Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Clinical Drug Investigation 8/2013

01-08-2013 | Original Research Article

A National Survey Examining Obstetrician Perspectives on Use of 17-Alpha Hydroxyprogesterone Caproate Post-US FDA Approval

Authors: Andrei Rebarber, Nathan Fox, Chad K. Klauser, Daniel Saltzman, Ashley S. Roman

Published in: Clinical Drug Investigation | Issue 8/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

A randomized study published in 2003 by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal Fetal Medicine Units network showed efficacy of 17-alpha hydroxyprogesterone caproate (17P) for the prevention of recurrent preterm delivery. Between 2003 and 2011 the drug was often provided by compounding pharmacies. In 2011, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the drug for this indication.

Objective

The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of FDA approval on physician attitudes and perceptions regarding use of 17P as a drug for preventing recurrent preterm delivery.

Methods

A 10-min online survey using a structure closed-ended questionnaire format was designed and administered from 17 June 2011 to 7 July 2011 among 401 obstetricians distributed evenly throughout the USA.

Results

There is nearly universal awareness of 17P for the prevention of preterm birth (93 %), with a large majority (80 %) of obstetricians having reported prescribing the medication. However, surveyed physicians reported that the average proportion of eligible patients seen in their practice but not prescribed 17P in 2009–2010 was 41 %. Financial and logistical barriers carried the most weight (approximately 75 %) in the decision not to prescribe 17P to an eligible patient. Forty-one percent of respondents cited lack of FDA approval of 17P as a deterrent to prescribing the medication. Thirty-nine percent of respondents had professional liability concerns regarding prescribing compounded 17P. Assuming the same out-of-pocket expense for patients, two-thirds of obstetricians would choose to prescribe Makena®.

Conclusion

Awareness of 17P for the prevention of preterm birth among obstetricians is high. FDA-approved medications seem to have physician preference due to enhanced assurance for product efficacy and safety.
Footnotes
1
This document was sent directly to members. The update was removed from the website after clarification was published in October 2011 (http://​www.​acog.​org/​~/​media/​Announcements/​20111013MakenaLt​r.​ashx).
 
Literature
1.
go back to reference Meis PJ, Klebanoff M, Thom E, et al. Prevention of recurrent preterm delivery by 17 alpha-hydroxyprogesterone caproate. N Engl J Med. 2003;348(24):2379–85.PubMedCrossRef Meis PJ, Klebanoff M, Thom E, et al. Prevention of recurrent preterm delivery by 17 alpha-hydroxyprogesterone caproate. N Engl J Med. 2003;348(24):2379–85.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Sutton PD, et al. Births: final data for 2008. Natl Vital Stat Syst. 2010;59(1):1, 3–71. Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Sutton PD, et al. Births: final data for 2008. Natl Vital Stat Syst. 2010;59(1):1, 3–71.
3.
go back to reference Goldstein P, Berrier J, Rosen S, et al. A meta-analysis of randomized control trials of progestational agents in pregnancy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1989;96(3):265–74.PubMedCrossRef Goldstein P, Berrier J, Rosen S, et al. A meta-analysis of randomized control trials of progestational agents in pregnancy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1989;96(3):265–74.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Sanchez-Ramos L, Kaunitz AM, Delke I. Progestational agents to prevent preterm birth: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;105(2):273–9.PubMedCrossRef Sanchez-Ramos L, Kaunitz AM, Delke I. Progestational agents to prevent preterm birth: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;105(2):273–9.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Ness A, Dias T, Damus K, et al. Impact of the recent randomized trials on the use of progesterone to prevent preterm birth: a 2005 follow-up survey. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;195(4):1174–9.PubMedCrossRef Ness A, Dias T, Damus K, et al. Impact of the recent randomized trials on the use of progesterone to prevent preterm birth: a 2005 follow-up survey. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;195(4):1174–9.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Henderson ZT, Power ML, Berghella V, et al. Attitudes and practices regarding use of progesterone to prevent preterm births. Am J Perinatol. 2009;26(7):529–36.PubMedCrossRef Henderson ZT, Power ML, Berghella V, et al. Attitudes and practices regarding use of progesterone to prevent preterm births. Am J Perinatol. 2009;26(7):529–36.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference ACOG Committee Opinion. Use of progesterone to reduce preterm birth. Obstet Gynecol. 2003;102(5 Pt 1):1115–6. ACOG Committee Opinion. Use of progesterone to reduce preterm birth. Obstet Gynecol. 2003;102(5 Pt 1):1115–6.
9.
go back to reference ACOG Committee Opinion number 419 October 2008 (replaces no. 291, November 2003). Use of progesterone to reduce preterm birth. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;112(4):963–5. ACOG Committee Opinion number 419 October 2008 (replaces no. 291, November 2003). Use of progesterone to reduce preterm birth. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;112(4):963–5.
10.
go back to reference O’Brien JM, Adair CD, Lewis DF, et al. Progesterone vaginal gel for the reduction of recurrent preterm birth: primary results from a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2007;30(5):687–96.PubMedCrossRef O’Brien JM, Adair CD, Lewis DF, et al. Progesterone vaginal gel for the reduction of recurrent preterm birth: primary results from a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2007;30(5):687–96.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference da Fonseca EB, Bittar RE, Carvalho MH, et al. Prophylactic administration of progesterone by vaginal suppository to reduce the incidence of spontaneous preterm birth in women at increased risk: a randomized placebo-controlled double-blind study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;188(2):419–24.PubMedCrossRef da Fonseca EB, Bittar RE, Carvalho MH, et al. Prophylactic administration of progesterone by vaginal suppository to reduce the incidence of spontaneous preterm birth in women at increased risk: a randomized placebo-controlled double-blind study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;188(2):419–24.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Mahaguna V, McDermott JM, Zhang F, et al. Investigation of product quality between extemporaneously compounded progesterone vaginal suppositories and an approved progesterone vaginal gel. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 2004;30(10):1069–78.PubMedCrossRef Mahaguna V, McDermott JM, Zhang F, et al. Investigation of product quality between extemporaneously compounded progesterone vaginal suppositories and an approved progesterone vaginal gel. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 2004;30(10):1069–78.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Johnson JW, Austin KL, Jones GS, et al. Efficacy of 17alpha-hydroxyprogesterone caproate in the prevention of premature labor. N Engl J Med. 1975;293(14):675–80.PubMedCrossRef Johnson JW, Austin KL, Jones GS, et al. Efficacy of 17alpha-hydroxyprogesterone caproate in the prevention of premature labor. N Engl J Med. 1975;293(14):675–80.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Rebarber A, Fox NS, Klauser CK, et al. Using 17 alpha-hydroxyprogesterone caproate to impact rates of recurrent preterm delivery in clinical practice. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2010;23(10):1139–42.PubMedCrossRef Rebarber A, Fox NS, Klauser CK, et al. Using 17 alpha-hydroxyprogesterone caproate to impact rates of recurrent preterm delivery in clinical practice. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2010;23(10):1139–42.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
A National Survey Examining Obstetrician Perspectives on Use of 17-Alpha Hydroxyprogesterone Caproate Post-US FDA Approval
Authors
Andrei Rebarber
Nathan Fox
Chad K. Klauser
Daniel Saltzman
Ashley S. Roman
Publication date
01-08-2013
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Clinical Drug Investigation / Issue 8/2013
Print ISSN: 1173-2563
Electronic ISSN: 1179-1918
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40261-013-0099-4

Other articles of this Issue 8/2013

Clinical Drug Investigation 8/2013 Go to the issue