12/2005
Print ISSN: 0114-5916
Electronic ISSN: 1179-1942
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2165/00002018-200528120-00010

Other articles of this Issue 12/2005

Drug Safety 12/2005 Go to the issue