Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Health Services Research 1/2021

Open Access 01-12-2021 | Research article

A multi-stakeholder approach to the co-production of the research agenda for medicines optimisation

Authors: John Fellenor, Nicky Britten, Molly Courtenay, Rupert A. Payne, Jose Valderas, Rachel Denholm, Polly Duncan, Deborah McCahon, Lynn Tatnell, Richard Fitzgerald, Krystal Warmoth, David Gillespie, Katrina Turner, Margaret Watson

Published in: BMC Health Services Research | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Up to 50% of medicines are not used as intended, resulting in poor health and economic outcomes. Medicines optimisation is ‘a person-centred approach to safe and effective medicines use, to ensure people obtain the best possible outcomes from their medicines’. The purpose of this exercise was to co-produce a prioritised research agenda for medicines optimisation using a multi-stakeholder (patient, researcher, public and health professionals) approach.

Methods

A three-stage, multiple method process was used including: generation of preliminary research questions (Stage 1) using a modified Nominal Group Technique; electronic consultation and ranking with a wider multi-stakeholder group (Stage 2); a face-to-face, one-day consensus meeting involving representatives from all stakeholder groups (Stage 3).

Results

In total, 92 research questions were identified during Stages 1 and 2 and ranked in order of priority during stage 3. Questions were categorised into four areas: ‘Patient Concerns’ [e.g. is there a shared decision (with patients) about using each medicine?], ‘Polypharmacy’ [e.g. how to design health services to cope with the challenge of multiple medicines use?], ‘Non-Medical Prescribing’ [e.g. how can the contribution of non-medical prescribers be optimised in primary care?], and ‘Deprescribing’ [e.g. what support is needed by prescribers to deprescribe?]. A significant number of the 92 questions were generated by Patient and Public Involvement representatives, which demonstrates the importance of including this stakeholder group when identifying research priorities.

