Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 9/2010

01-09-2010 | Orthopaedic Surgery

A modification of tibial inlay fixation in posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction by interference screw: a biomedical study on calf tibial bone model

Authors: Fereidoon M. Jaberi, Hooman Abbasi, Nasrin Saki, Amir Lotfazar, Ahmad Ensafdaran, Soraya Saki, Mehrad M. Jaberi

Published in: Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery | Issue 9/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

This study presents a modification of tibial inlay technique in posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction and evaluates the structural properties of tibial side fixation of the graft, comparing tibial inlay technique and a new modification, that is interference screw fixation of tibial side of the graft in suggested supine position which is more applicable, with less potential intraoperative neurovascular complications. Forty fresh calf knees that were prepared from 20 healthy 3 years old calves which were between 200 and 220 kg were the subject of this study. The tibias were separately used simulating tibial side PCL reconstruction with tibial tuberosity-patellar tendon–patellar bone graft. Tibial side of the graft was fixed using two cancellous screws in 20 tibiae and with interference screw in obliquely oriented canal in another 20 tibiae. Load-to-failure test was carried out on ten samples from each group. The remaining samples were used for cycling loading. Mann–Whitney U test was used to compare structural properties of each group. No significant differences were observed between two methods at load-to-failure test; but mean elongation at 1,000 cycles of new modification was significantly lower than tibial inlay technique.
Literature
1.
2.
go back to reference Noyes FR, Medveck MJ, Bhargava M (2003) Arthroscopically assisted quadriceps double-bundle tibial inlay posterior cruciate ligament reconstraction: An analysis of techniques and a safe operative approach to the popliteal fossa. Arthroscopy 19:894–905CrossRefPubMed Noyes FR, Medveck MJ, Bhargava M (2003) Arthroscopically assisted quadriceps double-bundle tibial inlay posterior cruciate ligament reconstraction: An analysis of techniques and a safe operative approach to the popliteal fossa. Arthroscopy 19:894–905CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Covey DC, Sapega AA, Sherman GM (1996) Testing for isometry during reconstruction of the posterior cruciate ligament. Anatomic and biomechanical considerations. Am J Spots Med 24:740–746CrossRef Covey DC, Sapega AA, Sherman GM (1996) Testing for isometry during reconstruction of the posterior cruciate ligament. Anatomic and biomechanical considerations. Am J Spots Med 24:740–746CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Bergfeld JA, Mc Allister DR, Parker RD, Valdevit AD, Kambic HE (2001) A biomechanical comparison of posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction techniques. Am J Spots Med 29:129–136 Bergfeld JA, Mc Allister DR, Parker RD, Valdevit AD, Kambic HE (2001) A biomechanical comparison of posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction techniques. Am J Spots Med 29:129–136
5.
go back to reference Mc Allister DR, Marlof KL, Oakes DA, Young CR, Mc Williams J (2002) A biomechanical comparison of tibial inlay and tibial tunnel posterior cruciate reconstruction techniques: graft pretension and knee laxity. Am J Spots Med 30:312–317 Mc Allister DR, Marlof KL, Oakes DA, Young CR, Mc Williams J (2002) A biomechanical comparison of tibial inlay and tibial tunnel posterior cruciate reconstruction techniques: graft pretension and knee laxity. Am J Spots Med 30:312–317
6.
go back to reference Clancy WD, Shelbourne KD, Zoellner GB, Keene JS, Reider J, Rosenberg JD (1983) Treatment of knee joint in stability secondary to rupture of the posterior cruciate ligament rupture of a new procedure. J Bone Joint Surg Am 65:310–322PubMed Clancy WD, Shelbourne KD, Zoellner GB, Keene JS, Reider J, Rosenberg JD (1983) Treatment of knee joint in stability secondary to rupture of the posterior cruciate ligament rupture of a new procedure. J Bone Joint Surg Am 65:310–322PubMed
7.
go back to reference Miller MD, Olszewski AD (1995) Posterior cruciate ligament injuries: new treatment options. Am J Knee Surg 8:145–156PubMed Miller MD, Olszewski AD (1995) Posterior cruciate ligament injuries: new treatment options. Am J Knee Surg 8:145–156PubMed
8.
go back to reference Miller MD, Gordon WT (1999) Posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: tibial inlay technique. Oper Tech Orthop 9(4):289–297CrossRef Miller MD, Gordon WT (1999) Posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: tibial inlay technique. Oper Tech Orthop 9(4):289–297CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Markolf KL, Davies M, Zorik B, Mc Allister DR (2003) Effects of bone block position and orientation within the tibial tunnel for PCL graft reconstruction: A cyclic loading study of bone-patellar tendon-bone allograft. Am J Sports Med 31(5):673–679PubMed Markolf KL, Davies M, Zorik B, Mc Allister DR (2003) Effects of bone block position and orientation within the tibial tunnel for PCL graft reconstruction: A cyclic loading study of bone-patellar tendon-bone allograft. Am J Sports Med 31(5):673–679PubMed
10.
go back to reference Insall JN, Scott WN (2001) Surgery of the knee. Churchill Living stone, New York Insall JN, Scott WN (2001) Surgery of the knee. Churchill Living stone, New York
11.
go back to reference Canale ST (2003) Campbell’s operative orthopaedics. Mosby, St. Louis Canale ST (2003) Campbell’s operative orthopaedics. Mosby, St. Louis
12.
go back to reference Markolf KL, Zemanovic JR, Mc Allister DR (2002) Cyclic loading of posterior cruciate ligament replacements fixed with tibial tunnel and tibial inlay methods. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84:518–524CrossRefPubMed Markolf KL, Zemanovic JR, Mc Allister DR (2002) Cyclic loading of posterior cruciate ligament replacements fixed with tibial tunnel and tibial inlay methods. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84:518–524CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Woo SL, Debski RE et al (2000) Use of robotic technology to study the biomechanics of ligaments and their replacements. Oper Tech Orthop 10(1):87–91 Woo SL, Debski RE et al (2000) Use of robotic technology to study the biomechanics of ligaments and their replacements. Oper Tech Orthop 10(1):87–91
14.
go back to reference Handy MH, Blessey PB, Kline AJ, Miller MD (2005) The graft/tunnel angles in posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a cadaveric comparison of two techniques for femoral tunnel replacement. Arthroscopy 21:711–714CrossRefPubMed Handy MH, Blessey PB, Kline AJ, Miller MD (2005) The graft/tunnel angles in posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a cadaveric comparison of two techniques for femoral tunnel replacement. Arthroscopy 21:711–714CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Fabbriciani C, Mulas PM, Ziranu F et al (2005) Mechanical analysis of fixation methods for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring tendon graft. An experimental study in sheep kness. Knee 12:135–138CrossRefPubMed Fabbriciani C, Mulas PM, Ziranu F et al (2005) Mechanical analysis of fixation methods for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring tendon graft. An experimental study in sheep kness. Knee 12:135–138CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
A modification of tibial inlay fixation in posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction by interference screw: a biomedical study on calf tibial bone model
Authors
Fereidoon M. Jaberi
Hooman Abbasi
Nasrin Saki
Amir Lotfazar
Ahmad Ensafdaran
Soraya Saki
Mehrad M. Jaberi
Publication date
01-09-2010
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery / Issue 9/2010
Print ISSN: 0936-8051
Electronic ISSN: 1434-3916
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-008-0734-3

Other articles of this Issue 9/2010

Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 9/2010 Go to the issue