Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 6/2018

01-06-2018 | Colorectal Cancer

A National-Level Validation of the New American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th Edition Subclassification of Stage IIA and B Anal Squamous Cell Cancer

Authors: Paolo Goffredo, MD, Mattia Garancini, MD, Timothy J. Robinson, MD, Jessica Frakes, MD, Hisakazu Hoshi, MD, Imran Hassan, MD

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 6/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

The 8th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) updated the staging system of anal squamous cell cancer (ASCC) by subdividing stage II into A (T2N0M0) and B (T3N0M0) based on a secondary analysis of the RTOG 98-11 trial. We aimed to validate this new subclassification utilizing two nationally representative databases.

Materials

The National Cancer Database (NCDB) [2004–2014] and the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database [1988–2013] were queried to identify patients with stage II ASCC.

Results

A total of 6651 and 2579 stage IIA (2–5 cm) and 1777 and 641 stage IIB (> 5 cm) patients were identified in the NCDB and SEER databases, respectively. Compared with stage IIB patients, stage IIA patients within the NCDB were more often females with fewer comorbidities. No significant differences were observed between age, race, receipt of chemotherapy and radiation, and mean radiation dose. Demographic, clinical, and pathologic characteristics were comparable between patients in both datasets. The 5-year OS was 72% and 69% for stage IIA versus 57% and 50% for stage IIB in the NCDB and SEER databases, respectively (p < 0.001). After adjustment for available demographic and clinical confounders, stage IIB was significantly associated with worse survival in both cohorts (hazard ratio 1.58 and 2.01, both p < 0.001).