Conclusions

A wide range of research questions was generated reflecting concerns which affect patients, practitioners, the health service, as well the ethical and philosophical aspects of the prescribing and deprescribing of medicines. These questions should be used to set future research agendas and funding commissions.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
2.
go back to reference Guthrie B, Makubate B, Hernandez-Santiago V, Dreischulte T. The rising tide of polypharmacy and drug-drug interactions: population database analysis 1995–2010. BMC Med. 2015;13(1):74.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Guthrie B, Makubate B, Hernandez-Santiago V, Dreischulte T. The rising tide of polypharmacy and drug-drug interactions: population database analysis 1995–2010. BMC Med. 2015;13(1):74.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Duerden M, Avery T, Payne R. Polypharmacy and medicines optimisation. Making it safe and sound. London: The King’s Fund; 2013. Duerden M, Avery T, Payne R. Polypharmacy and medicines optimisation. Making it safe and sound. London: The King’s Fund; 2013.
4.
go back to reference WHO. Medication without harm - global patient safety challenge on medication safety. Geneva: World Health Organisation; 2017. WHO. Medication without harm - global patient safety challenge on medication safety. Geneva: World Health Organisation; 2017.
6.
go back to reference Picton C, Wright H. Medicines optimisation: helping patients to make the most of medicines. In: Good practice guidance for healthcare professionals in England Royal Pharmaceutical Society; 2013. Picton C, Wright H. Medicines optimisation: helping patients to make the most of medicines. In: Good practice guidance for healthcare professionals in England Royal Pharmaceutical Society; 2013.
7.
8.
go back to reference Jansen J, Naganathan V, Carter SM, McLachlan AJ, Nickel B, Irwig L, Bonner C, Doust J, Colvin J, Heaney A. Too much medicine in older people? Deprescribing through shared decision making. BMJ. 2016;353:6. Jansen J, Naganathan V, Carter SM, McLachlan AJ, Nickel B, Irwig L, Bonner C, Doust J, Colvin J, Heaney A. Too much medicine in older people? Deprescribing through shared decision making. BMJ. 2016;353:6.
9.
go back to reference Faria R, Barbieri M, Light K, Elliott RA, Sculpher M. The economics of medicines optimization: policy developments, remaining challenges and research priorities. Br Med Bull. 2014;111(1):45–61.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Faria R, Barbieri M, Light K, Elliott RA, Sculpher M. The economics of medicines optimization: policy developments, remaining challenges and research priorities. Br Med Bull. 2014;111(1):45–61.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Alldred DP, Kennedy MC, Hughes C, Chen TF, Miller P. Interventions to optimise prescribing for older people in care homes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;2(2):CD009095.PubMed Alldred DP, Kennedy MC, Hughes C, Chen TF, Miller P. Interventions to optimise prescribing for older people in care homes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;2(2):CD009095.PubMed
11.
go back to reference Buckley B, Grant AM, Firkins L, Greene AC, Frankau J. Working together to identify research questions. Continence UK. 2007;1(1):76–81. Buckley B, Grant AM, Firkins L, Greene AC, Frankau J. Working together to identify research questions. Continence UK. 2007;1(1):76–81.
12.
go back to reference Batalden M, Batalden P, Margolis P, Seid M, Armstrong G, Opipari-Arrigan L, Hartung H. Coproduction of healthcare service. BMJ Qual Saf. 2015;25(7):9. Batalden M, Batalden P, Margolis P, Seid M, Armstrong G, Opipari-Arrigan L, Hartung H. Coproduction of healthcare service. BMJ Qual Saf. 2015;25(7):9.
13.
go back to reference Bovaird T, Loeffler E. The role of co-production for better health and wellbeing: why we need to change. In: Loeffler E, Power G, Bovaird T, Hine-Hughes F, editors. Co-production of health and wellbeing in Scotland Governance International, Birmingham, UK; 2013. p. 20–8. Bovaird T, Loeffler E. The role of co-production for better health and wellbeing: why we need to change. In: Loeffler E, Power G, Bovaird T, Hine-Hughes F, editors. Co-production of health and wellbeing in Scotland Governance International, Birmingham, UK; 2013. p. 20–8.
14.