Conclusion

This study validates the new AJCC subclassification of stage II anal cancer into A and B based on size (2–5 cm vs. > 5 cm) in the general ASCC population. AJCC stage IIB patients represent a higher risk category that should be targeted with more aggressive/novel therapies.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Nelson RA, Levine AM, Bernstein L, Smith DD, Lai LL. Changing Patterns of Anal Canal Carcinoma in the United States. Journal of clinical oncology. 2013;31(12):1569-1575.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Nelson RA, Levine AM, Bernstein L, Smith DD, Lai LL. Changing Patterns of Anal Canal Carcinoma in the United States. Journal of clinical oncology. 2013;31(12):1569-1575.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
go back to reference National Cancer Institute. Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program. Cancer Stat Facts: Anal Cancer. 2017. Accessed 31 Jul 2017. National Cancer Institute. Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program. Cancer Stat Facts: Anal Cancer. 2017. Accessed 31 Jul 2017.
3.
go back to reference Glynne-Jones R, Nilsson PJ, Aschele C, et al. Anal cancer: ESMO-ESSO-ESTRO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Radiother Oncol. 2014;111(3):330–39.CrossRefPubMed Glynne-Jones R, Nilsson PJ, Aschele C, et al. Anal cancer: ESMO-ESSO-ESTRO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Radiother Oncol. 2014;111(3):330–39.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Greene FL, Sobin LH. The staging of cancer: a retrospective and prospective appraisal. CA Cancer J Clin. 2008;58(3):180–90.CrossRefPubMed Greene FL, Sobin LH. The staging of cancer: a retrospective and prospective appraisal. CA Cancer J Clin. 2008;58(3):180–90.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference AJCC. American Joint Committee on Cancer Manual for Staging of Cancers. 3rd ed. AJCC; 1988. AJCC. American Joint Committee on Cancer Manual for Staging of Cancers. 3rd ed. AJCC; 1988.
6.
go back to reference Amin MB ES, Greene F, et al. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. 8th ed. New York: Springer; 2017.CrossRef Amin MB ES, Greene F, et al. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. 8th ed. New York: Springer; 2017.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Ajani JA, Winter KA, Gunderson LL, et al. Prognostic factors derived from a prospective database dictate clinical biology of anal cancer: the intergroup trial (RTOG 98-11). Cancer. 2010;116(17):4007–13.CrossRefPubMed Ajani JA, Winter KA, Gunderson LL, et al. Prognostic factors derived from a prospective database dictate clinical biology of anal cancer: the intergroup trial (RTOG 98-11). Cancer. 2010;116(17):4007–13.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference National Cancer Data Base. 2014. Accessed May 2014. National Cancer Data Base. 2014. Accessed May 2014.
9.
go back to reference Fritz A, Percy C, Jack A, Shanmugarathnam K, Sobin L, Parkin DM, Whelan S. International classification of disease for oncology. 3rd ed. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2000. Fritz A, Percy C, Jack A, Shanmugarathnam K, Sobin L, Parkin DM, Whelan S. International classification of disease for oncology. 3rd ed. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2000.
11.
go back to reference National Cancer Institute. Surveillance Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program. SEER registries. 2017. Accessed 1 Nov 2017. National Cancer Institute. Surveillance Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program. SEER registries. 2017. Accessed 1 Nov 2017.
12.
go back to reference Gunderson LL, Winter KA, Ajani JA, et al. Long-term update of US GI intergroup RTOG 98-11 phase III trial for anal carcinoma: survival, relapse, and colostomy failure with concurrent chemoradiation involving fluorouracil/mitomycin versus fluorouracil/cisplatin. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(35):4344–51.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Gunderson LL, Winter KA, Ajani JA, et al. Long-term update of US GI intergroup RTOG 98-11 phase III trial for anal carcinoma: survival, relapse, and colostomy failure with concurrent chemoradiation involving fluorouracil/mitomycin versus fluorouracil/cisplatin. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(35):4344–51.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
go back to reference Gunderson LL, Moughan J, Ajani JA, et al. Anal carcinoma: impact of TN category of disease on survival, disease relapse, and colostomy failure in US Gastrointestinal Intergroup RTOG 98-11 phase 3 trial. Int J Rad Oncol Biol Phys. 2013;87(4):638–45.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Gunderson LL, Moughan J, Ajani JA, et al. Anal carcinoma: impact of TN category of disease on survival, disease relapse, and colostomy failure in US Gastrointestinal Intergroup RTOG 98-11 phase 3 trial. Int J Rad Oncol Biol Phys. 2013;87(4):638–45.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
go back to reference Geltzeiler CB, Nabavizadeh N, Kim J, et al. Chemoradiotherapy with a radiation boost for anal cancer decreases the risk for salvage abdominoperineal resection: analysis from the national cancer data base. Ann surg oncol. 2014;21(11):3616–20.CrossRefPubMed Geltzeiler CB, Nabavizadeh N, Kim J, et al. Chemoradiotherapy with a radiation boost for anal cancer decreases the risk for salvage abdominoperineal resection: analysis from the national cancer data base. Ann surg oncol. 2014;21(11):3616–20.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Glynne-Jones R, Lim F. Anal cancer: an examination of radiotherapy strategies. Int j Rad Oncol Biol Phys. 2011;79(5):1290–301.CrossRefPubMed Glynne-Jones R, Lim F. Anal cancer: an examination of radiotherapy strategies. Int j Rad Oncol Biol Phys. 2011;79(5):1290–301.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Harlan LC, Hankey BF. The surveillance, epidemiology, and end-results program database as a resource for conducting descriptive epidemiologic and clinical studies. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21(12):2232–33.CrossRefPubMed Harlan LC, Hankey BF. The surveillance, epidemiology, and end-results program database as a resource for conducting descriptive epidemiologic and clinical studies. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21(12):2232–33.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Winchester DP, Stewart AK, Phillips JL, Ward EE. The national cancer data base: past, present, and future. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17(1):4–7.CrossRefPubMed Winchester DP, Stewart AK, Phillips JL, Ward EE. The national cancer data base: past, present, and future. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17(1):4–7.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
A National-Level Validation of the New American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th Edition Subclassification of Stage IIA and B Anal Squamous Cell Cancer
Authors
Paolo Goffredo, MD
Mattia Garancini, MD
Timothy J. Robinson, MD
Jessica Frakes, MD
Hisakazu Hoshi, MD
Imran Hassan, MD
Publication date
01-06-2018
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 6/2018
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-018-6449-y

Other articles of this Issue 6/2018

Annals of Surgical Oncology 6/2018 Go to the issue