go back to reference Wehrens R. Beyond two communities–from research utilization and knowledge translation to co-production? Public Health. 2014;128(6):545–51.PubMedCrossRef Wehrens R. Beyond two communities–from research utilization and knowledge translation to co-production? Public Health. 2014;128(6):545–51.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Hart AL, Lomer M, Verjee A, Kemp K, Faiz O, Daly A, Solomon J, McLaughlin J. What are the top 10 research questions in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease? A priority setting partnership with the James Lind Alliance. J Crohn's Colitis. 2016;11(2):204–11.CrossRef Hart AL, Lomer M, Verjee A, Kemp K, Faiz O, Daly A, Solomon J, McLaughlin J. What are the top 10 research questions in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease? A priority setting partnership with the James Lind Alliance. J Crohn's Colitis. 2016;11(2):204–11.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Finer S, Robb P, Cowan K, Daly A, Shah K, Farmer A. Setting the top 10 research priorities to improve the health of people with type 2 diabetes: a Diabetes UK–James Lind Alliance priority setting partnership. Diabet Med. 2018;35(7):862–70.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Finer S, Robb P, Cowan K, Daly A, Shah K, Farmer A. Setting the top 10 research priorities to improve the health of people with type 2 diabetes: a Diabetes UK–James Lind Alliance priority setting partnership. Diabet Med. 2018;35(7):862–70.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Oliver S, Milne R, Bradburn J, Buchanan P, Kerridge L, Walley T, Gabbay J. Involving consumers in a needs-led research programme: a pilot project. Health Expect. 2001;4(1):18–28.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Oliver S, Milne R, Bradburn J, Buchanan P, Kerridge L, Walley T, Gabbay J. Involving consumers in a needs-led research programme: a pilot project. Health Expect. 2001;4(1):18–28.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Rankin NM, McGregor D, Butow PN, White K, Phillips JL, Young JM, Pearson SA, York S, Shaw T. Adapting the nominal group technique for priority setting of evidence-practice gaps in implementation science. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016;16(1):110.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Rankin NM, McGregor D, Butow PN, White K, Phillips JL, Young JM, Pearson SA, York S, Shaw T. Adapting the nominal group technique for priority setting of evidence-practice gaps in implementation science. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016;16(1):110.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
20.
go back to reference McMillan SS, King M, Tully MP. How to use the nominal group and Delphi techniques. Int J Clin Pharm. 2016;38(3):655–62.PubMedPubMedCentral McMillan SS, King M, Tully MP. How to use the nominal group and Delphi techniques. Int J Clin Pharm. 2016;38(3):655–62.PubMedPubMedCentral
21.
go back to reference Manera K, Hanson C, Gutman T, Tong A. Consensus methods: nominal group technique. In: Handbook of research methods in health social sciences; 2018. p. 1–14. Manera K, Hanson C, Gutman T, Tong A. Consensus methods: nominal group technique. In: Handbook of research methods in health social sciences; 2018. p. 1–14.
22.
go back to reference Hutchings HA, Rapport FL, Wright S, Doel MA. Obtaining consensus from mixed groups: an adapted nominal group technique. J Adv Med Med Res. 2013;3(3):491–502.CrossRef Hutchings HA, Rapport FL, Wright S, Doel MA. Obtaining consensus from mixed groups: an adapted nominal group technique. J Adv Med Med Res. 2013;3(3):491–502.CrossRef
24.
25.
go back to reference Emerson P. The original Borda count and partial voting. Soc Choice Welf. 2013;40(2):353–8.CrossRef Emerson P. The original Borda count and partial voting. Soc Choice Welf. 2013;40(2):353–8.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Ben-Akiva M, Morikawa T, Shiroishi F. Analysis of the reliabilty of preference ranking data. J Busn Res. 1991;23:253–68.CrossRef Ben-Akiva M, Morikawa T, Shiroishi F. Analysis of the reliabilty of preference ranking data. J Busn Res. 1991;23:253–68.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Heaton J, Britten N, Krska J, Reeve J. Person-centred medicines optimisation policy in England: an agenda for research on polypharmacy. Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2017;18(1):24–34.PubMedCrossRef Heaton J, Britten N, Krska J, Reeve J. Person-centred medicines optimisation policy in England: an agenda for research on polypharmacy. Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2017;18(1):24–34.PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Mangin D, Stephen G, Bismah V, Risdon C. Making patient values visible in healthcare: a systematic review of tools to assess patient treatment priorities and preferences in the context of multimorbidity. BMJ Open. 2016;6(6):e010903.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Mangin D, Stephen G, Bismah V, Risdon C. Making patient values visible in healthcare: a systematic review of tools to assess patient treatment priorities and preferences in the context of multimorbidity. BMJ Open. 2016;6(6):e010903.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Fønhus MS, Dalsbø TK, Johansen M, Fretheim A, Skirbekk H, Flottorp SA. Patient-mediated interventions to improve professional practice. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;9(9):CD012472. Fønhus MS, Dalsbø TK, Johansen M, Fretheim A, Skirbekk H, Flottorp SA. Patient-mediated interventions to improve professional practice. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;9(9):CD012472.
31.
go back to reference Paterson RE, Redman SG, Unwin R, McElhinney E, Macphee M, Downer F. Non-medical prescribing assessment–an evaluation of a nationally agreed multi method approach. Nurse Educ Pract. 2016;16(1):280–6.PubMedCrossRef Paterson RE, Redman SG, Unwin R, McElhinney E, Macphee M, Downer F. Non-medical prescribing assessment–an evaluation of a nationally agreed multi method approach. Nurse Educ Pract. 2016;16(1):280–6.PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Courtenay M, Carey N, Stenner K. An overview of non-medical prescribing across one strategic health authority: a questionnaire survey. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012;12(1):138.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Courtenay M, Carey N, Stenner K. An overview of non-medical prescribing across one strategic health authority: a questionnaire survey. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012;12(1):138.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Carey N, Stenner K. Does non-medical prescribing make a difference to patients? Nurs Times. 2011;107(26):14–6.PubMed Carey N, Stenner K. Does non-medical prescribing make a difference to patients? Nurs Times. 2011;107(26):14–6.PubMed
34.
go back to reference Muth C, Blom JW, Smith SM, Johnell K, Gonzalez-Gonzalez AI, Nguyen TS, Brueckle MS, Cesari M, Tinetti ME, Valderas JM. Evidence supporting the best clinical management of patients with multimorbidity and polypharmacy: a systematic guideline review and expert consensus. J Intern Med. 2019;285(3):272–88.PubMed Muth C, Blom JW, Smith SM, Johnell K, Gonzalez-Gonzalez AI, Nguyen TS, Brueckle MS, Cesari M, Tinetti ME, Valderas JM. Evidence supporting the best clinical management of patients with multimorbidity and polypharmacy: a systematic guideline review and expert consensus. J Intern Med. 2019;285(3):272–88.PubMed
35.
go back to reference Glanz K, Bishop DB. The role of behavioral science theory in development and implementation of public health interventions. Annu Rev Public Health. 2010;31:399–418.PubMedCrossRef Glanz K, Bishop DB. The role of behavioral science theory in development and implementation of public health interventions. Annu Rev Public Health. 2010;31:399–418.PubMedCrossRef
36.
go back to reference Hindi AM, Schafheutle EI, Jacobs S. Patient and public perspectives of community pharmacies in the United Kingdom: a systematic review. Health Expect. 2018;21(2):409–28.PubMedCrossRef Hindi AM, Schafheutle EI, Jacobs S. Patient and public perspectives of community pharmacies in the United Kingdom: a systematic review. Health Expect. 2018;21(2):409–28.PubMedCrossRef
37.
go back to reference Thillainadesan J, Gnjidic D, Green S, Hilmer SN. Impact of deprescribing interventions in older hospitalised patients on prescribing and clinical outcomes: a systematic review of randomised trials. Drugs Aging. 2018;35(4):303–19.PubMedCrossRef Thillainadesan J, Gnjidic D, Green S, Hilmer SN. Impact of deprescribing interventions in older hospitalised patients on prescribing and clinical outcomes: a systematic review of randomised trials. Drugs Aging. 2018;35(4):303–19.PubMedCrossRef
38.
go back to reference Riordan DO, Walsh KA, Galvin R, Sinnott C, Kearney PM, Byrne S. The effect of pharmacist-led interventions in optimising prescribing in older adults in primary care: a systematic review. SAGE Open Med. 2016;4:2050312116652568.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Riordan DO, Walsh KA, Galvin R, Sinnott C, Kearney PM, Byrne S. The effect of pharmacist-led interventions in optimising prescribing in older adults in primary care: a systematic review. SAGE Open Med. 2016;4:2050312116652568.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
39.
go back to reference Hansen CR, O'mahony D, Kearney PM, Sahm LJ, Cullinan S, Huibers C, Thevelin S, Rutjes AW, Knol W, Streit S. Identification of behaviour change techniques in deprescribing interventions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2018;84(12):2716–28.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Hansen CR, O'mahony D, Kearney PM, Sahm LJ, Cullinan S, Huibers C, Thevelin S, Rutjes AW, Knol W, Streit S. Identification of behaviour change techniques in deprescribing interventions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2018;84(12):2716–28.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
40.
go back to reference Marvin V, Ward E, Poots AJ, Heard K, Rajagopalan A, Jubraj B. Deprescribing medicines in the acute setting to reduce the risk of falls. Eur J Hosp Pharm. 2017;24(1):10–5.PubMedCrossRef Marvin V, Ward E, Poots AJ, Heard K, Rajagopalan A, Jubraj B. Deprescribing medicines in the acute setting to reduce the risk of falls. Eur J Hosp Pharm. 2017;24(1):10–5.PubMedCrossRef
41.
go back to reference Wilson P, Mathie E, Poland F, Keenan J, Howe A, Munday D, Kendall S, Cowe M, Staniszewska S, Goodman C. How embedded is public involvement in mainstream health research in England a decade after policy implementation? A realist evaluation. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2018;23(2):98–106.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Wilson P, Mathie E, Poland F, Keenan J, Howe A, Munday D, Kendall S, Cowe M, Staniszewska S, Goodman C. How embedded is public involvement in mainstream health research in England a decade after policy implementation? A realist evaluation. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2018;23(2):98–106.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
42.
go back to reference Price A, Albarqouni L, Kirkpatrick J, Clarke M, Liew SM, Roberts N, Burls A. Patient and public involvement in the design of clinical trials: an overview of systematic reviews. J Eval Clin Pract. 2018;24(1):240–53.PubMedCrossRef Price A, Albarqouni L, Kirkpatrick J, Clarke M, Liew SM, Roberts N, Burls A. Patient and public involvement in the design of clinical trials: an overview of systematic reviews. J Eval Clin Pract. 2018;24(1):240–53.PubMedCrossRef
43.
go back to reference Shay LA, Lafata JE. Where is the evidence? A systematic review of shared decision making and patient outcomes. Med Decis Mak. 2015;35(1):114–31.CrossRef Shay LA, Lafata JE. Where is the evidence? A systematic review of shared decision making and patient outcomes. Med Decis Mak. 2015;35(1):114–31.CrossRef
44.
go back to reference Ng YK, Shah NM, Loong LS, Pee LT, Hidzir SAM, Chong WW. Attitudes toward concordance and self-efficacy in decision making: a cross-sectional study on pharmacist–patient consultations. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2018;12:615.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Ng YK, Shah NM, Loong LS, Pee LT, Hidzir SAM, Chong WW. Attitudes toward concordance and self-efficacy in decision making: a cross-sectional study on pharmacist–patient consultations. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2018;12:615.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
45.
go back to reference Donaldson LJ, Kelley ET, Dhingra-Kumar N, Kieny M-P, Sheikh A. Medication without harm: who’s third global patient safety challenge. Lancet. 2017;389(10080):1680–1.PubMedCrossRef Donaldson LJ, Kelley ET, Dhingra-Kumar N, Kieny M-P, Sheikh A. Medication without harm: who’s third global patient safety challenge. Lancet. 2017;389(10080):1680–1.PubMedCrossRef
46.
go back to reference Sheikh A, Rudan I, Cresswell K, Dhingra-Kumar N, Tan ML, Häkkinen ML, Donaldson L. Agreeing on global research priorities for medication safety: an international prioritisation exercise. J Glob Health. 2019;9(1):1–11.CrossRef Sheikh A, Rudan I, Cresswell K, Dhingra-Kumar N, Tan ML, Häkkinen ML, Donaldson L. Agreeing on global research priorities for medication safety: an international prioritisation exercise. J Glob Health. 2019;9(1):1–11.CrossRef
47.
go back to reference Sheikh A, Dhingra-Kumar N, Kelley E, Kieny MP, Donaldson LJ. The third global patient safety challenge: tackling medication-related harm. Bull World Health Organ. 2017;95(8):546.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Sheikh A, Dhingra-Kumar N, Kelley E, Kieny MP, Donaldson LJ. The third global patient safety challenge: tackling medication-related harm. Bull World Health Organ. 2017;95(8):546.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
48.
go back to reference Alami H, Gagnon M-P, Fortin J-P. Involving citizen-patients in the development of telehealth services: qualitative study of experts’ and citizen-patients’ perspectives. J Particip Med. 2018;10(4):e10665.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Alami H, Gagnon M-P, Fortin J-P. Involving citizen-patients in the development of telehealth services: qualitative study of experts’ and citizen-patients’ perspectives. J Particip Med. 2018;10(4):e10665.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
49.
go back to reference Liddell TM, Kruschke JK. Analyzing ordinal data with metric models: what could possibly go wrong? J Exp Soc Psychol. 2018;79:328–48.CrossRef Liddell TM, Kruschke JK. Analyzing ordinal data with metric models: what could possibly go wrong? J Exp Soc Psychol. 2018;79:328–48.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
A multi-stakeholder approach to the co-production of the research agenda for medicines optimisation
Authors
John Fellenor
Nicky Britten
Molly Courtenay
Rupert A. Payne
Jose Valderas
Rachel Denholm
Polly Duncan
Deborah McCahon
Lynn Tatnell
Richard Fitzgerald
Krystal Warmoth
David Gillespie
Katrina Turner
Margaret Watson
Publication date
01-12-2021
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Health Services Research / Issue 1/2021
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6963
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06056-5

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

BMC Health Services Research 1/2021 Go to the issue